Abstract
A novel fluidized bed gasification concept with enhanced gas–particle interaction combining two circulating fluidized bed reactors is proposed. Cold flow model results show the feasibility of the concept with regard to fluid dynamics. The aim of the design is to generate a nitrogen (N2) free product gas with low tars and fines contents. Therefore, the system is divided into an air/combustion and a fuel/gasification reactor. Two gas streams are obtained separately. The two reactors are interconnected via loop seals to assure the global circulation of bed material and to avoid gas leakages from one reactor to the other. The global circulation rate is driven by the gas velocity in the air/combustion reactor. Furthermore, the fuel/gasification reactor itself is a circulating fluidized bed with the special characteristic of almost countercurrent flow conditions for the gas phase and bed material particles. By simple geometrical modifications, it is possible to achieve well-mixed flow conditions in the fuel/gasification reactor along the full height. The gas velocity and the geometrical properties in the fuel/gasification reactor are chosen in such a way that the entrainment of coarse particles is low at the top. Due to the dispersed downward movement of the bed material particles and the feedstock input at defined locations of the fuel/gasification reactor, no volatiles are produced in the upper regions and the problems of insufficient gas phase conversion and high tar contents are avoided.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A :
-
Free cross section, m2
- A C :
-
Constricted cross section, m2
- A C/A :
-
Aperture ratio, –
- Ar:
-
Archimedes number, –
- D :
-
Riser free diameter, m
- D C :
-
Constricted diameter, m
- d p*:
-
Dimensionless particle diameter, –
- d p50 :
-
Particles mean diameter, m
- Δp :
-
Pressure drop, mbar
- ε :
-
Void fraction, voidage, –
- (1 − ε):
-
Particle volume fraction, –
- Fr*:
-
Modified Froude number, –
- g :
-
Gravity constant, g = 9.81, m/s2
- G p :
-
Particle mass flux, circulation rate, kg/(m2 s)
- \( {{\dot{m}}_{\text{p}}} \) :
-
Particle mass flow, kg/h
- Re :
-
Reynolds number, –
- U :
-
Superficial gas velocity, m/s
- U*:
-
Dimensionless gas velocity, –
- U mb :
-
Minimum bubbling velocity, m/s
- U mf :
-
Minimum fluidization velocity, m/s
- U t :
-
Terminal velocity, m/s
- \( {{\dot{V}}_{\text{g}}} \) :
-
Gas volume flow, m3/h
- ν :
-
Kinematic gas viscosity, m2/s
- ρ g :
-
Gas density, kg/m3
- ρ p :
-
Particle density, kg/m3
- (ρ p − ρ g)/ρ g :
-
Density ratio, –
- Φ:
-
Sphericity of particles, –
- APF:
-
Absolute pressure fluctuations
- AR/CR:
-
Air/combustion reactor
- CAGI:
-
Compressed Air and Gas Institute
- CFB:
-
Circulating fluidized bed
- CFM:
-
Cold flow model
- CLC:
-
Chemical looping combustion
- CLR:
-
Chemical looping reforming
- DCFB:
-
Dual circulating fluidized bed
- DFB:
-
Dual fluidized bed
- DPF:
-
Differential pressure fluctuations
- EPA:
-
US Environmental Protection Agency
- FR/GR:
-
Fuel/gasification reactor
- ILS:
-
Internal loop seal
- LLS:
-
Lower loop seal
- NBS:
-
National Bureau of Standards
- NIST:
-
National Institute of Standards and Technology
- SATP:
-
Standard ambient temperature and pressure
- SER:
-
Sorption enhanced reforming
- ULS:
-
Upper loop seal
References
Wilk V, Kitzler H, Koppatz S, Pfeifer C, Hofbauer H (2011) Gasification of waste wood and bark in a dual fluidized bed steam gasifier. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 1(2):91–97. doi:10.1007/s13399-011-0009-z
Schmid JC, Wolfesberger U, Koppatz S, Pfeifer C, Hofbauer H (2012) Variation of feedstock in a dual fluidized bed steam gasifier—influence on product gas, tar content and composition. Environ Progr Sustain Energy. doi:10.1002/ep.11607
Brown RC (2011) Thermochemical processing of biomass: conversion into fuels, chemicals and power. Wiley, Chichester. doi:10.1002/9781119990840. ISBN 9780470721117
Hofbauer H, Stoiber H, Veronik G (1995) Gasification of organic material in a novel fluidization bed system. Proc. 1st SCEJ Symposium on Fluidization, Tokyo, pp 291–299
Kirnbauer F, Wilk V, Kitzler H, Kern S, Hofbauer H (2012) The positive effects of bed material coating on tar reduction in a dual fluidized bed gasifier. Fuel 95:553–562. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2011.10.066
Grace JR (1986) Contacting modes and behaviour classification of gas–solid and other two-phase suspensions. Can J Chem Eng 64:353–363. doi:10.1002/cjce.5450640301
Lim KS, Zhu JX, Grace JR (1995) Hydrodynamics of gas–solid fluidization. Int J Multiphase Flow 2l:141–193. doi:10.1016/0301-9322(95)00038-Y
Kunii D, Levenspiel O (1997) Circulating fluidized-bed reactors. Chem Eng Sci 52(15):2471–2482. doi:10.1016/S0009-2509(97)00066-3
Lewis WK, Gilliland ER, Bauer WC (1949) Characteristics of fluidized particles. Ind Eng Chem 41(6):1104–1117. doi:10.1021/ie50474a004
Grace JR (1990) High-velocity fluidized bed reactors. Chem Eng Sci 45(8):1953–1966. doi:10.1016/0009-2509(90)80070-U
Schlichthaerle P, Werther J (1999) Axial pressure profiles and solids concentration distributions in the CFB bottom zone. Chem Eng Sci 54(22):5485–5493. doi:10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00289-4
Johansson A, Johnsson F, Leckner B (2007) Solids back-mixing in CFB boilers. Chem Eng Sci 62(1/2):561–573. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2006.09.021
Kolbitsch P, Pröll T, Hofbauer H (2008) Modeling of a 120 kW chemical looping combustion reactor system using a NiO oxygen carrier. Chem Eng Sci 64(1):99–108. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2008.09.014
Corella J, Aznar MP, Gil J, Caballero MA (1999) Biomass gasification in fluidized bed: where to locate the dolomite to improve gasification. Energy Fuel 13(6). doi:10.1021/ef990019r
Pfeifer C, Koppatz S, Hofbauer H (2011) Catalysts for dual fluidized bed biomass gasification—an experimental study at the pilot plant scale. Biomass Convers Biorefinery 1(2):63–74. doi:10.1007/s13399-011-0005-3
Pfeifer C, Schmid JC, Pröll T, Hofbauer H (2011) Next generation biomass gasifier. Proc. 19th European Biomass Conference, Berlin, Germany
Lyngfeld A, Thunman H (2005) Construction and 100 h of operational experience of a 10-kW chemical-looping combustor. In: Thomas DC (ed) Carbon dioxide capture for storage in deep geologic formations. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 625–645. doi:10.1016/B978-008044570-0/50122-7, chapter 36
Pröll T, Kolbitsch P, Bolhàr-Nordenkampf J, Hofbauer H (2009) A novel dual circulating fluidized bed (DCFB) system for chemical looping processes. AICHE J 55(12):3255–3266. doi:10.1002/aic.11934
Reh L (1961) Das Wirbeln von körnigem Gut im schlanken Diffusor als Grenzzustand zwischen Wirbelschicht und pneumatischer Förderung. Dissertation, TH Karlsruhe, Germany
Grace JR (1982) Fluidized bed hydrodynamics. In: Hetsroni G (ed) Handbook of multiphase systems, chapter 8.1. Hemisphere, Washington, DC
Haider A, Levenspiel O (1989) Drag coefficient and terminal velocity of spherical and nonspherical particles. Powder Technol 58(1):63–70. doi:10.1016/0032-5910(89)80008-7
Yang WC (2007) Modification and re-interpretation of Geldart’s classification of powders. Powder Technol 171(2):59–74. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2006.08.024
Geldart D (1973) Types of gas fluidization. Powder Technol 7(5):285–292. doi:10.1016/0032-5910(73)80037-3
Bi HT, Grace JR (1995) Flow regime diagrams for gas–solid fluidization and upward transport. Int J Multiphase Flow 21(6):1229–1236. doi:10.1016/0301-9322(95)00037-X
Bi HT, Grace JR (1995) Effect of measurement method on the velocities used to demarcate the onset of turbulent fluidization. Chem Eng J 57(3):261–271. doi:10.1016/0923-0467(94)02875-B
Ellis N, Bi HT, Lim CJ, Grace JR (2004) Hydrodynamics of turbulent fluidized beds of different diameters. Powder Technol 141(1/2):124–136. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2004.03.001
Bi HT, Ellis N, Abba IA, Grace JR (2000) A state-of-the-art review of gas–solid turbulent fluidization. Chem Eng Sci 55(21):4789–4825. doi:10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00107-X
Rabinovich E, Kalman H (2011) Flow regime diagram for vertical pneumatic conveying and fluidized bed systems. Powder Technol 207(1–3):119–133. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2010.10.017
Klinzing GE, Marcus RD, Rizk F, Leung LS (1997) Pneumatic conveying of solids: a theoretical and practical approach, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, London. ISBN 0-412-72440-5
Rautiainen A, Graeme S, Poikolainen V, Sarkomaa P (1999) An experimental study of vertical pneumatic conveying. Powder Technol 104(2):139–150. doi:10.1016/S0032-5910(99)00056-X
Abba IA, Grace JR, Bi HT, Thompson ML (2003) Spanning the flow regimes: generic fluidized-bed reactor model. AICHE J 49(7):1838–1848. doi:10.1002/aic.690490720
Göransson K, Söderlind U, He J, Zhang W (2010) Review of syngas production via biomass DFBGs. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(1):482–492. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.032
Schmid JC, Pröll T, Pfeifer C, Hofbauer H (2011) Improvement of gas–solid interaction in dual circulating fluidized bed systems. Proc. 9th European Conference on Industrial Furnaces and Boilers (INFUB), Estoril, Portugal
Lewis WK, Gilliland ER (1950) Conversion of hydrocarbons with suspended catalyst. US Patent No. 2498088
Bu J, Zhu JX (1999) Influence of ring-type internals on axial pressure distribution in circulating fluidized bed. Can J Chem Eng 77(1):26–34. doi:10.1002/cjce.5450770106
Pröll T, Schmid JC, Pfeifer C, Hofbauer H (2010) Design considerations for direct solid fuel chemical looping combustion systems. High temperature solid looping cycles network, 2nd network meeting, Alkmaar, Netherlands
Pröll T, Rupanovits K, Kolbitsch P, Bolhàr-Nordenkampf J, Hofbauer H (2009) Cold flow model study on a dual circulating fluidized bed system for chemical looping processes. Chem Eng Technol 32(3):418–424. doi:10.1002/ceat.200800521
Guìo-Pèrez DC, Marx K, Pröll T, Hofbauer H (2011) Fluid dynamic effects of ring-type internals in a dual circulating fluidized bed system. Proc. 10th International Conference on Circulating Fluidized Beds and Fluidization Technology (CFB-10), Sunriver, Oregon, USA
Jiang P, Bi HT, Jean RH, Fan LS (1991) Baffle effects on performance of catalytic circulating fluidized bed reactor. AICHE J 37(9):1392–1400. doi:10.1002/aic.690370911
Zhu JX, Salah M, Zhou Y (1997) Radial and axial voidage distributions in circulating fluidized bed with ring-type internals. J Chem Eng Jpn 30(5):928–937. doi:10.1252/jcej.30.928
Kersten RA, Prins W, van der Drift B, van Swaaij WPM (2003) Principles of a novel multistage circulating fluidized bed reactor for biomass gasification. Chem Eng Sci 58(3–6):725–731. doi:10.1016/S0009-2509(02)00601-2
Bi H, Cui H, Grace JR, Kern A, Lim CJ, Rusnell D, Song X, McKnight C (2004) Flooding of gas–solids countercurrent flow in fluidized beds. Ind Eng Chem Res 43(18):5611–5619. doi:10.1021/ie030772e
Bi X (2011) A generalized flow regime diagram for fluid–solid vertical transport. Proc. 10th International Conference on Circulating Fluidized Beds and Fluidization Technology (CFB-10), Sunriver, Oregon, USA
Glicksman LR (1984) Scaling relationships for fluidized beds. Chem Eng Sci 39(9):1373–1379. doi:10.1016/0009-2509(84)80070-6
Glicksman LR, Hyre M, Woloshun K (1993) Simplified scaling relationships for fluidized beds. Powder Technol 77(2):177–199. doi:10.1016/0032-5910(93)80055-F
Leckner B, Werther J (2000) Scale-up of circulating fluidized bed combustion. Energy Fuel 14(6):1286–1292. doi:10.1021/ef0001078
Penthor S, Pröll T, Hofbauer H (2011) Chemical-looping combustion using biomass as fuel. 2nd Oxyfuel Combustion Conference (OCC2), Yeppoon, Queensland, Australia
Acknowledgments
This work is part of the projects G-volution II and ERBA which are being conducted within the “New Energies 2020” research calls funded by the Austrian Climate and Energy Fund and processed by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG). The work has been accomplished in cooperation with TECON Engineering GmbH, voestalpine Stahl GmbH, and voestalpine Stahl Donawitz GmbH & Co KG.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmid, J.C., Pröll, T., Kitzler, H. et al. Cold flow model investigations of the countercurrent flow of a dual circulating fluidized bed gasifier. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 2, 229–244 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-012-0035-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-012-0035-5