Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“If I had to pick any subject, it wouldn’t be maths”: foundations for engagement with mathematics during the middle years

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematics Education Research Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is a report on a longitudinal case study that investigated the problem of lowered engagement with mathematics and students’ perspectives of the factors that influenced their engagement during the middle years of schooling. The article provides a synthesis of the entire study and a summary of its findings. In order to address the research question a group of 20 students from within the same school cohort participated in the study spanning three school years from their final year of primary school, to their second year of secondary school. Data was collected through interviews, focus group discussions, and classroom observations. A major finding of this study was that positive pedagogical relationships between teachers and their students must be developed as a foundation for sustained engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Attard, C. (2010). Students’ experiences of mathematics during the transition from primary to secondary school. Paper presented at the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Fremantle, Perth.

  • Attard, C. (2011a). Engagement with mathematics: the influence of teachers. Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal, 1(1), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attard, C. (2011b). “My favourite subject is maths. For some reason no-one really agrees with me”: student perspectives of mathematics teaching and learning in the upper primary classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(3), 363–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attard, C. (2012). The influence of pedagogy on student engagement with mathematics during the middle years of schooling. In A. L. White & U. H. Cheah (Eds.), Transforming school mathematics education in the 21st century (pp. 140–157). Penang: SEAMEO RECSAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers. (2006). Standards of excellence in teaching mathematics in Australian schools. Adelaide: Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2010). The shape of the australian curriculum version 2.0. Sydney: ACARA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahr, N. (2010). The middle years learner. In D. Pendergast & N. Bahr (Eds.), Teaching middle years: Rethinking curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (2nd ed., pp. 48–64). Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (2000). Mathematics from another world: traditional communities and the alienation of learners. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(4), 379–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (2009). The elephant in the classroom: Helping children learn and love maths. London: Souvenir Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., & Brown, M. (2000). Students’ experiences of ability grouping: disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal, 26(5), 631–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Board, A. C. (2009). Shape of the Australian curriculum: Mathematics. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington, V. (2006). Rethinking the middle years: Early adolescents, schooling and digital culture. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. (2009). Mathematics teaching and learning: where to? Learning Matters, 14(1), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2008). National numeracy review report. Canberra: Human Capital Working Group, Council of Australian Governments.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas Willms, J., Friesen, S., & Milton, P. (2009). What did you do in school today? Toronto: Canadian Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downer, J. T., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2007). How do classroom conditions and children’s risk for school problems contribute to children’s behavioral engagement in learning? School Psychology Review, 36(3), 413–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, B. (2006). “Go to the page and work it from there” young people’s experiences of learning mathematics from a text. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 20(1), 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fair Go Team NSW Department of Education and Training. (2006). School is for me: pathways to student engagement. Sydney: NSW Department of Education and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M., & Bennison, A. (2008). Surveying the technology landscape: teachers’ use of technology in secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(3), 102–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, D., Mills, M., Christie, P., & Lingard, B. (2006). Teachers and schooling making a difference. Sydney: Allan & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, D. T. (2003). Engaged participation versus marginal nonparticipation: a stridently sociocultural approach to achievement motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 103(4), 401–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowrie, T. (2004). Making mathematics meaningful, realistic and personalised: Changing the direction of relevance and applicability. Paper presented at the Mathematical Association of Victoria Annual Conference 2004: Towards Excellence in Mathematics. Clayton: Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J. (2008). Motivation and engagement Scale: High school (MES-HS) test user manual. Sydney: Lifelong Achievement Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J., Marsh, H. W., McInerney, D. M., & Green, J. (2009). Young people’s interpersonal relationships and academic and nonacademic outcomes: Scoping the relative salience of teachers, parents, same-sex peers, and opposite-sex peers. Teachers College Record, March 2009. Retrieved from http://www.tcrecord.org/Home.asp.

  • McGee, C., Ward, R., Gibbons, J., & Harlow, A. (2003). Transition to secondary school: A literature review. New Zealand: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munns, G. (2007). A sense of wonder: pedagogies to engage students who live in poverty. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munns, G., & Martin, A. J. (2005). It’s all about MeE: A motivation and engagement framework. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Academic Research Focus Conference, Cairns. http://www.aare.edu.au/05pap/mun05400.pdf.

  • NSW Department of Education and Training. (2003). Quality teaching in NSW public schools. Sydney: Professional Support and Curriculum Directorate.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, T., & Plummer, C. (2004). Social interaction: a vehicle for building meaning. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 9(4), 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, R., & Ball, L. (2009). Perceptions that may affect teachers’ intention to use technology in secondary mathematics classes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricks, T. E. (2009). Mathematics is motivating. The Mathematics Educator, 19(2), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. M. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialisation of adolescents’ motivation, engagement and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 25(2), 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • State of Victoria Department of Education and Training (2004). Middle years of schooling overview of Victorian Research 1998–2004 Retrieved July 7, 2005, from http://www.sofweb.vic.edu.au/mys/docs/research/

  • Stevens, L. P., Hunter, L., Pendergast, D., Carrington, V., Bahr, N., Kapitzke, C., et al. (2007). Reconceptualizing the possible narratives of adolescence. The Australian Educational Researcher, 34(2), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P., & McDonough, A. (2007, July). Eliciting positive student motivation for learning mathematics. Paper presented at the Mathematics: Essential Research, Essential Practice: 30th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Hobart, Tasmania.

  • Sullivan, P., Mousley, J., & Zevenbergen, R. (2005). Increasing access to mathematical thinking. The Australian Mathematical Society Gazette, 32(2), 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M., & Chinnappan, M. (2008). Teaching and learning with technology: Realising the potential. In H. Forgasz, A. Barkatsas, A. Bishop, B. Clarke, S. Keast, W. Seah, P. Sullivan, & S. Willis (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2004–2007: New directions in mathematics and science education (pp. 165–194). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2008). Learning from “didactikids”: an impetus for revisiting the empty number line. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20(3), 6–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatakrishnan, H., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Tracking and mixed-ability grouping in secondary school mathematics classrooms: a case study. British Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Western Sydney, Bankstown Campus, Locked Bag 1979, Penrith Sth DC, NSW, 1797, Australia

    Catherine Attard

Authors
  1. Catherine Attard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine Attard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Attard, C. “If I had to pick any subject, it wouldn’t be maths”: foundations for engagement with mathematics during the middle years. Math Ed Res J 25, 569–587 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0081-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0081-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation