Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Potential biosorbents for treatment of chromium(VI)-contaminated water discharged into Asopos River

  • Review
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study reports on the preliminary investigation of three low-cost natural materials with respect to their chromium(VI) removal efficiency from contaminated water. The tested materials were reed, in milled and chopped form, compost, and dewatered sludge from a municipal wastewater treatment plant. The chromium(VI) removal capacity of the aforementioned materials was investigated by simulating the physicochemical conditions prevailing in a stormwater outfall flowing into the Asopos River in Inofyta, Central Greece. Thus, batch and column experiments were carried out using solutions of 3–5 mg/L chromium(VI) and pH value 8.5 ± 0.5. The results showed that the tested materials were capable of removing 3 mg/L chromium(VI), however by allowing different contact times for each material. The chromium(VI) removal kinetics were studied through batch experiments, and reed was found to be the most efficient material. Therefore, at a second series of batch and up-flow column experiments, the effect of the liquid-to-solid ratio, pH, and contact time on chromium(VI) removal using chopped reed was investigated. Chromium(VI) removal took place through both reduction and adsorption mechanisms, while the released soluble organic matter from reed seemed to favor the reduction mechanism. As a result, reed is a potential biosorbent capable of treating heavily chromium(VI)-contaminated water flows, although a high mass of reed is required for a treatment process, such in the case of the stormwater discharged into Asopos River.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksu Z, Gonen F, Demircan Z (2002) Biosorption of chromium(VI) ions by Mowital®B30H resin immobilized activated sludge in a packed bed: comparison with granular activated carbon. Process Biochem 38(2):175–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aoyama M (2003) Comment on biosorption of chromium(VI) from aqueous solution by cone biomass of pinus sylvestris. Bioresource Technol 89(3):317–318

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey SE, Olin TJ, Bricka RM, Adrian DD (1999) A review of potentially low-cost sorbents for heavy metals. Water Res 33(11):2469–2479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boni MR, Sbaffoni S (2009) The potential of compost-based biobarriers for Cr(VI) removal from contaminated groundwater: column test. J Hazard Mater 166(2–3):1087–1095

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JM, Hao OJ (1996) Environmental factors and modeling in microbial chromium(VI) reduction. Water Environ Res 68(7):1156–1164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dermatas D, Meng X (2003) Utilization of fly ash for stabilization/solidification of heavy metal contaminated soils. Eng Geol 70(3–4):377–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elangovan R, Philip L, Chandraraj K (2008) Biosorption of chromium species by aquatic weeds: kinetics and mechanism studies. J Hazard Mater 152(1):100–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fendorf SE (1995) Surface reactions of chromium in soils and waters. Geoderma 67(1–2):55–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fu F, Wang Q (2011) Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: a review. J Environ Manag 92(3):407–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Garg VK, Gupta R, Kumar R, Gupta RK (2004) Adsorption of chromium from aqueous solution on treated sawdust. Bioresource Technol 92(1):79–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasan SH, Singh KK, Prakash O, Talat M, Ho YS (2008) Removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions using agricultural waste ‘maize bran’. J Hazard Mater 152(1):356–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CP, Bowers AR (1978) The use of activated carbon for chromium(VI) removal. Prog Water Technol 10(5–6):45–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JI, Zoltek J Jr (1977) Chromium removal with activated carbon. Prog Water Technol 9:143–155

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Yue Q, Gao B, Li Q, Li C (2008) Adsorption thermodynamic and kinetic studies of dissolved chromium onto humic acids. Colloids Surf B 65(1):25–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan D, Pittman CU Jr (2006) Activated carbons and low cost adsorbents for the remediation of tri- and hexavalent chromium from water. J Hazard Mater 137(2):762–811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Namasivayam C, Sureshkumar MV (2008) Removal of chromium(VI) from water and wastewater using surfactant modified coconut coir pith as a biosorbent. Bioresource Technol 99(7):2218–2225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nourbakhsh M, Sag Y, Ozer D, Aksu Z, Kutsal T, Caglar A (1994) A comparative study of various biosorbents for removal of chromium(VI) ions from industrial waste waters. Process Biochem 29(1):1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oze C, Bird DK, Fendorf S (2007) Genesis of hexavalent chromium from natural sources in soil and groundwater. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(16):6544–6549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park D, Yun Y-S, Hye Jo J, Park JM (2005) Mechanism of hexavalent chromium removal by dead fungal biomass of aspergillus niger. Water Res 39(4):533–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park D, Yun Y-S, Park JM (2006) Comment on the removal mechanism of hexavalent chromium by biomaterials or biomaterial-based activated carbons. Ind Eng Chem Res 45(7):2405–2407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Park D, Lim S-R, Yun Y-S, Park JM (2007) Reliable evidences that the removal mechanism of hexavalent chromium by natural biomaterials is adsorption-coupled reduction. Chemosphere 70(2):298–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raval NP, Shah PU, Shah NK (2016) Adsorptive removal of nickel(II) ions from aqueous environment: a review. J Environ Manag 179:1–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rawajfih Z, Nsour N (2008) Thermodynamic analysis of sorption isotherms of chromium(VI) anionic species on reed biomass. J Chem Thermodyn 40(5):846–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Remoudaki E, Hatzikioseyian A, Kaltsa F, Tsezos M (2003) The role of metal-organic complexes in the treatment of chromium containing effluents in biological reactors. In: Proceedings of the 15th international biohydrometallurgy symposium (IBS 2003), Athens, Hellas, 14–19 September 2003

  • Saha B, Orvig C (2010) Biosorbents for hexavalent chromium elimination from industrial and municipal effluents. Coord Chem Rev 254(23–24):2959–2972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shah PU, Raval NP, Shah NK (2015) Adsorption of copper from an aqueous solution by chemically modified cassava starch. J Mater Environ Sci 6(9):2573–2582

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanker A, Cervantes C, Lozatavera H, Avudainayagam S (2005) Chromium toxicity in plants. Environ Int 31(5):739–753

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sudha Bai R, Abraham TE (2003) Studies on chromium (VI) adsorption-desorption using immobilized fungal biomass. Bioresour Technol 87(1):17–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas C, Brandao PFB, Agreda J, Castillo E (2012) Bioadsorption using compost: an alternative for removal of chromium (VI) from aqueous solutions. BioResources 7(3):2711–2727

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2003) Chromium in drinking-water, Background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality (originally published in Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 2nd edn. Vol 2. Health criteria and other supporting information. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1996)

  • Wu J, Zhang H, He P-J, Yao Q, Shao L-M (2010) Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution by dried activated sludge biomass. J Hazard Mater 176(1–3):697–703

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the LIFE + CHARM project (LIFE10 ENV/GR/000601).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Zografou Campus, 9 Iroon Polytexneiou Str., 15780, Zografou, Athens, Greece

    I. Lagiopoulos, A. Binteris, Τ. Mpouras & D. Dermatas

  2. ENYDRON - Environmental Protection Services, 1 Ipirou Str., 104 33, Athens, Greece

    I. Panagiotakis

  3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, 261 Glenbrook Road, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA

    M. Chrysochoou

Authors
  1. I. Lagiopoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Binteris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Τ. Mpouras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. Panagiotakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Chrysochoou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D. Dermatas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Lagiopoulos.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Tanmoy Karak.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 67 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lagiopoulos, I., Binteris, A., Mpouras, Τ. et al. Potential biosorbents for treatment of chromium(VI)-contaminated water discharged into Asopos River. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 14, 1481–1488 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1254-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1254-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation