Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A biorefinery approach for the production of bioethanol from alkaline-pretreated, enzymatically hydrolyzed Nicotiana tabacum stalks as feedstock for the bio-based industry

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, an attempt was made to investigate bioethanol production using low-cost feedstock, namely, tobacco wastes obtained after the leaves harvesting. Tobacco stalks, an abundant biomass source of the leftover agricultural crop field, are a promising feedstock for bioethanol production. Traditional Thai tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) is known as non-Virginia type tobacco stalks and was used as biomass feedstock for ethanol production by separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) with a computerized fermenter. Tobacco stalks were efficiently hydrolyzed after a mild physical-chemical pretreatment. The economically cheapest alkaline chemical (2% CaO) was used for pretreatment. The robust yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was utilized, and it is suitable for industrial ethanol production. These data suggest that tobacco stalks are potential candidates for ethanol production from physical alkali-pretreated biomass with enzymatic hydrolysis on the SHF system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dussadee N, Reansuwan K, Ramaraj R (2014) Potential development of compressed bio-methane gas production from pig farms and elephant grass silage for transportation in Thailand. Bioresour Technol 155:438–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dussadee N, Unpaprom Y, Ramaraj R (2016) Grass silage for biogas production. Advances in Silage Production and Utilization 16:153

  3. Nong HT, Unpaprom Y, Whangchai K, Ramaraj R (2020) Sustainable valorization of water primrose with cow dung for enhanced biogas production. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01065-6

  4. Unpaprom Y, Pimpimol T, Whangchai K, Ramaraj R (2020) Sustainability assessment of water hyacinth with swine dung for biogas production, methane enhancement, and biofertilizer. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00850-72

  5. Van Tran G, Unpaprom Y, Ramaraj R (2019) Methane productivity evaluation of an invasive wetland plant, common reed. Biomass Conv Bioref 10:689–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00451-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khammee P, Ramaraj R, Whangchai N, Bhuyar P, Unpaprom Y (2020) The immobilization of yeast for fermentation of macroalgae Rhizoclonium sp. for efficient conversion into bioethanol. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00786-y

  7. Ramaraj R, Dussadee N, Whangchai N, Unpaprom Y (2015) Microalgae biomass as an alternative substrate in biogas production. IJSGE 4:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mueller W, Loh M, Vardoulakis S, Johnston HJ, Steinle S, Precha N, Kliengchuay W, Tantrakarnapa K, Cherrie JW (2020) Ambient particulate matter and biomass burning: an ecological time series study of respiratory and cardiovascular hospital visits in northern Thailand. Environ Health 19:77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-020-00629-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moran J, NaSuwan C, Poocharoen OO (2019) The haze problem in northern Thailand and policies to combat it: a review. Environ Sci Pol 97:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saleeon T, Siriwong W, Maldonado-Pérez HL, Robson MG (2015) Green tobacco sickness among Thai traditional tobacco farmers, Thailand. Int J Occup Environ Med 6:169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sophanodorn K, Unpaprom Y, Whangchai K, Homdoung N, Dussadee N, Ramaraj R (2020) Environmental management and valorization of cultivated tobacco stalks by combined pretreatment for potential bioethanol production. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00992-8

  12. Cong K, Han F, Zhang Y, Li Q (2019) The investigation of co-combustion characteristics of tobacco stalk and low rank coal using a macro-TGA. Fuel 237:126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manmai N, Unpaprom Y, Ramaraj R (2020) Bioethanol production from sunflower stalk: application of chemical and biological pretreatments by response surface methodology (RSM). Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00602-7

  14. Nguyen TV, Unpaprom Y, Manmai N, Whangchai K, Ramaraj R (2020) Impact and significance of pretreatment on the fermentable sugar production from low-grade longan fruit wastes for bioethanol production. Biomass Conv Bioref. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00977-7

  15. Ramaraj R, Unpaprom Y (2019) Enzymatic hydrolysis of small-flowered nutsedge (Cyperus difformis) with alkaline pretreatment for bioethanol production. Maejo Int J Sci Technol 13(2):110–120

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ramaraj R, Unpaprom Y (2019) Optimization of pretreatment condition for ethanol production from Cyperus difformis by response surface methodology. 3 Biotech 9(6):218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramaraj R, Dussadee N (2015) Biological purification processes for biogas using algae cultures: a review. IJSGE 4:20–32

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nong HT, Whangchai K, Unpaprom Y, Thararux C, Ramaraj R (2020) Development of sustainable approaches for converting the agro-weeds Ludwigia hyssopifolia to biogas production. Biomass Conv Bioref 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01083-4

  19. You Z, Zhang S, Kim H, Chiang PC, Sun Y, Guo Z, Xu H (2019) Effects of corn stover pretreated with NaOH and CaO on anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and corn stover. Appl Sci 9(1):123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vu PT, Unpaprom Y, Ramaraj R (2018) Impact and significance of alkaline-oxidant pretreatment on the enzymatic digestibility of Sphenoclea zeylanica for bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol 247:125–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vu PT, Unpaprom Y, Ramaraj R (2017) Evaluation of bioethanol production from rice field weed biomass. Emerg Life Sci Res 3:42–49

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ask M, Olofsson K, Di Felice T, Ruohonen L, Penttilä M, Lidén G, Olsson L (2012) Challenges in enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of pretreated Arundo donax revealed by a comparison between SHF and SSF. Process Biochem 47(10):1452–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Soest PV, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 74(10):3583–3597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dubois M, Gilles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebers PA, Smith F (1956) Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 28:350–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31:426–428

    Google Scholar 

  26. Khat-udomkiri N, Sivamaruthi BS, Sirilun S, Lailerd N, Peerajan S, Chaiyasut C (2018) Optimization of alkaline pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis for the extraction of xylooligosaccharide from rice husk. AMB Express 8:115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0645-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ramaraj R, Dussadee N (2015) Renewable energy application for organic agriculture: a review. Int J Sustain Green Energy 4(1–1):33–38

    Google Scholar 

  28. Keshav PK, Naseeruddin S, Rao LV (2016) Improved enzymatic saccharification of steam exploded cotton stalk using alkaline extraction and fermentation of cellulosic sugars into ethanol. Bioresour Technol 214:363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Caserta G, Cervigni T (1991) The use of Jerusalem artichoke stalks for the production of fructose or ethanol. Bioresour Technol 35(3):247–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hernández-Beltrán JU, Lira HD, Omar I, Cruz-Santos MM, Saucedo-Luevanos A, Hernández-Terán F, Balagurusamy N (2019) Insight into pretreatment methods of lignocellulosic biomass to increase biogas yield: current state, challenges, and opportunities. Appl Sci 9(18):3721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar SJ, Kumar NS, Chintagunta AD (2020) Bioethanol production from cereal crops and lignocelluloses rich agro-residues: prospects and challenges. SN Appl Sci 2:1673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kondo R, De Leon R, Anh TK, Shimizu K, Kamei I (2014) Bioethanol production from alkaline-pretreated sugarcane bagasse by consolidated bioprocessing using Phlebia sp. MG-60. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation 88:62–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bensah EC, Mensah M (2013) Chemical pretreatment methods for the production of cellulosic ethanol: technologies and innovations. Int J Chem Eng 2013:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Alvira P, Tomás-Pejó E, Ballesteros M, Negro MJ (2010) Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour Technol 101(13):4851–4861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee HY, Lee SE, Jung KH, Yeon JH, Choi WY (2011) Repeated-batch operation of surface-aerated fermentor for bioethanol production from the hydrolysate of seaweed Sargassum sagamianum. J Microbiol Biotechnol 21(3):323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Adams JMM, Ross AB, Anastasakis K, Hodgson EM, Gallagher JA, Jones JM, Donnison IS (2011) Seasonal variation in the chemical composition of the bioenergy feedstock Laminaria digitata for thermochemical conversion. Bioresour Technol 102:226–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sunarti TC, Yanti SD, Ruriani E (2017) Twosteps microwave-assisted treatment on acid hydrolysis of sago pith for bioethanol production. InIOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ Sci 65:1755–1315

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mtui G, Nakamura Y (2005) Bioconversion of lignocellulosic waste from selected dumping sites in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Biodegradation 16(6):493–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledged the Program in Biotechnology, Energy Research Center, School of Renewable Energy, Maejo University, Chiang Mai, Thailand, for the research facilities to accomplish this experimental study and the Center of Excellence in Bioresources for Agriculture, Industry and Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Renewable Energy, Maejo University, Chiang Mai, 50290, Thailand

    Karn Sophanodorn & Rameshprabu Ramaraj

  2. Program in Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Maejo University, 50290, Chiang Mai, Thailand

    Yuwalee Unpaprom

  3. Center of Excellence in Bioresources for Agriculture, Industry and Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand

    Kanda Whangchai

  4. Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, Chiang Mai, 50300, Thailand

    Akksatcha Duangsuphasin

  5. Department of Forestry, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, 402, Taiwan

    Numchok Manmai

Authors
  1. Karn Sophanodorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuwalee Unpaprom
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kanda Whangchai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Akksatcha Duangsuphasin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Numchok Manmai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rameshprabu Ramaraj
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rameshprabu Ramaraj.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sophanodorn, K., Unpaprom, Y., Whangchai, K. et al. A biorefinery approach for the production of bioethanol from alkaline-pretreated, enzymatically hydrolyzed Nicotiana tabacum stalks as feedstock for the bio-based industry. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 12, 891–899 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01177-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01177-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation