Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Binder-free torrefied biomass pellets: significance of torrefaction temperature and pelletization parameters by multivariate analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Torrefaction is a promising technology to improve fuel properties of biomass. However, torrefied char does not show densified energy content compared with coal and typically requires densification such as pelletization. Several key parameters including pelletization and torrefaction conditions were investigated in order to determine the effects on energy density of torrefied char pellets. In this study, multivariate analyses were performed using three independent variables, torrefaction temperature, pelletization temperature, and pelletization pressure; and five dependent variables: mass density, durability, volume expansion, higher heating value (HHV), and energy density (ED). The variation and correlation of the dependent variables were evaluated using principal component analysis (PCA). Additionally, multivariate linear regression was performed to correlate independent variables and dependent variable responses using an adjusted sum of squares method and a two-sided, 90% confidence interval for the mean response; the model was fitted with statistically significant linear, quadratic, and interaction terms. The statistical analysis showed that all independent parameters are statistically significant for ED with the largest model variation from experimental data being 1.44%. Response curve of the regression analysis showed that mass density, HHV, and energy density model have the highest output predictability with higher R2 values of 95.3%, 98.1%, and 74.1%, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U.D.o. Energy (2016) Billion ton update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry, OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY

  2. D.U.S.D.o. Energy) (2016) Bioenergy Technologies Office Multi-Year Program Plan, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  3. NETL (2015) Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants volume 1a: bituminous coal (PC) and natural gas to electricity, revision 3, National Energy Technology Laboratory

  4. Davis RD, Kinchin C, Markham J, Tan ECD, Laurens LM, Sexton D, Knorr D, Schoen P, Lukacs J (2014) Process design and economics for the conversion of algal biomass to biofuels: algal biomass fractionation to lipid and carbohydrate-derived fuel products. National Renewable Energy Laboratory

  5. Davis RD, Tao L, Tan ECD, Biddy MJ, Beckham GT, Scarlata C, Jacobson J, Cafferty K, Ross J, Lukas J, Knorr D, Schoen P (2013) Process design and economics for the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to hydrocarbons: dilute-acid and enzymatic deconstruction of biomass to sugars and biological conversion of sugars to hydrocarbons, National Renewable Energy Laboratory

  6. Li J, Zhang X, Pawlak-Kruczek H, Yang W, Kruczek P, Blasiak W (2014) Process simulation of co-firing torrefied biomass in a 220MWe coal-fired power plant. Energy Convers Manag 84:503–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tapasvi D, Kempegowda RS, Tran K-Q, Skreiberg Ø, Grønli M (2015) A simulation study on the torrefied biomass gasification. Energy Convers Manag 90:446–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Manouchehrinejad M, Mani S (2019) Process simulation of an integrated biomass torrefaction and pelletization (iBTP) plant to produce solid biofuels. Energy Convers Manag 1:100008

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ribeiro MJ, Godina R, Matias CJ, Nunes JL (2018) Future perspectives of biomass torrefaction: review of the current state-of-the-art and research development. Sustainability 10(7):2323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072323

  10. Pirraglia A, Gonzalez R, Saloni D, Denig J (2013) Technical and economic assessment for the production of torrefied ligno-cellulosic biomass pellets in the US. Energy Convers Manag 66:153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Agar DA (2017) A comparative economic analysis of torrefied pellet production based on state-of-the-art pellets. Biomass Bioenergy 97:155–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bach Q-V, Trinh TN, Tran K-Q, Thi NBD (2017) Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of biomass torrefied in various atmospheres. Energy Convers Manag 141:72–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen WH, Kuo PC (2011) Isothermal torrefaction kinetics of hemicellulose, cellulose, lignin and xylan using thermogravimetric analysis. Energy 36(11):6451–6460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan W, Acharjee TC, Coronella CJ, Vasquez VR (2009) Thermal pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 28(3):435–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chang S, Zhao Z, Zheng A, He F, Huang Z, Li H (2012) Characterization of products from torrefaction of sprucewood and bagasse in an auger reactor. Energy Fuel 26(11):7009–7017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mun TY, Tumsa TZ, Lee U, Yang W (2016) Performance evaluation of co-firing various kinds of biomass with low rank coals in a 500 MWe coal-fired power plant. Energy 115:954–962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thrän D, Witt J, Schaubach K, Kiel J, Carbo M, Maier J, Ndibe C, Koppejan J, Alakangas E, Majer S, Schipfer F (2016) Moving torrefaction towards market introduction—technical improvements and economic-environmental assessment along the overall torrefaction supply chain through the SECTOR project. Biomass Bioenergy 89:184–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Toptas A, Yildirim Y, Duman G, Yanik J (2015) Combustion behavior of different kinds of torrefied biomass and their blends with lignite. Bioresour Technol 177:328–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kambo HS, Dutta A (2014) Strength, storage, and combustion characteristics of densified lignocellulosic biomass produced via torrefaction and hydrothermal carbonization. Appl Energy 135:182–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaliyan N, Morey RV (2010) Natural binders and solid bridge type binding mechanisms in briquettes and pellets made from corn stover and switchgrass. Bioresour Technol 101(3):1082–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reza MT (2011) Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass. Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering Univeristy of Nevada Reno, Reno

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reza MT, Uddin MH, Lynam JG, Coronella CJ (2014) Engineered pellets from dry torrefied and HTC biochar blends. Biomass Bioenergy 63:229–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Reza MT, Lynam JG, Vasquez VR, Coronella CJ (2012) Pelletization of biochar from hydrothermally carbonized wood. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 31(2):225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu Q, Shao J, Yang H, Yao D, Wang X, Chen H (2015) Effects of binders on the properties of bio-char pellets. Appl Energy 157:508–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Peng J, Bi XT, Lim CJ, Peng H, Kim CS, Jia D, Zuo H (2015) Sawdust as an effective binder for making torrefied pellets. Appl Energy 157:491–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peng JH, Bi HT, Lim CJ, Sokhansanj S (2013) Study on density, hardness, and moisture uptake of torrefied wood pellets. Energy Fuel 27(2):967–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ghiasi B, Kumar L, Furubayashi T, Lim CJ, Bi X, Kim CS, Sokhansanj S (2014) Densified biocoal from woodchips: is it better to do torrefaction before or after densification? Appl Energy 134:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Emadi B, Iroba KL, Tabil LG (2017) Effect of polymer plastic binder on mechanical, storage and combustion characteristics of torrefied and pelletized herbaceous biomass. Appl Energy 198:312–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Reza MT, Uddin MH, Lynam J, Hoekman SK, Coronella C (2014) Hydrothermal carbonization of loblolly pine: reaction chemistry and water balance. Biomass Convers Bior 4(4):311–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gil MV, Oulego P, Casal MD, Pevida C, Pis JJ, Rubiera F (2010) Mechanical durability and combustion characteristics of pellets from biomass blends. Bioresour Technol 101(22):8859–8867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mäkelä M, Yoshikawa K (2016) Ash behavior during hydrothermal treatment for solid fuel applications. Part 2: effects of treatment conditions on industrial waste biomass. Energy Convers Manag 121:409–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Smilde A, Bro R, Geladi P (2004) Multi-way analysis with applications in the chemical sciences. Wiley, Sussex

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Shlens J (2014) A tutorial on principal component analysis, arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.1100

  34. Phanphanich M, Mani S (2011) Impact of torrefaction on the grindability and fuel characteristics of forest biomass. Bioresour Technol 102(2):1246–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rejdak M, Czardybon A, Ignasiak K, Sobolewski A, Robak J (2017) Compaction studies of torrefied willow. J Ecol Eng 18(1):183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Stelte W, Clemons C, Holm JK, Sanadi AR, Ahrenfeldt J, Shang L, Henriksen UB (2011) Pelletizing properties of torrefied spruce. Biomass Bioenergy 35(11):4690–4698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Makela M, Benavente V, Fullana A (2016) Hydrothermal carbonization of industrial mixed sludge from a pulp and paper mill. Bioresour Technol 200:444–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Makela M, Yoshikawa K (2016) Simulating hydrothermal treatment of sludge within a pulp and paper mill. Appl Energy 173:177–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mäkelä M, Benavente V, Fullana A (2015) Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass: effect of process conditions on hydrochar properties. Appl Energy 155:576–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Tessa Berger from Ohio University and Eddie Torres from University of Nevada, Reno for their MATLAB and laboratory efforts, respectively.

Funding

This research is supported by Western Sun Grant Initiative (grant no. 2010-38502-21839) and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) grant (2019-67019-2928).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ohio University, Athens, OH, 45701, USA

    Akbar Saba

  2. Department of Biomedical and Chemical Engineering and Sciences, Florida Institute of Technology, 150 W University Blvd, Melbourne, FL, 32905, USA

    Nepu Saha & M. Toufiq Reza

  3. Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Mail Stop 170, Reno, NV, 89557, USA

    Keenan-Conrad Williams & Charles J. Coronella

Authors
  1. Akbar Saba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nepu Saha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Keenan-Conrad Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Charles J. Coronella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Toufiq Reza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Toufiq Reza.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• Increasing torrefaction temperature significantly increases pellet higher heating value (HHV).

• Increasing pelletization temperature and pressure does not affect pellet HHV but increases energy density.

• Mass density, HHV, and energy density mathematical models are highly predictable.

• Multilinear regression modeling agreed with the experimentally determined energy density.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 39 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saba, A., Saha, N., Williams, KC. et al. Binder-free torrefied biomass pellets: significance of torrefaction temperature and pelletization parameters by multivariate analysis. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 12, 2175–2183 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00737-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00737-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation