Skip to main content
Log in

Power Geometric Aggregation Operators Based on Connection Number of Set Pair Analysis Under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment

  • Research Article - Systems Engineering
  • Published:
Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of the presented paper is to develop a multiattribute decision-making (MADM) method under the intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) environment using the set pair analysis (SPA) theory. IFS can express the uncertain information in terms of membership grades, while the connection number (CN) based on the “identity,” “discrepancy” and “contrary” degrees of the SPA theory handles the uncertainties and certainties systems. Meanwhile, capturing the relationship between the values during the aggregation is a prominent advantage of the power aggregation operator. Motivated by these primary characteristics, in this paper, we develop some power geometric aggregation operators namely for aggregating the CNs, namely, CN power geometric, CN weighted power geometric and CN ordered weighted power geometric operators. A few properties like idempotency, commutativity and boundedness are established to show the viability and legitimacy of developed operators. Afterward, we develop a decision-making (DM) approach based on the proposed operators for tackling the MADM issues under the intuitionistic fuzzy numbers environment. Finally, real-life case of MADM problem has been discussed to manifest the developed DM approach, and obtained results are compared with the results that are obtained by the existing DM methods for showing the feasibility and validity of the developed DM approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garg, H.: Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy interactive geometric interaction operators using Einstein t-norm and t-conorm and their application to decision making. Comput. Ind. Eng. 101, 53–69 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garg, H.; Rani, D.: Complex interval- valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their aggregation operators. Fundamenta Informaticae 164(1), 61–101 (2019)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20, 87–96 (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Atanassov, K.; Gargov, G.: Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 31, 343–349 (1989)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, Z.; Liu, P.; Pei, Z.: An approach to multiple attribute group decision making based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 8(4), 747–760 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garg, H.; Kumar, K.: Linguistic interval-valued atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to group decision-making problems. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2897961

    Google Scholar 

  8. Xu, Z.S.: Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 15, 1179–1187 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xu, Z.S.; Yager, R.R.: Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 35, 417–433 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Garg, H.: Some series of intuitionistic fuzzy interactive averaging aggregation operators. SpringerPlus 5(1), 999 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2591-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Garg, H.: Novel intuitionistic fuzzy decision making method based on an improved operation laws and its application. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 60, 164–174 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ye, J.: Intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid arithmetic and geometric aggregation operators for the decision-making of mechanical design schemes. Appl. Intell. 47, 743–751 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garg, H.: Intuitionistic fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators with entropy weight and their applications to multi-criteria decision-making problems. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Electr. Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40998-018-0167-0

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huang, J.Y.: Intuitionistic fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operator and their application to multiple attribute decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 27, 505–513 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, W.; Liu, X.: Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation using einstein operations. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20(5), 923–938 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaur, G.; Garg, H.: Generalized cubic intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators using t-norm operations and their applications to group decision-making process. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 44(3), 2775–2794 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Singh, S.; Garg, H.: Symmetric triangular interval type-2 intuitionistic fuzzy sets with their applications in multi criteria decision making. Symmetry 10(9), 401 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10090401

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu, Z.: Approaches to multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators. Knowl.-Based Syst. 24(6), 749–760 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kaur, G.; Garg, H.: Cubic intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif. 8(5), 405–427 (2018)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Goyal, M.; Yadav, D.; Tripathi, A.: Intuitionistic fuzzy genetic weighted averaging operator and its application for multiple attribute decision making in E-learning. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 9(1), 1–15 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou, W.; Xu, Z.: Extreme intuitionistic fuzzy weighted aggregation operators and their applications in optimism and pessimism decision-making processes. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 32, 1129–1138 (2017)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Singh, S.; Garg, H.: Distance measures between type-2 intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to multicriteria decision-making process. Appl. Intell. 46(4), 788–799 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, W.C.; Xu, D.M.; Chau, K.W.; Lei, G.J.: Assessment of river water quality based on theory of variable fuzzy sets and fuzzy binary comparison method. Water Resour. Manag. 28(12), 4183–4200 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rani, D.; Garg, H.: Distance measures between the complex intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its applications to the decision—making process. Int. J. Uncertain. Quantif. 7(5), 423–439 (2017)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. He, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhau, L.; Liu, J.; Tao, Z.: Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric interaction averaging operators and their application to multi-criteria decision making. Inf. Sci. 259, 142–159 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen, S.M.; Chang, C.H.: Fuzzy multiattribute decision making based on transformation techniques of intuitionistic fuzzy values and intuitionistic fuzzy geometric averaging operators. Inf. Sci. 352–353, 133–149 (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Joshi, D.; Kumar, S.: Intuitionistic fuzzy entropy and distance measure based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria decision making. Egypt. Inform. J. 15(2), 97–104 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yager, R.R.: The power average operator. IEEE Syst. Man Cybern. Soc. 31(6), 724–731 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xu, Z.; Yager, R.R.: Power—geometric operators and their use in group decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 18(1), 94–105 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Garg, H.; Arora, R.: Generalized intuitionistic fuzzy soft power aggregation operator based on t-norm and their application in multi criteria decision-making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 34(2), 215–246 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rani, D.; Garg, H.: Complex intuitionistic fuzzy power aggregation operators and their applications in multi-criteria decision-making. Expert Syst. 35(6), e12325 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhao, K.: Set pair and set pair analysis-a new concept and systematic analysis method. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on System Theory and Regional Planning, pp. 87 – 91 (1989)

  33. Jiang, Y.L.; Xu, C.F.; Yao, Y.; Zhao, K.Q.: Systems information in set pair analysis and its applications. In: Proceedings of 2004 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Vol. 3, pp. 1717 – 1722 (2004)

  34. ChangJian, W.: Application of the set pair analysis theory in multiple attribute decision-making. J. Mech. Strength 6(029), 1009–1012 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lu, W.S.; Zhang, B.: Set pair analysis method of containing target constraint mixed interval multi-attribute decision-making. In: Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 226, pp. 2222–2226. Trans Tech Publ (2012)

  36. Xie, Z.; Zhang, F.; Cheng, J.; Li, L.: Fuzzy multi-attribute decision making methods based on improved set pair analysis. In: Sixth International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design, Vol. 2, pp. 386–389 (2013)

  37. Kumar, K.; Garg, H.: TOPSIS method based on the connection number of set pair analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy set environment. Comput. Appl. Math. 37(2), 1319–1329 (2018)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Kumar, K.; Garg, H.: Connection number of set pair analysis based TOPSIS method on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application to decision making. Appl. Intell. 48(8), 2112–2119 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Cao, Y.X.; Zhou, H.; Wang, J.Q.: An approach to interval-valued intuitionistic stochastic multi-criteria decision-making using set pair analysis. Int. J. Mach. Learn. Cybern. 9(4), 629–640 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Fu, S.; Zhou, H.: Triangular fuzzy number multi-attribute decision-making method based on set-pair analysis. J. Softw. Eng. (2016). https://doi.org/10.3923/jse.2016

  41. Garg, H.; Kumar, K.: Distance measures for connection number sets based on set pair analysis and its applications to decision making process. Appl. Intell. 48(10), 3346–3359 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Garg, H.; Kumar, K.: An advanced study on the similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on the set pair analysis theory and their application in decision making. Soft Comput. 22(15), 4959–4970 (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Hu, J.; Yang, L.: Dynamic stochastic multi-criteria decision making method based on cumulative prospect theory and set pair analysis. Syst. Eng. Procedia 1, 432–439 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Garg, H.; Kumar, K.: A novel exponential distance and its based TOPSIS method for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets using connection number of SPA theory. Artif. Intell. Rev. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9668-5

  45. Garg, H.; Kumar, K.: A novel correlation coefficient of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on the connection number of set pair analysis and its application. Scientia Iranica E 25(4), 2373–2388 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Garg, H.; Kumar, K.: Some aggregation operators for linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy set and its application to group decision-making process using the set pair analysis. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 43(6), 3213–3227 (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Garg, H.; Kumar, K.: Improved possibility degree method for ranking intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their application in multiattribute decision-making. Granul. Comput. 4(2), 237–247 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chaokai, H.; Meng, W.: A new reputation model for p2p network based on set pair analysis. Open Cybern. Syst. J. 9, 1393–1398 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wang, X.; Triantaphyllou, E.: Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some electre methods. Omega - Int. J. Manag. Sci. 36, 45–63 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Nancy.; Garg, H.: A novel divergence measure and its based TOPSIS method for multi criteria decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 36(1), 101–115 (2019)

  51. Taormina, R.; Chau, K.W.; Sivakumar, B.: Neural network river forecasting through baseflow separation and binary-coded swarm optimization. J. Hydrol. 529, 1788–1797 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sefeedpari, P.; Rafiee, S.; Akram, A.; Chau, K.W.; Pishgar-Komleh, S.H.: Prophesying egg production based on energy consumption using multi-layered adaptive neural fuzzy inference system approach. Comput. Electron. Agric. 131, 10–19 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Wu, C.; Chau, K.: Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural network coupled with singular spectrum analysis. J. Hydrol. 399(3–4), 394–409 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Chau, K.W.; Cao, Y.; Anson, M.; Zhang, J.: Application of data warehouse and decision support system in construction management. Autom. Constr. 12(2), 213–224 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Arora, R.; Garg, H.: Group decision-making method based on prioritized linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators and its fundamental properties. Comput. Appl. Math. 38(2), 1–36 (2019)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Garg, H.; Kumar, K.: An extended technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution group decision making method with linguistic interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 26(1–2), 16–26 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Garg, H.; Nancy.: Algorithms for possibility linguistic single-valued neutrosophic decision-making based on COPRAS and aggregation operators with new information measures. Measurement 138, 278–290 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harish Garg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Garg, H., Kumar, K. Power Geometric Aggregation Operators Based on Connection Number of Set Pair Analysis Under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment. Arab J Sci Eng 45, 2049–2063 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03961-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-03961-0

Keywords

Navigation