Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Variations in the rate at which students cross the boundaries between Australian vocational and higher education

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers the rate at which students are crossing the boundaries between Australian vocational and higher education. It finds that public universities admit a higher proportion of students on the basis of a vocational education qualification than do private colleges and that private colleges broadly do not admit a higher proportion of students from a low socioeconomic status background than public universities do. Vocational education transfers are most important in the higher education fields of nursing (22 % of commencing students), education (13 %) and information technology (12 %). Upward transfers are least important in the natural and physical sciences (3.5 %) and engineering and related technologies (6 %). Some 17 % of commencing students are from a low socioeconomic status background, but nursing (24 %) and education (22 %) provide more opportunities for students from a low socioeconomic status background. Conversely, fewer opportunities are provided in architecture and building (12 %) and the creative arts (14 %). There is considerable variation in the proportion of students that higher education institutions admit on the basis of vocational qualifications, even in a relatively homogeneous field such as nursing. Some of this apparent variation may be explained by different treatment of admissions data, but much remains unexplained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bathmaker, A., Brooks, G., Parry, G., & Smith, D. (2008). Dual-sector further and higher education: Policies, organisations and students in transition. Research Papers in Education, 23(2), 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, D. (chair). (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved 23 Dec 2008 from www.deewr.gov.au/he_review_finalreport.

  • Carlan, P., & Byxbe, F. R. (2000). Community colleges under the microscope: An analysis of performance predictors for native and transfer students. Community College Review, 28(i2), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2009). Transforming Australia’s higher education system. Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved 12 May 2007 from http://home.deewr.gov.au/Budget/documents/TransformingAusHigherED.pdf.

  • Crump, S. (2007). Changing identities and performance of post-compulsory educational providers. The Australian Educational Researcher, 34(3), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, D. (2006). Inter-sectoral transfers: Sense, status, prevalence and purpose. Paper presented at the 15th national vocational education and training research conference: 15th, 12–14 July, Mooloolaba, Australia. Retrieved 23 Sep 2008 from http://www.voced.edu.au/docs/confs/ncver/vetconf15/tr15curtis.pdf.

  • Doherty, L. (2009). Extract from Students, selected higher education statistics (DEST) RFI: 09-219 produced 6 August 2009.

  • Dougherty, K. J. (1992). Community colleges and baccalaureate attainment. The Journal of Higher Education, 63(2), 188–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallacher, J. (2003). Higher education in further education colleges: The Scottish experience. London: Council for Industry and Higher Education. Retrieved 19 Mar 2003 from http://www.cihe-uk.com/docs/PUBS/0303HEinFECScottish.pdf.

  • Garrod, N., & Macfarlane, B. (Eds.). (2009). Challenging boundaries: Managing the integration of post-secondary education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelin, F. (1999). Transfer rates: How to measure and for what purpose? A discussion paper. Vancouver: British Columbia Council on Admissions and Transfer. Retrieved 21 Jan 2010 from http://www.bccat.bc.ca/pubs/transrates.pdf.

  • Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P. A. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage (pp. 1–68). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, G. C., Jones, D. P., McGuinness, A. C. Jr. & Timar, A. (2004). Ensuring access with quality to California’s community colleges, report #04-3. San Jose, California: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. Retrieved 23 Dec 2007 from http://www.highereducation.org/reports/hewlett/Hewlett3.pdf.

  • Higher Education Funding Council for England (Hefce). (2006). Higher education in further education colleges: consultation on HEFCE policy. Bristol: Hefce. Retrieved 23 Nov 2006 from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/hefce/2006/06_48/.

  • Hoelscher, M., Hayward, G., Ertl, H., & Dunbar-Goddet, H. (2008). The transition from vocational education and training to higher education: A successful pathway? Research Papers in Education, 23(2), 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, D. (2009). Served, yes, but well-served? Inside Higher Ed, 8 October. Retrieved 22 Jan 2010 from http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/10/08/pell.

  • Moodie, G. (2005). Student transfers. Adelaide: National Centre for Vocational Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moodie, G. (2007). Do tiers affect student transfer? Examining the student admission ratio. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 31(11), 847–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moodie, G. (2008). From vocational to higher education: An international perspective. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER). (2009). Students and courses 2008, Students by courses. Adelaide: NCVER. Retrieved 18 Nov 2009 from http://www.ncver.edu.au/statistic/publications/2164.html.

  • Parry, G. (2003). Mass higher education and the English: Wherein the colleges? Higher Education Quarterly, 57(4), 308–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, T. (1998). Improving articulation policy to increase transfer. ECS policy paper, Denver: Education Commission of the States. Retrieved 23 Dec 2007 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/24/cf.pdf.

  • Sachs, J., Mansfield, N. & Kosman, B. (2011). Teaching standards framework project. Final report. Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Retrieved 16 Feb 2012 from http://www.olt.gov.au/resources.

  • Shaw, K. M., & London, H. B. (2001). Culture and ideology in keeping transfer commitment: Three community colleges. The Review of Higher Education, 25(1), 91–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. T. Miller, A. & Bermeo, C. A. (2009). Bridging the gaps to success: Promising practices promoting transfer among low income and first generation students, an in depth study of six exemplary community colleges in Texas. Washington: Pell Institute. Retrieved 20 Jan 2009 from http://www.pellinstitute.org/pdf/COE_Pell_Report_layout_3.pdf.

  • Stevenson, J. (2007). Technical and Further Education reforms: Theoretical issues. The Australian Educational Researcher, 34(3), 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Striplin, J. J. (1999). Facilitating transfer for first-generation community college students. ERIC Digest. Los Angeles, California: ERIC Clearinghouse for Community Colleges. ERIC Reproduction Service Document No. ED 430 627. Retrieved 21 Jan 2010 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED430627&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED430627.

  • Wassmer, R., Moore, C. & Shulock, N. (2003). A quantitative study of California community college transfer rates: Policy implications and a future research agenda. Sacramento: Senate Office of Research. Retrieved 20 Jan 2009 from http://www.csus.edu/ihelp/PDFs/SOR%20paper-COMMUNITYCOLLEGETRANSFER.pdf.

  • Wellman, J. V. (2002). State policy and community college-baccalaureate transfer, National Center Report #02-6. The National Centre for Public Policy and Higher Education. Retrieved 23 Dec 2007 from http://www.highereducation.org/reports/transfer/transfer.shtml.

  • Wheelahan, L. (2009). Do educational pathways contribute to equity in tertiary education in Australia? Critical Studies in Education, 50(3), 261–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheelahan, L. & Moodie, G. (2005). Separate post-compulsory education sectors within a liberal market economy: Interesting models generated by the Australian anomaly. In M. Osborne & J. Gallacher (Eds.) A contested landscape. International perspectives on diversity in mass higher education (pp. 18–46). Leicester: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.

  • White, M. (2009). Keeping VET and higher education in perspective. Campus Review, 27 April. Retrieved 27 Apr 2009 from http://www.campusreview.com.au/pages/section/article.php?s=VET&idArticle=7081.

Download references

Acknowledgments

An earlier version of this paper was presented to the Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association’s 13th annual conference at Surfers Paradise on 8–9 April, 2010. The AER’s two referees provided valuable comments on the initial manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gavin Moodie.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Moodie, G. Variations in the rate at which students cross the boundaries between Australian vocational and higher education. Aust. Educ. Res. 39, 143–158 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0054-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0054-z

Keywords

Navigation