Skip to main content
Log in

An experimental study on the influences of wind erosion on water erosion

  • Published:
Journal of Arid Land Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In semi-arid regions, complex erosion resulted from a combination of wind and water actions has led to a massive soil loss and a comprehensive understanding of its mechanism is the first step toward prevention of the erosion. However, the mutual influences between wind erosion and water erosion have not been fully understood. This research used a wind tunnel and two rainfall simulators and simulated two rounds of alternations between wind erosion and water erosion (i.e., 1st wind erosion–1st water erosion and 2nd wind erosion–2nd water erosion) on three slopes (5°, 10°, and 15°) with six wind speeds (0, 9, 11, 13, 15, and 20 m/s) and five rainfall intensities (0, 30, 45, 60, and 75 mm/h). The objective was to analyze the influences of wind erosion on succeeding water erosion. Results showed that the effects of wind erosion on water erosion were not the same in the two rounds of tests. In the 1st round of tests, wind erosion first restrained and then intensified water erosion mostly because the blocking effect of wind-sculpted micro-topography on surface flow was weakened with the increase in slope. In the 2nd round of tests, wind erosion intensified water erosion on beds with no rills at gentle slopes and low rainfall intensities or with large-size rills at steep slopes and high rainfall intensities. Wind erosion restrained water erosion on beds with small rills at moderate slopes and moderate rainfall intensities. The effects were mainly related to the fine grain layer, rills and slope of the original bed in the 2nd round of tests. The findings can deepen our understanding of complex erosion resulted from a combination of wind and water actions and provide scientific references to regional soil and water conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allmaras R R, Burwell R E, Larson W E, et al. 1966. Total porosity and random roughness of the interrow zone as influenced by tillage. Consewation Research Report No. 7. Washington: U.S. Department of Agriculture, 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap J, Munson S M, Field J P. 2011. Aeolian and fluvial processes in dryland regions: the need for integrated studies. Ecohydrology, 4(5): 615–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullard J E, Livingstone I. 2002. Interactions between aeolian and fluvial systems in dryland environments. Area, 34(1): 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darboux F, Huang C H. 2005. Does soil surface roughness increase or decrease water and particle transfers? Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69(3): 748–756.

  • Dong Z B, Qian G Q. 2007. Characterizing the height profile of the flux of wind-eroded sediment. Environmental Geology, 51(5): 835–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunkerley D L, Brown K J. 1999. Banded vegetation near BRroken Hill, Australia: significance of surface roughness and soil physical properties. CATENA, 37(1–2): 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekhtesasi M R, Sepehr A. 2009. Investigation of wind erosion process for estimation, prevention, and control of DSS in Yazd-Ardakan plain. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 159(1–4): 267–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erpul G, Gabriëls D, Cornelis W M, et al. 2008. Sand detachment under rains with varying angle of incidence. CATENA, 72(3): 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field J P, Breshears D D, Whicker J J. 2009. Toward a more holistic perspective of soil erosion: Why aeolian research needs to explicitly consider fluvial processes and interactions. Aeolian Research, 1(1–2): 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez J A, Nearing M A. 2005. Runoff and sediment losses from rough and smooth soil surfaces in a laboratory experiment. CATENA, 59(3): 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helming K, Römkens M J M, Prasad S N. 1998. Surface roughness related processes of runoff and soil loss: A flume study. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 62(1): 243–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson C B, Mannering J V, Moldenhauer W C. 1979. Influence of surface roughness and clod size and stability on soil and water losses. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 43(4): 772–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B L, Coulthard T J. 2015. Mapping the interactions between rivers and sand dunes: Implications for fluvial and aeolian geomorphology. Geomorphol, 231: 246–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lü P, Dong Z B. 2006. Wind tunnel experiments on the turbulent transmission over the near surface layer of different surfaces. Environmental Geology, 50(7): 983–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajot J L, Alfaro S C, Gomes L, et al. 2003. Soil crusting on sandy soils and its influence on wind erosion. CATENA, 53(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren C Y, Wang Z M, Song K S, et al. 2011. Spatial variation of soil organic carbon and its relationship with environmental factors in the farming-pastoral ecotone of Northeast China. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 20(1A): 253–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Römkens M J M, Wang J Y. 1986. Effect of tillage on surface roughness. Transactions of the ASAE, 29(2): 429–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Römkens M J M, Helming K, Prasad S N. 2002. Soil erosion under different rainfall intensities, surface roughness, and soil water regimes. CATENA, 46(2–3): 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh A. 1993. Soil roughness measurement: Chain method. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 48(6): 527–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma P P. 1996. Interrill erosion. In: Agassi M. Soil Erosion, Conservation, and Rehabilitation. New York: Marcel Dekker, 125–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen H O, Zheng F L, Wen L L, et al. 2015. An experimental study of rill erosion and morphology. Geomorphology, 231: 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen H O, Zheng F L, Wen L L, et al. 2016. Impacts of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on rill erosion processes at loessial hillslope. Soil and Tillage Research, 155: 429–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi P J, Wang J A. 1986. Study on the landform characteristics by aeolian-fluvial interaction and its development process. Journal of Inner Mongolia Forestry College, 8(2): 88–97. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Yan P, Liu L Y. 2006. A review of the research on complex erosion by wind and water. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 16(2): 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Yan P, Liu L Y, et al. 2007. Simulated experiment of erosion by wind and rainfall on sandy loess in Weiliantan Gully. Journal of Desert Research, 27(5): 814–819. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ta W Q, Wang H B, Jia X P. 2015. The contribution of aeolian processes to fluvial sediment yield from a desert watershed in the Ordos Plateau, China. Hydrological Processes, 29(1): 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuo D F, Xu M X, Gao L Q, et al. 2016. Changed surface roughness by wind erosion accelerates water erosion. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 16(1): 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T, Qu J J, Yao Z Y, et al. 2008. Current status and comprehensive control strategies of soil erosion for wind-water complex erosion region in the Northern agro-pasture zigzag zone of China. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 6(1): 28–36, 42. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X X, Liu T X, Li F L, et al. 2014. Simulated soil erosion from a semiarid typical steppe watershed using an integrated aeolian and fluvial prediction model. Hydrological Processes, 28(2): 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Y, Lin X J, Liu Y N, et al. 2008. Calibration of simulated rainfall intensity and its spatial distribution for trough rainfall simulator. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 28(4): 1–6. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu J X. 2005. Hyperconcentrated flows as influenced by coupled wind-water processes. Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 48(11): 1990–2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G H, Liu B Y, Li P K. 2007. Principles and properties of artificial through rainfall simulator. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 27(6): 56–60. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G H, Liu G B, Wang G L, et al. 2011. Effects of vegetation cover and rainfall intensity on sediment-bound nutrient loss, size composition and volume fractal dimension of sediment particles. Pedosphere, 21(5): 676–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Q Y, Fan J, Zhang X P. 2016. Effects of simulated wind followed by rain on runoff and sediment yield from a sandy loessial soil with rills. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 16(9): 2306–2315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H L, Yi X Y, Zhou R L, et al. 2006. Wind erosion and sand accumulation effects on soil properties in Horqin sandy farmland, Inner Mongolia. CATENA, 65(1): 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou Y R, Zhang Z X, Wang C Y, et al. 2003. Analysis on the distribution characteristics of the interleaving zones of water/wind erosion in China. Arid Zone Research, 20(1): 67–71. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41271286) and the Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (413221001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peijun Shi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, H., Gao, Y., Lin, D. et al. An experimental study on the influences of wind erosion on water erosion. J. Arid Land 9, 580–590 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-017-0004-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40333-017-0004-8

Keywords

Navigation