Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Diagnostic relevance of simultaneous testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae

  • Clinical and Epidemiological Study
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infection in a Swiss cohort among individuals consulting for screening or symptomatic reasons is not very well known.

Methods

Between January 2009 and January 2010, diagnostic samples referred to us to test for either CT or NG or both were simultaneously analysed for both infections. Testing was performed using the commercial m2000sp and m2000rt devices from Abbott Diagnostics involving automated DNA extraction and semi-quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), respectively.

Results

A total of 9,245 individuals (8,009 female, 1,236 male) were tested. CT alone was found in 318 (3.97%) samples from female patients and NG infections were found in 5 (0.06%) of the female samples. Six (0.08%) women had both CT and NG infections. The numbers for males were 72 (5.83%) for CT alone, 18 (1.14%) for NG alone and 8 (0.65%) for coincident infections. Among women, a selective testing approach in which only the presence of CT was investigated missed six NG cases (0.07% prevalence, 54.55% of all NG-positive women) and the request to test only for NG missed two CT cases (0.02% prevalence, 0.62% of all CT-positive women). For the male samples, one NG case (0.08% prevalence, 3.85% of all NG-positive men) was missed when only CT was requested and three CT cases (0.24% prevalence, 3.75% of all CT-positive men) were overlooked when only NG testing was requested.

Conclusion

A sizeable number (12) of CT and NG cases is missed by physician-referred testing for only one of the two pathogens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ratcliff RM, Chang G, Kok T, Sloots TP. Molecular diagnosis of medical viruses. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2007;9:87–102.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Olshen E, Shrier LA. Diagnostic tests for chlamydial and gonorrheal infections. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2005;16:192–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Pfaller MA, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. 9th ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paget WJ, Zbinden R, Ritzler E, Zwahlen M, Lengeler C, Stürchler D, et al. National laboratory reports of Chlamydia trachomatis seriously underestimate the frequency of genital chlamydial infections among women in Switzerland. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29:715–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baud D, Jaton K, Bertelli C, Kulling JP, Greub G. Low prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic young Swiss men. BMC Infect Dis. 2008;8:45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson JS, Honey E, Templeton A, Paavonen J, Mardh J, Stray-Pedersen B; EU Biomed Concerted Action Group. A systematic review of the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis among European women. Hum Reprod Uptdate. 2002;8:385–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Colliers A, Verster A, Van Puyenbroeck K, Stalpaert M, Van Royen P, Verhoeven V. Screening Belgian university students for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: a feasibility study. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2009;21:343–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Low N, Bender N, Nartey L, Shang A, Stephenson JM. Effectiveness of chlamydia screening: systematic review. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38:435–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Haugland S, Thune T, Fosse B, Wentzel-Larsen T, Hjelmevoll SO, Myrmel H. Comparing urine samples and cervical swabs for Chlamydia testing in a female population by means of Strand Displacement Assay (SDA). BMC Womens Health. 2010;10:9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Whiley DM, Tapsall JW, Sloots TP. Nucleic acid amplification testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: an ongoing challenge. J Mol Diagn. 2006;8:3–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Marshall R, Chernesky M, Jang D, Hook EW, Cartwright CP, Howell-Adams B, et al. Characteristics of the m2000 automated sample preparation and multiplex real-time PCR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:747–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Whiley DM, Garland SM, Harnett G, Lum G, Smith DW, Tabrizi SN, et al. Exploring ‘best practice’ for nucleic acid detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Sex Health. 2008;5:17–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weinstock HS, Bolan GA, Kohn R, Balladares C, Back A, Oliva G. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women: a need for universal screening in high prevalence populations? Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135:41–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Böhm I, Gröning A, Sommer B, Müller HW, Krawczak M, Glaubitz R. A German Chlamydia trachomatis screening program employing semi-automated real-time PCR: results and perspectives. J Clin Virol. 2009;46:S27–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ebrahim SH, McKenna MT, Marks JS. Sexual behaviour: related adverse health burden in the United States. Sex Transm Infect. 2005;81:38–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Steiner AS, Haller DM, Elger BS, Sebo P, Gaspoz JM, Wolff H. Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a Swiss prison: a cross sectional study. Swiss Med Wkly. 2010;140:w13126.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the expeditious support by the laboratory technicians of the microbial section at the Labormedizinisches Zentrum Dr. Risch.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Labormedizinisches Zentrum Dr. Risch, Waldeggstrasse 37, 3097, Liebefeld-Bern, Switzerland

    B. Sakem, R. Michel, U. E. Nydegger, D. Radjenovic, M. Wydler, M. Risch & L. Risch

Authors
  1. B. Sakem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Michel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. U. E. Nydegger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. Radjenovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Wydler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Risch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. L. Risch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. E. Nydegger.

Additional information

B. Sakem and R. Michel contributed equally to this paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sakem, B., Michel, R., Nydegger, U.E. et al. Diagnostic relevance of simultaneous testing for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae . Infection 39, 231–237 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-011-0110-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-011-0110-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation