Skip to main content
Log in

Scattering of the fundamental anti-symmetric Lamb wave at through-thickness notches in isotropic plates

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lamb wave based structural health monitoring technique is one of the promising techniques for detecting damage in structures. Among different types of guided waves, the fundamental anti-symmetric mode of Lamb wave (A0) has attracted considerable attention for damage detection in plates due to its outstanding properties, such as sensitivity to small and different types of defects, which make it a powerful tool for damage detection. Cracks are one of the major culprits in metallic structures which affect their durability and serviceability. Once the crack appears on the structures, it can affect its serviceability. It is important to detect cracks at early stage to avoid any catastrophic failure of the structures. This paper presents a study on the capability of using the A0 Lamb wave in detecting crack-like defects in aluminium plates, in which the scattering behaviour of the A0 Lamb wave at through-thickness notches in aluminium plates is studied in detail. 3D explicit finite element simulations are used to provide a comprehensive study on the scattering characteristics of the A0 Lamb wave at notches with different sizes and orientations. This study also considers different incident and scattered wave directions on the scattering characteristics. The results show that scattering characteristics of the A0 Lamb wave are sensitive to the size and orientation of notches. The findings of this study can improve the understanding of the capability of the A0 Lamb wave in detecting the crack-like defects and further advance damage detection techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cawley P, Alleyne D (1996) The use of Lamb waves for the long range inspection of large structures. Ultrasonics 34:287–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rose JL (2002) A baseline and vision of ultrasonic guided wave inspection potential. J Press Vessel Tech 124(3):273–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Raghavan A, Cesnik CES (2007) Review of guided-wave structural health monitoring. Sock Vib Digest 39(2):91–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giurgiutiu V (2008) Structural health monitoring with piezoelectric wafer active sensor. Elsevier Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Giurgiutiu V, Bao JJ (2004) Embedded-ultrasonics structural radar for in situ structural health monitoring of thin-wall structures. Struct Health Monit 3(121):121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sohn H, Par G, Wait JR, Limback NP, Farra CR (2004) Wavelet-based active sensing for delamination detection in composite structures. Smart Mater Struct 13:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Flynn EB, Todd MD, Wilcox Drinkwater BW, Croxford AJ (2011) Maximum-likelihood estimation of damage location in guided-wave structural health monitoring. Proc R Soc A 467:2575–2596

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ng CT (2014) Bayesian model updating approach for experimental identification of damage in beams using guided waves. Struct Health Monit 13(4):359–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ng CT (2015) A two-stage approach for quantitative damage imaging in metallic plates using Lamb waves. Earthq Struct 8(4):821–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ratassepp M, Lowe MJS, Cawley P, Kauson A (2008) Scattering of the fundamental shear horizontal mode in a plate when incident at a through notches aligned in the propagation direction of the mode. J Acoust Soc Am 124:2873–2882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fromme P, Sayir MB (2002) Detection of cracks at rivet holes using guided wave. Ultrasonics 40:199–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Veidt M, Ng CT, Hames S, Wattinger T (2008) Imaging laminar damage in plates using Lamb wave beamforming. Adv Mate Res 47–50:666–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moreau L, Velichko A, Wilcox PD (2012) Accurate finite element modelling of guided wave scattering from irregular defects. NDT&E Int 45:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ng CT (2015) On accuracy of analytical modelling of Lamb wave scattering at delaminations in multi-layered isotropic plates. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 15(1540010):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang Y, Zhu X, Hao H, Ou J (2009) Guided wave propagation and spectral element method for debonding damage assessment in RC structures. J Sound Vib 324(3–5):751–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Norris AN, Vemula C (1995) Scattering of flexural wages on thin plates. J Sound Vib 181:115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grahn T (2003) Lamb wave scattering from a circular partly through-thickness hole in a plate. Wave Motion 37:63–80

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Auld B (1990) Acoustic fields and waves in solids, vol 2. Krieger, Malabar

    Google Scholar 

  19. Crane LJ, Gilchrist MD, Miller JJH (1997) Analysis of Rayleigh-Lamb wave scattering by a crack in an elastic plate. Comput Mech 19:533–537

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Ramadas C, Balasubramaniam K, Joshi M, Krishnamurthy CV (2009) Interaction of the primary anti-symmetric Lamb wave (A0) with symmetric delaminations: numerical and experimental studies. Smart Mater Struct 18(085011):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  21. Soleimanpour R, Ng CT (2015) Mode conversion and scattering analysis of guided wave at delaminations in laminated composite beams. Struct Montior Maint 2(3):213–236

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ostachowicz W, Kudela P, Krawczuk M, Żak A (2011) Guided waves in structures for SHM. The time-domain spectral element method. Wiley, Singapore

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Ostachowicz W, Kudela P, Krawczuk M, Zak A (2012) Guided waves in structures for SHM: the time-domain spectral element method. Wiley, Singapore

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. He S, Ng CT (2015) Analysis of mode conversion and scattering of guided wave at cracks in isotropic beams using a time-domain spectral finite element method. Elec J Struct Eng 14:20–32

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schubert F (2004) Numerical time-domain modelling of linear and nonlinear ultrasonic wave propagation using finite integration techniques—theory and applications. Ultrasonics 42:221–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Obenchain MB, Cesnik CES (2014) Guided wave interaction with hole damage using the local interaction simulation approach. Smart Mater Struct 23(125010):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang L, Shen J (1997) Scattering of elastic waves by a crack in isotropic plate. Ultrasonics 35:451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lowe MJS, Cawley P, Kao JY, Dillgent O (2002) The low frequency reflection characteristics of the fundamental antisymmetric Lamb wave a0 from a rectangular notch in a plate. J Acoust Soc Am 112:2612–2622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lowe MJS, Diligent O (2002) Low-frequency reflection characteristics of the s0 Lamb wave from a rectangular notch in a plate. J Acoust Soc Am 111:64–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lu Y, Ye L, Su Z, Yang C (2008) Quantitative assessment of through-thickness crack size based on Lamb wave scattering in aluminium plates. NDT&E Inter 41:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Quek ST, Tua PS, Wang Q (2003) Detecting anomalies in beams and plate based on the Hilbert-Huang transform of real signals. Smart Mater Struct 12(3):447–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Salvino L, Purekar A, Pines D (2005) Health monitoring of 2-D plates using EMD and Hilbert phase. In: Proc 4th Int workshop on struct health monitor, Stanford University, CA

  33. Sun Z, Mao Y, Jiang W, Zhang D (2000) Investigation on interaction of lamb waves and circumferential notch in pipe by means of wavelet transform. In: Proc IEEE ultrasonics symposium, vol 1, San Juan, Puerto Rico, pp 827–830

  34. Fromme P, Rouge C (2001) Directivity of guided ultrasonic wave scattering at notches and cracks. J Phys Conf Ser 269(012018):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kovic B, Lowe M (2003) DISPERSE user’s manual version 2.0.16B Imperial College, University of London, Non-Destructive Testing Laboratory

  36. Stewart JR, Gullerud AS, Heinstein MW (2006) Solution verification for explicit transient dynamics problems in the presence of hourglass and contact forces. J Comp Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:1499–1516

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Bathe KJ (1982) Finite element procedures in engineering analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  38. Castaings M, Hosten B (2001) Lamb and SH waves generated and detected by air-coupled ultrasonic transducers in composite material plates. NDT & E Inter 34:249–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ng CT, Veidt M, Rajic N (2009) Integrated piezoceramic transducers for imaging damage in composite laminates. Proc SPIE 7493(74932M):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ng CT (2014) On the selection of advanced signal processing techniques for guided wave damage identification using a statistical approach. Eng Struct 67:50–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Australian Research Council under Grant Number DE130100261. The support is greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ching-Tai Ng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soleimanpour, R., Ng, CT. Scattering of the fundamental anti-symmetric Lamb wave at through-thickness notches in isotropic plates. J Civil Struct Health Monit 6, 447–459 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-016-0166-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-016-0166-7

Keywords

Navigation