Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of PEG addition on pore morphology and biocompatibility of PLLA scaffolds prepared by freeze drying

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomedical Engineering Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A 3wt% poly(L-lactic acid) (PLLA) with different concentrations of polyethylene glycol (PEG, 0~9wt%) was blended and lyophilized to evaluate the morphology and the biocompatibility of the PLLA/PEG scaffolds. The purpose of this study is to investigate the biocompatibility of the PLLA/ PEG blends. Morphology, degradation rate, cytotoxicity, skin sensitization, acute systemic toxicity, and intradermal reactivity are examined.

Methods

The morphology of the scaffolds was examined by using scanning electron microscopy. The degradation of the scaffolds in phosphate buffer solution was measured for up to 9 weeks by measuring the weight loss. The extract test method was conducted on the scaffolds to evaluate the potential of cytotoxicity on the base of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 10993-5). Skin sensitization, acute systemic toxicity, and intradermal reactivity were conducted according to ISO 10993-10(2010), ISO 10993-11(2006), ISO 10993-10(2010), respectively.

Results

The lamellar morphology of PLLA scaffold was changed to the ladder-like structure with adding PEG. The pore size of the PLLA/PEG blends decreased from 24±6 μm to 13±2 μm with increasing the PEG content from 0wt% to 9wt%. As a result of the measurement, degradation rate rose with increasing the PEG content in PLLA and biodegradable PLLA/PEG blend scaffolds exhibited excellent biocompatibility due to the absence of cytotoxicity, skin sensitizing potency, acute systemic toxicity, and intradermal reactivity.

Conclusions

This outcome implied that the biodegradable PLLA/PEG scaffolds were clinically safe and effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim HD, Bae EH, Kwon IC, Pal RR, Nam JD, Lee DS. Effect of PEG-PLLA diblock copolymer on macroporous PLLA scaffolds by thermally induced phase separation. Biomaterials. 2004; 25(12):2319–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ma PX, Choi J. Biodegradable polymer scaffolds with welldefined interconnected spherical pore network. Tissue Eng. 2001; 7(1):23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schugens Ch, Maquet V, Grandfils C, Jerome R, Teyssie Ph. Biodegradable and macroporous polylactide implants for cell transplantation: 1.Preparation of macroporous polylactide supports by solid-liquid phase separation. Polymer. 1996; 37(6):1027–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li J, Chen Y, Mak AF, Tuan RS, Li L, Li Y. A one-step method to fabricate PLLA scaffolds with deposition of bioactive hydroxyapatite and collagen using ice-based microporogens. Acta Biomater. 2010; 6(6):2013–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hwang S, Todo M. Characterization of compressive deformation behavior of multi-layer porous composite materials for articular tissue engineering. J Mech Sci Technol. 2012; 26(7):1999–2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deplaine H, Ribelles JLG, Ferrer GG. Effect of the content of hydroxyapatites on the properties and bioactivity of poly(Llactide)-Hybrid membranes. Comp Sci Technol. 2010; 70(13): 1805–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gaona LA, Gomez Ribelles JLG, Perilla JE, Lebourg M. Hydrolytic degradation of PLLA/PCL microporous membranes prepared by freeze extraction. Polym Degrad Stabil. 2012; 97(9):1621–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xing Q, Dong X, Li R, Yang H, Han CC, Wang D. Morphology and performance control of PLLA-based porous membranes by phase separation. Polymer. 2013; 54(21):5965–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu YS, Huang QL, Kienzle A, Müller WEG, Feng QL. In vitro degradation of porous PLLA/pearl powder composite scaffolds. Mater Sci Eng C. 2014; 38(1):227–34.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kim J, Lee DY, Kim T, Song Y, Cho N, Biocompatibility of hyaluronic acid hydrogels prepared by porous hyaluronic acid microbeads. Met. Mater. Intl. 2014; 20:555–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim J, Lee DY, Kim E, Jang J, Cho N. Tissue response to implants of hyaluronic acid hydrogel prepared by microbeads. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2014; 11(1):32–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ISO 10993-11:2006, Biological evaluation of medical devices-Part 11: Tests for systemic toxicity. In: ISO/TC 194 Biological and clinical evaluation of medical devices. International Organization for Standardization. 2006. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=35977. Accessed 21 Nov 2016.

  13. Shasteen C, Choy YB. Controlling degradation rate of poly(lactic acid) for its biomedical applications. Biomed Eng Lett. 2011; 1:163–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim JH, Noh H, Kang JH, Lee BS, Choi J, Park K, Han DK. Characteristics of PLLA films blended with PEG block copolymers as additives for biodegradable polymer stents. Biomed Eng Lett. 2011; 1(1):42–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deuk Yong Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, Y., Son, S., Chun, C. et al. Effect of PEG addition on pore morphology and biocompatibility of PLLA scaffolds prepared by freeze drying. Biomed. Eng. Lett. 6, 287–295 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-016-0241-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-016-0241-3

Keywords

Navigation