Abstract
Knowledge about students’ conceptions is one of the requisite components of pedagogical content knowledge. A keen awareness of students’ alternative conceptions provides teachers with information about prospective difficulties students may incur as they make attempts to learn more accurate scientific representations of critical concepts. In this study, we investigated elementary school teachers’ understanding of their students’ alternative conceptions about change of states and dissolution. The subjects were 152 elementary school teachers and 529 sixth graders in Korea. A conceptions test and the test of the understanding about students’ conceptions were administered in order to examine students’ alternative conceptions and the teachers’ awareness of their students’ alternative conceptions, respectively. The effects of teachers’ characteristics such as teaching experience, highest academic degree, science teaching efficacy, and views about teaching and learning (i.e., constructivist and traditional) in relation to their awareness of students’ alternative conceptions were also investigated. The results indicated that the teachers tended to overestimate the number of students with scientifically accepted conceptions. The teachers also did not possess adequate knowledge about the existence and the distribution of their students’ alternative conceptions. It was found that teaching experience, highest academic degree, science teaching efficacy, and the level of teachers’ adoption of a constructivist view about teaching and learning were not significantly related to the their awareness of students’ alternative conceptions. It was found, however, that there is a significant relationship between the level of teachers’ traditional view about teaching and learning and their awareness of students’ alternative conceptions. Educational implications are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, P. E., & Krockover, G. H. (1997). Beginning science teacher cognition and its origin in the preservice secondary science teacher program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 633–653.
Akerson, V. L. (2005). How do elementary teachers compensate for incomplete science content knowledge? Research in Science Education, 35(2/3), 245–268.
Akerson, V. L., Flick, L. B., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). The influence of primary children’s ideas in science on teaching practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 363–385.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy, Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
Angell, C., Ryder, J., & Scott, P. H. (2005). Becoming an expert teacher: Novice physics teachers’ development of conceptual and pedagogical knowledge. Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association Conference, Barcelona.
Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 1–25.
Ball, D. L., Hill, H. H., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching. American Educator, 29(3), 14–46.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman & Company.
Bar, V., & Travis, A. S. (1991). Children’s views concerning phase changes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 363–382.
Barker, V. (2002). Beyond misconceptions: Students’ misconceptions about basic chemical ideas. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Barnett, M. (2002). Addressing children’s alternative frameworks of the moon’s phases and eclipses. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 859–879.
Barnett, J., & Hudson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Education, 85(4), 426–453.
Berg, T., & Brouwer, W. (1991). Teacher awareness of student alternate conceptions about rotational motion and gravity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 3–18.
Bleicher, R. E. (2004). Revisiting the STEBI-B: Measuring self-efficacy in preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 104(8), 383–391.
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In R. C. Calfee & D. C. Berliner (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology. New York: Macmillan.
Brown, D. F., & Rose, T. J. (1995). Self-reported classroom impact of teachers’ theories about learning and obstacles to implementation. Action in Teacher Education, 17(1), 20–29.
Bryan, L. A. (2003). Nestedness of beliefs: Examining a prospective elementary teacher’s belief system about science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 835–868.
Burgoon, J. N., Heddle, M. L., & Duran, E. (2010). Re-examining the similarities between teacher and student conceptions about physical science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(7), 859–872.
Caillods, F., Gottelmann-duret, G., & Lewin, K. (1997). Science Educational Development. Paris: Ergamon.
Chan, K.-W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(8), 817–831.
Chaney, B. (1995). Student outcomes and the professional preparation of eighth-grade teachers in science and mathematics: NSF/NELS:88 Teacher transcript analysis. Rockville, MD: Westat.
Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161–199.
Crespo, M. A. G., & Pozo, J. I. (2004). Relationships between everyday knowledge and scientific knowledge: Understanding how matter changes. International Journal of Science Education, 26(11), 1325–1343.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–50.
Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607–651.
Davis, E. A., & Smithey, J. (2009). Beginning teachers moving toward effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 93(4), 745–770.
Diakidoy, I. N., & Iordanou, K. (2003). Preservice teachers’ and teachers’ conceptions of energy and their ability to predict pupils’ level of understanding. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18(4), 357–368.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, L., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994a). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s idea in science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994b). Making sense of secondary science research into children’s ideas. New York: Routledge.
Duit, R. T., Treagust, D. F., & Widodo, A. (2008). Teaching science for conceptual change: Theory and practice. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 629–646). New York: Routledge.
Enochs, L. G., Scharmann, L. C., & Riggs, I. M. (1995). The relationship of pupil control to preservice elementary science teacher self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. Science Education, 70(1), 63–75.
Enochs, L. G., Smith, P. L., & Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the mathematics teaching efficacy beliefs instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 194–203.
Eryilmaz, A. (2002). Effects of conceptual assignments and conceptual change discussions on students’ misconceptions and achievement regarding force and motion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 1001–1015.
Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. T. (2003). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6), 643–658.
Garnett, P. J., Garnett, P. J., & Hackling, M. W. (1995). Students’ alternative conceptions in chemistry: A review of research and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 25(1), 69–95.
Germann, P. J., & Barrow, L. H. (1995). Inservice needs of teachers of biology: A comparison between veteran and nonveteran teachers. American Biology Teacher, 57(5), 272–277.
Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.). (1999). Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gimmestad, M. J., & Hall, G. E. (1995). Structure of teacher education programs. In L. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
Goldberg, F., Robinson, S., & Otero, V. (2006). Physics for elementary teachers. Armonk: It’s about time.
Gomez-Zwiep, S. (2008). Elementary teachers’ understanding of students’ science misconceptions: Implications for practice and teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19(5), 437–454.
Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Gullberg, A., Kellner, E., Attorps, I., Thoren, I., & Tarneberg, R. (2008). Prospective teachers’ initial conceptions about pupils’ understanding of science and mathematics. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(3), 257–278.
Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63–69.
Halim, L., & Meerah, S. M. (2002). Science trainee teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and its influence on physics teaching. Research in Science and Technological Education, 20(2), 215–225.
Haney, J. J., & McArthur, J. (2002). Four case studies of prospective science teachers’ beliefs concerning constructivist teaching practices. Science Education, 86(6), 783–802.
Hashweh, M. Z. (1996). Effects of science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 47–263.
Hashweh, M. Z. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: A reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(3), 273–292.
Hatzinikita, V., & Koulaidis, V. (1997). Pupils’ ideas on conservation during changes in the state of water. Research in Science and Technological Education, 15(1), 53–70.
Hogan, T., Rabinowitz, M., & Craven, J. A. (2003). Representation in teaching: Inferences from research of expert and novice teachers. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 235–247.
Holding, B. (1987). Investigation of schoolchildren’s understanding of the process of dissolving with special reference to the conservation of matter and the development of atomistic ideas. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Leeds.
Johnson, P. (1997). Understanding chemical change: What does it take? Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Science Education, Birmingham.
Johnson, P. (1998). Children’s understanding of changes of state involving the gas state, part 1: Boiling water and the particle theory. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 567–583.
Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 71–96.
Kang, N.-H., & Wallace, C. S. (2005). Secondary science teachers’ use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89(1), 141–165.
Käpylä, M., Heikkinen, J.-P., & Asunta, T. (2009). Influence of content knowledge on pedagogical content knowledge: The case of teaching photosynthesis and plant growth. International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), 1395–1415.
Kim, Y. G., & Lee, K. J. (1998). The conception of elementary school student in regards to solution. Journal of the Science Education, 23, 269–283 (written in Korean).
Kruger, C. J., Summers, M. K., & Palacio, D. J. (1990). An investigation of some English primary school teachers’ understanding of the concepts force and gravity. British Educational Research Journal, 16(4), 383–397.
Larkin, D. (2012). Misconceptions about “misconceptions”: Preservice secondary science teachers’ views on the value and role of student ideas. Science Education, 96(5), 927–959.
Lederman, N. G., & Niess, M. L. (2001). An attempt to anchor our moving targets. School Science and Mathematics, 101(2), 50–57.
Lim, C.-H. (2003). Science teaching practice and science teaching efficacy beliefs by development of elementary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 24(4), 258–272 (written in Korean).
Linn, M. C., & Muillenburg, L. (1996). Creating lifelong science learners: What models form a firm foundation? Educational Researcher, 25(5), 18–24.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). Achievement goals and intentional conceptual change. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 347–374). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Loughran, J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 33–43.
Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: Developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 370–391.
Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., & Czerniak, C. M. (2000). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 275–292.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Mant, J., & Summers, M. (1995). Some primary school teachers’ understanding of the earth’s place in the universe. Research Papers in Education, 8(1), 101–129.
Marshall, J. C., Horton, R., Igo, B. L., & Switzer, D. M. (2009). K-12 science and mathematics teachers’ beliefs about and use of inquiry in the classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 575–596.
Mellado, V. (1997). Preservice teachers’ classroom practice and their conceptions of the nature of science. Science & Education, 6(4), 331–354.
Mellado, V., Blanco, L. J., & Ruiz, C. (1998). A framework for learning to teach science in initial primary teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 9(3), 195–219.
MEST. (2009). Education in Korea. Seoul: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and expert teachers’ conceptions of learners’ prior knowledge. Science Education, 88(6), 970–983.
Monk, D. H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125–145.
Morrison, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Science teachers’ diagnosis and understanding of students’ preconceptions. Science Education, 87(6), 849–867.
Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Bolyard, J. J., Kitsantas, A., & Oh, H. (2008). The assessment of mathematics and science teacher quality. Peabody Journal of Education, 83(4), 562–591.
National Center on Education and the Economy (NCEE). (2006). Tough choices for tough times: The report of the new commission on the skills of the American workforce. Washington, DC: National Center on Education and the Economy.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding: The complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service education. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1281–1299.
Noh, T., Cha, J., Kang, S., & Scharmann, C. (2004). Perceived professional needs of Korean science teachers majoring in chemical education and their preferences for online and on-site training. International Journal of Science Education, 26(10), 1269–1289.
Noh, K. J., & Kim, H. N. (1996). Elementary school children’s conceptions about dissolution according to scientific and everyday context. Elementary Science Education, 15(2), 233–250 (written in Korean).
OECD. (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Osborne, R. J., Bell, B. F., & Gilbert, J. K. (1983). Science teaching and children’s views of the world. European Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 1–14.
Osborne, R. J., & Cosgrove, M. M. (1983). Children’s conceptions of the changes of state of water. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 825–838.
Otero, V. K., & Nathan, M. J. (2008). Preservice elementary teachers’ views of their students’ prior knowledge of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 497–523.
Papageorgiou, G., & Sakka, D. (2000). Primary school teachers’ views on fundamental chemical concepts. Chemistry Education Research and Practice in Europe, 1(2), 237–247.
Papageorgiou, G., Stamovlasis, D., & Johnson, P. M. (2010). Primary teachers’ particle ideas and explanations of physical phenomena: Effect of an in-service training course. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 629–652.
Pine, K., Messer, D., & John, K. (2001). Children’s misconceptions in primary science: A survey of teachers’ views. Research in Science and Technological Education, 19(1), 79–96.
Prawat, R. S. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education, 100(3), 354–395.
Pringle, R. M. (2006). Preservice teachers’ exploration of children’s alternative conceptions: Cornerstone for planning to teach science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 291–307.
Quílez-Pardo, J., & Solaz-Portolés, J. J. (1995). Students’ and teachers’ misapplication of Le Châtelier’s principle: Implications for the teaching of chemical equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(9), 939–957.
Rahayu, S., & Tytler, R. (1999). Progression in primary school children’s conceptions of burning: Toward an understanding of the concept of substance. Research in Science Education, 29(3), 295–312.
Riggs, I. M., & Enochs, L. G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher’s science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74(6), 625–637.
Sanders, M. (1993). Erroneous ideas about respiration: The teacher factor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(8), 919–934.
Smith, D. C. (1999). Changing our teaching: The role of pedagogical content knowledge in elementary science. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 163–197). Nerherlands: Kluwer Acadetmic.
Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1991). The construction of subject-matter knowledge in primary science teaching. In J. Brophy (Ed.) Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 187–243). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Southerland, S., Abrams, E., Cummins, C., & Anzelmo, J. (2001). Understanding students’ explanations of biological phenomena: Conceptual frameworks or p-prims? Science Education, 85(4), 328–348.
Staver, J. R., & Pascarella, E. T. (1984). The effects of method and format on the responses of subjects to a Piagetian reasoning problem. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(3), 305–314.
Stavy, R. (1990). Children’s conception of changes in the state of matter: From liquid (or solid) to gas. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(3), 247–266.
Taber, K. S. (2001). The mismatch between assumed prior knowledge and the learner’s conceptions: A typology of learning impediments. Educational Studies, 27(2), 159–171.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805.
van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2010). Pedagogical content knowledge. In P. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (3rd ed., pp. 656–661). UK: Elsevier.
van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & de Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 673–695.
Vosniadou, S. (2003). Exploring the relationships between conceptual change and intentional learning. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change (pp. 377–406). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York: MacMillan.
Watts, D., & Zylbersztajn, A. (1981). A survey of some children’s ideas about force. Physics Education, 16(6), 360–365.
Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Burke-Spero, R. (2005). Changes in teacher efficacy during the early years of teaching: A comparison of four measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(4), 343–356.
Zeidler, D. L. (2002). Dancing with maggots and saints: Visions for subject matter knowledge, pedagogical knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education reform. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 27–42.
Zohar, A. (2004). Elements of teachers’ pedagogical knowledge regarding instruction of higher-order thinking. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(4), 293–312.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Question 1 |
When water boils in a pot, one can observe big bubbles in the water. What does the bubble consist of? |
Question 2 |
A balloon is tightly fitted at the top of a test tube containing a small amount of water. The test tube, the water, and the balloon weigh 65 g altogether. On heating the test tube, the water in the test tube disappears while the balloon is inflated. If one weigh the test tube with the inflated balloon, the weight will be … |
a. Less than 65 g |
b. More than 65 g |
c. Equal to 65 g |
Question 3 |
A glass is filled with ice cubes. The lid is closed tightly and the outer surface of the glass is dried with a towel. After 15 min, the outer surface of the glass is wet. Where do the drops on the outer surface of the glass come from? |
Question 4 |
A glass, the water in the glass, and a sugar cube weigh 200 g altogether. After dropping the sugar cube into the glass, the water is stirred until the sugar completely disappears. If one weigh the glass with the water containing the dissolved sugar, the weight will be … |
a. Less than 200 g |
b. More than 200 g |
c. Equal to 200 g |
Question 5 A spoon of salt is poured into a glass with water. The water is stirred until the salt completely dissolved. If one respectively tastes the upper part, the lower part, and the middle part of the solution 1 day later, which part will taste the saltiest? |
a. The upper part |
b. The lower part |
c. The middle part |
d. Any part of the solution will taste the same |
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, C., Noh, T., Scharmann, L.C. et al. A Study on the Elementary School Teachers’ Awareness of Students’ Alternative Conceptions about Change of States and Dissolution. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 23, 683–698 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0140-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0140-7