Abstract
An external change agent (ECA) was recently employed in three Queensland schools to align the school curriculum with the requirements of the state’s high stakes test known as the Queensland Core Skills test (QCS). This paper reports on the teachers’ perceptions of a change process led by an ECA. With the ever-increasing implementation of high stakes testing in Australian schools, teachers are under mounting pressure to produce ‘results’. Therefore, in order to maximise their students’ success in these tests, schools are altering their curricula to incorporate the test requirements. Rather than the traditional method of managing such curriculum change processes internally, there is a growing trend for principals to source external expertise in the form of ECAs. Although some academics, teachers, and much of the relevant literature, would regard such a practice as problematic, this study found that in fact, teachers were quite open to externally led curriculum change, especially if they perceived the leader to be knowledgeable and creditable in this area.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blanton, L. P., Sindelar, P. T., & Correa, V. I. (2007). Models of measures of beginning teacher quality. Journal of Special Education, 40(2), 115–127.
Booz Allen Hamilton (2004). 10 guiding principles of change management. http://www.boozallen.com/media/file/138137.pdf. Accessed 22 October 2008.
Cavana, R., Delahaye, B., & Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied business research: qualitative and quantitative methods. Brisbane: Wiley.
Cribb, A. (2009). Professional ethics: Whose responsibility? In P. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall, & A. Cribb (Eds.), Changing teacher professionalism: international trends, changes and ways forward (pp. 31–42). London: Routledge.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–33). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M., & Hargreaves, A. (1991). What’s worth fighting for: working together for your school. Toronto: Ontario Public School Teachers’ Federation.
Goodman, J., Barron, D., & Myers, C. (2001). Bringing democracy to the occupational life of educators in the United States: constructing a foundation for school based reform. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(1), 57–86.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four ages of professionalism and professional learning. Teachers and Teaching, 6(2), 151–182.
Harris, A. (2001). Building the capacity for school improvement. School Leadership and Management, 21(3), 261–270.
Hirst, P. (1968). The contribution of philosophy to the study of the curriculum. In J. Kerr (Ed.), Changing the curriculum (pp. 39–62). London: University of London Press.
Huberman, K., & Miles, M. (1984). Innovation up close. New York: Plenum.
Kerr, J. (Ed.). (1968). Changing the curriculum. London: University of London Press.
Leppitt, N. (2006). Challenging the code of change: Part 1. Praxis does not make perfect. Journal of Change Management, 6(2), 121–142.
Lieberman, A. (1992). Introduction: the changing context of education. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), The changing contexts of teaching (pp. i–v). Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.
Lincoln, N., & Guba, E. (2002). Judging the quality of case study reports. In A. M. Huberman & M. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher’s companion (pp. 205–215). London: SAGE.
Luxon, N. (2004). Truthfulness, risk and trust in the late lectures of Michel Foucault. Inquiry, 47(5), 464–489.
Macdonald, D. (2004). Curriculum change in health and physical education: the devil’s perspective. Journal of Physical Education New Zealand, 37, 70–83.
Malen, B., & Rice, J. (2009). A framework for assessing the impact of educational reforms on school capacity: Insights from studies of high-stakes accountability initiatives. In J. King Rice & C. Roellke (Eds.), High stakes accountability: implications for resources and capacity (pp. 3–32). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
Mansell, H. (1999). Curriculum reform in New Zealand: what is really being done and is it worth the trouble? Paper presented at the AARE–NZARE, Melbourne.
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McBeath, C. (1995). Overcoming barriers to effective curriculum change: a case study in dissemination practice. Paper presented at the 3rd International Conference on Post-Compulsory Education and Training, Brisbane.
McWilliam, E., & Perry, L. (2006). On being more accountable: the push and pull of risk in school leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 9(2), 97–109.
Merriam, S. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Paechter, C. (2003). Power, knowledge, gender and curriculum change. Journal of Educational Change, 4, 129–148.
Parkay, F. (2006). Curriculum and instruction for becoming a teacher. Boston: A and B Rearson.
Perry, L., & McWilliam, E. (2007). Accountability, responsibility and school leadership. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 7(1), 32–43.
Pinar, W. (2004). What is curriculum theory?. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Print, M. (1993). Curriculum development and design. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Razik, T., & Swanson, D. (1995). Fundamental concepts of educational leadership and management. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersy: Merrill.
Roellke, C., & Rice, J. (2009). Introduction and overview leveraging student performance through high-stakes reform. In J. King Rice & C. Roellke (Eds.), High stakes accountability: Implications for resources and capacity (pp. vii–xii). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Rowe, K. (2000). Assessment, league tables and school effectiveness: consider the issues and ‘let’s get real’! Journal of Educational Enquiry, 1(1), 73–98.
Schaffer, R. H., & Thomson, H. A. (1992). Successful change programs begin with results. Harvard business review on change (pp. 189–213). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Skilbeck, M. (1998). School-based curriculum development. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change: part one (Vol. 5, pp. 121–144). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Smeed, J. (2008). Accountability and curriculum change. Perspectives on Educational Leadership, 5, 1–2.
Smith, D., & Lovat, T. (2003). Curriculum: action on reflection (4th ed.). Tuggerah, NSW: Social Science Press.
Ward, V. (2006). From the Principal. Mt Alvernia College Newsletter, pp. 1–2.
Warren, R. L. (1977). Social change and human purpose: toward understanding and action. Chicago: Rand McNally College Publishing Co.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smeed, J., Bourke, T. Teachers’ perceptions of the use of an external change agent in school curriculum change. Aust. Educ. Res. 39, 207–220 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0059-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0059-7