Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Maximization of hydrogen production from pine needles steam gasification based on response surface methodology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current work focuses on the determination of optimal values of operating input factors, namely gasifier temperature (650–850 °C), steam/biomass ratio (0.4–1.6), and particle size (75–275 μm) leading to maximization of the H2 concentration, syngas yield, and H2 yield during steam gasification process in bubbling fluidized bed gasifier. Response surface methodology–based central composite spherical design approach is used to design the experiments. To evaluate the effect of individual and interaction factors on output responses, ANOVA has been performed. From the ANOVA analysis, the temperature is found to be the most effective input factor for H2 concentration compared with particle size and steam/biomass ratio whereas the steam/biomass ratio is most effective for H2 yield and syngas yield amongst all input factors. Optimization predicts the maximum H2 concentration as 60.9 vol% at the optimum input factors (temperature of 820 °C, the particle size of 190 μm, and steam/biomass ratio of 0.8), whereas the maximum H2 yield of 41.85 g/kg biomass is found at temperature of 793 °C, steam/biomass ratio of 1.3, and particle size of 172 μm. Moreover, the maximum syngas yield of 0.91 m3/kg biomass is found at the temperature of 812 °C, steam/biomass ratio of 1.4, and the particle size of 130 μm. The values of output responses predicted by the developed quadratic models fit well with the experimental values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mishra RK, Mohanty K (2018) Characterization of non-edible lignocellulosic biomass in terms of their candidacy towards alternative renewable fuels. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 8:799–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-018-0332-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. B.P.S. Review, W.E. June (2015) BP Statistical Review of World Energy

  3. Liu W, Gu M, Hu G, Li C, Liao H, Tang L, Shapira P (2014) Profile of developments in biomass-based bioenergy research: a 20-year perspective. Scientometrics 99:507–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1152-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Varma AK, Mondal P (2018) Pyrolysis of pine needles: effects of process parameters on products yield and analysis of products. J Therm Anal Calorim 131:2057–2072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6727-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mohammed MAA, Salmiaton A, Wan Azlina WAKG, Mohammad Amran MS, Fakhru’L-Razi A (2011) Air gasification of empty fruit bunch for hydrogen-rich gas production in a fluidized-bed reactor. Energy Convers Manag 52:1555–1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.10.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fermoso J, Rubiera F, Chen D (2012) Sorption enhanced catalytic steam gasification process: a direct route from lignocellulosic biomass to high purity hydrogen. Energy Environ Sci 5:6358–6367. https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee02593k

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Puig-Arnavat M, Hernández JA, Bruno JC, Coronas A (2013) Artificial neural network models for biomass gasification in fluidized bed gasifiers. Biomass Bioenergy 49:279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rapagnâ S, Jand N, Kiennemann A, Foscolo P (2000) Steam-gasification of biomass in a fluidised-bed of olivine particles. Biomass Bioenergy 19:187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Puig-Arnavat M, Bruno JC, Coronas A (2010) Review and analysis of biomass gasification models. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14:2841–2851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lim MT, Alimuddin Z (2008) Bubbling fluidized bed biomass gasification-performance, process findings and energy analysis. Renew Energy 33:2339–2343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2008.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karatas H, Akgun F (2013) Experimental results of gasification of walnut shell and pistachio shell in a bubbling fluidized bed gasifier under air and steam atmospheres. Fuel 112:494–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.10.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lahijani P, Zainal ZA (2011) Gasification of palm empty fruit bunch in a bubbling fluidized bed: a performance and agglomeration study. Bioresour Technol 102:2068–2076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Khan Z, Yusup S, Melati M, Ahmad, Rashidi NA (2014) Integrated calatytic adsorption (ICA) steam gasification synstem for enhanced hydrogen production using palm kernel shell. Int J Hydrog Energy 39:3286–3293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.12.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pfeifer C, Hofbauer H (2008) Development of catalytic tar decomposition downstream from a dual fluidized bed biomass steam gasifier. Powder Technol 180:9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fremaux S, Beheshti SM, Ghassemi H, Shahsavan-Markadeh R (2015) An experimental study on hydrogen-rich gas production via steam gasification of biomass in a research-scale fluidized bed. Energy Convers Manag 91:427–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Franco C, Pinto F, Gulyurtlu I, Cabrita I (2003) The study of reactions influences the biomass steam gasification process. Fuel 82:835–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Niu Y, Han F, Chen Y, Lyu Y, Wang L (2017) Experimental study on steam gasification of pine particles for hydrogen-rich gas. J Energy Inst 90:715–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2016.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Weerachanchai P, Horio M, Tangsathitkulchai C (2009) Effects of gasifying conditions and bed materials on fluidized bed steam gasification of wood biomass. Bioresour Technol 100:1419–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shayan E, Zare V, Mirzaee I (2018) Hydrogen production from biomass gasification: a theoretical comparison of using different gasification agents. Energy Convers Manag 159:30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maisano S, Urbani F, Cipitì F, Freni F, Chiodo V (2019) Syngas production by BFB gasification: experimental comparison of different biomasses. Int J Hydrog Energy 44:4414–4422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lv P, Xiong Z, Wang T, Chang J, Wu C, Chen Y (2003) Biomass air-steam gasification in a fluidized bed to produce hydrogen-rich gas. Energy Fuel 17:677–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yusup S, Khan Z, Ahmad MM, Rashidi NA (2014) Optimization of hydrogen production in in-situ catalytic adsorption (ICA) steam gasification based on response surface methodology. Biomass Bioenergy 60:98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shahbaz M, Yusup S, Inayat A, Patrick DO, Pratama A, Ammar M (2017) Optimization of hydrogen and syngas production from PKS gasification by using coal bottom ash. Bioresour Technol 241:284–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fermoso J, Gil MV, Arias B, Plaza MG, Pevida C, Pis JJ, Rubiera F (2010) Application of response surface methodology to assess the combined effect of operating variables on high-pressure coal gasification for H2-rich gas production. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:1191–1204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.11.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ASTM (2015) E1757–01, Standard practice for preparation of biomass for compositional analysis. West Conshohocken, ASTM International

    Google Scholar 

  26. Karimipour S, Gerspacher R, Gupta R, Spiteri RJ (2013) Study of factors affecting syngas quality and their interactions in fluidized bed gasification of lignite coal. Fuel. 103:308–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shen L, Gao Y, Xiao J (2008) Simulation of hydrogen production from biomass gasification in interconnected fluidized beds. Biomass Bioenergy 32:120–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Luo S, Xiao B, Hu Z, Liu S, Guo X, He M (2009) Hydrogen-rich gas from catalytic steam gasification of biomass in a fixed bed reactor: influence of temperature and steam on gasification performance. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.12.075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Li J, Yin Y, Zhang X, Liu J, Yan R (2009) Hydrogen-rich gas production by steam gasification of palm oil wastes over supported tri-metallic catalyst. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:9108–9115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.09.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li B, Yang H, Wei L, Shao J, Wang X, Chen H (2017) Hydrogen production from agricultural biomass wastes gasification in a fluidized bed with calcium oxide enhancing. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:4832–4839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nikoo MB, Mahinpey N (2008) Simulation of biomass gasification in fluidized bed reactor using ASPEN PLUS. Biomass Bioenergy 32:1245–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.02.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Priti Kumari.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumari, P., Mohanty, B. Maximization of hydrogen production from pine needles steam gasification based on response surface methodology. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 12, 2335–2348 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00761-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00761-7

Keywords

Navigation