Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Similarity in occupancy of different-sized forest patches by small mammals on clearcuts: conservation implications for red-backed voles and small mustelids

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mammal Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many mammalian species decline on forest sites that are harvested by clearcutting because of a loss of food, cover, and other components of stand structure. Small mustelids are impacted negatively as is the southern red-backed vole (Myodes gapperi), a principal prey species, that disappears from clearcuts within a year of harvest. These effects may be potentially ameliorated by aggregated retention harvests that leave unlogged patches on clearcuts. We tested three hypotheses (H) that (H1) abundance, reproduction, and survival of M. gapperi populations, (H2) total abundance, species richness, and diversity of the forest-floor small mammal community, and (H3) the presence of small mustelids would be greater in large than small patches of retention forest on new clearcuts. We measured demographic responses of M. gapperi, total small mammals, and the presence of small mustelids (American marten, Martes americana, and small weasels (Mustela spp.)) from 2014 to 2016 in replicated treatments of four sizes (ha) of retention patches (means of 0.53, 1.50, 4.13, and 18.73) near Elkhart in south-central British Columbia, Canada. Mean abundance, reproduction, and survival attributes of M. gapperi were similar among treatment sites over the 3-year study. Overall mean abundance ranged from 3.5 to 5.3 voles per line in patches while this microtine was extirpated on clearcut sites (i.e., no forest patches). The similarity in population dynamics among the various forest patches across a gradient of increasing patch size of 4.5 to 35.3 times did not support H1. Mean abundance, species richness, and diversity of total forest-floor small mammals were similar among treatment sites, and hence did not support H2. Although not formally significant, mean species diversity did show a consistent increase from the largest (0.82) to the smallest (1.11) patch size, owing primarily to the presence of several generalist species such as Neotamias amoenus, Microtus, and Sorex in nearby early successional habitat. Small mustelids were present at similar levels among patch sizes, presumably in response to abundance of small mammal prey, and hence did not support H3. Although our results were relatively short-term, the detailed assessment of population dynamics of M. gapperi indicated that habitat quality was sufficient to maintain this species regardless of patch sizes, ranging from 0.3 to 20.0 ha. Similarly, the total forest-floor small mammal community and presence of small mustelids also followed this pattern. All sizes of forest patches have conservation value and will help to maintain abundance and diversity of forest mammals, both predator and prey species, on clearcuts. Longer-term studies (e.g., at 5- to 10-year intervals) are essential to determine if our results are sustainable in augmenting forest restoration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bayne EM, Hobson KA (1998) The effects of habitat fragmentation by forestry and agriculture on the abundance of small mammals in the southern boreal mixedwood forest. Can J Zool 76:62–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdziewicz M, Zwolak R (2014) Responses of small mammals to clear-cutting in temperate and boreal forests of Europe: a meta-analysis and review. Eur J Forest Res 133:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra R, Krebs CJ (2012) Population dynamics of red-backed voles (Myodes) in North America. Oecologia 168:601–620

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers MA, Matter SF (1997) Landscape ecology of mammals: relationships between density and patch size. J Mammal 78:999–1013

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman J, Cappuccino N, Fahrig L (2002) Patch size and population density: the effect of immigration behavior. Conserv Ecol 6:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • British Columbia Ministry of Environment (1998) Inventory methods for marten and weasels. Standards for Components of British Columbia’s Biodiversity No. 24 Version 2.0

  • Burton PJ, Balisky AC, Coward LP, Cumming SG, Kneeshaw DD (1992) The value of managing for biodiversity. For Chron 68:225–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskirk SW, Zielinski WJ (2003) Small and mid-sized carnivores. In: Zabel CJ, Anthony RG (eds) Mammal community dynamics. Management and Conservation in the Coniferous Forests of Western North America Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 207–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Cote M, Ferron J (2001) Short-term use of different residual forest structures by three sciurid species in a clear-cut boreal landscape. Can J For Res 31:1805–1815

    Google Scholar 

  • Darveau M, Labbe P, Beauchesne P, Belanger L (2001) The use of riparian forest strips by small mammals in boreal balsam fir forest. For Ecol Manag 143:95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Englund SR, O’Brien JJ, Clark DB (2000) Evaluation of digital and film hemispherical photography and spherical densiometry for measuring forest light environments. Can J. For Res 30:1999–2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher JT, Wilkinson L (2005) The response of mammals to forest fire and timber harvest in the North American boreal forest. Mamm Rev 35:51–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler J, Cohen L, Jarvis P (1998) Practical statistics for field biology. 2nd. John Wiley and Sons. 259 pp

  • Franklin JF, Berb DR, Thornburgh DA, Tappeiner JC (1997) Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber harvesting: variable retention harvest systems. In: Kohm KA, Franklin JF (eds) Creating a forestry for the 21st century: the science of ecosystem management. Island Press, Washington, pp 111–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller AK, Harrison DJ, Lachowski HJ (2004) Stand scale effects of partial harvesting and clearcutting on small mammals and forest structure. For Ecol Manag 191:373–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillis EA, Nams VO (1998) How red-backed voles find habitat patches. Can J Zool 76:791–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitzen RA, West SD (2002) Small mammal response to experimental canopy gaps in the southern Washington cascades. For Ecol Manag 168:187–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliwicz J (1980) Island populations of rodents: their organization and functioning. Biol Rev 55:109–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson L, Baker SC, Bauhous J, Beese WJ, Brodie A, Kouki J et al (2012) Retention forestry to maintain multifunctional forests: a world perspective. BioScience 62:633–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon SJ, Paszkowski CA, Boutin S, DeGroot J, Macdonald SE, Wheatley M, Eaton BR (2002) Abundance and species composition of amphibians, small mammals, and songbirds in riparian forest buffer strips of varying widths in the boreal mixedwood of Alberta. Can J For Res 32:1784–1800

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L (1994) Vertebrate distributions relative to clear-cut edges in a boreal forest landscape. Landsc Ecol 9:105–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward GD, Henry SH, Ruggiero LF (1999) Response of red-backed voles to recent patch cutting in subalpine forests. Cons Biol 13:168–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh H, Feldt LS (1976) Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in the randomized block and split-plot designs. J Educ Stat 1:69–82

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM Corp (2017) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. IBM Corp, Armonk

  • Kingston SR, Morris DW (2000) Voles looking for an edge: habitat selection across forest ecotones. Can J Zool 78:2174–2183

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenner W, Sullivan TP (2003) Partial and clear-cut harvesting of high-elevation spruce-fir forests: implications for small mammal communities. Can J For Res 33:2283–2296

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology. Addison Wesley Longman, Inc. 624 p

  • Krebs CJ (2013) Population fluctuations in rodents. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  • Krebs CJ, Boonstra R (1984) Trappability estimates for mark-recapture data. Can J Zool 62:2440–2444

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ, Keller BL, Tamarin RH (1969) Microtus population biology: demographic changes in fluctuating populations of M. ochrogaster and M. pennsylvanicus in southern Indiana. Ecology 50:587–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ, Boonstra R, Gilbert S, Reid D, Kenney AJ, Hofer EJ (2011) Density estimation for small mammals from livetrapping grids: rodents in northern Canada. Can J Mammal 92:974–981

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuehl RC (1994) Statistical principles of research design and analysis. Duxbury Press, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuuluvainen T (2009) Forest management and biodiversity conservation based on natural ecosystem dynamics in northern Europe: the complexity challenge. Ambio 38:309–315

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Franklin JF (2002) Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscaled approach. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Littel RC (1989) Statistical analysis of experiments with repeated measures. Hortsci 24:36–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin SK (1994) Feeding ecology of American martens and fishers. In: Buskirk S, Harestad AS, Raphael MG, Powell A (eds) Martens, sables, and fishers. Biology and Conservation Comstock Publ. Assoc., Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 297–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Martineau J, Pothier D, Fortin D (2016) Processes driving short-term temporal dynamics of small mammal distribution in human-disturbed environments. Oecologia 181:831–840

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maser C, Claridge AW, Trappe JM (2008) Trees, truffles, and beasts: how forests function. Rutgers University Press, Piscataway

    Google Scholar 

  • Meidinger D, Pojar J (1991) Ecosystems of British Columbia. Special Report Series No. 6. Research Branch, Min. Forests, Victoria

  • Merritt JF (1981) Clethrionomys gapperi. Mammalian species. No. 146. American Society of Mammalogists, Provo

  • Mills LS (1995) Edge effects and isolation: red-backed voles on forest remnants. Conserv Biol 9:395–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Murie O (1954) A field guide to animal tracks. The Peterson Field Guide Series 9. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston

  • Nagorsen DW (1996) Opossums, shrews, and moles of British Columbia. The mammals of British Columbia, vol 2. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DL, Kellner KF, Swihart RK (2019) Rodent population density and survival respond to disturbance induced by timber harvest. J Mammal. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyz094

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordyke KA, Buskirk SW (1991) Southern red-backed vole, Clethrionomys gapperi, populations in relation to stand succession and old-growth character in the central Rocky Mountains. Can Field-Nat 105:330–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce J, Venier L (2005) Small mammals as bioindicators of sustainable boreal forest management. For Ecol Manag 208:153–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson DE, Ruggiero LF (2003) Transect versus grid trapping arrangements for sampling small-mammal communities. Wildl Soc Bull 31:454–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Potvin F, Bertrand N (2004) Leaving forest strips in large clearcut landscapes of boreal forest: a management scenario suitable for wildlife? For Chron 80:44–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezendes P (1999) Tracking and the art of seeing. How to read animal tracks and sign. Firefly Books, Willowdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenvald R, Lohmus A (2008) For what, when, and where is green-tree retention better than clearcutting? A review of biodiversity aspects. For Ecol Manag 255:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Saville DJ (1990) Multiple comparison procedures: the practical solution. Amer Stat 44:174–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Seber GAF (1982) The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters, 2nd edn. Charles Griffin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekgororoane GB, Dilworth TG (1995) Relative abundance, richness, and diversity of small mammals at induced forest edges. Can J Zool 73:1432–1437

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms DA (1979) North American weasels: resource utilization and distribution. Can J Zool 57:504–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Steventon JD, MacKenzie KL, Mahon TE (1998) Response of small mammals and birds to partial cutting and clearcutting in northwest British Columbia. For Chron 74:703–713

    Google Scholar 

  • St-Laurent M-H, Ferron J, Hache S, Gagnon R (2008) Planning timber harvest of residual forest stands without compromising bird and small mammal communities in boreal landscapes. For Ecol Manag 254:261–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan TP, Sullivan DS (2014) Responses of red-backed voles (Myodes gapperi) to windrows of woody debris along forest-clearcut edges. Wildl Res 41:212–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan TP, Sullivan DS (2019) Long-term functionality of woody debris structures for forest-floor small mammals on clearcuts. For Ecol Manag 451:117535

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan TP, Sullivan DS, Lindgren PMF, Ransome DB (2010) Green-tree retention and life after the beetle: stand structure and small mammals 30 years after salvage harvesting. Silva Fenn 44:749–774

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan TP, Sullivan DS, Sullivan JH (2017a) Mammalian responses to windrows of woody debris on clearcuts: abundance and diversity of forest-floor small mammals and presence of small mustelids. For Ecol Manag 399:143–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan TP, Sullivan DS, Boonstra R, Krebs CJ, Vyse A (2017b) Mechanisms of population limitation in the southern red-backed vole in conifer forests of western North America: insights from a long-term study. J Mammal 98:1367–1378

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton DA (1992) Tamias amoenus. Mamm. Species No.390. pp 1-8

  • Tallmon DA, Mills LS (2004) Edge effects and isolation: red-backed voles revisited. Cons Biol 18:1658–1664

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson ID, Harestad AS (1994) Effects of logging on American martens, and models for habitat management. In: Buskirk SW, Harestad AS, Raphael MG (eds) Martens, sables, and fishers. Biology and Conservation. Comstock Publ. Assoc., Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 355–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson ID, Fryxell J, Harrison DJ (2012) Improved insights into use of habitat by American martens. In: Aubry KB, Zielinski WJ, Raphael MG, Proulx G, Buskirk SW (eds) Biology and conservation of martens, sables, and fishers. A new synthesis. Comstock Publ. Assoc., Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp 209–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horne B (1983) Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality. J Wildl Manag 47:893–901

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs 663 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Zielinski WJ, Kucera TE (eds) (1995) American marten, fisher, lynx, and wolverine: survey methods for their detection. USDA Forest Service. Gen Tech Rep PSW-GTR-157

  • Zwolak R (2009) A meta-analysis of the effects of wildfire, clearcutting, and partial harvest on the abundance of North American small mammals. For Ecol Manag 258:539–545

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

T. Ball, D. Gill, D. Gossoo, A. LaChapelle, and R. Wilson were particularly helpful in assisting with this project; H. Sullivan was instrumental in assisting with fieldwork.

Funding

We thank the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Aspen Planers Ltd., the British Columbia Habitat Conservation Trust Foundation, the Westbank First Nation, Jaeden Resources Ltd., Gold Mountain Mining Corp., and the Applied Mammal Research Institute who provided financial and logistical support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, 2424 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada

    Thomas P. Sullivan

  2. Applied Mammal Research Institute, 11010 Mitchell Avenue, Summerland, BC, V0H 1Z8, Canada

    Druscilla S. Sullivan

Authors
  1. Thomas P. Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Druscilla S. Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas P. Sullivan.

Ethics declarations

All handling of animals was in accordance with the principles of the Animal Care Committee, University of British Columbia.

Additional information

Communicated by: Jan M. Wójcik

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sullivan, T.P., Sullivan, D.S. Similarity in occupancy of different-sized forest patches by small mammals on clearcuts: conservation implications for red-backed voles and small mustelids. Mamm Res 65, 255–266 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-019-00467-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-019-00467-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation