Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploratory Analysis of Modularization Strategy Based on the Theory of Constraints Thinking Process

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The search for competitiveness has led companies to increase the variety of products on offer in their portfolios with the aim of broadening their consumer market. However, there is a trade-off between increasing product variety and operational performance. Thus, the aim of this paper is to analyze the critical root causes that can prevent manufacturing companies from obtaining sustainable growth, by showing how modularization strategy can contribute in this area. In order to achieve the proposed objective, a bibliographical review was carried out for the topic, and an effect–cause–effect analysis was subsequently structured using the theory of constraints thinking process. From the main results, it was possible to identify that, besides the use of modularization strategy, supplier participation in the product development process needs to be considered, as well as defining constraints in the flow of production and postponing the definition of final products. Another contribution from the article is it presents an integrated effect–cause–effect analysis that lays out the contributions from modularization strategy. Adopting the strategy can contribute toward manufacturing companies obtaining sustainable growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonio, K. W. L., Richard, C. M. Y., & Tang, E. (2009). The complementarity of internal integration and product modularity: An empirical study of their interaction effect on competitive capabilities. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 26, 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2009.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonio, K. W. L., Yam, R. C. M., & Tang, E. (2007). The impacts of product modularity on competitive capabilities and performance: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 105, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.02.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asadi, N., Fundin, A., & Jackson, M. (2015). The essential constituents of flexible assembly systems: A case study in the heavy vehicle manufacturing industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 16, 235–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-015-0096-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan, J., & Cheng, C. H. (2005). The theory of constraints and the make-or-buy decision: An update and review. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41, 40–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (1997). Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 84–93.

  • Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000). Design rules (The Power of Modularity, v. 1). Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Barbosa, L. M., Lacerda, D. P., Piran, F. A. S., & Dresch, A. (2017). Exploratory analysis of the variables prevailing on the effects of product modularization on production volume and efficiency. International Journal of Production Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.08.028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, C. S. (2013). Traditional measures in finance and accounting, problems, literature review, and TOC measures. In J. F. Cox III & J. G. Schleier Jr. (Eds.), Theory of constraints handbook (1st ed., pp. 335–371). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabigiosu, A., Zirpoli, F., & Camuffo, A. (2013). Modularity, interfaces definition and the integration of external sources of innovation in the automotive industry. Research Policy, 42, 662–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, A. K., & Balakrishnan, N. (2007). Achieving product variety through optimal choice of module variations. IIE Transactions (Institute of Industrial Engineering), 33, 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010896517590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S., & Yeh, T. (2013). Optimal order quantity and product modularity for a two-echelon returnable supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 51, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K., & Liu, R. (2005). Interface strategies in modular product innovation. Technovation, 25, 771–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, L. B. M., & Godinho Filho, M. (2016). Lean healthcare: Review, classification and analysis of literature. Production Planning & Control, 27, 823–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2016.1143131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danese, P., & Filippini, R. (2010). Modularity and impact on new product development time performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30, 1191–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danese, P., & Filippini, R. (2013). Direct and mediated effects of product modularity on development time and product performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60, 260–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J., & Joglekar, N. (2013). Supply chain integration, product modularity, and market valuation: Evidence from the solar energy industry. Production and Operations Management, 22, 1494–1508. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekkers, R. (2006). Engineering management and the order entry point. International Journal of Production Research, 44, 4011–4025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, D. (2004). Rethinking the supply chain: An automotive perspective. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 9, 102–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, G., Jiao, R. J., & Chen, M. (2013). Joint optimization of product family configuration and scaling design by Stackelberg game. European Journal of Operational Research, 232, 330–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmaraghy, H., Schuh, G., Elmaraghy, W., Schönsleben, P., Tseng, M., & Bernard, A. (2013). Product variety management. CIRP Annnals-Manufacturing Technology, 62, 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2013.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, T., & Zhang, F. (2013). The impact of modular assembly on supply chain efficiency. Production and Operations Management, 23, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärtner, C., & Schön, O. (2016). Article information. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldratt, E. M. (2013). Introdução à TOC: minha visão. In J. F. Cox III, J. G. Schleier (Eds.), Handbook da teoria das restrições (pp. 3–9). Porto Alegre: Bookman.

  • Goldratt, E. M., & Cox, J. (2004). The goal: A process of ongoing improvement. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopp, W. J., & Xu, X. (2005). Product Line selection and pricing with modularity in design. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 7, 172–187. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1050.0077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifandoudas, P., & Gurd, B. (2010). Costing for decision-making in a theory of constraints environment. JAMAR, 8, 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman, R. A., Sale, M. L., & Green, K. W., Jr. (2009). Analysis of the relationships among TOC use, TOC outcomes, and organizational performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29, 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570910945819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M., Droge, C., Vickery, S. K., & Calantone, R. (2011). Product and process modularity’s effects on manufacturing agility and firm growth performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., Mabin, V. J., & Davies, J. (2008). The theory of constraints thinking processes: Retrospect and prospect. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28, 155–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570810846883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan, V., & Ramachandran, K. (2011). Integrated product architecture and pricing for managing sequential innovation. Management Science, 57, 2040–2053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacerda, D. P., Cassel, R. A., & Rodrigues, L. H. (2010). Service process analysis using process engineering and the theory of constraints thinking process. Business Process Management Journal, 16, 264–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. N. (2002). Modularity in technology and organization. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 49, 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00056-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, A. K. W., Yam, R. C. M., & Tang, E. P. Y. (2010). Supply chain integration and product modularity: An empirical study of product performance for selected Hong Kong manufacturing industries. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30, 20–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabin, V. J., Davies, J. (2013). O processo de pensamento da TOC: sua natureza e utilização—reflexões e consolidação. In J. F. Cox III, J. G. Schleier (Eds.), Handbook da teoria das restrições (1st ed., p. 1206). Bookman: Porto Alegre.

  • Mikkola, J. R., & Gassmann, O. (2003). Managing modularity of product architectures: toward an integrated theory. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50, 204–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morandi, M. I. W. M., & Camargo, L. F. R. (2015). Revisão sistemática da literatura. In A. Dresch, D. P. Lacerda, J. A. V. Antunes Jr. (Eds.), Design science research: Método de pesquisa para avanço da ciência e tecnologia (pp. 141–175). Porto Alegre: Bookman.

  • Negrão, L. L. L., Godinho Filho, M., & Marodin, G. (2017). Lean practices and their effect on performance: A literature review. Production Planning & Control, 28, 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2016.1231853.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P. C., & Jayaram, J. (2014). The antecedents and consequences of product variety in new ventures: An empirical study. Journal of Operations Management, 32, 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2013.07.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perona, M., & Miragliotta, G. (2004). Complexity management and supply chain performance assessment. A field study and a conceptual framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 90, 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pine, B. J. (1993). Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piran, F. A. S., Lacerda, D. P., Antunes, J. A., Jr., Viero, C. F., & Dresch, A. (2015). Modularization strategy: analysis of published articles on production and operations management (1999–2013). The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8221-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piran, F. A. S., Lacerda, D. P., Camargo, L. F. R., Viero, C. F., Dresch, A., & Cauchick-Miguel, P. A. (2016a). Product modularization and effects on efficiency: An analysis of a bus manufacturer using data envelopment analysis (DEA). International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piran, F. A. S., Lacerda, D. P., Camargo, L. F. R., Viero, C. F., & Dresch, A. (2016b). Product modularity and its effects on the production process: an analysis in a bus manufacturer. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 84, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8906-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, K., & Krishnan, V. (2008). Design architecture and introduction timing for rapidly improving industrial products. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10, 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.1060.0143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D., & Ulrich, K. T. (1998). Planning for product platforms. Sloan Management Review, 39(4), 19–31.

  • Salvador, F., Forza, C., & Rungtusanatham, M. (2002). Modularity, product variety, production volume, and component sourcing: Theorizing beyond generic prescriptions. Journal of Operations Management, 20, 549–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(02)00027-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheinkopf, L. J. (1999). Thinking for a change: Putting the TOC thinking process to use. Boca Raton: St Lucie Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D., & Herman, J. (2010). Resolving measurement/performance dilemmas. In J. F. Cox III & J. G. Schleier Jr. (Eds.), Theory of constraints handbook (1st ed., pp. 373–401). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Z., & Kusiak, A. (2010). Mining Pareto-optimal modules for delayed product differentiation. European Journal of Operational Research, 201, 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.02.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa, M. E., Mihm, J., & Browning, T. R. (2013). Linking cyclicality and product quality. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 15, 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2013.0432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, M. K. (1965). Modular production: A new concept. Harvard Business Review, 3, 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teich, E., & Claus, T. (2017). Measurement of load and capacity flexibility in manufacturing. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 18, 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-017-0165-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. J., & Warsking, D. P. (2007). A periodic inventory model for stocking modular components. Production and Operations Management, 16, 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00263.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsou, C.-M. (2013). On the strategy of supply chain collaboration based on dynamic inventory target level management: A theory of constraint perspective. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 37, 5204–5214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsvetskova, A., & Gustafsson, M. (2012). Business models for industrial ecosystems: A modular approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 29–30, 246–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, Q., Vonderembse, M. A., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Ragu-Nathan, B. (2004). Measuring modularity-based manufacturing practices and their impact on mass customization capability: A customer-driven perspective. Decision Sciences, 35, 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulku, S., Dimofte, C. V., & Schmidt, G. M. (2012). Consumer valuation of modularly upgradeable products. Management Science, 58, 1761–1776. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, S. K., Bolumole, Y. A., Castel, M. J., & Calantone, R. J. (2015a). The effects of product modularity on launch speed. International Journal of Production Research, 53, 5369–5381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery, S. K., Koufteros, X., Dröge, C., & Calantone, R. (2015b). Product modularity, process modularity, and new product introduction performance: Does complexity matter? Production and Operations Management, 25, 751–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worren, N., Moore, K., & Cardona, P. (2002). Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: A study of the home appliance industry. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1123–1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos – UNISINOS, Av. Unisinos, 950 – Bairro Cristo Rei, São Leopoldo, RS, CEP 93.022-000, Brazil

    Fabricio Eidelwein, Fabio Antonio Sartori Piran, Daniel Pacheco Lacerda & Aline Dresch

  2. Instituto de Estudos Sistêmicos do Brasil, Porto Alegre, Brazil

    Luis Henrique Rodrigues

Authors
  1. Fabricio Eidelwein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fabio Antonio Sartori Piran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Pacheco Lacerda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aline Dresch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Luis Henrique Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aline Dresch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eidelwein, F., Piran, F.A.S., Lacerda, D.P. et al. Exploratory Analysis of Modularization Strategy Based on the Theory of Constraints Thinking Process. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 19, 111–122 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-017-0177-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-017-0177-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation