Skip to main content
Log in

Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT): Influenced Case Research of a Philippine Physics Class

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study critically explored the case of Pangasinan learners’ physics learning process using culture and language-influenced curriculum materials in physics (CLI-CMP). Case research using cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) designed the study to provide unique ideas on how socio-cultural theory, a recent field of study of Physics Education Research, works best and contributes through a bottom-up approach to the body of knowledge in this research area. Sampled 48 grade 10 participants and their physics teacher, a Pangasinan native, used the designed CLI-CMP for 10 weeks to determine how effective the tool is in addressing student misconceptions in physics. Data gathered from the design and development of the CLI-CMP, classroom observations, interviews, and focus-group-discussions extracted information on how the customized curriculum materials provided means of meaning making and conceptual change, which may eventually lead to achieving scientific literacy. The results show that better conceptual understanding observed in the physics class may be significantly due to the socio-culturally influenced curriculum materials. Further analysis using CHAT framework (methodical level) determined the coherence and progressive characteristics of the activities in a particular physics unit which matched Engeström’s expansive learning cycle and served as a suited tool to mediate the subject to the object and to the goal attainment. Exploration of the learning process using the epistemological level of analysis of CHAT framework provided how the mediating tool may have addressed the noted student misconception emphasizing learning science as participatory to the community and socio-culturally influenced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angell, C., Guttersrud, O., Henriksen, E., & Isnes, A. (2004). Physics: Frightful, but fun. Pupils’ and teachers’ views of physics and physics teaching. Science Education, 88(5), 683–706. doi:10.1002/sce.10141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avis, J. (2007). Engeström’s version of activity theory: A conservative praxis? Journal of Education and Work, 20(3), 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beichner, R. J. (2009). An introduction to physics education research. Getting Started in PER, 2(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. E., & Hammer, D. (2008). Conceptual change in physics. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 127–154). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camillo, J., & Mattos, C. (2014). Making explicit some tensions in educational practice: science education in focus. Kul’turno-istori-cheskaya psikologiya = Cultural-historical psychology, 10(2), 110–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Champagne, A. B., & Newell, S. T. (1992). Directions for research and development. Alternative methods of assessing scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(8), 841–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J.C. (2012). Researching concept mapping using cultural historical activity theory: Collaborations and activity in the zone of proximal development. Contemporary Approaches to Research in Mathematics, Science, Health and Environmental Science, 1–15.

  • Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durant, J. R. (1993). What is science literacy? In J. R. Durant & J. Gregory (Eds.), Science and culture in Europe (pp. 129–137). London: Science Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra, D. I., Boyle, C. F., & Monarch, I. A. (1992). Studying conceptual change in learning physics. Science Education., 76(6), 615–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eijck, M., & Roth, M. W. (2007). Improving science education for sustainable development. PLoS Biology, 5(12), 2763–2769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: an activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: OrientaKonsultit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (1999). Expansive visiblization of work: an activity theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 63–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooding, J., & Metz, W. (2011). From misconception to conceptual change: tips for identifying and overcoming students’ misconceptions. The Science Teacher, 78(4), 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guile, D. (2005). Knowledge, mediation and activity. Unpublished PhD, Institute of Education, London.

  • Jenkins, E. W. (1992). School science education: Towards a reconstruction. Journal of Curriculum and Studies, 24(3), 229–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2005). Making instruction relevant to language minority students at the middle level. Middle School Journal, 37(2), 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, P. (2012). Misunderstanding misconceptions. Science Scope, 35(8), 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolokouri, E., Theodoraki, X., & Plakitsi, K. (2012). A cultural historical activity theory approach in natural sciences education laboratory lessons towards reforming teachers. World Journal of Education, 2(2), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyle, W. C., Jr. (1995a). Scientific literacy: How many lost generations can we afford? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(9), 895–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyle, W. C., Jr. (1995b). Scientific literacy: Where do we go from here? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(10), 1007–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laugksch, R. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leont’ev, A. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Engelwood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. R. (1979). Vygotsky, in The Making of Mind. Cambridge: MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, T. (2006). The puzzle of falling enrolments in physics and chemistry courses: putting some pieces together. Research in Science Education, 36, 285–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, L. C., & Redish, E. F. (1999). RL-PER1: Resource letter on physics education research. American Journal of Physics, 67(9), 755–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales, M. (2014). Cultural and epistemological profile of Filipino learners. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 18(6), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2008). Science, evolution, and creationism. Washington: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, T., Postholm, B., Flem, A., & Gudmundsdottir, S. (2004). The classroom as a stage and the teacher’s role. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 589–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plakitsi, K. (Ed.). (2013). Activity theory in formal and informal science education. AW Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.

  • Popov, O. (2008). Developing outdoor physics project using activity theory framework. Journal of Physics Teacher Education On-line., 3(3), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2003). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth,W., Radford, L., & LaCroix, L. (2012). Working with cultural historical activity theory. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung Journal, 13(2). Art. 23.

  • Science Teaching Reconsidered (1997). Misconception as a barrier to science understanding. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  • United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2008). Report of the mother tongue matters: local languages a key to effective learning.

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C., Stanisstreet, M., Spall, K., Boyes, E., & Dickson, D. (2003). Why aren’t secondary students interested in physics? Physics Education, 38(4), 324–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, V. (2014). Examining teacher education through cultural historical activity theory. Teacher Advancement Network Journal, 6(1), 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to extend her heartfelt thanks to the following that helped in the completion of the article: Mr. Renato Fontanilla and Dr. Venancio L. Mendiola.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marie Paz E. Morales.

Appendix 1: Sample Student-Accomplished Worksheets

Appendix 1: Sample Student-Accomplished Worksheets

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morales, M.P.E. Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT): Influenced Case Research of a Philippine Physics Class. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 26, 85–96 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0329-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0329-2

Keywords

Navigation