Abstract
This study explored the beliefs about student engagement in mathematics of three Year 5 and 6 teachers, focusing on the shifts that occurred during a 10-week intervention. Data obtained from teacher surveys, interviews, video-recorded workshop observations and artefacts from teachers’ classrooms reveal variations in their reactions to the professional learning experiences. Teacher responses were mediated by personal and contextual elements including teacher efficacy beliefs, teacher confidence in mathematics and their conceptions of student engagement. Theories of teacher conceptual change are used to account for variations to teacher beliefs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguirre, J., & Speer, N. (1999). Examining the relationship between beliefs and goals in teacher practice. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(3), 327–356.
Aubusson, P., Ewing, R., & Hoban, G. (2009). Action learning in schools. London: Routledge.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Barrington, F. (2011). Australian mathematical sciences institute interim update on year 12 mathematics student numbers. Melbourne: Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute.
Beswick, K., Callingham, R., & Watson, J. (2011). The nature and development of middle school mathematics teachers’ knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(1), 1–27.
Bobis, J., Anderson, J., Martin, A., & Way, J. (2011). A model for mathematics instruction to enhance student motivation and engagement. In D. Brahier (Ed.), Motivation and disposition: Pathways to learning mathematics, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Seventy-third Yearbook (pp. 31–42). Reston Va.: NCTM.
Bruce, C., Esmonde, I., Ross, J., Gookie, L., & Beatty, R. (2010). The effects of sustained classroom embedded teacher professional learning on teacher efficacy and related student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1598–1608.
Constas, M. A. (1992). Qualitative analysis as a public event: The documentation of category development procedures. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 253–266.
Cooper, K. (2014). Eliciting engagement in the high school classroom: A mixed-methods examination of teaching practices. American Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 363–402.
Cross, D. (2009). Alignment, cohesions, and change: Examining mathematics teachers’ belief structures and their influence on instructional practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 325–346.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualisations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
Di Martino, P., & Zan, R. (2011). Attitude towards mathematics: A bridge between beliefs and emotions. ZDM, 43, 471–482.
Dweck, C. (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research And Pedagogy, 15(1), 13–33.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117–142.
Forgasz, H., & Leder, G. (2008). Beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching. In P. Sullivan & T. Wood (Eds.), The international handbook of mathematics teacher education: Knowledge and beliefs in mathematics teaching and teaching development (Vol. 1). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence: Growth trajectories in two male-sex-typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38, 519–533.
Furinghetti, F., & Morselli, F. (2011). Beliefs and beyond: How and whys in the teaching of proof. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43, 587–599.
Furinghetti, F., & Pehkonen, E. (2002). Rethinking characterizations of beliefs. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education? (pp. 39–57). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Gettinger, M., & Walter, M. (2012). Classroom strategies to enhance academic engaged time. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 653–673). New York: Springer.
Goldin, G., Rösken, B., & Törner, G. (2009). Beliefs: No longer a hidden variable in mathematical teaching and learning processes. In J. Maass & W. Schloeglmann (Eds.), Beliefs and attitudes in mathematics education: New research results (pp. 1–18). Rotterdam: Sense.
Goldsmith, L. T., Doerr, H. M., & Lewis, C. C. (2014). Mathematics teachers’ learning: A conceptual framework and synthesis of research. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 17(1), 5–36.
Gregoire, M. (2003). Is it a challenge or a threat? A dual-process model of teachers’ cognition and appraisal processes during conceptual change. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 147–179.
Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381–391.
Guskey, T. R. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan, 84(10), 748–750.
Hadré, P. L., Kendrick, A. D., & Sullivan, D. W. (2008). Measuring teacher perceptions of the ‘‘how’’ and ‘‘why’’ of student motivation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(2), 155–179.
Hardré, P. L., & Sullivan, D. W. (2008). Teacher perceptions and individual differences: How they influence rural teachers’ motivating strategies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2059–2075.
Hill, P., & Rowe, K. (1996). Multilevel modelling in school effectiveness research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 1–34.
Kaasila, R., Hannula, M. S., Laine, A., & Pehkonen, E. (2008). Socio-emotional orientations and teacher change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 111–123.
Lawson, M., & Lawson, H. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83, 432–479.
Leatham, K. (2006). Viewing mathematics teachers’ beliefs as sensible systems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 91–102.
Leatham, K., & Hill, D. (2010). Exploring our complex math identities. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 15(4), 224–231.
Liljedahl, P. (2010). Noticing rapid and profound mathematics teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(5), 411–423.
Martin, A. J. (2007). Examining a multidimensional model of student motivation and engagement using a construct validation approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 413–440.
Martin, A. J. (2008). The motivation and engagement scale. Sydney: Lifelong Achievement Group (www.lifelongachievement.com).
Martin, A. J., Anderson, J., Bobis, J., Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2012). Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement amongst middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1–18.
Martin, A. J., Bobis, J., Anderson, J., Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2011). Multilevel variance in psycho-educational phenomena: Exploring differences across constructs. German Journal of Educational Psychology/Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25(1), 49–61.
Maxwell, J. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3–11.
Middleton, J. A., & Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 65–88.
Nardi, E., & Steward, S. (2003). Is Mathematics T.I.R.E.D? A profile of quiet disaffection in the secondary mathematics classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 345–367.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Pianta, R., Hamre, B., & Allen, J. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365–386). New York: Springer.
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169.
Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In C. Wylie, S. L. Christenson, & A. L. Reschly (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3–19). New York: Springer.
Rösken, B., Hannula, M., & Pehkonen, E. (2011). Dimensions of students’ views of themselves as learners of mathematics. ZDM, 43, 497–506.
Ross, J. A., & Bruce, C. D. (2007). Professional development effects on teacher efficacy. Results of randomized field trial. Journal of Educational Research, 101(1), 50–60.
Ross, J. A., McDougall, D., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & LeSage, A. (2003). A survey measuring elementary teachers’ implementation of standards-based mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(4), 344–363.
Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 219–236). New York: Springer.
Skilling, K. (2014). Teacher practices: How they promote or hinder student engagement in mathematics. In J. Anderson, M. Cavanagh, & A. Prescott (Eds.), Curriculum in focus: Research guided practice (proceedings of the 37th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 589–596). Sydney: MERGA.
Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 435–454). London: Sage.
Stipek, D., Salmon, J., Givvin, K., Kazemi, K., Saxe, G., & MacGyvers, V. (1998). The value (and convergence) of practices suggested by motivation research and promoted by mathematics education reformers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 465–488.
Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., Nicholas, M., Hillman, K., & Buckley, S. (2010). PISA in brief: Highlights from the full Australian report. Melbourne: ACER.
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
Turner, J. C., Warzon, K., & Christenson, A. (2011). Motivating mathematics learning: Changes in teachers’ practices and beliefs during a nine-month collaboration. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 718–762.
Wilkins, J. L. M. (2008). The relationship among primary teachers’ content knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(2), 139–164.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.
Zazkis, R., & Hazzan, O. (1999). Interviewing in mathematics education: Choosing the questions. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 17(4), 429–439.
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by an Australian Research Council Linkage Projects Grant, in partnership with the Catholic Education Office, Sydney.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bobis, J., Way, J., Anderson, J. et al. Challenging teacher beliefs about student engagement in mathematics. J Math Teacher Educ 19, 33–55 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9300-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9300-4