Abstract
The study critically explored the case of Pangasinan learners’ physics learning process using culture and language-influenced curriculum materials in physics (CLI-CMP). Case research using cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) designed the study to provide unique ideas on how socio-cultural theory, a recent field of study of Physics Education Research, works best and contributes through a bottom-up approach to the body of knowledge in this research area. Sampled 48 grade 10 participants and their physics teacher, a Pangasinan native, used the designed CLI-CMP for 10 weeks to determine how effective the tool is in addressing student misconceptions in physics. Data gathered from the design and development of the CLI-CMP, classroom observations, interviews, and focus-group-discussions extracted information on how the customized curriculum materials provided means of meaning making and conceptual change, which may eventually lead to achieving scientific literacy. The results show that better conceptual understanding observed in the physics class may be significantly due to the socio-culturally influenced curriculum materials. Further analysis using CHAT framework (methodical level) determined the coherence and progressive characteristics of the activities in a particular physics unit which matched Engeström’s expansive learning cycle and served as a suited tool to mediate the subject to the object and to the goal attainment. Exploration of the learning process using the epistemological level of analysis of CHAT framework provided how the mediating tool may have addressed the noted student misconception emphasizing learning science as participatory to the community and socio-culturally influenced.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angell, C., Guttersrud, O., Henriksen, E., & Isnes, A. (2004). Physics: Frightful, but fun. Pupils’ and teachers’ views of physics and physics teaching. Science Education, 88(5), 683–706. doi:10.1002/sce.10141.
Avis, J. (2007). Engeström’s version of activity theory: A conservative praxis? Journal of Education and Work, 20(3), 161–177.
Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Beichner, R. J. (2009). An introduction to physics education research. Getting Started in PER, 2(1), 1–25.
Brown, D. E., & Hammer, D. (2008). Conceptual change in physics. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 127–154). New York: Routledge.
Camillo, J., & Mattos, C. (2014). Making explicit some tensions in educational practice: science education in focus. Kul’turno-istori-cheskaya psikologiya = Cultural-historical psychology, 10(2), 110–115.
Champagne, A. B., & Newell, S. T. (1992). Directions for research and development. Alternative methods of assessing scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 841–860.
Clark, J.C. (2012). Researching concept mapping using cultural historical activity theory: Collaborations and activity in the zone of proximal development. Contemporary Approaches to Research in Mathematics, Science, Health and Environmental Science, 1–15.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688.
Durant, J. R. (1993). What is science literacy? In J. R. Durant & J. Gregory (Eds.), Science and culture in Europe (pp. 129–137). London: Science Museum.
Dykstra, D. I., Boyle, C. F., & Monarch, I. A. (1992). Studying conceptual change in learning physics. Science Education., 76(6), 615–652.
Eijck, M., & Roth, M. W. (2007). Improving science education for sustainable development. PLoS Biology, 5(12), 2763–2769.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: an activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: OrientaKonsultit.
Engeström, Y. (1999). Expansive visiblization of work: an activity theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 63–93.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
Gooding, J., & Metz, W. (2011). From misconception to conceptual change: tips for identifying and overcoming students’ misconceptions. The Science Teacher, 78(4), 34–37.
Guile, D. (2005). Knowledge, mediation and activity. Unpublished PhD, Institute of Education, London.
Jenkins, E. W. (1992). School science education: Towards a reconstruction. Journal of Curriculum and Studies, 24(3), 229–246.
Johnson, C. (2005). Making instruction relevant to language minority students at the middle level. Middle School Journal, 37(2), 10–14.
Keeley, P. (2012). Misunderstanding misconceptions. Science Scope, 35(8), 12–15.
Kolokouri, E., Theodoraki, X., & Plakitsi, K. (2012). A cultural historical activity theory approach in natural sciences education laboratory lessons towards reforming teachers. World Journal of Education, 2(2), 23–40.
Kyle, W. C., Jr. (1995a). Scientific literacy: How many lost generations can we afford? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(9), 895–896.
Kyle, W. C., Jr. (1995b). Scientific literacy: Where do we go from here? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(10), 1007–1009.
Laugksch, R. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94.
Leont’ev, A. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Engelwood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Luria, A. R. (1979). Vygotsky, in The Making of Mind. Cambridge: MA, Harvard University Press.
Lyons, T. (2006). The puzzle of falling enrolments in physics and chemistry courses: putting some pieces together. Research in Science Education, 36, 285–311.
McDermott, L. C., & Redish, E. F. (1999). RL-PER1: Resource letter on physics education research. American Journal of Physics, 67(9), 755–767.
Morales, M. (2014). Cultural and epistemological profile of Filipino learners. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 18(6), 1–25.
National Research Council. (2008). Science, evolution, and creationism. Washington: National Academies Press.
Peterson, T., Postholm, B., Flem, A., & Gudmundsdottir, S. (2004). The classroom as a stage and the teacher’s role. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 589–605.
Plakitsi, K. (Ed.). (2013). Activity theory in formal and informal science education. AW Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.
Popov, O. (2008). Developing outdoor physics project using activity theory framework. Journal of Physics Teacher Education On-line., 3(3), 18–23.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.
Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2003). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263–291.
Roth,W., Radford, L., & LaCroix, L. (2012). Working with cultural historical activity theory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Journal, 13(2). Art. 23.
Science Teaching Reconsidered (1997). Misconception as a barrier to science understanding. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2008). Report of the mother tongue matters: local languages a key to effective learning.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Williams, C., Stanisstreet, M., Spall, K., Boyes, E., & Dickson, D. (2003). Why aren’t secondary students interested in physics? Physics Education, 38(4), 324–329.
Wilson, V. (2014). Examining teacher education through cultural historical activity theory. Teacher Advancement Network Journal, 6(1), 20–29.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to extend her heartfelt thanks to the following that helped in the completion of the article: Mr. Renato Fontanilla and Dr. Venancio L. Mendiola.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 1: Sample Student-Accomplished Worksheets
Appendix 1: Sample Student-Accomplished Worksheets
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morales, M.P.E. Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT): Influenced Case Research of a Philippine Physics Class. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 26, 85–96 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0329-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0329-2