Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

‘To be numerate is to be someone…’: Tracing the doings of students labelled ‘at risk’

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scores from the Australian National Assessment Program—Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) identify students ‘at risk’ of not meeting minimum standards deemed necessary for future success in school and employment. The NAPLAN tests include items related to numeracy but also mathematics content and skills. Research in the area of mathematics education examining the effectiveness of pedagogical interventions in improving student scores on NAPLAN and other international measures is not only shaped by the standardised testing regime, it also effectively corrals the problem within the school context. As such, it is unable to answer questions related to other factors implicated in the lives of those who continue to ‘fail’ in relation to numeracy outcomes. This paper critically examines the type of funded research being done in relation to numeracy and mathematics education, the ‘social’ turn and the disconnect between this research and the widening ‘gap’ in NAPLAN numeracy outcomes. It argues for a research approach informed by institutional ethnography that begins with the ‘doings’ of individual students labelled ‘at risk’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Graph 1
Graph 2
Graph 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACARA. (2013). NAP: National Assessment Program. Retrieved December 22, 2014 from http://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/naplan.html.

  • ACARA. (2014). NAPLAN Achievement in reading, persuasive writing, language conventions and numeracy: National Report for 2014. NAP: National Assessment Program. Retrieved February 04, 2015 from http://www.nap.edu.au/results-and-reports/national-reports.html.

  • Anderson, J. (2016). Misconceptions about numeracy standards. Staff Bulletin. Retrieved from https://wordvine.sydney.edu.au/files/1336/12202/#!1yna6fa-in-the-media-misconceptions-about-numeracy-standards.

  • ARC. (2015). Grants Data Set. Australian Research Council. Retrieved March 05, 2015 from http://www.arc.gov.au/grants-dataset.

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • COAG. (2008a). Closing the gap in indigenous disadvantage. Retrieved February 04, 2015 from https://www.coag.gov.au/closing_the_gap_in_indigenous_disadvantage.

  • COAG. (2008b). National Numeracy Review Report. Australia: Australian Government Retrieved February 04, 2015 from https://www.coag.gov.au/sites/default/files/national_numeracy_review.pdf.

  • Comber, B. (2012). Mandated literacy assessment and the reorganisation of teachers’ work: federal policy, local effects. Critical Studies in Education, 53(2), 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W., Ashendon, D. J., Kessler, S., & Dowsett, G. W. (1982). Making the difference: Schools, families and social division. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, Y. (2004). The discursive effects of policy texts: An institutional ethnography of funding special education in Ontario. (PhD thesis), Toronto, ON: York University.

  • DEETYA. (1997). Numeracy = Everyone’s Business, The Report of the Numeracy Education Strategy Development Conference May 1997. Adelaide, SA: Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEWA. (2001). Students at Educational Risk. Perth, WA: The Government of Western Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doig, B. (2001). Summing up: Australian numeracy performances, practices, programs and possibilities. Retrieved February 04, 2015 from http://research.acer.edu.au/literacy_numeracy_reviews/2.

  • Donovan, M. (2015). Aboriginal student stories, the missing voice to guide us towards change. Australian Educational Researcher, 42, 613–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. (2012). Data modelling with first-grade students. Educational Studies in Mathematics: An International Journal, 81(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. (2013). Reconceptualizing statistical learning in the early years, reconceptualizing early mathematics learning. Advances in mathematics education, 1463–6441(5), 67. (British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M., Lincoln, D., Coco, A., Frid, S., Galbraith, P., Horne, M., & Gholan, M. (2004). Home, school and community partnerships to support children’s numeracy. Canberra, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, A. I., & Smith, D. E. (Eds.). (2014). Under new public management: Institutional ethnographies of changing front-line work. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, R. (2010). Structured failing: Reshaping a mathematical future for marginalised learners. In: Paper presented at the MERGA33—2010 Shaping the Future of Mathematics Education Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Freemantle, WA.

  • Jorgensen, R. (2014). Social theories of learning: A need for a new paradigm in mathematics education. Paper presented at the 37th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Sydney.

  • Jorgensen, R., Gates, P., & Roper, V. (2014). Structural exclusion through school mathematics: using Bourdieu to understand mathematics as a social practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87, 221–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen, R., & Lowrie, T. (2013). Both ways strong: Using digital games to engage Aboriginal learners. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 17(2), 130–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, L. (2011). The educational production of students at risk. (Doctoral Thesis), Toronto, ON: University of Toronto.

  • Ladwig, J., & Luke, A. (2013). Does improving school level attendance lead to improved school level achievement? An empirical study of Indigenous education policy in Australia. Australian Educational Researcher,. doi:10.1007/s13384-013-0131-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, S. (2000). The social turn in mathematics education research. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 19–44). Westport, CT: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makar, K. (2012). The pedagogy of mathematics inquiry. In R. Gillies (Ed.), Pedagogy: New developments in the learning sciences. New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, H. (2005). Supporting Indigenous students as “smart, not good” knowers and learners: The practices of two teachers. In: Paper presented at the AARE International Education Research 2004 Conference, Melbourne, VIC: Australia

  • Morgan, C. (2014a). Social theory in mathematics education: Guest editorial. Education Studies in Mathematics, 87(3), 123–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. (2014b). Understanding practices in mathematics education: structure and text. Education Studies in Mathematics, 87(3), 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J., & English, L. (2014). Developing young students’ meta-representational competence through integrated mathematics and science investigations. In: Paper presented at the Curriculum in focus: Research guided practice (Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 493–500), Sydney.

  • Nakata, M. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and the cultural interface: Underlying issues at the intersection of knowledge and information systems. IFLA J, 28(5), 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakata, M. (2007). The Cultural Interface. Aust J Indigen Educ, 36(Supplement), 7–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NSWDEC. (2014). Early Action for Success 2014 Implementation Plan. NSW Government: Sydney, NSW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pais, A., & Valero, P. (2014). Whither social theory? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87(3), 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polhaus, G. (2002). Knowing communities: An investigation of Harding’s standpoint epistomology. Social Epistemology, 16(3), 283–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. (1999). Human capital theory and education policy in Australia. Australian Economic Review, 32(2), 130–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for the people. Oxford: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. E., & Turner, S. M. (Eds.). (2014). Incorporating texts into institutional ethnographies. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, D. (2015). Tracing complexities of teacher professional learning to evidence of transformed practice. (PhD thesis), University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

  • Uptin, J., Wright, J., & Harwood, V. (2013). ‘It felt like I was a black dot on white paper’: Examining young former refugees’ experience of entering Australian high schools. Australian Educational Researcher, 40, 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vass, G. (2015). Putting critical race theory to work in Australian education research:’We are with the garden hose here’. Australian Educational Researcher, 42(3), 371–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VICDET. (2015). Identifying students at risk. Retrieved May 05, 2015 from http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/principals/participation/Pages/disengagedrisk.aspx.

  • Watters, J., & Diezmann, C. (2013). Community partnerships for fostering student interest and engagement in STEM. Journal of STEM Education, 14(2), 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, S. (1998). Which numeracy? Unicorn, 24(2), 32–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the following people for their generous and valuable comments on earlier drafts of this article: Eve Mayes, Meghan Stacey, and the reviewers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Debra Talbot

Authors
  1. Debra Talbot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Debra Talbot.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 1 and 2.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Talbot, D. ‘To be numerate is to be someone…’: Tracing the doings of students labelled ‘at risk’. Aust. Educ. Res. 43, 419–436 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-016-0207-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-016-0207-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation