Abstract
Background
Warfarin, an anticoagulant with a low therapeutic index, requires frequent international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring to ensure efficacy and safety. Little is known about anticoagulation management in Namibia.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to investigate the level of anticoagulation control among outpatients requiring maintenance warfarin therapy.
Setting
Clinical records of patients attending the warfarin anticoagulation clinic at Windhoek Central Hospital (Windhoek, Namibia) during a 1-year period were reviewed.
Methods
Of the 294 outpatients who visited the warfarin anticoagulation monitoring clinic in 2017, 215 patients were included in the data analysis. The following information was available and used for data analysis: age and sex of the patient, indication for warfarin use, number of visits, warfarin dose and INR values. The individual’s time in therapeutic range (iTTR) was the primary outcome, which was calculated both using the Rosendaal method and as the percentage of the reported INR values in the therapeutic range.
Results
The patients’ mean iTTR was 29.4%, well below the 65% target, when estimated by the Rosendaal method and 25.2% when calculated as the percentage of INR values within the therapeutic range. Only 22 of the 215 patients (10%) had an iTTR ≥ 65%.
Conclusions
Anticoagulation control at this outpatient clinic was low relative to the target iTTR of 65%. Consequently, patients were at risk for further embolic events or bleeding events based on the high numbers of sub- and supratherapeutic INRs during the time period studied.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burn J, Pirmohamed M. Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin: is new always better than old? Open Heart. 2018;5:e000712.
Vinogradova Y, Coupland C, Hill T, et al. Risks and benefits of direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in a real world setting: cohort study in primary care. BMJ. 2018;362:k2505.
Weitz JI. Blood coagulation and anticoagulant, fibrinolytic and antiplatelet drugs. In: Brunton L, Chabner B, Knollman B, editors. Goodman & Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 12th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2012. p. 849–76.
The International Warfarin Pharmacogentics Consortium. Estimation of the warfarin dose with clinical and pharmacogenetics data. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:753–64.
Johnson JA, Gong L, Whirl-Carillo M, et al. Clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium guidelines for CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotypes and warfarin dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;90:625–9.
Witt DM, Clark NP, Kaatz S, et al. Guidance for the practical management of warfarin therapy in the treatment of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016;41:187–205.
Kearon C, Akl EA, Comerota AJ, et al. Antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(Suppl):e419S–94S.
Clark NP, Witt DM, Delate T, et al. Thromboembolic consequences of subtherapeutic anticoagulation in patients stabilized on warfarin therapy: the low INR study. Pharmacotherapy. 2008;28:960–7.
Lind M, Fahlén M, Kosiborod M, et al. Variability of INR and its relationship with mortality, stroke, bleeding and hospitalisations in patients with atrial fibrillation. Thromb Res. 2012;129:32–5.
Budnitz DS, Shehab N, Kegler SR, et al. Medication use leading to emergency department visits for adverse drug events in older adults. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:755–65.
Rosendaal FR, Cannegieter SC, van der Meer FJ, et al. A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost. 1993;69:236–9.
Passman R. Time in therapeutic range in warfarin-treated patients: is very good good enough? J Am Med Assoc. 2016;316:872–3.
Reiffel JA. Time in the therapeutic range (TTR): an overly simplified conundrum. J Innov Cardiac Rhythm Manag. 2017;8:2643–6.
Connolly SJ, Pogue J, Eikelboom J, et al. Benefit of oral anticoagulant over antiplatelet therapy depends on the quality of international normalized ratio control achieved by centers and countries as measured by time in therapeutic range. Circulation. 2008;118:2029–37.
van Walraven C, Jennings A, Oake N, et al. Effect of study setting on anticoagulation control: a systematic review and metaregression. Chest. 2006;129:1155–66.
Kaatz S. Determinants and measures of quality in oral anticoagulation. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2008;25:61–6.
Khoury G, Sheikh-Taha M. Effect of age and sex on warfarin dosing. Clin Pharmacol. 2014;6:103–6.
Schapkaitz E, Sithole J. Predictors of warfarin dose requirements in South African patients attending an anticoagulation unit. J Vasc Nurs. 2017;35:27–30.
Yooh S-H, Nah H-W, Jo M-W, et al. Age and body weight adjusted warfarin initiation program for ischaemic stroke patients. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16:1100–5.
Ebrahim I, Bryer A, Cohen K, et al. Poor anticoagulation control in patients taking warfarin at a tertiary and district-level prothrombin clinic in Cape Town, South Africa. S Afr J Med. 2018;108:490–4.
Wallentin L, Yusuf S, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalized ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of RE-LY trial. Lancet. 2010;376:975–83.
Lee CR, Thrasher KA. Difficulties in anticoagulation management during coadministration of warfarin and rifampin. Pharmacotherapy. 2001;21:1240–6.
Liedtke MD, Rathburn RC. Drug interactions with antiretrovirals and warfarin. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2010;9:215–23.
Esterly JS, Darin KM, Gerzenshtein L, et al. Clinical implications of antiretroviral drug interactions with warfarin: a case-control study. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68:1360–3.
Wigle P, Hein B, Bloomfield HE, et al. Updated guidelines on outpatient anticoagulation. Am Fam Physician. 2013;87:556–66.
Schulman S, Parpia S, Stewart C, et al. Warfarin dose assessment every 4 weeks versus every 12 weeks in patients with stable international normalized ratios. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:653–9.
Manji I, Pastakia SD, Do AN, et al. Performance outcomes of a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic in the rural, resource-constrained setting of Eldoret, Kenya. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9:2215–20.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the invaluable help of the nursing staff at the Warfarin Clinic (Cardiac Clinic) of Windhoek Central Hospital.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The study was approved by the human ethics committees of the University of Namibia and of the Ministry of Health & Social Services, Namibia.
Conflict of interest
The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
This study received no specific funding. L.J. Jonkman was supported by a Fulbright Scholarship.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jonkman, L.J., Gwanyanya, M.P., Kakololo, M.N. et al. Assessment of anticoagulation management in outpatients attending a warfarin clinic in Windhoek, Namibia. Drugs Ther Perspect 35, 341–346 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40267-019-00630-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40267-019-00630-y