Skip to main content
Log in

Safety of Artemisinin-Based Combination Therapies in Nigeria: A Cohort Event Monitoring Study

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drug Safety Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

A pilot programme of Cohort Event Monitoring (CEM) was conducted across the six geopolitical zones of Nigeria on patients treated for uncomplicated malaria with artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). The emergence and spread of malaria parasites resistant to commonly available antimalarial drugs necessitated a shift in policy for malaria treatment by the Federal Government from the use of chloroquine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) as first-line treatments to ACTs. Initial reports following deployment of ACTs in clinical settings raised safety concerns regarding their use. Although artemisinin and its derivatives are generally thought to be safe, there are currently few or no data on their safety among populations in Nigeria.

Objectives

The main objectives of the CEM programme were to proactively determine the adverse event (AE) profile of artesunate/amodiaquine (AA) and artemether/lumefantrine (AL) in real-life settings and to find out the factors predisposing to AEs.

Methods

The CEM study was observational, longitudinal, prospective, and inceptional. Patients were observed in real-life situations. It was conducted in six public health facilities in Nigeria on patients with a clinical diagnosis of uncomplicated malaria treated with ACTs. Patients were prescribed one of the ACTs on an alternate basis as they enrolled into the programme. Follow-up reviews were undertaken on days 3 and 7 following commencement of ACT treatment. At follow-up, patients were evaluated for any clinical event that they might have experienced following the use of the ACTs. We report the result of this initial pilot in which 3,010 patients treated for uncomplicated malaria with AA or AL were enrolled.

Results

The seven most common AEs seen were general body weakness 25.0/36.6 % (AL/AA); dizziness 11.9/17.2 % (AL/AA); vomiting 8.0/10.2 % (AL/AA); abdominal pain 8.5/7.2 % (AL/AA); insomnia 6.3/5.9 % (AL/AA); body pains 3.4/5.2 (AL/AA) %; anorexia 8.5/4.6 % (AL/AA). Most adverse events occurred from day 1 and peaked by day 2 and 3 of medication with the mean duration of events being 3 days. By the end of the follow-up visit on day 7, the AEs had resolved in the majority of patients. Adverse events were more common in the AA group than AL revealing a better safety profile for AL (p < 0.001). Both ACTs demonstrated good ability to resolve the clinical symptoms of uncomplicated malaria.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this pilot CEM programme suggests that adverse events with ACTs were common. However, serious life-threatening events were not common. It appears that ACTs have a tolerable safety profile among Nigerians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja. National Strategic Plan for Roll Back Malaria in Nigeria. Federal Ministry of Health, Nigeria. 2001; 8.

  2. Federal Ministry of Health. The National Health Policy of Nigeria. Lagos: Federal Ministry of Health; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Snow RW, Craig MH, Newton CR, Steketee RW. The public health burden of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Africa. Deriving the numbers. In: Disease control priorities project. Bethesda, Maryland: Fogarty International Center, National Institute of Health; Working paper 2003; No 11.

  4. Snow RW, Guerra CA, Noor AM, et al. The global distribution of clinical episodes of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 2005;434:214–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja. National guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of malaria (3rd Ed. June 2011), p. 16–17. http://nmcpnigeria.org/f/case-management/2011%20National%20Policy%20on%20Diagnosis%20and%20Treatment%20of%20Malaria.pdf.

  6. Onwujekwe O, Chima R, Okonkwo P. Economic burden of malaria illness on households versus that of all other illness episodes. A study in five malaria holoendemic Nigerian communities. Health Policy. 2000;54:143–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Paediatric Association of Nigeria. 1994;1:5.

  8. Ejezie GC, Ezednachi EN, Usanga EA, et al. Malaria and its treatment in rural villages of Aboh Mbaise, Imo State Nigeria. Acta Trop. 1991;48:17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mokuolu O. Current trends in management of malaria. A paper presented at the inauguration ceremony of the National Malarial Drug Policy Implementation Transition Committee, March 24th 2005.

  10. Olumese PE, Amodu OK, Bjorkman A, et al. Chloroquine resistance of Plasmodium falciparum is associated with severity of disease in Nigerian children. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002;96(4):418–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization. Monitoring antimalarial drug resistance. Report of a WHO Consultation 3–5 December 2001. Geneva, Switzerland. 2002; WHO/CDS/RBM/2002.2039-2072.

  12. Krogstad DJ, Gluzman IY, Kyle DE, et al. Efflux of Chloroquine from Plasmodium falciparum: mechanism of Chloroquine resistance. Science. 1987;238:1283–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Olumese PE: Global antimalarial drug policy database. Antimalarial treatment policies for P. falciparum and P. vivax by country in WHO African and Eastern Mediterranean region [April 2007 update]. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; 2007.

  14. Trape JF, Pison G, Preziosi MP, et al. Impact of chloroquine resistance on malaria mortality. Comptes Rendus de l Académie des Sciences – Série iii, Sciences de la Vie. 1998; 321:689–97.

  15. Zucker JR, Ruebush TK, Obonyo C, et al. The mortality consequences of the continued use of chloroquine in Africa: experience in Siaya, western Kenya. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2003;68:386–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Price R, van Vugt M, Phaipun L, Luxemburger C, Simpson J, McGready R, ter Kuile F, Kham A, Chongsuphajaisiddhi T, White NJ, Nosten F. Adverse effects in patients with acute falciparum malaria treated with artemisinin derivatives. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999;60:547–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Talisuna AO, Staedke SG, D’Alessandro U. Pharmacovigilance of antimalarial treatment in Africa: is it possible? Malar J. 2006;5:50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. WHO: The importance of pharmacovigilance: safety monitoring of medicinal products. Geneva; 2002.

  19. Falade C, Manyando C. Safety profile of Coartem: the evidence base. Malar J. 2009;8(Suppl 1):S6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pirmohamed M, Atuah KN, Dodoo AN, Winstanley P. Pharmacovigilance in developing countries. BMJ. 2007;335:462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Olsson S, Pal SN, Stergachis A, Couper M. Pharmacovigilance activities in 55 low- and middle-income countries: a questionnaire-based analysis. Drug Saf. 2010;33:689–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. World Health Organization (2006). The safety of medicines in public health programmes: Pharmacovigilance an essential tool; 2006. p. 40–1. www.who.int/hiv/pub/pharmacovigilance/safety/en/index.html.

  23. World Health Organization. A practical handbook on the pharmacovigilance of antimalarial medicines. 2007. p. 20–35.

  24. Nosten F, White NJ. Artemisinin-based combination treatment of falciparum malaria. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007;77(6 Suppl):181–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Olliaro P, Nevill C, LeBras J, Ringwald P, Mussano P, Garner P, Brausseur P. Systematic review of amodiaquine treatment in uncomplicated malaria. Lancet. 1996;348:1196–201.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kunac DL, Harrison-Woolrych M, Tatley MV. Pharmacovigilance in New Zealand: the role of the New Zealand Pharmacovigilance Centre in facilitating safer medicines use. NZ Med J. 2008;121:76–89.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shen JX. Antimalarial Drug Development in China. Beijing National Institute of Pharmaceutical Research and Development, on behalf of the UNDP/World Bank/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases. 1989. p. 31–95.

  28. Guo XB, Fu LC, Jian HX, Li GQ, Wang XH. Clinical trials of artemisinin and its derivatives in the treatment of malaria in China. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1994;88(suppl 1):5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Catherine M-S, Prasanna J, Vincent MY, et al. Safety and tolerability of combination antimalarial therapies for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Ugandan children. Malaria J. 2008;7:106. doi:10.1186/1475-2875-7-106.28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pandey AV, Tekwani BL, Singh RL, et al. Artemisinin, an endoperoxide antimalarial, disrupts the hemoglobin catabolism and heme detoxification systems in malarial parasite. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(27):19383–8. doi:10.1074/jbc.274.27.19383.3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fanello CI, Karema C, van Doren W, van Overmeir C, Ngamije D, D'Alessandro U. A randomised trial to assess the safety and efficacy of artemether–lumefantrine (Coartem®) for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Rwanda. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101(4):344–50. doi:10.1016/j.trstmh.2006.06.010

  32. Barennes H, Nagot N, Valea I, et al. A randomized trial of amodiaquine and artesunate alone and in combination for the treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in children from Burkina Faso. Trop Med Int Health. 2004;9(4):438–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Asante KP, Owusu R, Dosoo D, Awini E, Adjei G, Etego SA, Chandramohan D, Owusu-Agyei S. Adherence to artesunate-amodiaquine therapy for uncomplicated malaria in rural Ghana: a randomised trial of supervised versus unsupervised drug administration. J Trop Med. 2009;2009:529583.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Adisa R, Fakeye TO, Dike D. Evaluation of adverse reactions to Amodiaquine- based combination therapy in s Nigerian University Community. Trop J Pharm R. 2008;7(2):937–44.

    Google Scholar 

  35. WHO Guideline. Guideline for the treatment of malaria. 2nd ed. WHO Press, Appia, Geneva; 2010. p 88.

  36. Simooya OO, Sijumbil G, Lennard MS, et al. Halofantrine and chloroquine inhibit CYP2D6 activity in healthy Zambians. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;45:315–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. von Lorenz S, Paul M, Margaret P, et al. Efficacy of artesunate plus pyrimethamine/sulphadoxine for uncomplicated malaria in Gambian children: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Lancet. 2000;9201(355):352–7.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Grant Dorsey MD, Sarah Staedke MD, Tamara DC, et al. Combination therapy for uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Ugandan children. A randomized trial. JAMA. 2007;297(20):2210–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Akpalu AK, Nyame PK, Dodoo ANO. Amodiaquine- induced dystonic reactions: Case reports and implications for policy change in Ghana. Int J Risk Saf Med. 2005;17:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  40. McEwen J. Artesunate- and amodiaquine-associated extrapyramidal reactions. A series of 49 cases in Vigibase. Drug Saf. 2012;35(8):667–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Brewer TG, Peggins JO, Grate SJ, et al. Neurotoxicity in animals due to arteether and artemether. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1994;88(suppl 1):33–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Miller LG, Panosian CB. Ataxia and slurred speech after artesunate treatment for falciparum malaria. New Engl J Med. 1997;336:1328.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kappe SH, Vaughan AM, Boddey JA, et al. That was then but this is now: malaria research in the time of an eradication agenda. Science. 2010;328(5980):862–6. doi:10.1126/science.1184785.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Chau THH, Day NPJ, Chuong LV, et al. Black water fever in Southern Vietnam. A prospective descriptive study of 50 cases. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;23:1274–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hein TT, Day NPJ, Phu NH, et al. Controlled trial of artemether or quinine in Vietnamese adults with severe falciparum malaria. New Eng J Med. 1996;335:76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Cumming JN, Ploypradith P, Gary HP. Antimalarial activity of artemisinin (qinghaosu) and related trioxanes: mechanism(s) of action. Adv Pharmacol (San Diego). 1997;37:253–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Science Daily. New Data Regarding Safety of Artemisinin Combination Therapy for Pregnant Women with Malaria; 2008.

  48. World Health Organization. A practical handbook on the pharmacovigilance of antimalarial medicines. WHO Press, World Health Organization, Appia, Geneva, Switzerland. 2007; 27.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Cohort event monitoring (CEM) team would like to express its appreciation to all doctors, pharmacists, nurses, and health workers in the six health facilities across Nigeria for their support and/or involvement in this work.

Special acknowledgement goes to the authorities of the six institutions for allowing the use of their Institutions for this pilot programme.

Special appreciation also goes to the Director General of the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control (NAFDAC), Nigeria, the host agency for the programme, for the financial supplement that facilitated completion of monitoring of the programme, including the provision of secretarial services.

The CEM programme was made possible by a grant and training from the WHO Department of Essential Medicines and Health Products, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. The National Malaria Control Programme, Federal Ministry of Health (FMoH), Abuja and Society for Family Health Abuja-Nigeria, and Yakubu Gowon Centre Nigeria provided the programme drugs and long-lasting insecticide-treated mosquito nets for use as incentives plus travel subsidies for participants in the programme.

We acknowledge Dr. (Mrs.) Ogori Taylor, WHO Nigeria, Dr. BM Afolabi, Dr. Ntadam, the National Malaria Control Programme, Nigeria, and a host of others for their assistance in the training, sponsorship, and contributions to the project.

Dr. Pal is an employee of WHO, which partially funded the CEM programme.

Dr. Suku has received funds from the WHO to attend meetings to present the CEM work. Dr. Nyong received site coordinator honorarium from NAFDAC Nigeria for travel for review meetings in Abuja during the preparation for the study. Provisions of the ACTs were undertaken by the WHO, NAFDAC, and Federal Ministry of Health.

None of the other authors declared any conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Usman Bassi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 19 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bassi, P.U., Osakwe, A.I., Isah, A. et al. Safety of Artemisinin-Based Combination Therapies in Nigeria: A Cohort Event Monitoring Study. Drug Saf 36, 747–756 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-013-0044-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-013-0044-8

Keywords

Navigation