Skip to main content
Log in

Equation for Maximum Ground Surface Settlement due to Bored Tunnelling in Cohesive and Cohesionless Soils Obtained by Numerical Simulations

  • Research Article-Civil Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Estimation of tunnelling-induced surface settlements requires empirical, analytical, or finite element analysis methods to be applied. Tunnelling method and construction sequence highly influence the surface settlements and require appropriate consideration in the analyses. In this research, the effect of single tunnel construction in soft clays, stiff clays, loose sand, and dense sand was simulated using Plaxis 2D finite element software. The results were interpreted to obtain maximum settlement at the ground surface. The effect of varying tunnelling depth, diameter, and volume loss on the maximum ground surface settlement and the location of inflection point along the ground surface settlement curve was investigated. Based on the results obtained, a set of equations for maximum surface settlement and inflection point were developed that provides a method of evaluation for maximum surface settlement and inflection point variation with respect to the tunnel diameter, depth, and volume loss. The multivariable prediction equation for maximum surface settlement is validated to be very successful overall for tunnelling in most soils, and the analyses were calibrated using field data from various tunnelling projects presented in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Modified from Möller [42])

Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\({N}_{C}\) :

Collapse stability number

\({S}_{\mathrm{max},\mathrm{ field}}\) :

Field maximum settlement

\({S}_{\mathrm{max}}\) :

Maximum settlement

\({S}_{v(y)}\) :

Vertical settlement

\({V}_{L,c}\) :

Consolidation volume loss

\({V}_{L,f}\) :

Tunnel face volume loss

\({V}_{L,s}\) :

Volume loss along the shield

\({V}_{L,t}\) :

Volume loss at tail

\({V}_{L}\) :

Volume loss

\({V}_{\mathrm{cons}}\) :

Consolidation settlement volume

\({V}_{s,t}\) :

Grouting pressure surface settlement

\({c}_{u}\) :

Undrained cohesion

\({p}_{c}\) :

Initial recorded tunnel face pressure displacements

\({p}_{f}\) :

Support collapse pressure

\({u}_{j}\) :

Consolidation settlement

\({\gamma }_{n}\) :

Soil unit weight

\({\sigma }_{T}\) :

TBM face pressure

\({\sigma }_{s}\) :

Soil surcharge

\({\sigma }_{v,o}^{^{\prime}}\) :

Initial effective vertical stress

\({\sigma }_{v}^{^{\prime}}\) :

Effective vertical stress

\(C\) :

Depth to tunnel crown

\(D\) :

Tunnel diameter

\(DS\) :

Dense sand

\(\mathrm{EPBM}\) :

Earth pressure balance machine

\(K\) :

Trough width parameter

\(\mathrm{LF}\) :

Load factor

\(N\) :

TBM stability ratio

\(R\) :

Tunnel radius

\(\mathrm{SOC}\) :

Soft clay

\(\mathrm{STC}\) :

Stiff clay

\(\mathrm{TBM}\) :

Tunnel boring machine

\(Z\) :

Tunnel depth

\(i\) :

Inflection point

\(p\) :

Applied tunnel face pressure.

\(x\) :

Horizontal distance from tunnel centreline

\(\delta\) :

Average overcut thickness

References

  1. Peck, R.B.: Deep excavation and tunneling in soft ground. In Proceedings of 7th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Mexico City, State of the Art Volume, 225–290 (1969)

  2. Schmidt, B.: Settlements and ground movements associated with tunneling in soils. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois Ph.D. Thesis (1969).

  3. Attewell, P.B.; Woodman, J.P.: Predicting the dynamics of ground settlement and its derivatives caused by tunneling in soil. Ground Eng. 15(8), 13–22 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sagaseta, C.: Analysis of undrained soil deformation due to ground loss. Géotechnique 37(3), 301–320 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1987.37.3.301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. New, B.M., O’Reilly, M.P.: Tunnelling induced ground movements: predicting their magnitude and effects. In 4th Int. Conf. Ground Movements and Structures, Pentech Press, 671–697 (1991).

  6. Mair, R.J., Taylor, R.N., Burland, J.B.: Prediction of ground movements and assessment of risk of building damage due to bored tunnelling. In Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, 713–7s18 (1996).

  7. Verruijt, A.; Booker, J.R.: Surface settlements due to deformation of a tunnel in an elastic half plane. Géotechnique 48(5), 709–713 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1996.46.4.753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Loganathan, N.; Poulos, H.G.: Analytical prediction for tunneling-induced ground movements in clays. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 124(9), 846–856 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:9(846)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chi, S.Y.; Chern, J.C.; Lin, C.C.: Optimized back-analysis for tunneling-induced ground movement using equivalent ground loss model. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 16(3), 159–165 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00048-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ocak, I.: A new approach for estimating the transverse surface settlement curve for twin tunnels in shallow and soft soils. Environ. Earth Sci. 72(7), 2357–2367 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3145-5

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ye, G.L.; Hashimoto, T.; Shen, S.L.; Zhu, H.H.; Bai, T.H.: Lessons learnt from unusual ground settlement during double-o-tube tunnelling in soft ground. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 49, 79–91 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Anato, N.J.; Chen, J.; Tang, A.; Assogba, O.C.: Numerical investigation of ground settlements induced by the construction of Nanjing WeiSanLu Tunnel and parametric analysis. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-05642-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mair, R.J.; Taylor, R.N.; Bracegirdle, A.: Subsurface settlement profiles above tunnels in clays. Géotechnique 43(2), 315–320 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1993.43.2.315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vu, M.N.; Broere, W.; Bosch, J.: Volume loss in shallow tunnelling. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 59, 77–90 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2016.06.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharifzadeh, M.; Kolivand, F.; Ghorbani, M.; Yasrobi, S.: Design of sequential excavation method for large span urban tunnels in soft ground–Niayesh tunnel. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 35, 178–188 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2013.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mair, R.J.: Settlement effects of bored tunnels. In Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, Rotterdam: Balkema, 43–53 (1996)

  17. Ahmed, M.; Iskander, M.: Analysis of tunneling-induced ground movements using transparent soil models. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 137(5), 525–535 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Macklin, S.R.: The prediction of volume loss due to tunnelling in overconsolidated clay based on heading geometry and stability number. Ground Eng. 32(4), 30–33 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  19. O’Reilly, M.P.: Evaluating and predicting ground settlements caused by tunnelling in London Clay. In: Tunnelling’88, IMM, London, 1988, 231–241 (1988)

  20. Broms, B.B.; Bennermark, H.: Stability of clay at vertical openings. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. ASCE (1967). https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0000946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mair, R.J., Taylor, R. N.: Theme lecture: Bored tunnelling in the urban environment. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rotterdam, 2353–2385 (1997)

  22. Kimura, T, Mair, R. J.: Centrifugal testing of model tunnels in soft clay. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 319–322 (1981)

  23. Dimmock, P.S.; Mair, R.J.: Estimating volume loss for open-face tunnels in London Clay. Proc. Inst. Civil Eng.-Geotech. Eng. 160(1), 13–22 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.2007.160.1.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Leca, E.; New, B.: Settlements induced by tunneling in soft ground. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 22(2), 119–149 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2006.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee, K.M.; Rowe, R.K.: Deformations caused by surface loading and tunnelling: the role of elastic anisotropy. Géotechnique 39(1), 125–140 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1989.39.1.125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chambon, P.; Corte, J.F.: Shallow tunnels in cohesionless soil: stability of tunnel face. J. Geotech. Eng. 120(7), 1148–1165 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:7(1148)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kamata, H.; Mashimo, H.: Centrifuge model test of tunnel face reinforcement by bolting. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 18(2–3), 205–212 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(03)00029-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kirsch, A.: Experimental investigation of the face stability of shallow tunnels in sand. Acta Geotech. 5(1), 43–62 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-010-0110-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Reilly, M.P., New, B.M.: Settlements above tunnels in the UK-Their magnitude and prediction. In Proceedings of the Tunnelling’82, IMM, London, 173–181 (1982)

  30. Attewell, P.B.; Farmer, I.W.: Ground deformations resulting from shield tunnelling in London Clay. Can. Geotech. J. 11(3), 380–395 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1139/t74-039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cording, E.J., Hansmire, W.H.: Displacements around soft ground tunnels. In Proceedings of the 5th Pan-American Cong. On Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Buenos Aires Argentina, 571–632 (1975)

  32. Herzog, M.: Surface subsidence above shallow tunnels. Bautechnik 62(11), 375–377 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Arioglu, E.: Surface movements due to tunneling activities in urban areas and minimization of building damages. Short Course, Istanbul Technical University, Mining Engineering Department (1992).

  34. Glossop, N.H.: Soil deformation caused by soft ground tunnelling. PhD thesis, University of Durham (1978)

  35. Rankin, W.J.: Ground movements resulting from urban tunnelling: predictions and effects. Geol. Soc. London Eng. Geol. Special Publ. 5(1), 79–92 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.ENG.1988.005.01.06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Clough, G.W., Schmidt, B.: Design and performance of excavations and tunnels in soft clay. In: Brand E.W. Brands, R.P. Brenner (Eds.) Soft Clay Engineering. Elsevier, pp. 569–634 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-41784-8.50011-3

  37. Sugiyama, T.; Hagiwara, T.; Nomoto, T.; Nomoto, M.; Ano, Y.; Mair, R.J.; Bolton, M.D.; Soga, K.: Observations of ground movements during tunnel construction by slurry shield method at the Docklands Light Railway Lewisham Extension—East London. Soils Found. 39(3), 99–112 (1999). https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.39.3_99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Atkinson, J.H.; Potts, D.M.: Subsidence above shallow tunnels in soft ground. J. Geotech. Eng. Div. ASCE 103(4), 307–325 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0000402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhao, J.; Gong, Q.M.; Eisensten, Z.: Tunnelling through a frequently changing and mixed ground: a case history in Singapore. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 22(4), 388–400 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2006.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Legge, N.B.: Tunnel lining design—hard ground. In Course on Tunnel Construction and Design Module 2, Thomas Telford Publishing, 1–14 (2011).

  41. He, X.C.; Xu, Y.S.; Shen, S.L.; Zhou, A.N.: Geological environment problems during metro shield tunnelling in Shenzhen China. Arab. J. Geosci. 13(2), 1–18 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-5071-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Möller, S.C.: Tunnel induced settlements and structural forces in linings (pp. 108–125). Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Stuttgart, Germany (2006).

  43. Möller, S.C.; Vermeer, P.A.: On numerical simulation of tunnel installation. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 23(4), 461–475 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, J.G., Kong, S.L. and Leung, C.F.: Twin tunnels-induced ground settlement in soft soils. In Proceeding of the Sino-Japanese Symposium on Geotechnical Engineering, Beijing, China, 241–244 (2003)

  45. Surarak, C.: Geotechnical aspects of the Bangkok MRT blue line project. PhD thesis, Griffith University (2011)

  46. Likitlersuang, S.; Surarak, C.; Suwansawat, S.; Wanatowski, D.; Oh, E.; Balasubramaniam, A.: Simplified finite-element modelling for tunnelling-induced settlements. Geotech. Res. 1(4), 133–152 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1680/gr.14.00016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Elmanan, A.A., Elarabi, H.: Analysis of surface settlement due to tunneling in soft ground using empirical and numerical methods. In The Fourth African Young Geotechnical Engineer's Conference (2015)

  48. Kanagaraju, R.; Krishnamurthy, P.: Influence of tunneling in cohesionless soil for different tunnel geometry and volume loss under greenfield condition. Adv. Civil Eng. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1946761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Jáky, J.: Pressure in Silos, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. I, pp. 103–107 (1948)

  50. Van Jaarsveld, E.P., Plekkenpol, J.W. and Messemaeckers van ed Graa, C.A.: Ground deformations due to the boring of the Second Heinenoord Tunnel. In Twelfth European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (Proceedings) The Netherlands Society of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering; Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management; AP van den Berg Machinefabriek; Fugro NV; GeoDelft; Holland Railconsult, Vol. 1 (1999)

  51. Ercelebi, S.G.; Copur, H.; Ocak, I.: Surface settlement predictions for Istanbul Metro tunnels excavated by EPB-TBM. Environ. Earth Sci. 62(2), 357–365 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-010-0530-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Moh, Z.C., Hwang, R.N.: Underground construction of Taipei transit systems. In 11th Southeast Asian Geotechnical Conference, 5–8 (1993).

  53. Moh, Z.C., Ju, D.H., Hwang, R.N.: Ground movements around tunnels in soft ground. In Proceedings of Symposium on Geotechnical Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, London, 725–730 (1996)

  54. Ledesma, A., Romero, E.: Systematic back analysis in tunnel excavation problems as a monitoring technique. In International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1425–1428 (1999)

  55. Phienwej, N.: Ground movements in shield tunneling in Bangkok soils. In International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1469–1472 (1999)

  56. Park, K.H.: Elastic solution for tunneling-induced ground movements in clays. Int. J. Geomech. 4(4), 310–318 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2004)4:4(310)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Le, B.T., Bui, N.T., Nguyen, T.A., Nguyen, T.C., Kuriki, M., Phan, Q.D.H., Nguyen, N.T. and Taylor, R.N..: Soil displacements due to TBM tunnelling in Ho Chi Minh city-Vietnam. In Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (2019)

  58. Gonzalez, C.; Sagaseta, C.: Patterns of soil deformations around tunnels. Application to the extension of Madrid Metro. Comput. Geotech. 28(6–7), 445–468 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-352X(01)00007-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Pinto, F.; Zymnis, D.M.; Whittle, A.J.: Ground movements due to shallow tunnels in soft ground II: Analytical interpretation and prediction. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 140(4), 04013041 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Palmer, J.H.L.; Belshaw, D.J.: Deformations and pore pressures in the vicinity of a precast, segmented, concrete-lined tunnel in clay. Can. Geotech. J. 17(2), 174–184 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1139/t80-021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Romo, M.P.: Soil movements induced by slurry shield tunneling. In International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 1473–1481 (1997)

  62. Yi, X.; Rowe, R.K.; Lee, K.M.: Observed and calculated pore pressures and deformations induced by an earth balance shield. Can. Geotech. J. 30(3), 476–490 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1139/t93-041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Clough, G.W.; Sweeney, B.P.; Finno, R.J.: Measured soil response to EPB shield tunneling. J. Geotech. Eng. 109(2), 131–149 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:2(131)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamza Saeed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saeed, H., Uygar, E. Equation for Maximum Ground Surface Settlement due to Bored Tunnelling in Cohesive and Cohesionless Soils Obtained by Numerical Simulations. Arab J Sci Eng 47, 5139–5165 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06436-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06436-3

Keywords

Navigation