Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Update on the Massive Transfusion Guidelines on Hemorrhagic Shock: After the Wars

  • Trauma Surgery (J. Diaz, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Surgery Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the past decade, crystalloid- and red blood cell-dominated massive resuscitation practices have largely been replaced with high-ratio transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells (RBCs) in massively bleeding trauma patients. Literature from military and civilian experiences with massive transfusion (MT) was reviewed, beginning with military transfusion practices at the onset of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and continuing through to present day. Early and balanced resuscitation (1:1:1 ratio of plasma, platelets, and RBCs) is superior to crystalloid- or red blood cell-driven resuscitation. Military research from Afghanistan and Iraq stimulated civilian investigations into ratio-based MT. 1:1:1 resuscitation carries the most benefit for massively bleeding trauma patients. Thrombelastography-guided MT can be used to supplement empiric 1:1:1 therapy in order to detect and address specific coagulopathies. Future directions in MT research presently include resuscitation with fresh whole blood and pre-hospital plasma-based resuscitation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Perkins JG, Cap AP, Spinella PC, et al. An evaluation of the impact of apheresis platelets used in the setting of massively transfused trauma patients. J Trauma. 2009;66(4 Suppl):S77–84 discussion S84–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cosgriff N, Moore EE, Sauaia A, Kenny-Moynihan M, Burch JM, Galloway B. Predicting life-threatening coagulopathy in the massively transfused trauma patient: Hypothermia and acidoses revisited. J Trauma. 1997;42(5):857–61 discussion 861–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McLaughlin DF, Niles SE, Salinas J, et al. A predictive model for massive transfusion in combat casualty patients. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2008;64(2 Suppl):S57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sauaia A, Moore FA, Moore EE, et al. Epidemiology of trauma deaths: a reassessment. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 1995;38(2):185–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bellamy RF, Maningas PA, Vayer JS. Epidemiology of trauma: military experience. Ann Emerg Med. 1986;15(12):1384–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peng R, Chang C, Gilmore D, Bongard F. Epidemiology of immediate and early trauma deaths at an urban level I trauma center. Am Surg. 1998;64(10):950–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pidcoke HF, Aden JK, Mora AG, et al. Ten-year analysis of transfusion in operation Iraqi freedom and operation enduring freedom: increased plasma and platelet use correlates with improved survival. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S445–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen MJ. Towards hemostatic resuscitation: the changing understanding of acute traumatic biology, massive bleeding, and damage-control resuscitation. Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92(4):877–91, viii.

  9. Malone DL, Hess JR, Fingerhut A. Massive transfusion practices around the globe and a suggestion for a common massive transfusion protocol. J Trauma. 2006;60(6 Suppl):S91–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001-2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kashuk JL, Moore EE, Millikan JS, Moore JB. Major abdominal vascular trauma–a unified approach. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 1982;22(8):672–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sihler KC, Napolitano LM. Massive transfusion: new insights. Chest. 2009;136(6):1654–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Simmons RL, Heisterkamp CA 3rd, Collins JA, Bredenburg CE, Martin AM. Acute pulmonary edema in battle casualties. J Trauma. 1969;9(9):760–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. • Schreiber MA, Meier EN, Tisherman SA, et al. A controlled resuscitation strategy is feasible and safe in hypotensive trauma patients: results of a prospective randomized pilot trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(4):687–95; discussion 695–7. A prospective, randomized pilot trial comparing controlled resuscitation to standard resuscitation that demonstrated that controlled pre-hospital resuscitation conferred an early survival advantage to blunt trauma patients.

  15. Cotton BA, Guy JS, Morris JA Jr, Abumrad NN. The cellular, metabolic, and systemic consequences of aggressive fluid resuscitation strategies. Shock. 2006;26(2):115–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brandstrup B, Tonnesen H, Beier-Holgersen R, et al. Effects of intravenous fluid restriction on postoperative complications: comparison of two perioperative fluid regimens: a randomized assessor-blinded multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2003;238(5):641–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kerger H, Saltzman DJ, Menger MD, Messmer K, Intaglietta M. Systemic and subcutaneous microvascular Po2 dissociation during 4-h hemorrhagic shock in conscious hamsters. Am J Physiol. 1996;270(3 Pt 2):H827–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen MJ, Call M, Nelson M, et al. Critical role of activated protein C in early coagulopathy and later organ failure, infection and death in trauma patients. Ann Surg. 2012;255(2):379–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Belmont PJ Jr, McCriskin BJ, Sieg RN, Burks R, Schoenfeld AJ. Combat wounds in Iraq and Afghanistan from 2005 to 2009. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(1):3–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Borgman MA, Spinella PC, Perkins JG, et al. The ratio of blood products transfused affects mortality in patients receiving massive transfusions at a combat support hospital. J Trauma. 2007;63(4):805–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Spinella PC, Perkins JG, Grathwohl KW, et al. Effect of plasma and red blood cell transfusions on survival in patients with combat related traumatic injuries. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2008;64(2 Suppl):S69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Simmons JW, White CE, Eastridge BJ, Mace JE, Wade CE, Blackbourne LH. Impact of policy change on US army combat transfusion practices. J Trauma. 2010;69(Suppl 1):S75–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Snyder CW, Weinberg JA, McGwin G Jr, et al. The relationship of blood product ratio to mortality: survival benefit or survival bias? J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 2009;66(2):358–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Magnotti LJ, Zarzaur BL, Fischer PE, et al. Improved survival after hemostatic resuscitation: does the emperor have no clothes? J Trauma. 2011;70(1):97–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Scalea TM, Bochicchio KM, Lumpkins K, et al. Early aggressive use of fresh frozen plasma does not improve outcome in critically injured trauma patients. Ann Surg. 2008;248(4):578–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. •• Holcomb JB, del Junco DJ, Fox EE, et al. The prospective, observational, multicenter, major trauma transfusion (PROMMTT) study: comparative effectiveness of a time-varying treatment with competing risks. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(2):127–36. A large prospective, observational study comparing blood component resuscitation ratios and outcomes that demonstrated a reduction in mortality among patients who received higher plasma and platelet ratios.

  27. •• Holcomb JB, Tilley BC, Baraniuk S, et al. Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(5):471–82. A randomized, controlled trial comparing 1:1:1 to 1:1:2 resuscitation that demonstrated that patients receiving 1:1:1 achieved hemostasis more frequently and experienced fewer early deaths due to hemorrhage.

  28. Haider AH, Piper LC, Zogg CK, et al. Military-to-civilian translation of battlefield innovations in operative trauma care. Surgery. 2015;158(6):1686–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kutcher ME, Kornblith LZ, Narayan R, et al. A paradigm shift in trauma resuscitation: evaluation of evolving massive transfusion practices. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(9):834–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Camazine MN, Hemmila MR, Leonard JC, et al. Massive transfusion policies at trauma centers participating in the american college of surgeons trauma quality improvement program. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(6 Suppl 1):S48–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Novak DJ, Bai Y, Cooke RK, et al. Making thawed universal donor plasma available rapidly for massively bleeding trauma patients: experience from the pragmatic, randomized optimal platelets and plasma ratios (PROPPR) trial. Transfusion. 2015;55(6):1331–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Riskin DJ, Tsai TC, Riskin L, et al. Massive transfusion protocols: the role of aggressive resuscitation versus product ratio in mortality reduction. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(2):198–205.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Radwan ZA, Bai Y, Matijevic N, et al. An emergency department thawed plasma protocol for severely injured patients. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(2):170–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Holcomb JB, Pati S. Optimal trauma resuscitation with plasma as the primary resuscitative fluid: the surgeon’s perspective. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2013;2013:656–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Stubbs JR, Zielinski MD, Berns KS, et al. How we provide thawed plasma for trauma patients. Transfusion. 2015;55(8):1830–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Khan S, Allard S, Weaver A, Barber C, Davenport R, Brohi K. A major haemorrhage protocol improves the delivery of blood component therapy and reduces waste in trauma massive transfusion. Injury. 2013;44(5):587–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Nascimento B, Callum J, Tien H, et al. Effect of a fixed-ratio (1:1:1) transfusion protocol versus laboratory-results-guided transfusion in patients with severe trauma: a randomized feasibility trial. CMAJ. 2013;185(12):E583–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Balvers K, Coppens M, van Dieren S, et al. Effects of a hospital-wide introduction of a massive transfusion protocol on blood product ratio and blood product waste. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2015;8(4):199–204.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Zink KA, Sambasivan CN, Holcomb JB, Chisholm G, Schreiber MA. A high ratio of plasma and platelets to packed red blood cells in the first 6 hours of massive transfusion improves outcomes in a large multicenter study. Am J Surg. 2009;197(5):565–70 discussion 570.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nunez TC, Voskresensky IV, Dossett LA, Shinall R, Dutton WD, Cotton BA. Early prediction of massive transfusion in trauma: simple as ABC (assessment of blood consumption)? J Trauma. 2009;66(2):346–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Callcut RA, Cripps MW, Nelson MF, Conroy AS, Robinson BB, Cohen MJ. The massive transfusion score as a decision aid for resuscitation: learning when to turn the massive transfusion protocol on and off. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(3):450–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. • Savage SA, Zarzaur BL, Croce MA, Fabian TC. Redefining massive transfusion when every second counts. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(2):396–400; discussion 400–2. A study comparing the CAT to the traditional MT definition that found that CAT allowed for early identification of critically ill patients.

  43. •• Holcomb JB, Minei KM, Scerbo ML, et al. Admission rapid thrombelastography can replace conventional coagulation tests in the emergency department: experience with 1974 consecutive trauma patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256(3):476–86. A study comparing accuracy and feasibility of using rapid-TEG in the trauma bay to manage massively bleeding patients that found that r-TEG data was superior to conventional coagulation assay data and advocated for the replacement of conventional coagulation testing with r-TEG in trauma patient management.

  44. • Whiting D, DiNardo JA. TEG and ROTEM: technology and clinical applications. Am J Hematol. 2014;89(2):228–32. An excellent review of thrombelastography, from the basic mechanistic features of the test to interpretation of the results.

  45. Plotkin AJ, Wade CE, Jenkins DH, et al. A reduction in clot formation rate and strength assessed by thrombelastography is indicative of transfusion requirements in patients with penetrating injuries. J Trauma. 2008;64(2 Suppl):S64–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kornblith LZ, Kutcher ME, Redick BJ, Calfee CS, Vilardi RF, Cohen MJ. Fibrinogen and platelet contributions to clot formation: Implications for trauma resuscitation and thromboprophylaxis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76(2):255–6 discussion 262–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Hagemo JS, Christiaans SC, Stanworth SJ, et al. Detection of acute traumatic coagulopathy and massive transfusion requirements by means of rotational thromboelastometry: an international prospective validation study. Crit Care. 2015;19:97. doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0823-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. •• Gonzalez E, Moore EE, Moore HB, et al. Goal-directed hemostatic resuscitation of trauma-induced coagulopathy: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial comparing a viscoelastic assay to conventional coagulation assays. Ann Surg. 2015. A study comparing TEG-guided MT to conventional coagulation testing-guided MT that found that TEG-guided MT improved survival and resulted in less product utilization in early resuscitative efforts.

  49. •• Tapia NM, Chang A, Norman M, et al. TEG-guided resuscitation is superior to standardized MTP resuscitation in massively transfused penetrating trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(2):378–85; discussion 385–6. A study comparing TEG-guided MT to 1:1:1-guided MT that found that 1:1:1 therapy may not be sufficient in all patients.

  50. Hejl CG, Martinaud C, Macarez R, et al. The implementation of a multinational “walking blood bank” in a combat zone: the experience of a health service team deployed to a medical treatment facility in Afghanistan. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(5):949–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Auten JD, Lunceford NL, Horton JL, et al. The safety of early fresh, whole blood transfusion among severely battle injured at US marine corps forward surgical care facilities in Afghanistan. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(5):790–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Nessen SC, Eastridge BJ, Cronk D, et al. Fresh whole blood use by forward surgical teams in Afghanistan is associated with improved survival compared to component therapy without platelets. Transfusion. 2013;53(Suppl 1):107S–13S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Spinella PC, Perkins JG, Grathwohl KW, Beekley AC, Holcomb JB. Warm fresh whole blood is independently associated with improved survival for patients with combat-related traumatic injuries. J Trauma. 2009;66(4 Suppl):S69–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Spinella PC, Perkins JG, Grathwohl KW, et al. Risks associated with fresh whole blood and red blood cell transfusions in a combat support hospital. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(11):2576–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. • Cotton BA, Podbielski J, Camp E, et al. A randomized controlled pilot trial of modified whole blood versus component therapy in severely injured patients requiring large volume transfusions. Ann Surg. 2013;258(4):527–32; discussion 532–3. A pilot study comparing component therapy to modified whole blood therapy that found that the use of modified whole blood reduced transfusion volumes among trauma patients without severe TBI.

  56. Jenkins DH, Rappold JF, Badloe JF, et al. Trauma hemostasis and oxygenation research position paper on remote damage control resuscitation: definitions, current practice, and knowledge gaps. Shock. 2014;41(Suppl 1):3–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Holcomb JB, Donathan DP, Cotton BA, et al. Prehospital transfusion of plasma and red blood cells in trauma patients. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2015;19(1):1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. • Brown JB, Cohen MJ, Minei JP, et al. Pretrauma center red blood cell transfusion is associated with reduced mortality and coagulopathy in severely injured patients with blunt trauma. Ann Surg. 2015;261(5):997–1005. A study comparing patients who received pre-hospital RBC transfusions to patients who did not receive transfusion; after propensity-score matching, patients receiving RBCs before arrival were found to have a lower risk of 24-hr and 30-d mortality.

  59. Brown JB, Sperry JL, Fombona A, Billiar TR, Peitzman AB, Guyette FX. Pre-trauma center red blood cell transfusion is associated with improved early outcomes in air medical trauma patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220(5):797–808.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Van PY, Cho SD, Underwood SJ, Morris MS, Watters JM, Schreiber MA. Thrombelastography versus AntiFactor xa levels in the assessment of prophylactic-dose enoxaparin in critically ill patients. J Trauma. 2009;66(6):1509–15 discussion 1515–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Trauma, Critical Care & Acute Care Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, L611, Portland, OR, 97239, USA

    Phillip M. Kemp Bohan, John D. Yonge & Martin A. Schreiber

Authors
  1. Phillip M. Kemp Bohan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John D. Yonge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin A. Schreiber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Phillip M. Kemp Bohan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Mr. Kemp Bohan, Dr. Yonge, and Dr. Schreiber declare no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Trauma Surgery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kemp Bohan, P.M., Yonge, J.D. & Schreiber, M.A. Update on the Massive Transfusion Guidelines on Hemorrhagic Shock: After the Wars. Curr Surg Rep 4, 16 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-016-0137-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40137-016-0137-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation