Skip to main content
Log in

Forced degradation study with a developed and validated RP-HPLC method for determination of cefpodoxime proxetil in the bulk and finished pharmaceutical products

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aimed to develop an HPLC method of Cfp analysis which enjoyed highly linearity, repeatability, robustness, ruggedness, selectivity, rapidly, and economic to use. The chromatographic method uses a column Inertsil ODS-3 (250 mm × 4.6 mm × 5 µm). The mobile phase consists of a mixture of acetonitrile: acetate buffer (4:6, v/v) at isocratic flow rate 1.5 mL/min with PDA detector at 240 nm, column oven adjusted at 30 °C, and injection volume 20 µL. The method revealed that satisfied linearity regression R2 (0.9998) with repeatability (0.77%) with LOD and LOQ: 1.102 µg/mL and 3.340 µg/mL respectively. The method showed a successful application of analytical method validation for Cfp in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Cfp:

Cefpodoxime proxetil

Cfp S:

Cefpodoxime S isomer

Cfp R:

Cefpodoxime R isomer

HPLC:

High-performance liquid chromatography.

PDA:

Photodiode array detector

UV:

Ultraviolet

FT-IR:

Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy

EP:

European Pharmacopeia

USP:

United States Pharmacopeia

LOD:

Limit of detection

LOQ:

Limit of quantitation

Conc:

Concentration

P. A:

Peak area

STDEV:

Standard deviation

RSD:

Relative standard deviation

References

  1. D. Patle, A.R. Rote, Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 5, 4769 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.R. Acharya, D.B. Patel, Indian. J. Pharm. Sci. 75, 31 (2013)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. M.J. Wang, W.B. Zou, J. Xue, C.Q. Hu, Chromatographia 65, 69 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. V.K. Kakumanu, V.K. Arora, A.K. Bansal, J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed Life Sci. 835, 16 (2006)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Malathi, R.N. Dubey, R. Venkatnarayanan, Indian. J. Pharm. Sci. 71, 102 (2009)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. R.P. Kotkar, A.A. Shirkhedkar, S.J. Surana, Int. J. Res. Pharm. Biomed. Sci. 3, 156 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. B.H. Darji, N.J. Shah, A.T. Patel, N.M. Patel, Indian. J. Pharm. Sci. 69, 331 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. P.S. Jain, A.J. Chaudhari, A.K. Bang, S.J. Surana, J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 4, 101 (2012)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. A.A. Ramadan, H. Mandil, R. Shamseh, Res. J. Pharm. Technol. 10, 843 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Sreekanth, C.H. Baburao, P. Ramalingam, S. Ganapaty, Asian J. Chem. 20, 3373 (2008)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. C.S. Chauhan, M.S. Ranawat, P.K. Choudhury, Asian J. Chem. 19, 3277 (2007)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Geddes, Drugs 42, 34 (1991)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. I. Ahmad, R. Bano, S.G. Musharraf, S. Ahmed, M.A. Sheraz, Q. Arfeen, M.S. Bhatti, Z. Shad, AAPS Pharmscitech 15, 1588 (2014)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Machado, A. Lange, V. Todeschini, N. Volpato, AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 15, 189 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. R.T. Addo, K. Davis, R. Ubale, J.S. Owen, E.B. Watkins, AAPS Pharm. Sci. Tech. 16, 30 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S.S. Mannemala, V. Kannappan, J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 12, 1325 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. G.A. Shabir, J. Validation Technol. 10, 314 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. ICH Steering Committee, ICH Q2B validation of analytical procedures: methodology, European agency for the evaluation of medicinal products, International commission on harmonisation, London (CPMP/ICH/281/95) (1996)

  19. P. Ravisankar, C.N. Navya, D. Pravallika, D.N. Sri, IOSR J. Pharm. 5, 7 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. European Medicines Agency, ICH Topic Q 2 (R1) Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology, pp 5–12 (1995)

  21. L. Huber, BioPharm 12, 64 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  22. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guidelines, Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, Q2(R1) (Switzerland, Geneva, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Vessman, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 14, 867 (1996)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. FDA, Analytical procedures, methods validation: chemistry, manufacturing and controls documentation, availability, Federal Reg. (Notices) 65 52776 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  25. European Pharmacopoeia, Appendix III chromatographic separation techniques, Ph. Eur. method 2.2.46, 7th edition 17 (2013)

  26. C. Mathew, M. Ajitha, P. Sathesh Babu, Int. Sch. Rec. Netw. Chromatogr. 2013 (2013)

  27. M.F. Al-Hakkani, A rapid, developed and validated RP-HPLC method for determination of azithromycin. SN Appl. Sci. 1, 222 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0237-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author presents great thanks to Smart Pharma Company for supporting this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mostafa F. Al-Hakkani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Hakkani, M.F. Forced degradation study with a developed and validated RP-HPLC method for determination of cefpodoxime proxetil in the bulk and finished pharmaceutical products. J IRAN CHEM SOC 16, 1571–1578 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13738-019-01630-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13738-019-01630-5

Keyword

Navigation