Abstract
The issue of limited engagement with science for young people from Indigenous, minority and lower socio-economic groups in Australia appears to have been sidelined from the mainstream debate around falling rates of engagement with science at the secondary schooling level. The ‘closing the gap’ mantra of education policy in Australia has seen an extraordinary focus on improving literacy and numeracy outcomes for Indigenous students, which, while valuable, has subsumed the importance of other key learning areas including science. Teachers are soon to be expected to incorporate Indigenous Perspectives within the science subjects of the new Australian National Curriculum yet appear to be under-resourced to meet this challenge to traditional approaches to science teaching. The purpose of this paper is to explore the pedagogy of a teacher working at an alternative secondary schooling site in North Queensland Australia who volunteered to modify his teaching of science to explicitly incorporate Indigenous Perspectives. The qualitative data collected through classroom observation and teacher interviews demonstrates the complex and multi-faceted nature of the science education experience when traditional pedagogical boundaries are dismantled to allow for a drawing upon of the lived experiences of diverse young people. The teacher’s ability to embrace this broader vision of science is linked to the inclusive culture of the alternative school environment that is brought into being through a ‘common ground’ philosophy of mutual respect and democratic relations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The teacher participant, Todd, as co-author of this paper, has chosen to be identified.
All student names are pseudonyms.
References
Australian curriculum, assessment and reporting authority (ACARA). (2010, March). Australian curriculum information sheet science. Sydney: ACARA.
Calabrese Barton, A. (1998). Reframing “Science for All” through the Politics of Poverty. Educational Policy, 12(5), 525–541.
Chigeza, P. (2011). Cultural resources of minority and marginalised students should be included in the school science curriculum. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(2), 401–412.
Edmund Rice Education Australia. (2004). Centre education programme. http://www.learningplace.com.au/defaulteqa2.asp?orgid=72&suborgid=482. Accessed 18 March 2008.
Edmund Rice Education Australia. (2010). A new beginning flexible learning and youth. http://www.erea.edu.au/educational-leadership/dsp-story.cfm?loadref=148. Accessed 30 October 2010.
Edmund Rice Education Australia Flexible Learning Centre Network. (2008). National working paper 2. http://www.ereflc.org.au/docs/NationalWorkingPaperWEB.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2008.
Edmund Rice Education Australia Flexible Learning Centre Network. (2010). Annual report 2010. http://www.ereflc.org.au/annual_reports.html. Accessed 2 February 2011.
Fensham, P. (2004, September). Engagement with science: an international issue that goes beyond knowledge. Paper presented at the Science and Mathematics Education Conference (SMEC), Dublin, Ireland.
Foley, R., & Pang, L. (2006). Alternative education programs: program and student characteristics. The High School Journal, 89(3), 10–21.
Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the Oppressed (20th anniversary edn). New York: Continuum.
Gonzalez, N., & Moll, L. (2002). Cruzando El Puente: building bridges to funds of knowledge. Educational Policy, 16(4), 623–641.
Lee, O., & Buxton, C. (2011). Engaging culturally and linguistically diverse students in learning science. Theory into Practice, 50(4), 277–284.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: language, learning, and values. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296–316.
Morgan, A. (2009). The four paths and four values. EREAFLC Network: Brisbane.
Schreiner, C., & Sjoberg, S. (2004). Sowing the seeds of Rose. Oslo: Unipub AS.
Seiler, G. (2001). Reversing the “standard” direction: science emerging from the lives of African American students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(9), 1000–1014.
Seiler, G. (2011). Reconstructing science curricula through student voice and choice. Education and Urban Society,. doi:10.1177/0013124511408596.
Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Thomson, S., & De Bertoli, L. (2008). Exploring scientific literacy: How Australia measures up. The PISA 2006 survey of students’ scientific, reading and mathematical literacy skills. http://research.acer.edu.au/ozpisa/2. Accessed 3 February 2012.
Thomson, S., De Bertoli, L., Nicholas, M., Hillman, K., & Buckley, S. (2010). Challenges for Australian education: results from PISA 2009. Camberwell: ACER Press.
Tobin, K. (2006). Aligning the cultures of teaching and learning science in urban high schools. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 219–252.
Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Camberwell: ACER Press.
Acknowledgments
The ‘Re-Engaging Disadvantaged Youth Through Science’ Project has been supported by the Australian Research Council, who provided funding for the venture. This project has the active support of Edmund Rice Education Australia (EREA).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, K., Alloway, T. Expecting the unexpected: engaging diverse young people in conversations around science. Aust. Educ. Res. 40, 195–206 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0084-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0084-6