Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utilizing Peer Coaching to Facilitate Pre-service Physical Education Teachers’ Reflection

  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine pre-service physical education teachers’ perceptions of peer coaching as a tool for reflection, and their reflectivity on their microteaching peer coaching experiences. Five pairs of coaches and coachees (4 female, 6 male) were selected from a pool of 30 students who were enrolled in a secondary physical education methods course. Data, which were collected from teachers’ reflective journal entries, peer coaching evaluation forms, and individual interviews with participants, were analyzed inductively by individual and cross-case analysis. The findings revealed that peer coaching facilitated teacher candidates’ reflection by: (a) helping them to face and deal with barriers to reflection, (b) connecting planning, instruction, and reflection, and (c) providing three-dimensional perspectives. In addition, the teacher candidates’ reflectivity on peer coaching was categorized into: (a) reiteration and acceptance, (b) extension and confrontation, and (c) adjustment and re-aiming. The findings supported that peer coaching can be a viable tool to initiate and sustain teacher candidates’ reflection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amboi, F. A. (2005). Preservice teachers’ reflectivity on the sequence and consequences of teaching actions in a microteaching experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(1), 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bataineh, R. F., Al-Karasneh, S. S., Al-Barakat, A. A., & Bataineh, R. F. (2007). Jordanian pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the portfolio as a reflective learning tool. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binks, E., Simth, D. L., Smith, L. J., & Joshi, M. (2009). Tell me your story: A reflective strategy for preservice teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(4), 141–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brett, P., & Nagra, J. (2005). An investigation into students’ use of a computer-based social learning space: Lessons for facilitating collaborative approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 281–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britton, L. R., & Anderson, K. A. (2010). Peer coaching and pre-service teachers: Examining an underutilized concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 306–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calderhead, J. (1989). Reflective teaching and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Chicago: Henry Regnery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, F. (1969). Concerns of teachers: A developmental conceptualization. American Educational Research Journal, 6(2), 207–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T. J., & Smith, M. A. (2006). Teacher planning, instruction and reflection: What we know about teacher cognitive processes. Quest, 58, 424–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Toward definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, W. H., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1989). Supervising student teachers. In A. E. Woolfolk (Ed.), Research perspectives on the graduate preparation of teachers (pp. 108–131). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1998). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 179–210). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes-Dusel, J. M. (1999). Physical education student teacher concerns. Physical Educator, 56(1), 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. M., & Veal, M. L. (2002). Preservice teachers’ PCK development during peer coaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22, 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. M., Garn, A., & Jenkins, P. (2005). Preservice teacher observations in peer coaching. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24, 2–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1980). Improving inservice training: The messages of research. Educational leadership, 37, 379–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F., & Wubbels, T. (2001). Evaluative research on the realistic approach and on the promotion of reflection. In F. A. J. Korthagen (Ed.), Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education (pp. 88–107). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuechle, J., Holzhauer, M., Lin, R., Brulle, A., & Morrison, S. (2010). Teaching Ms. Kerbin: A unique approach to student teacher reflections and their use with preservice candidates. Actions in Teacher Education, 32(3), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O. (2010). Facilitating preservice teachers’ reflection through interactive online journal writing. Physical Educator, 67(3), 128–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, Y.-F. (2010). Assessing critical reflection in Asian EFL students’ portfolios: An exploratory study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(2), 347–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorson, K., Goodway, J. D., & Hovatter, R. (2007). Using goal-directed reflection to make reflection more meaningful. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 78(4), 42–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansvelder-Longaryoux, D. D., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2007). The portfolio as a tool for stimulating reflection by student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(1), 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, E. A., & Neubert, G. A. (1995). New teachers helping new teachers: Preservice peer coaching. Bloomington: EDINFO Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, K., & Kottkamp, R. (1993). Reflective practice for educators. Newbury Park: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ovens, A. (2004). Using peer coaching and action research to structure practicum: an analysis of student teacher perceptions. Journal of Physical Education New Zealand, 37(1), 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiman, A. J., & Johnson, L. (2003). Promoting teacher professional judgment. Journal of Research in Education, 13(1), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sebren, A. (1995). Preservice teachers’ reflection and knowledge development in a field-based elementary physical education methods course. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14, 262–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1987). New thoughts on teacher education. Oxford Review of Education, 13(3), 267–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsangaridou, N., & O’Sullivan, M. (1994). Using pedagogical reflective strategies to enhance reflection among preservice physical education teachers. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 14, 13–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6, 205–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidmar, D. (2006). Reflective peer coaching: Crafting collaborative self-assessment in teaching. Research Strategies, 20, 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Boston MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipp, J. L. (2003). Scaffolding critical reflection in online discussions: Helping prospective teachers think deeply about field experience in urban schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 321–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong-Wylie, G. (2007). Barriers and facilitators of reflective practice in counselor education: Critical incidents from doctoral graduates. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 41(2), 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K. M. (1994). Conceptions of reflective practice in teaching and teacher education. In G. Harvard & P. Hodkinson (Eds.), Action and reflection in teacher education. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart, R. C., Wubbels, T., Bergen, T., & Bolhuis, S. (2009). Which characteristics of a reciprocal peer coaching context affect teacher learning as perceived by teachers and their students? Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Euichang Choi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, O., Choi, E. Utilizing Peer Coaching to Facilitate Pre-service Physical Education Teachers’ Reflection. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 22, 147–154 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0007-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-012-0007-3

Keywords

Navigation