Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Field-Based Physiological Testing of Wheelchair Athletes

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The volume of literature on field-based physiological testing of wheelchair sports, such as basketball, rugby and tennis, is considerably smaller when compared with that available for individuals and team athletes in able-bodied (AB) sports. In analogy to the AB literature, it is recognized that performance in wheelchair sports not only relies on fitness, but also sport-specific skills, experience and technical proficiency. However, in contrast to AB sports, two major components contribute towards ‘wheeled sports’ performance, which are the athlete and the wheelchair. It is the interaction of these two that enable wheelchair propulsion and the sporting movements required within a given sport. Like any other athlete, participants of wheelchair sports are looking for efficient ways to train and/or analyse their technique and fitness to improve their performance. Consequently, laboratory and/or field-based physiological monitoring tools used at regular intervals at key time points throughout the year must be considered to help with training evaluation. The present review examines methods available in the literature to assess wheelchair sports fitness in a field-based environment, with special attention on outcome variables, validity and reliability issues, and non-physiological influences on performance. It also lays out the context of field-based testing by providing details about the Paralympic court sports and the impacts of a disability on sporting performance. Due to the limited availability of specialized equipment for testing wheelchair-dependent participants in the laboratory, the adoption of field-based testing has become the preferred option by team coaches of wheelchair athletes. An obvious advantage of field-based testing is that large groups of athletes can be tested in less time. Furthermore, athletes are tested in their natural environment (using their normal sports wheelchair set-up and floor surface), potentially making the results of such testing more relevant than laboratory testing. However, given that many tests, such as the multistage fitness test and the Yo-Yo intermittent test, have originally been developed for AB games players, the assumption that these can also be used for wheelchair athletes may be erroneous. With the array of AB aerobic and anaerobic field tests available, it is difficult to ascertain which ones may be best suited for wheelchair athletes. Therefore, new, wheelchair sport-specific tests have been proposed and validated. Careful selection of tests to enable coaches to distinguish between disability classifications, wheelchair proficiency and actual performance improvements is paramount as this will not only enhance the value of field-based testing, but also help with the development of meaningful normative data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vanlandewijck YC, Daly DJ, Theisen DM. Field test evaluation of aerobic, anaerobic, and wheelchair basketball skill performances. Int J Sports Med. 1999;20(8):548–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goosey-Tolfrey V. Physiological profiles of elite wheelchair basketball players in preparation for the 2000 paralympic games. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2005;22(1):57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Malone LA, Morgulec-Adamowicz N, Orr K. Contribution of sport science to performance: wheelchair rugby. In: Vanlandewijck YC, Thompson WR, editors. The paralympic athlete. 1st ed. Chicester: Wiley; 2011. p. 249–63.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bhambhani Y. Physiology of wheelchair racing in athletes with spinal cord injury. Sports Med. 2002;32(1):23–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hartung GH, Lally DA, Blancq RJ. Comparison of treadmill exercise testing protocols for wheelchair users. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1993;66(4):362–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Perret C, Labruyere R, Mueller G, et al. Correlation of heart rate at lactate minimum and maximal lactate steady state in wheelchair-racing athletes. Spinal Cord. 2012;50:33–6.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rasche W, Janssen TW, van Oers CA, et al. Responses of subjects with spinal cord injuries to maximal wheelchair exercise: comparison of discontinuous and continuous protocols. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1993;66(4):328–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vinet A, Le Gallais D, Bernard PL, et al. Aerobic metabolism and cardioventilatory responses in paraplegic athletes during an incremental wheelchair exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1997;76(5):455–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gold JR, Gold MM. Access for all: the rise of the paralympic games. J R Soc Promot Health. 2007;127(3):133–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernardi M, Guerra E, Di Giacinto B, et al. Field evaluation of paralympic athletes in selected sports: implications for training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(6):1200–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ardigo’ LP, Goosey-Tolfrey VL, Minetti AE. Biomechanics and energetics of basketball wheelchairs evolution. Int J Sports Med. 2005;26(5):388–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hullemann KD, List M, Matthes D, et al. Spiroergometric and telemetric investigations during the XXI International Stoke Mandeville Games 1972 in Heidelberg. Paraplegia. 1975;13(2):09–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. International Wheelchair Basketball Federation. IWBF (online). http://www.iwbf.org. Accessed 31 Jan 2012.

  14. Coutts KD. Dynamics of wheelchair basketball. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24(2):231–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bloxham LA, Bell GJ, Bhambhani Y, et al. Time motion analysis and physiological profile of Canadian world cup wheelchair basketball players. Res Sports Med. 2001;10(3):183–98.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Croft L, Dybrus S, Lenton J, et al. A comparison of the physiological demands of wheelchair basketball and wheelchair tennis. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010;5(3):301–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. International Wheelchair Rugby Federation. IWRF (online). http://www.iwrf.com. Accessed 27 Jan 2012.

  18. Goosey-Tolfrey V, Castle P, Webborn N. Aerobic capacity and peak power output of elite quadriplegic games players. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(8):684–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Loan MD, McCluer S, Loftin JM, et al. Comparison of physiological responses to maximal arm exercise among able-bodied, paraplegics and quadriplegics. Paraplegia. 1987;25(5):397–405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haisma JA, van der Woude LH, Stam HJ, et al. Physical capacity in wheelchair-dependent persons with a spinal cord injury: a critical review of the literature. Spinal Cord. 2006;44(11):642–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abel T, Platen P, Rojas Vega S, et al. Energy expenditure in ball games for wheelchair users. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(12):785–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sarro KJ, Misuta MS, Burkett B, et al. Tracking of wheelchair rugby players in the 2008 demolition derby final. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(2):193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. International Tennis Federation. ITF (online). http://www.itftennis.com. Accessed 31 Oct 2011.

  24. Sporner ML, Grindle GG, Kelleher A, et al. Quantification of activity during wheelchair basketball and rugby at the national veterans wheelchair games: a pilot study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009;33(3):210–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sindall P, Lenton JP, Tolfrey K, et al. Wheelchair tennis match-play demands: effect of player rank and result. Int J Sports Physiol Perform (Epub 1 Aug 2012).

  26. Jacobs PL, Nash MS. Exercise recommendations for individuals with spinal cord injury. Sports Med. 2004;34(11):727–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoffman MD. Cardiorespiratory fitness and training in quadriplegics and paraplegics. Sports Med. 1986;3(5):312–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Janssen TWJ, Hopman MTE. Spinal cord injury. In: Skinner JS, editor. Exercise testing and exercise prescription for special cases: theoretical basis and clinical applications. 3rd ed. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005. p. 203–19.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Colivicchi F, Bassi A, Traballesi M. Exercise physiology, benefits of physical activity and training prescription in paraplegic subjects. Eur Medicophys. 2002;38(2):107–11.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hutzler Y, Ochana S, Bolotin R, et al. Aerobic and anaerobic arm-cranking power outputs of males with lower limb impairments: relationship with sport participation intensity, age, impairment and functional classification. Spinal Cord. 1998;36(3):205–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Janssen TW, Dallmeijer AJ, Veeger DJ, et al. Normative values and determinants of physical capacity in individuals with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002;39(1):29–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hopman MT, Dueck C, Monroe M, et al. Limits to maximal performance in individuals with spinal cord injury. Int J Sports Med. 1998;19(2):98–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Reybrouck T, Heigenhauser GF, Faulkner JA. Limitations to maximum oxygen uptake in arms, leg, and combined arm-leg ergometry. J Appl Physiol. 1975;38(5):774–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Krassioukov A. Autonomic function following cervical spinal cord injury. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2009;169(2):157–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Coutts KD, Rhodes EC, McKenzie DC. Maximal exercise responses of tetraplegics and paraplegics. J Appl Physiol. 1983;55(2):479–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Campbell IG, Williams C, Lakomy HK. Physiological and metabolic responses of wheelchair athletes in different racing classes to prolonged exercise. J Sports Sci. 2004;22(5):449–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Barfield JP, Malone LA, Arbo C, et al. Exercise intensity during wheelchair rugby training. J Sports Sci. 2010;28(4):389–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Valent LJ, Dallmeijer AJ, Houdijk H, et al. The individual relationship between heart rate and oxygen uptake in people with a tetraplegia during exercise. Spinal Cord. 2007;45(1):104–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tweedy S, Diaper NJ. Introduction to wheelchair sport. In: Goosey-Tolfrey V, editor. Wheelchair sport. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 2010. p. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  40. International Paralympic Committee (IPC). IPC (online). http://www.paralympic.org. Accessed 6 Jan 2011.

  41. Rhodes EC, McKenzie DC, Coutts KD, et al. A field test for the prediction of aerobic capacity in male paraplegics and quadriplegics. Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1981;6(4):182–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chapman D, Fulton S, Gough C. Anthropometric and physical performance characteristics of elite male wheelchair basketball athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(1):1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Morgulec-Adamowicz N, Kosmol A, Molik B, et al. Aerobic, anaerobic, and skill performance with regard to classification in wheelchair rugby athletes. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2011;82(1):61–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bhambhani YN, Holland LJ, Eriksson P, et al. Physiological responses during wheelchair racing in quadriplegics and paraplegics. Paraplegia. 1994;32(4):253–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Coutts KD. Peak oxygen uptake of elite wheelchair athletes. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 1990;7(1):62–6.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Molik B, Laskin JJ, Kosmol A, et al. Relationship between functional classification levels and anaerobic performance of wheelchair basketball athletes. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2010;81(1):69–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Morgulec N, Kosmol A, Vanlandewijck Y, et al. Anaerobic performance of active and sedentary male individuals with quadriplegia. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2005;22(3):253–64.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Leicht CA, Bishop NC, Goosey-Tolfrey VL. Submaximal exercise responses in tetraplegic, paraplegic and non spinal cord injured elite wheelchair athletes. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012;22(6):729–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bhambhani Y. Physiology. In: Vanlandewijck YC, Thompson WR, editors. The Paralympic athlete. 1st ed. Chicester: Wiley; 2011. p. 51–73.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bernardi M, Carucci S, Faiola F, et al. Physical fitness evaluation of paralympic winter sports sitting athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2012;22(1):26–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Leicht CA, Tolfrey K, Lenton JP, et al. The verification phase and reliability of physiological parameters in peak testing of elite wheelchair athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 (Epub 21 June).

  52. Dallmeijer AJ, Zentgraaff ID, Zijp NI, et al. Submaximal physical strain and peak performance in handcycling versus handrim wheelchair propulsion. Spinal Cord. 2004;42(2):91–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Goosey-Tolfrey VL, Tolfrey K. The multi-stage fitness test as a predictor of endurance fitness in wheelchair athletes. J Sports Sci. 2008;26(5):511–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Cooper RA. SMARTWheel: from concept to clinical practice. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2009;33(3):198–209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Moss AD, Fowler NE, Tolfrey VL. A telemetry-based velocometer to measure wheelchair velocity. J Biomech. 2003;36(2):53–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Goosey-Tolfrey VL, Moss AD. The velocity characteristics of wheelchair tennis players with and without the use of racquets. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2003;22(3):291–301.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Mason BM, van der Woude LH, Tolfrey K, et al. The effects of rear-wheel camber on maximal effort mobility performance in wheelchair athletes. Int J Sports Med. 2012;33(3):199–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Xu H, Chua JC, Burton M, et al. Development of low cost on-board velocity and position measurement system for wheelchair sports. Procedia Eng. 2010;2:3121–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Vanderthommen M, Francaux M, Colinet C, et al. A multistage field test of wheelchair users for evaluation of fitness and prediction of peak oxygen consumption. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2002;39(6):685–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Vinet A, Le Gallais D, Bouges S, et al. Prediction of VO(2peak) in wheelchair-dependent athletes from the adapted Leger and Boucher test. Spinal Cord. 2002;40(10):507–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Mason BS, van der Woude LH, Goosey-Tolfrey VL. Influence of glove type on mobility performance for wheelchair rugby players. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;88(7):559–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Yilla AB, Sherill C. Validating the beck battery of quad rugby skill tests. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 1998;15(2):155–67.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Franklin BA, Swantek KI, Grais SL, et al. Field test estimation of maximal oxygen consumption in wheelchair users. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71(8):574–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Vinet A, Bernard PL, Poulain M, et al. Validation of an incremental field test for the direct assessment of peak oxygen uptake in wheelchair-dependent athletes. Spinal Cord. 1996;34(5):288–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Dwyer GB, Davis RW. The relationship between a twelve minute wheelchair push test and VO2peak in women wheelchair athletes. Res Sports Med. 1997;8(1):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Traballesi M, Averna T, Delussu AS, et al. Improvement in metabolic parameters and specific skills in an elite wheelchair basketball team: a pilot study. Med Sport. 2009;62:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Goosey-Tolfrey VL, Foden E, Perret C, et al. Effects of inspiratory muscle training on respiratory function and repetitive sprint performance in wheelchair basketball players. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44:665–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Nadeau M, Leveille P, Quessy M, et al. The mechanical power output of world class wheelchair athletes. In: Doll-Tepper G, Dahms C, Doll B, et al., editors. Adapted physical activity: an interdisciplinary approach. Berlin: Springer; 1990. p. 87–91.

  69. Coutts KD. Drag and sprint performance of wheelchair basketball players. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1994;31(2):138–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Goosey-Tolfrey V, Moss AD. Wheelchair velocity of tennis players during propulsion with and without the use of racquets. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2005;22(3):291–301.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Newbery D, Richards G, Trill S, et al. Wheelchair tennis. In: Goosey-Tolfrey V, editor. Wheelchair sport. 1st ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 2010. p. 167–86.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Mason B. The ergonomics of wheelchair configuration for optimal sport performance. Dissertation, Loughborough (UK): Loughborough University. 2011.

  73. Brewer J, Ramsbottom R, Williams C. Multistage fitness test. Leeds: National Coaching Foundation; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Cunningham TK, McCann GP, Nimmo MA, et al. A comparison of the multistage fitness test with ergometer derived peak VO2 in paraplegic athletes: abstract annual congress, BASM 1999. Br J Sports Med. 2000;34:148–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Penry JT, Wilcox AR, Yun J. Validity and reliability analysis of Cooper’s 12-minute run and the multistage shuttle run in healthy adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(3):597–605.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Gass GC, Camp EM. The maximum physiological responses during incremental wheelchair and arm cranking exercise in male paraplegics. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1984;16(4):355–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Tropp H, Samuelsson K, Jorfeldt L. Power output for wheelchair driving on a treadmill compared with arm crank ergometry. Br J Sports Med. 1997;31(1):41–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Sassi RH, Dardouri W, Yahmed MH, et al. Relative and absolute reliability of a modified agility T-test and its relationship with vertical jump and straight sprint. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(6):1644–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Krustrup P, Mohr M, Amstrup T, et al. The yo-yo intermittent recovery test: physiological response, reliability, and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(4):697–705.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Poulain M, Vinet A, Bernard PL, et al. Reproducibility of the adapted Leger and Boucher test for wheelchair-dependent athletes. Spinal Cord. 1999;37(2):129–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Faupin A, Campillo P, Weissland T, et al. The effects of rear-wheel camber on the mechanical parameters produced during the wheelchair sprinting of handibasketball athletes. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41(3B):421–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Fuss FK. Influence of mass on the speed of wheelchair racing. Sports Eng. 2009;12:41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Paton CD, Hopkins WG. Tests of cycling performance. Sports Med. 2001;31(7):489–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Hutzler Y. Anaerobic fitness testing of wheelchair users. Sports Med. 1998;25(2):101–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. van der Woude LH, Bakker WH, Elkhuizen JW, et al. Propulsion technique and anaerobic work capacity in elite wheelchair athletes: cross-sectional analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;77(3):222–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. van der Woude LH, de Groot G, Hollander AP, et al. Wheelchair ergonomics and physiological testing of prototypes. Ergonomics. 1986;29(12):1561–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Lenton JP, Fowler NE, van der Woude L, et al. Wheelchair propulsion: effects of experience and push strategy on efficiency and perceived exertion. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008;33(5):870–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Rice I, Gagnon D, Gallagher J, et al. Hand rim wheelchair propulsion training using biomechanical real-time visual feedback based on motor learning theory principles. J Spinal Cord Med. 2010;33(1):33–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. de Groot S, Veeger DH, Hollander AP, et al. Wheelchair propulsion technique and mechanical efficiency after 3 wk of practice. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(5):756–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. de Groot S, Veeger HE, Hollander AP, et al. Influence of task complexity on mechanical efficiency and propulsion technique during learning of hand rim wheelchair propulsion. Med Eng Phys. 2005;27(1):41–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. de Groot S, de Bruin M, Noomen SP, et al. Mechanical efficiency and propulsion technique after 7 weeks of low-intensity wheelchair training. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008;23(4):434–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Goosey-Tolfrey VL, West M, Lenton JP, et al. Influence of varied tempo music on wheelchair mechanical efficiency following 3-week practice. Int J Sports Med. 2011;32(2):126–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Kannekens R, Elferink-Gemser MT, Visscher C. Positioning and deciding: key factors for talent development in soccer. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011;21(6):846–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Mujika I, Santisteban J, Impellizzeri FM, et al. Fitness determinants of success in men’s and women’s football. J Sports Sci. 2009;27(2):107–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Wang YT, Chen S, Limroongreungrat W, et al. Contributions of selected fundamental factors to wheelchair basketball performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(1):30–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Okuma H, Ogata H, Hatada K. Transition of physical fitness in wheelchair marathon competitors over several years. Paraplegia. 1989;27(3):237–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Diaper NJ, Goosey-Tolfrey VL. A physiological case study of a paralympic wheelchair tennis player: reflective practise. J Sport Sci Med. 2009;8:300–7.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Mason BS, Porcellato L, van der Woude LH, et al. A qualitative examination of wheelchair configuration for optimal mobility performance in wheelchair sports: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(2):141–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Goosey-Tolfrey V. Supporting the paralympic athlete: focus on wheeled sports. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(26):2237–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Stephens CL, Engsberg JR. Comparison of overground and treadmill propulsion patterns of manual wheelchair users with tetraplegia. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2010;5(6):420–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Vanlandewijck Y, Theisen D, Daly D. Wheelchair propulsion biomechanics: implications for wheelchair sports. Sports Med. 2001;31(5):339–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Great Britain Wheelchair Rugby Ltd, British Wheelchair Basketball and the Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport for their ongoing support. The authors further acknowledge the assistance of Mark Jarvis and Nick Grantham with the sharing of the field-based protocols of the English Institute of Sport and the support of Nik Diaper of the English Institute of Sport for his input and critical feedback. No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this review, and the authors have no conflict of interest to declare that are directly relevant to the content of this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, The Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK

    Victoria L. Goosey-Tolfrey & Christof A. Leicht

Authors
  1. Victoria L. Goosey-Tolfrey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christof A. Leicht
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victoria L. Goosey-Tolfrey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goosey-Tolfrey, V.L., Leicht, C.A. Field-Based Physiological Testing of Wheelchair Athletes. Sports Med 43, 77–91 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-012-0009-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-012-0009-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation