Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The re-creation and resolution of the ‘problem’ of Indigenous education in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cross-curriculum priority

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the ‘problem’ of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander education represented in the Australian Curriculum’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories and cultures cross-curriculum priority. Looking beyond particular curriculum content, we uncover the policy discourses that construct (and reconstruct) the cross-curriculum priority. In the years after the Australian Curriculum’s creation, curriculum authors have moulded the priority from an initiative without a clear purpose into a purported solution to the ‘Indigenous problem’ of educational underachievement, student resistance and disengagement. As the cross-curriculum priority was created and subsequently reframed, the ‘problem’ of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander education has thereby been manifested in policy, strategised as curriculum content and precipitated in the cross-curriculum priority. These policy problematisations perpetuate contemporary racialisation and actively construct Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, histories and knowledges as deficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahearne, J. (2004). Between cultural theory and policy: The cultural policy thinking of Pierre Bourdieu, Michel de Certeau and Régis Debray. Research Paper no. 7. Coventry: Centre for Cultural Policy Studies, University of Warwick.

  • Allen, D. (2007). Periodic peaks of progress: Applying Bell’s interest covergence theory to the Mabo decision. University of Tasmania Law Review, 26, 63–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, J. (2010). What future for remote Indigenous Australia? Economic hybridity and the neoliberal turn. In Culture Crisis: Anthropology and Politics in Aboriginal Australia (pp. 259–280). Sydney, NSW: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., & Hickey, A. (2011). Incorporating Indigenous knowledge into the curriculum: Responses of science teacher educators. International Journal of Science in Society, 2(4), 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2011). Cross-curriculum priorities. Retrieved June 14, 2017, from https://web.archive.org/web/20110301230719/http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/CrossCurriculumPriorities.

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2015). Cross-curriculum priorities: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories and cultures. Retrieved 19 July, 2016, from http://v7-5.australiancurriculum.edu.au/crosscurriculumpriorities/Aboriginal-and-Torres-Strait-Islander-histories-and-cultures.

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2016a). Cross-curriculum priorities: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander histories and cultures - Overview. Retrieved 19 July, 2016, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/crosscurriculumpriorities/aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-histories-and-cultures/overview.

  • Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2016b). Cross-curriculum priorities: Introduction. Retrieved 19 July, 2016, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/crosscurriculumpriorities/overview/introduction.

  • Australian Education Senior Officials Committee. (2006). Australian directions in Indigenous education 2005–2008. Retrieved from http://www.scseec.edu.au/site/DefaultSite/filesystem/documents/ATSI%20documents/Australian_Directions_in_Indigenous_Education_2005-2008.pdf.

  • Australian Education Council. (1989). The Hobart declaration on schooling. Retrieved from http://www.educationcouncil.edu.au/EC-Publications/EC-Publications-archive/EC-The-Hobart-Declaration-on-Schooling-1989.aspx.

  • Australian Government, Department of Education (2014). Review of the Australian curriculum—final report. Retrieved from https://docs.education.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/review_of_the_national_curriculum_final_report.pdf.

  • Australian Primary Principals Association. (2014). The overcrowded primary curriculum: A way forward: Recommendations from the Australian Primary Principals Association. Retrieved from http://www.appa.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Overcrowded-primary-curriculum.pdf.

  • Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be?. Frenchs Forrest, NSW: Pearson Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi, C., & Goodwin, S. (2016). Poststructural analysis: A guide to practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillian.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (1993). What is policy? Texts, Trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 13(2), 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, L. (1992). National curriculum in Australia: An instrument of corporate federalism. British Journal of Educational Studies, 40(3), 218–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeson, M., & Firth, A. (1998). Neoliberalism as a political rationality: Australian public policy since the 1980s. Journal of Sociology, 34(3), 215–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (2004). Silent covenants: Brown v. Board of Education and the unfulfilled hopes for racial reform. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Berg, C. (Ed.). (2010). The national curriculum: A critique. Subiaco, WA: Institute of Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M. (2011). National curriculum: A political-educational tangle. Australian Journal of Education, 55(3), 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, C. (2009). What good a national curriculum for Indigenous students?. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education, International Research Conference, Canberra, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/09pap/bur091104.pdf.

  • Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. (2008). One big conversation: The Australia 2020 Summit. The Australian Journal of Public Administration, 67(4), 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Plevitz, L. (2007). Testing the social justice goals of education: A role for anti-discrimination law. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36(Suppl), 98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Training. (1989). National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Education Policy, 1989. Retrieved from http://vital.new.voced.edu.au/vital/access/services/Download/ngv:5686/SOURCE2?view=true.

  • Ditchburn, G. (2012). A national Australian curriculum: In whose interests? Asia Pacific Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2012.711243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, C. (2014). Forging the heteroglossic citizen: Articulating local, national, regional and global horizons in the Australian Curriculum. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(2), 177–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, K. (2011). A back-to-nonsense curriculum. Quadrant, 55(3). Retrieved from http://www.quadrant.org.au/magazine/issue/2011/3/a-back-to-nonsense-curriculumD.

  • Donnelly, K. (2013). Conservative values deserve championing, Opinion. The Australian. Retrived from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/opinion/conservative-values-deservechampioning/news-story/8a68472777d90b492bd024ca104e8384.

  • Fforde, C., Bamblett, L., Lovett, R., Gorringe, S., & Fogarty, B. (2013). Discourse, deficit and identity: Aboriginality, the race paradigm and the language of representation in contemporary Australia. Media International Australia, 149(1), 162–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Michel Foucault’s lecture at the College de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2), 190–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J., & Beresford, Q. (2008). A ‘formidable challenge’: Australia’s quest for equity in Indigenous education. Australian Journal of Education, 52(2), 197–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, N. (2007). Where do we look now? The future of research in Indigenous Australian education. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 36, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickling-Hudson, A. (2003). Multicultural education and the postcolonial turn. Policy Futures in Education, 1(2), 381–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickling-Hudson, A., & Ahlquist, R. (2003). Contesting the curriculum in the schooling of Indigenous children in Australia and the United States: From Eurocentrism to culturally powerful pedagogies. Comparative Education Review, 47(1), 64–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hokowhitu, B. (2009). Indigenous existentialism and the body. Cultural Studies Review, 15(2), 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokowhitu, B. (2016). Monster: Post-Indigenous studies. In A. Moreton-Robinson (Ed.), Critical Indigenous studies: Engagements in first world locations (pp. 83–101). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard-Wagner, D. (2007). Restoring social order through tackling passive welfare: The statutory intent of the Northern Territory National Emergency Response Act 2007 (Cth) and Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Welfare Payment Reform) Act 2007 (Cth). Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 19, 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, S. V. (2008). Child maltreatment in remote Aboriginal communities and the Northern Territory emergency response: A complex issue. Australian Social Work, 61(4), 372–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, K., & Yunkaporta, T. (2013). The inclusion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander content in the Australian National Curriculum: A cultural, cognitive and socio-political evaluation. Curriculum Perspectives, 33(1), 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, K., Backhaus, V., Yunkaporta, T., Brown, L., & Loynes, S. (2014). Wunang-y Bagay Gaay: Know the river’s story. Curriculum Perspectives, 34(5), 59–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, S. (2009). Australia: Indigenous autonomy matters. Development, 52(4), 483–489. https://doi.org/10.1057/dev.2009.62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. (2014). It’s a bit hard to tell isn’t it: identifying and analysing intentions behind a cross-curriculum priority. Curriculum Perspectives, 34(3), 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerial Council of Education, Early Childhood Development and Youth Affairs. (1999). The Adelaide declaration on national goals for schooling in the twenty first century. Retrieved from http://www.mceecdya.edu.au/mceecdya/adelaide_declaration_1999_text,28298.html.

  • Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2005). Australian directions in Indigenous education 2005–2008. Retrieved from http://www.mceetya.edu.au/verve/_resources/Australian_Directions_in_Indigenous_Education_2005-2008.pdf.

  • Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2008a). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians. Retrieved from http://www.mceecdya.edu.au/verve/_resources/national_declaration_on_the_educational_goals_for_young_australians.pdf.

  • Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. (2008b). National declaration on educational goals for young Australians - Draft. Retrieved from http://www.mceetya.edu.au/verve/_resources/Draft_National_Declaration_on_Educational_Goals_for_Young_Australians.pdf.

  • Moreton-Robinson, A. (2016). Critical Indigenous studies: Engagements in first world locations. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreton-Robinson, A., Singh, D., Kolopenuk, J., & Robinson, A. (2012). Learning the lessons? Pre-service teacher preparation for teaching Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students. QUT Indigenous Studies Research Network. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/docs/default-source/default-document-library/learning_the_lessons_final_report_isrn_qut__phases_1_-_3_2012.

  • Moreton-Robinson, A., & Walter, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies in social research. In M. Walter (Ed.), Social research methods (pp. 1–18). Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, M. N. (2007). Disciplining the savages: Savaging the disciplines. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Curriculum Board. (2008). The shape of the National Curriculum: A proposal for discussion. Retrieved from http://www.ncb.org.au/verve/_resources/The_Shape_of_the_National_Curriculum_paper.pdf.

  • New South Wales Aboriginal Education Consultative Group Incorporated and New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (2004). The report of the review of Aboriginal education—Yanigurra Muya: Ganggurrinyma Yarri Guurulaw Yirringin.gurray, Freeing the spirit: Dreaming an equal future. Sydney: NSW Department of Education and Training.

  • O’Meara, J. (2011). Australian teacher education reforms: Reinforcing the problem or providing a solution? Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(4), 423–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. (2012). Cross-curriculum priorities Health and Physical Education and Technologies Writers’ Workshop, Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority, Sydney.

  • Patrick, R., & Moodie, N. (2016). Indigenous education policy discourses in Australia. In T. Barkatsas & A. Bertram (Eds.), Global learning in the 21st century (pp. 165–184). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Petriwskyj, A. (2014). Early years national curriculum documents: Revisiting inclusive education. Curriculum Perspectives, 34(1), 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyne, C. (2014). Review of Curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.pyneonline.com.au/media/transcripts/review-of-national-curriculum.

  • Reid, A. (2009). Is this a revolution?: A critical analysis of the Rudd government’s national education agenda. Garth Boomer Memorial Lecture, Biennial Conference of the Australian Curriculum Studies Association. Canberra, Australia.

  • Review Steering Committee. (2007). Federalist Paper 2: The future of schooling in Australia—Revised edition. Retrieved from http://education.qld.gov.au/publication/production/reports/pdfs/future-schooling.pdf.

  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2009). Globalizing education policy. New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rowse, T. (2009). The ontological politics of ‘closing the gaps’. Journal of Cultural Economy, 2(1–2), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (RCIADIC). (1991). National report [volume 5]: The process of reconciliation—recommendations, by Commissioner Elliott Johnston, QC. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. Retrieved from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/IndigLRes/rciadic/national/vol5/5.html#Heading28.

  • Rudolph, S. (2016). The logic of history in ‘gap’discourse and related research. The Australian Educational Researcher, 43(4), 437–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, P., & Maxwell, J. (2015). The inherent vulnerability of the Australian Curriculum’s cross-curriculum priorities. Critical Studies in Education, 57(3), 296–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter, P., & Maxwell, J. (2016): Navigating the ‘inter’ in intercultural education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2016.1179171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. Denis, V. (2011). Silencing Aboriginal curricular content and perspectives through multiculturalism:“There are other children here”. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 33(4), 306–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision. (2009). Overcoming Indigenous disadvantage: Key indicators 2009. Canberra: Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision. (2011). Overcoming Indigenous disadvantage: Key indicators 2011. Melbourne: Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision. (2014). Overcoming Indigenous disadvantage: Key indicators 2014. Canberra: Productivity Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, R. B. (1986). Incentive, achievement and community: An analysis of Black viewpoints on issues relating to Black Australian education. Sydney: Sydney University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunkaporta, T. (2009). Aboriginal pedagogies at the cultural interface. Unpublished doctoral thesis, James Cook University, Australia.

  • Zubrick, S. R., Silburn, S. R., De Maio, J. A., Shepherd, C., Griffin, J. A., Dalby, R. B., et al. (2006). The Western Australian Aboriginal Child Health Survey: Improving the educational experiences of Aboriginal children and young people (Volume 3). Perth: Curtin University of Technology and Telethon Institute for Child Health Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia

    Jacinta Maxwell

  2. Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

    Kevin Lowe

  3. James Cook University, Townsville, Australia

    Peta Salter

Authors
  1. Jacinta Maxwell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kevin Lowe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peta Salter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacinta Maxwell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maxwell, J., Lowe, K. & Salter, P. The re-creation and resolution of the ‘problem’ of Indigenous education in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cross-curriculum priority. Aust. Educ. Res. 45, 161–177 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-017-0254-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-017-0254-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation