Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are There Any Joint Effects of Online Student Question Generation and Cooperative Learning?

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the joint effects of online student question-generation and cooperative learning strategies with regard to learning anxiety and student perceptions of the value of the related activity for enhancing self-perceived competence. A 2 (question generation vs non-question generation) × 2 (cooperative learning vs individual learning) quasi-experimental research design was adopted. A total of 132 sixth graders from four classes participated in an intervention that lasted for four consecutive weeks. An online learning system that enabled students to construct, assess, and answer questions was used. An analysis of the data thus obtained revealed that the joint use of the cooperative learning and question-generation strategies did neither lead to less learning anxiety being associated with the activity, nor did it promote student perceptions of the value of the activity for enhancing self-competence with regard to either the learning content or strategies used, as compared to the approach using only one strategy. These unexpected results are explained with reference to cognitive load theory. The limitations and significance of this study are provided, along with suggestions for practitioners and researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramovich, S., & Cho, E. K. (2006). Technology as a medium for elementary pre-teachers’ problem-posing experience in mathematics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(4), 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andre, M., & Anderson, T. (1978–1979). The development and evaluation of a self-questioning study technique. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 605–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, W. E., & Lemke, E. A. (1971). Group variables influencing the transfer of conceptual behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(3), 215–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social cognitive theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., & Rafaeli, S. (2004). On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61, 84–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2005). The art of problem posing (3rd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 325–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 411–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drake, J. M., & Barlow, A. T. (2008). Assessing students’ levels of understanding multiplication through problem writing. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(5), 272–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children’s self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, M. (2000). The effects of captioned, subtitled and non-captioned television videotapes on foreign language learning. Unpublished master thesis, National Cheng-Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.

  • Janssen, J., Kirschner, F., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Paas, F. (2010). Making the black box of collaborative learning transparent: Combining process-oriented and cognitive load approaches. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, E. (2005). Teaching with the brain in mind (2nd ed.). Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, E., & Nickelsen, L. (2008). Deeper learning: 7 powerful strategies for in-depth and longer-lasting learning. Ridgefield: Maximize Learning, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. T., & Johnson, D. W. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Stanne, M.B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. http://www.tablelearning.com/uploads/File/EXHIBIT-B.pdf. Accessed 12 August 2012.

  • Jolliffe, W. (2007). Cooperative learning in the classroom: Putting it into practice. Thousand Oaks: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorczak, R. L. (2011). An information processing perspective on divergence and convergence in collaborative learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 207–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. (1989). Verbal interaction and problem-solving within computer-assisted cooperative learning groups. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009a). A cognitive load approach to collaborative learning: United brains for complex tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009b). Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks: Effects on retention and transfer efficiency. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 306–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, F., Paas, F., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Task complexity as a driver for collaborative learning efficiency: The collective working-memory effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 615–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D. (1987). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. England: Prentice Hall Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyman, L., Foyle, H.C. & Azwell, T.S. (1993). Cooperative learning in the elementary classroom. Washington, D.C: National Education Association Professional Library.

  • Millis, B. (2010). Cooperative learning in higher education: Across the disciplines, across the academy. Sterling: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, B. M., Bjork, E., & Goldenberg, E. P. (1993). Beyond problem solving: Problem posing. In S. I. Brown & M. I. Walter (Eds.), Problem posing: Reflections and applications (pp. 178–188). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neber, H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: The role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohtsubo, Y. (2005). Should information be redundantly distributed among group members? Effective use of group memory in collaborative problem solving. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 1219–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orngreen, R. & Levinsen, K. (2007). Acting against all odds. In D. Remenyi (Ed.), 6 th European Conference on E-Learning (pp. 479-486). Frederiksberg: Copenhagen Business School.

  • Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education and human activity. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 423–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peklaj, C. (2003). Gender, ability, cognitive style and students’ achievement in cooperative learning. Horizons of Psychology, 12(4), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham, T. H. T., & Gillies, R. (2010). Group composition of cooperative learning: Does heterogeneous grouping work in Asian classrooms? International Education Studies, 3(3), 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. A. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: a review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. (1986). Computers and collaborative work among students. Educational Technology, 26(10), 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, G. (2000). A model of collaborative knowledge-building, In Proceedings of the fourth international conference of the learning sciences (ICLS 2000), (pp. 70–77). Ann Arbor, MI. http://GerryStahl.net/cscl/papers/ch14.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2013.

  • Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N.F. (1996). A framework for research into students’ problem posing in school mathematics. Technology in mathematics education: Proceedings of the 19th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA), June 30–July 3, the University of Melbourne. http://www.merga.net.au/documents/RP_Stoyanova_Ellerton_1996.pdf. Accessed 13 June 2013.

  • Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swing, S., & Peterson, P. (1982). The relationship of student ability and small group interaction to student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzić, F. (2012). ERR framework system and cooperative learning. Metodički obzori, 7(14), 47–68. http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=117120. Accessed 20 June 2013.

  • Villa, R. A., Thousand, J. S., & Nevin, A. I. (2010). Collaborating with students in instruction and decision making. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vreman-de Olde, C., & de Jong, T. (2004). Student-generated assignments about electrical circuits in a computer simulation. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 859–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1980). An analysis of group interaction and mathematical errors in heterogeneous ability groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 266–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, N. M. (1982). Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 475–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitin, P. (2004). Promoting problem-posing explorations. Teaching Children Mathematics, 11, 180–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A. J. A., & Freedman-Doan, C. (1997). Change in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 451–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, F.Y. (1996). The effects of cooperation with inter-group competition on student academic achievement, affect and group process in a CAI environment in Taiwan. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Texas at Austin.

  • Yu, F. Y. (2009). Scaffolding student-generated questions: Design and development of a customizable online learning system. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1129–1138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, F.Y. (2012). Keynote Speech: Learner-centered pedagogy + adaptable and scaffolded learning space design—online student question-generation. International conference on computers in education 2012, November 26–30, Singapore.

  • Yu, F.Y., & Chen, Y.J. (in press). Effects of student-generated questions as the source of online drill-and-practice on learning. British Journal of Educational Technology.

  • Yu, F. Y., & Liu, Y. H. (2005). Potential values of incorporating multiple-choice question-construction for physics experimentation instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1319–1335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, F. Y., & Liu, Y. H. (2008). The comparative effects of student question-posing and question-answering strategies on promoting college students’ academic achievement, cognitive and metacognitive strategies use. Journal of Education and Psychology, 31(3), 25–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, F. Y., Liu, Y. H., & Chan, T. W. (2005). A web-based learning system for question-posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42, 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, F. Y., & Wu, C. P. (2012). Student question-generation: The learning processes involved and their relationships with students’ perceived value. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 57(4), 135–162.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was funded by research grants from the National Science Council, Taiwan (NSC 99-2511-S-006-015-MY3) and the Ministry of Education, Taiwan (Project No. 89-H-FA07-1-4).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Education, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, University Road, Tainan City, 701, Taiwan

    Fu-Yun Yu

  2. Department of Educational Technology, TamKang University, No. 151, Yingzhuan Rd., Danshui Dist., New Taipei City, 251, Taiwan

    Chun-Ping Wu

  3. No. 130, Huashan Rd., Xiaogang Dist., Kaohsiung City, 812, Taiwan

    Chung-Chi Hung

Authors
  1. Fu-Yun Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chun-Ping Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chung-Chi Hung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chun-Ping Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, FY., Wu, CP. & Hung, CC. Are There Any Joint Effects of Online Student Question Generation and Cooperative Learning?. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 23, 367–378 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0112-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0112-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation