Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of anticoagulation management in outpatients attending a warfarin clinic in Windhoek, Namibia

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Therapy Perspectives Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Warfarin, an anticoagulant with a low therapeutic index, requires frequent international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring to ensure efficacy and safety. Little is known about anticoagulation management in Namibia.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the level of anticoagulation control among outpatients requiring maintenance warfarin therapy.

Setting

Clinical records of patients attending the warfarin anticoagulation clinic at Windhoek Central Hospital (Windhoek, Namibia) during a 1-year period were reviewed.

Methods

Of the 294 outpatients who visited the warfarin anticoagulation monitoring clinic in 2017, 215 patients were included in the data analysis. The following information was available and used for data analysis: age and sex of the patient, indication for warfarin use, number of visits, warfarin dose and INR values. The individual’s time in therapeutic range (iTTR) was the primary outcome, which was calculated both using the Rosendaal method and as the percentage of the reported INR values in the therapeutic range.

Results

The patients’ mean iTTR was 29.4%, well below the 65% target, when estimated by the Rosendaal method and 25.2% when calculated as the percentage of INR values within the therapeutic range. Only 22 of the 215 patients (10%) had an iTTR ≥ 65%.

Conclusions

Anticoagulation control at this outpatient clinic was low relative to the target iTTR of 65%. Consequently, patients were at risk for further embolic events or bleeding events based on the high numbers of sub- and supratherapeutic INRs during the time period studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burn J, Pirmohamed M. Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin: is new always better than old? Open Heart. 2018;5:e000712.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Vinogradova Y, Coupland C, Hill T, et al. Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care. BMJ. 2018;362:k2505.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Weitz JI. Blood coagulation and anticoagulant, fibrinolytic and antiplatelet drugs. In: Brunton L, Chabner B, Knollman B, editors. Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 12th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2012. p. 849–76.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The International Warfarin Pharmacogentics Consortium. Estimation of the warfarin dose with clinical and pharmacogenetics data. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:753–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Johnson JA, Gong L, Whirl-Carillo M, et al. Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guidelines for CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes and warfarin dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;90:625–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Witt DM, Clark NP, Kaatz S, et al. Guidance for the practical management of warfarin therapy in the treatment of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016;41:187–205.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ, et al. Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(Suppl):e419S–94S.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Clark NP, Witt DM, Delate T, et al. Thromboembolic consequences of subtherapeutic anticoagulation in patients stabilized on warfarin therapy: the low INR study. Pharmacotherapy. 2008;28:960–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lind M, Fahlén M, Kosiborod M, et al. Variability of INR and its relationship with mortality, stroke, bleeding and hospitalisations in patients with atrial fibrillation. Thromb Res. 2012;129:32–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Budnitz DS, Shehab N, Kegler SR, et al. Medication use leading to emergency department visits for adverse drug events in older adults. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:755–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosendaal FR, Cannegieter SC, van der Meer FJ, et al. A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost. 1993;69:236–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Passman R. Time in therapeutic range in warfarin-treated patients: is very good good enough? J Am Med Assoc. 2016;316:872–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Reiffel JA. Time in the therapeutic range (TTR): an overly simplified conundrum. J Innov Cardiac Rhythm Manag. 2017;8:2643–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Connolly SJ, Pogue J, Eikelboom J, et al. Benefit of oral anticoagulant over antiplatelet therapy depends on the quality of international normalized ratio control achieved by centers and countries as measured by time in therapeutic range. Circulation. 2008;118:2029–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van Walraven C, Jennings A, Oake N, et al. Effect of study setting on anticoagulation control: a systematic review and metaregression. Chest. 2006;129:1155–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaatz S. Determinants and measures of quality in oral anticoagulation. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2008;25:61–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Khoury G, Sheikh-Taha M. Effect of age and sex on warfarin dosing. Clin Pharmacol. 2014;6:103–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Schapkaitz E, Sithole J. Predictors of warfarin dose requirements in South African patients attending an anticoagulation unit. J Vasc Nurs. 2017;35:27–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yooh S-H, Nah H-W, Jo M-W, et al. Age and body weight adjusted warfarin initiation program for ischaemic stroke patients. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16:1100–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ebrahim I, Bryer A, Cohen K, et al. Poor anticoagulation control in patients taking warfarin at a tertiary and district-level prothrombin clinic in Cape Town, South Africa. S Afr J Med. 2018;108:490–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wallentin L, Yusuf S, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalized ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of RE-LY trial. Lancet. 2010;376:975–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee CR, Thrasher KA. Difficulties in anticoagulation management during coadministration of warfarin and rifampin. Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21:1240–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liedtke MD, Rathburn RC. Drug interactions with antiretrovirals and warfarin. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2010;9:215–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Esterly JS, Darin KM, Gerzenshtein L, et al. Clinical implications of antiretroviral drug interactions with warfarin: a case-control study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68:1360–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wigle P, Hein B, Bloomfield HE, et al. Updated guidelines on outpatient anticoagulation. Am Fam Physician. 2013;87:556–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schulman S, Parpia S, Stewart C, et al. Warfarin dose assessment every 4 weeks versus every 12 weeks in patients with stable international normalized ratios. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:653–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Manji I, Pastakia SD, Do AN, et al. Performance outcomes of a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic in the rural, resource-constrained setting of Eldoret, Kenya. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9:2215–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the invaluable help of the nursing staff at the Warfarin Clinic (Cardiac Clinic) of Windhoek Central Hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bonifasius S. Singu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the human ethics committees of the University of Namibia and of the Ministry of Health & Social Services, Namibia.

Conflict of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

This study received no specific funding. L.J. Jonkman was supported by a Fulbright Scholarship.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jonkman, L.J., Gwanyanya, M.P., Kakololo, M.N. et al. Assessment of anticoagulation management in outpatients attending a warfarin clinic in Windhoek, Namibia. Drugs Ther Perspect 35, 341–346 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40267-019-00630-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40267-019-00630-y

Navigation