Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Turkish Students’ Science Performance and Related Factors in PISA 2006 and 2009

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) enables participating countries to monitor 15-year old students’ progress in reading, mathematics, and science literacy. The present study investigates persistent factors that contribute to science performance of Turkish students in PISA 2006 and PISA 2009. Additionally, the study investigates whether factors explaining science performance has changed between 2006 and 2009. Multilevel analyses of student level and school-level variables revealed that the variance in science performance explained by school-level variables is 13 % for PISA 2006 and 28 % for PISA 2009. Moreover, the variance in science performance explained by student-level variables is 19 % for PISA 2006 and 20 % for PISA 2009. The six most common student-level variables in PISA 2006 and 2009 were statistically significant predictors of science performance. At the school level, location of school was a significant predictor of science achievement in both PISA 2006 and 2009.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alacacı, C., & Erbaş, A. K. (2010). Unpacking the inequality among Turkish schools: Findings from PISA 2006. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(2), 182–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. O., Lin, H. S., Treagust, D. F., Ross, S. P., & Yore, L. D. (2007). Using large-scale assessment data sets for research in science and mathematics education: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 591–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anıl, D. (2009). Factors effecting science achievement of science students in Programme for International Students’ Achievement (PISA) in Turkey. Education and Science, 34(152), 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barone, C. (2006). Cultural capital, ambition and the explanation of inequalities in learning outcomes: A comparative analysis. Sociology, 40(6), 1039–1058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, W. L. (1991). What makes ghetto schools succeed or fail? Teachers College Record, 92, 331–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, A., & Lanot, G. (2002). The relative effect of family characteristics and financial situation on educational achievement. Education Economics, 10(2), 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartlant, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfall, F. D., et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordero, J. M., Crespo, E., & Santín, D. (2010). Factors affecting educational attainment: Evidence from Spanish PISA 2006 results. Regional and Sectorial Economic Studies, 10(3), 55–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delen, E., & Bulut, O. (2011). The relationship between students’ exposure to technology and their achievement in science and math. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(3), 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engin-Demir, C. (2009). Factors influencing the academic achievement of the Turkish urban poor. International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, T., & Wößmann, L. (2007). What accounts for international differences in student performance? A re-examination using PISA data. Empirical Economics, 32, 433–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilleece, L., Cosgrove, J., & Sofroniou, N. (2010). Equity in mathematics and science outcomes: Characteristics associated with high and low achievement on PISA 2006 in Ireland. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 475–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürsakal, S. (2012). An evaluation of PISA 2009 student achievement levels’ affecting factors. Süleyman Demirel University the Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 17(1), 441–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinan, M. T. (1994). Tracking: From theory to practice. Sociology of Education, 67(2), 79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A. (2003). The failure of input based schooling policies. The Economic Journal, 113(485), 64–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, E. A., & Luque, J. (2003). Efficiency and equity in schools around the world. Economics of Education Review, 22, 481–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyneman, S. P., & Loxley, W. (1983). The effect of primary school quality on academic achievement across twenty-nine high- and low-income countries. American Journal of Sociology, 88(6), 1162–1194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. C. (2010a). Family influences on science learning among Hong Kong adolescents: What we learned from PISA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 409–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. C. (2010b). Assessing the quality and equality of Hong Kong basic education results from PISA 2000+ to PISA 2006. Frontiers of Education in China, 5(2), 238–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalender, I., & Berberoglu, G. (2009). An assessment of factors related to science achievement of Turkish students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), 1379–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knipprath, H. (2010). What PISA tells us about the quality and inequality of Japanese education in mathematics and science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. (1999). Experimental estimates of education production functions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 497–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuziemko, I. (2006). Using shocks to school enrollment to estimate the effect of school size on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 25(1), 63–75.

  • Ma, X. (2003). Measuring up: Academic performance of Canadian immigrant children in reading, mathematics and science. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 4(4), 541–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of National Education of Turkey (MONE) (2005). Science and technology curriculum of elementary schools (6th–8th grades) [in Turkish]. Board of Education.

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2010b). PISA 2009 results: Learning trends: Changes in student performance since 2000, vol. V. Paris.

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world. First results from PISA 2003. Paris.

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2005). School sampling preparation manual. [Online] Retrieved May 02, 2013, from http://www.oecd.org/education/school/programmeforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/39829698.pdf.

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2007a). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Paris.

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2010a). PISA 2009 Results: What students know and can do—Student performance in reading, mathematics and science, vol. I. Paris.

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2010c). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background—Equity in learning opportunities and outcomes, vol. II. Paris.

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R. T., & du Toit, M. (2011). HLM 7: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, S., Park, E. J., & Armor, D. J. (2012). Comparing effects of family and school factors on cross-national academic achievement using the 2009 and 2006 PISA surveys. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 14(5), 449–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, E. B. (2008). School structural characteristics, student effort, peer associations, and parental involvement: The influence of school-and individual-level factors on academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 40(2), 179–204.

  • Xia, N. (2009). Family factors and student outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, CA.

  • Yalcin, M., Aslan, S., & Usta, E. (2012). Analysis of PISA 2009 exam according to some variables. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 2(1), 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yayan, B., & Berberoglu, G. (2004). A re-analysis of the TIMSS-1999 mathematics assessment data of the Turkish students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 30, 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz, H. B. (2009). Turkish students’ scientific literacy scores: A multilevel analysis of data from program for international student assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Elementary Education, Faculty of Education, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Mustafa Sami Topçu

  2. Department of Elementary Education, Faculty of Education, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey

    Serkan Arıkan & Evrim Erbilgin

Authors
  1. Mustafa Sami Topçu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Serkan Arıkan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Evrim Erbilgin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Sami Topçu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Topçu, M.S., Arıkan, S. & Erbilgin, E. Turkish Students’ Science Performance and Related Factors in PISA 2006 and 2009. Aust. Educ. Res. 42, 117–132 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0157-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0157-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation