Abstract
Beliefs about pedagogy and the use of technology affect the integration ICT in classrooms. This comparative study explores the pedagogical beliefs of pre-service physics teachers from two different cultures and examines the relationship between teachers’ beliefs about constructivist and traditional teaching and their related beliefs about the use of technology. This study was conducted with 115 Turkish and 90 Singaporean pre-service physics teachers. The results indicate that both Turkish and Singaporean pre-service physics teachers tend to believe in constructivist teaching which are aligned with their respective countries reform efforts. However, there is a significant difference between Turkish and Singaporean pre-service physics teachers in terms of constructivist use of technology beliefs. According to the results of this study more efforts are needed to insure that ICT is used more productively to support the teaching of physics in a constructivist manner and to create more effective physics classes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angell, C., Guttersrud, Ø., Henriksen, E. K., & Isnes, A. (2004). Physics: frightful, but fun. Pupils’ and teachers’ views of physics and physics teaching. Science Education, 88(5), 683–706.
Bain, A., & Weston, M. E. (2012). The learning edge: What technology can do to educate all children. New York: Teacher College Press.
Becker, H. J. (2001, April). How are teachers using computers in instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
Chai, C. S. (2010). The relationships between Singaporean preservice teachers’ ICT competencies, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs on the espoused use of ICT. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(3), 387–400.
Chai, C. S., Hong, H. Y., & Teo, T. (2009). Singaporean and Taiwanese pre-service teachers’ beliefs and their attitude towards ICT: A comparative study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(1), 117–128.
Chai, C. S., & Khine, M. S. (2008). Assessing the epistemological and pedagogical beliefs among pre-service teachers in Singapore. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Knowing, knowledge and beliefs: Epistemological studies across diverse cultures (pp. 287–302). Dordrecht: Springer.
Chan, K. W., & Elliott, R. G. (2004). Relational analysis of personal epistemology and conceptions about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 817–831.
Chandra, V., & Watters, J. J. (2012). Re-thinking physics teaching with web-based learning. Computers and Education, 58(1), 631–640.
Day, C., Elliot, B., & Kington, A. (2005). Reform, standards and teacher identity: Challenges of sustaining commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 563–577.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688.
Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. H. (1991). Changes in teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-rich classrooms. Educational Technology, 48(8), 45–52.
Eren, A. (2009). Examining the teacher efficacy and achievement goals as predictors of Turkish student teachers’ conceptions about teaching and learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 69–87.
Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.
Ertmer, P. A., Gopalakrishnan, S., & Ross, E. M. (2001). Technology-using teachers: Comparing perceptions of exemplary technology use to best practice. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 33(5), 1–24.
Fox, R., & Henri, J. (2005). Understanding teacher mindsets: IT and change in Hong Kong schools. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 8(2), 161–169.
Francis, L. J. (1994). The relationship between computer related attitudes and gender stereotyping of computer use. Computers and Education, 22(4), 283–289.
Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of education change. London: Cassell Educational Limited.
Galanouli, D., Murphy, C., & Gardner, J. (2004). Teachers’ perceptions of the effectiveness of ICT competence training. Computers and Education, 43, 63–79.
Gao, P., Choy, D., Wong, A. F. L., & Wu, J. (2009). Developing a better understanding of technology-based pedagogy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(5), 714–730.
Goktas, Y., Yildirim, Z., & Yildirim, S. (2008). Status of ICT in schools of teacher education. Deans’ views. Education and Science, 33(149), 30–50.
Harrison, C., Lunzer, E., Tymms, P., Fitz-Gibbon, C., & Restorick, J. (2004). Use of ICT and its relationship with performance in examinations: a comparison of the ImpaCT2 project’s research findings using pupil-level, school-level and multilevel modeling data. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 319–337.
Hofer, B. (2010). Personal epistemology in Asia: Burgeoning research and future directions. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 179–184.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Model, 6, 1–55.
Inan, F. A., Lowther, D. L., Ross, S. M., & Strahl, D. (2010). Pattern of classroom activities during students’ use of computers: Relations between instructional strategies and computer applications. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 540–546.
Jedeskog, G., & Nissen, J. (2004). ICT in the classroom: Is doing more important than knowing? Education and Information Technologies, 9(1), 37–45.
Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2007). Examining teachers’ beliefs about ICT in education: Implications of a teacher preparation programme. Teacher Development, 11(2), 149–173.
Leung, A. W. L. (2008). Teacher concerns about curriculum reform: The case of project learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17(1), 75–97.
Lim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their planning and conduct of computer-mediated classroom lessons. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 807–828.
Lim, C. P., & Hang, D. (2003). An activity theory approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore schools. Computersand& Education, 41(1), 49–63.
Liu, S. H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers and Education, 56, 1012–1022.
Minor, L. C., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Witcher, A. E., & James, T. L. (2002). Preservice teachers’ educational beliefs and their perceptions of characteristics of effective teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(2), 116–127.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Mumtaz, S. (2000). Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: A review of the literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 319–342.
Ornek, F., Robinson, W. R., & Haugan, M. (2008). What makes physics difficult? International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3(1), 30–34.
Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. (1985). The generative learning model and its applications for science education. Studies in Science Education, 12, 59–87.
Pelgrum, W. J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers and Education, 37(2), 163–178.
Ravitz, J., & Becker, H. J. (2000, April). Evidence for computer use being related to more constructivist practices and to changes in practice in a more constructivist-compatible direction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers and Education, 54(1), 103–112.
So, H., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101–116.
Teo, T., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Confirmatory factor analysis of the conception for teaching and learning questionnaire (CTLQ). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17(2), 215–224.
Teo, T., Chai, C. S., Hung, D., & Lee, C. B. (2008). Beliefs about teaching and uses of technology among pre-service teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 163–174.
Tubin, D. (2006). Typology of ICT implementation and technology application. Computers in the Schools, 23(1/2), 85–98.
Van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M. W., & Verloop, N. (2005). The conceptions of chemistry teachers about teaching and learning in the context of a curriculum innovation. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 303–322.
Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., Van Werven, I., & Dekkers, H. (1997). Teachers’ craft knowledge and curriculum innovation in higher engineering education. Higher Education, 34(1), 105–122.
Veen, W. (1993). How teachers use computers in instructional practice—four case studies in a Dutch secondary school. Computers and Education, 21(1–2), 1–8.
Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131–175.
Wong, B., & Chai, C. S. (2010). Asian personal epistemologies and beyond: Overview and some reflections. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(1), 1–6.
Yildirim, Z., & Goktas, Y. (2007). ICT Integration in primary education and teacher education programs in Turkey and in EU countries. Education and Science, 32, 55–67.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gurcay, D., Wong, B. & Chai, C.S. Turkish and Singaporean Pre-service Physics Teachers’ Beliefs about Teaching and Use of Technology. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 22, 155–162 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0008-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0008-2