Abstract
In 2008, the Ministry of Education of South Korea planned to develop a domestic, standardized language test called the National English Ability Test (NEAT) as part of sweeping reforms designed to democratize and improve the Korean education system. On many levels, NEAT was an innovative initiative. From a financial perspective, NEAT was designed to curb private spending on English education and to divert money from international standardized English tests. Educationally, NEAT was groundbreaking in that it introduced speaking and writing into English assessment and was meant to replace the English section on the College Scholastic Ability Test of Korea. In addition, NEAT was a two-track English test for high school students intended to meet the differing needs of students and colleges. After about five years, including a trialing period and a new presidential administration, plans for implementing NEAT were abandoned officially in 2013. The present paper examines the educational, sociopolitical, and economic factors that led to the rise and demise of NEAT from a critical language testing perspective. Following the tenets of critical language testing, this paper addresses the responsibility of the language testers to create an assessment that fairly measures test-takers’ language proficiency. A review and an inductive interpretation of policy documents and recent NEAT research demonstrate the discrepancies among the original intentions of NEAT, the unintended outcomes, and overlooked issues of practicality. Findings also reveal that the two tracks of NEAT negatively branded both students and universities, deepening instead of alleviating the English divide.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn, H. (2013). English policy in South Korea: a role in attaining global competitiveness or a vehicle of social mobility? Journal of English as an International Language, 8(1), 1–20.
Alderson, J. C. (2009). Test of English as a Foreign Language: internet-based test (TOEFL iBT). Language Testing, 26(4), 621–631.
Ary, D., Cheser Jacobs, L., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Bachman, L. F. (2005). Building and supporting a case for test use. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2(1), 1–34.
Bachman, L. F. (2013). NEAT to have a positive impact on language learning. The Korea Times. Retrieved from http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2013/10/181_133721.html
Bahk, E. (2014). Homegrown English test to be phased out. The Korea Times. Retrieved from http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2014/01/181_149859.html
Ban, Y. M. (2013). A study on high school teachers’ perception and preparation for speaking test of National English Ability Test. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Hanyang University.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. (1977/1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
Cha, Y.-K., & Ham, S.-H. (2008). The impact of English on the school curriculum. In B. Spolsky & F. M. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 313–327). Oxford: Blackwell.
Chappelle, C. A., Enright, M. K., & Jamieson, J. M. (Eds.). (2008). Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language. New York: Routledge.
Choi, I-C. (2008). The impact of EFL testing on EFL education in Korea. Language Testing, 25(1), 39–62.
Chung, H. (2014). English for communication. The Korea Times. Retrieved from http://koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2014/09/113_164314.html
Coffey, A., & Atkinson, P. (1996). Making sense of qualitative data. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
Jeong, Y. G., & Cha, G. H. (2014). An investigation of middle school and high school students’ private English education in Korea. Korean Education Inquiry, 32(4), 141–160.
Jo, C. (2013). Technical errors found in NEAT for high school students: doubts arise for its use in college admissions. Yonhap News. Retrieved from http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/society/2013/06/11/0703000000AKR20130611222500004.HTML
Jung, J-Y. (2009). The study on English divide experienced by students. Unpublished master’s thesis. Ewha Womans University.
Jung, S. H. (2012). A study on the suitability of Korean English teachers for instructing and assessing the English writing section on NEAT. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 15(1), 187–208.
KICE. (2010a). NEAT Level 2—Test form manual. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
KICE. (2010b). NEAT Level 3—Test form manual. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
Kim, H.-J. (2009). An antecedent study of the state-wide English language ability test. Modern English Education, 10(2), 44–59.
Kim, E.-J. (2012). An evaluation of the NEAT from the perspective of secondary school teachers. English Language Teaching, 24(2), 205–224.
Kim, J-S., Lee, S-M., Kwak, Y-S., Song, M-Y., Cho, Y-K., Kim, K-J., et al. (2012). Developing introductory materials for ‘Education in Korea’. Research report RRC 2012-9-1. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
Kim, Y-m., Lee, B. C., Kim, S. H., Park, J-S., Hwang, P-A., Lee, M-A., et al. (2013a). An exploration of the structure of the 2015 integrated CSAT English section test. KICE Position Paper, 5(5). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
Kim, S. H., Kim, Y-m., Lee, B. C., Park, J-S., & Hwang, P-A. (2013b). A study on improving differentiated English tests of CSAT. Research report CAT 2013-30. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
Kobayashi, Y. (2007). TEFL policy as a part of stratified Japan and beyond. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 566–571.
Kubota, R. (2011). Questioning linguistic instrumentalism: English , neoliberalism, and language tests in Japan. Linguistics and Education, 22(3), 248–260.
Lee, E.-J. (2012). A study on major considerations about developing National English Ability Test (NEAT). Studies in Linguistics, 23, 167–188.
Lee, S., & Brinton, M. (1996). Elite education and social capital: the case of South Korea. Sociology of Education, 69(3), 177–192.
Lee, S.-C., & Yu, H.-J. (2012). The perception of teachers and students on the NEAT as an alternative English test to the current scholastic one: a case study. Studies in Foreign Language Education, 26(2), 93–112.
Lim, H. Y. (2012). The study of parents’, teachers’, and students’ perceptions on National English Ability Test in Korea. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Woosong University TESOL-MALL Graduate School.
Noh, H., & Jeon, J. (2012). English divide perceived by employees: a case study of “A” corporation. Foreign Languages Education, 19(2), 201–224.
Oh, H. N. (2013). A study on middle school students’ perceptions of English writing and National English Ability Test. Unpublished Master’s thesis. Sookmyung Women’s University.
Ok, K. (2013). Prospects dim for new state English test. The Korea Herald. Retrieved from http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20130828000801
Park, J. S. (2009). The local construction of a global language: ideologies of English in South Korea. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Park, J. S. (2010). Naturalization of competences and the neoliberal subject: success stories of English language learning in the Korean conservative press. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 20(1), 22–38.
Park, T., Si, K., Shin, D., Kim, S. H., Lee, Y., Yoon, J., et al. (2013). Methods to widen the uses of NEAT according to the 2013 education policy on college admission system. Research report RRE 2013-1. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
Pennycook, A. (2004). Critical applied linguistics. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 784–807). Oxford: Blackwell.
Seth, M. (2002). Education fever. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Shohamy, E. (1998). Critical language testing and beyond. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 24(4), 331–345.
Shohamy, E. (2001a). The power of tests: a critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Shohamy, E. (2001b). Democratic assessment as an alternative. Language Testing, 18(4), 373–391.
Shohamy, E. (2006). Language policy: hidden agendas and new approaches. London: Routledge.
Shohamy, E. (2007). Language tests as language policy tools. Assessment in Education, 14(1), 117–130.
Song, J. (2010). Language ideology and identity in transnational space: globalization, migration, and bilingualism among Korean families in the USA. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(1), 23–42.
Sorenson, C. (1994). Success and education in South Korea. Comparative Education Review, 38(1), 10–35.
Spolsky, B. (1994). Policy issues in testing and evaluation. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 532, 226–237.
Spolsky, B. (2000). Language testing in The Modern Language Journal. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 536–552.
Statistics Korea. (2012). Private education expenditures survey in 2012. Retrieved from http://kostat.go.kr/portal/english/index.action
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, H., Lee, K. An Analysis of the Failure(s) of South Korea’s National English Ability Test. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 25, 827–834 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0301-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0301-6