Skip to main content
Log in

Challenging teacher beliefs about student engagement in mathematics

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study explored the beliefs about student engagement in mathematics of three Year 5 and 6 teachers, focusing on the shifts that occurred during a 10-week intervention. Data obtained from teacher surveys, interviews, video-recorded workshop observations and artefacts from teachers’ classrooms reveal variations in their reactions to the professional learning experiences. Teacher responses were mediated by personal and contextual elements including teacher efficacy beliefs, teacher confidence in mathematics and their conceptions of student engagement. Theories of teacher conceptual change are used to account for variations to teacher beliefs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguirre, J., & Speer, N. (1999). Examining the relationship between beliefs and goals in teacher practice. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 327–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubusson, P., Ewing, R., & Hoban, G. (2009). Action learning in schools. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrington, F. (2011). Australian mathematical sciences institute interim update on year 12 mathematics student numbers. Melbourne: Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beswick, K., Callingham, R., & Watson, J. (2011). The nature and development of middle school mathematics teachers’ knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobis, J., Anderson, J., Martin, A., & Way, J. (2011). A model for mathematics instruction to enhance student motivation and engagement. In D. Brahier (Ed.), Motivation and disposition: Pathways to learning mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Seventy-third Yearbook (pp. 31–42). Reston Va.: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C., Esmonde, I., Ross, J., Gookie, L., & Beatty, R. (2010). The effects of sustained classroom embedded teacher professional learning on teacher efficacy and related student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1598–1608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constas, M. A. (1992). Qualitative analysis as a public event: The documentation of category development procedures. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, K. (2014). Eliciting engagement in the high school classroom: A mixed-methods examination of teaching practices. American Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 363–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, D. (2009). Alignment, cohesions, and change: Examining mathematics teachers’ belief structures and their influence on instructional practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 325–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualisations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2011). Attitude towards mathematics: A bridge between beliefs and emotions. ZDM, 43, 471–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dweck, C. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research And Pedagogy, 15(1), 13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgasz, H., & Leder, G. (2008). Beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching. In P. Sullivan & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education: Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development (Vol. 1). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38, 519–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furinghetti, F., & Morselli, F. (2011). Beliefs and beyond: How and whys in the teaching of proof. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43, 587–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furinghetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterizations of beliefs. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 39–57). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettinger, M., & Walter, M. (2012). Classroom strategies to enhance academic engaged time. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 653–673). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, G., Rösken, B., & Törner, G. (2009). Beliefs: No longer a hidden variable in mathematical teaching and learning processes. In J. Maass & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education: New research results (pp. 1–18). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, L. T., Doerr, H. M., & Lewis, C. C. (2014). Mathematics teachers’ learning: A conceptual framework and synthesis of research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(1), 5–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 147–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadré, P. L., Kendrick, A. D., & Sullivan, D. W. (2008). Measuring teacher perceptions of the ‘‘how’’ and ‘‘why’’ of student motivation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(2), 155–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardré, P. L., & Sullivan, D. W. (2008). Teacher perceptions and individual differences: How they influence rural teachers’ motivating strategies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2059–2075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P., & Rowe, K. (1996). Multilevel modelling in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaasila, R., Hannula, M. S., Laine, A., & Pehkonen, E. (2008). Socio-emotional orientations and teacher change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, M., & Lawson, H. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83, 432–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leatham, K. (2006). Viewing mathematics teachers’ beliefs as sensible systems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leatham, K., & Hill, D. (2010). Exploring our complex math identities. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 15(4), 224–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liljedahl, P. (2010). Noticing rapid and profound mathematics teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(5), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J. (2008). The motivation and engagement scale. Sydney: Lifelong Achievement Group (www.lifelongachievement.com).

  • Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., Bobis, J., Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2012). Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement amongst middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. J., Bobis, J., Anderson, J., Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2011). Multilevel variance in psycho-educational phenomena: Exploring differences across constructs. German Journal of Educational Psychology/Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25(1), 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, J. A., & Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 65–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, E., & Steward, S. (2003). Is Mathematics T.I.R.E.D? A profile of quiet disaffection in the secondary mathematics classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 345–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R., Hamre, B., & Allen, J. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In C. Wylie, S. L. Christenson, & A. L. Reschly (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rösken, B., Hannula, M., & Pehkonen, E. (2011). Dimensions of students’ views of themselves as learners of mathematics. ZDM, 43, 497–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. D. (2007). Professional development effects on teacher efficacy. Results of randomized field trial. Journal of Educational Research, 101(1), 50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. A., McDougall, D., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & LeSage, A. (2003). A survey measuring elementary teachers’ implementation of standards-based mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(4), 344–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 219–236). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Skilling, K. (2014). Teacher practices: How they promote or hinder student engagement in mathematics. In J. Anderson, M. Cavanagh, & A. Prescott (Eds.), Curriculum in focus: Research guided practice (proceedings of the 37th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 589–596). Sydney: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stipek, D., Salmon, J., Givvin, K., Kazemi, K., Saxe, G., & MacGyvers, V. (1998). The value (and convergence) of practices suggested by motivation research and promoted by mathematics education reformers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 465–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., Nicholas, M., Hillman, K., & Buckley, S. (2010). PISA in brief: Highlights from the full Australian report. Melbourne: ACER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Warzon, K., & Christenson, A. (2011). Motivating mathematics learning: Changes in teachers’ practices and beliefs during a nine-month collaboration. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 718–762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, J. L. M. (2008). The relationship among primary teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 139–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zazkis, R., & Hazzan, O. (1999). Interviewing in mathematics education: Choosing the questions. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 17(4), 429–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by an Australian Research Council Linkage Projects Grant, in partnership with the Catholic Education Office, Sydney.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Janette Bobis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bobis, J., Way, J., Anderson, J. et al. Challenging teacher beliefs about student engagement in mathematics. J Math Teacher Educ 19, 33–55 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9300-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9300-4

Keywords

Navigation