Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of DEET on chemosensing of the honey bee and its parasite Varroa destructor

  • Original article
  • Published:
Apidologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman (Acari: Varroidae) is an obligatory ectoparasitic mite of honey bees. In view of limited success in mite control, the use of synthetic repellent was evaluated. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of common arthropod repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) on the chemosensing of the V. destructor and its hosts, the European honey bee (Apis mellifera L.), by electrophysiological and behavioural bioassays. In electrophysiological assays, the nurse headspace served as a positive stimulus for the V. destructor foreleg, whereas a queen headspace was used as a positive stimulus for honey bee antennae. Two effects of DEET on V. destructor host chemosensing were evaluated: short-term inhibition and long-term inhibition. The inhibition observed in the presence of DEET simultaneously with a positive stimulus was termed “short term inhibition”, while inhibition that occurred following the administration of the compound alone was termed “long term inhibition”. In V. destructor, DEET served as a long-term inhibitor to the response of the chemosensory organ to nurse bee headspace volatiles, whereas in honey bee, it caused short-term inhibition of antenna response to queen volatiles. Consistent with electrophysiological studies, DEET significantly inhibited host choice of mites, whereas even a 10 times higher dose did not alter honey bee behaviours (e.g. antennating, grooming, fanning etc.) or worker attraction to a queen. These data suggest that DEET may selectively disrupt the honey bee chemosensing of V. destructor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Carroll, J.F., Benante, J.P., Klun, J.A., White, C.E., Debboun, M., Pound, J.M., Dheranetra, W. (2008) Twelve-hour duration testing of cream formulations of three repellents against Amblyomma americanum. Med. Vet. Entomol. 22, 144–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A.M., Rubnik, W.L., Aguilar, J.I.C., Hellmich, R.L. (1996) Use of Insect Repellents for Dispersing Defending Honey Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 89, 608–613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corbel, V., Stankiewicz, M., Pennetier, C., Fournier, D., Stojan, J., Girard, E., Dimitrov, M., Molgó, J., Hougard, J.M., Lapied, B. (2009) Evidence for inhibition of cholinesterases in insect and mammalian nervous systems by the insect repellent Deet. BMC Biol. 47, 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Croset, V., Rytz, R., Cummins, S.F., Budd, A., Brawand, D., Kaessmann, H., Gibson, T.J., Benton, R. (2010) Ancient protostome origin of chemosensory ionotropic glutamate receptors and the evolution of insect taste and olfaction. PLoS Genet. 6, 1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Piccolo, F., Nazzi, F., Della Vedova, G., Milani, N. (2010) Selection of Apis mellifera workers by the parasitic mite Varroa destructor using host cuticular hydrocarbons. Parasitology 137, 967–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, J.S., Bohbot, J.D. (2013) Mini review: Mode of action of mosquito repellents. Pesticide Biochem Physiol. 106, 149–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dillier, F.X., Fluri, P., Imdorf, A. (2006) Review of the orientation behaviour in the bee parasitic mite Varroa destructor: sensory equipment and cell invasion behavior. Revue Suisse de Zoologie. 113, 857–877

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditzen, M., Pellegrino, M., Vosshall, B.L. (2008) Insect odorant receptors are molecular targets of the insect repellent DEET. Science 319, 1838–1842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eliash, N. (2012) Learning and disrupting the chemical communication of Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman. M.Sc. Thesis, Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel

  • Eliash, N., Singh K. N., Kamer Y., Plettner, E., Soroker, V. (2014) Can we disrupt the sensing of honey bees by the bee parasite Varroa destructor? PLoS One, in press

  • Esslen, J., Kaissling, K.E. (1976) ZahlundVerteilungantennalerSen- sillen beider Honigbiene (Apis mellifera L.). Zoomorphologie 83, 227–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fabbro, S.D., Nazzi, F. (2013) From Chemistry to Behavior. Molecular Structure and Bioactivity of Repellents against Ixodes ricinus Ticks. PLoS One 8, 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrewijn, P., van Oosten, A.M., Piron, P.G. (2001) Natural Terpenoids as Messengers: A Multidisciplinary Study of Their production, biological Functions and Practical Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers., Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Kain, P., Boyle, S.M., Tharadra, S.K., Guda, T., Pham, C., Dahanukar, A., Ray, A.(2013) Odour receptors and neurons for DEET and new insect repellents. Nature 502, 507–514

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klun, J.A., Khrimian, A., Debboun, M. (2006) Repellent and deterrent effects of SS220, Picaridin, and DEET suppress human blood feeding be Aedes aegypti, Anopheles stephensi, and Phlebotomus papatasi . J Med. Entomol. 43, 34–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, B. (1993) Preferences of Varroa jacobsoni for honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) of different ages. J Apic. Res. 32, 57–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Conte, Y., Arnold, G., Trouiller, J., Masson, C., Chappe, B., Ourisson, G. (1989) Attraction of the parasitic mite Varroa to the drone larvae of honey bees by simple aliphatic esters. Science 245, 638–639

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Kim, S.H., Montell, C. (2010) Avoiding DEET through insect gustatory receptors. Neuron 67, 5551–5561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S.J. (2001) Biology and life history of Varroa mites. In: Webster TC, Delaplane KS. (Eds.) Mites of the Honey Bee. Hamilton: Dadant Sons. pp. 131–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Missbach, C., Dweck, H.K., Vogel, H., Vilcinskae, A., Stensmyr, M.C., Hansson, B.S., Grosse-Wilde, E. (2014) Evolution of insect olfactory receptors. Elife 3, 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazzi, F., Milani, N., Vedova, G.D., Nimis, M. (2001) Semiochemicals from larval food affect the locomotory behaviour of Varroa destructor. Apidologie 32, 149–155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, M., Steinbach, N., Stensmyr, M.C., Hansson, B.S., Vosshall, L.B. (2011) A natural polymorphism alters odour and DEET sensitivity in an insect odorant receptor. Nature 478, 511–514

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pernal, S.F., Baird, D.S., Birmingham, A.L., Higo, H.A., Slessor, K.N., Winston, M.L. (2005) Semiochemicals influencing the host-finding behaviour of Varroa destructor. Exp Appl Acarol. 37,1–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plettner, E., Gries, R. (2010) Agonists and antagonists of antennal responses of gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) to the pheromone (+)-disparlure and other odorants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 3708–3719

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenkranz, P., Aumeier, P., Ziegelmann, B. (2010) Biology and control of Varroa destructor. J Invertebr. Pathol. 103, S96-S119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sandoz, J.C. (2011) Behavioral and neurophysiological study of olfactory perception and learning in honey bee. Front Syst Neurosci. 5,1-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J.O., Johnston, A.N., Ginter, D.L., Spangler, H.G. (2003) Olfactory stimulation of Africanized honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) attacks by insect repellents. J. Med. Entomol. 40, 275–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, A., Fritz, B., Weber, D., Wallner, K. (2007) A bee repellent endangers the quality of bee products. Apidologie 38, 495–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanczyk, N.M., Brookfield, J.F., Ignell, R., Logan, J.G., Field, L.M. (2010) Behavioral insensitivity to DEET in Aedes aegypti is a genetically determined trait residing in changes in sensillum function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 107, 8575–8580

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stanczyk, N.M., Brookfield, J.F., Field, L.M., Logan, J.G. (2013) Aedes aegypti mosquitoes exhibit decreased repellency by DEET following previous exposure. PLoS One 8, 1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syed, Z., Leal, W.S. (2008) Mosquitoes smell and avoid the insect repellent DEET. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 105, 13598–13603

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Torto, B., Carroll, M.J., Duehl, A., Fombong, A.T., Gozansky, T. K., Nazzi, F., Soroker, V., Teal, P.E.A. (2013) Standard methods for chemical ecology research in Apis mellifera. J. Apic. Res. 52, 1–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston, M.L. (1987) The Biology of the Honey Bee. Harvard University Press., Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Miss Yafit Brenner for providing us with dedicated program for behavioural analysis and Dr. Ada Rafaeli (Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center) for stimulating discussions during manuscript preparation. We also wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for the valuable comments and suggestions. This project was supported by the Jewish Charitable Association, grant no 131-1740, and subsequently by grant from the Chief Scientist Ministry of Agriculture, grant no. 131-1815. We are also thankful to the Agricultural Research Organization, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel for providing postdoctoral fellowship to Dr. Nitin Kumar Singh.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victoria Soroker.

Additional information

Effet du DEET sur la sensibilité chimique de l'abeille et de son parasite Varroa destructor

N,N-diéthyl-m-toulamide / Apis mellifera ligustica / électroantennogramme / essai biologique comportement / inhibition à court terme / inhibition à long terme

Der Effekt von DEET auf die Chemosensorik von Honigbienen und ihrem Parasiten Varroa destructor

N,N-Diethyl-m-Toulamid / Apis mellifera ligustica / Elektroantennogramm / Verhaltensbiotest / Kurzzeit-Inhibition / Langzeit-Inhibition

Manuscript editor: Peter Rosenkranz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, N.K., Eliash, N., Kamer, Y. et al. The effect of DEET on chemosensing of the honey bee and its parasite Varroa destructor . Apidologie 46, 380–391 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-014-0330-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13592-014-0330-1

Keywords

Navigation