Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prognostic significance of the ratio of absolute neutrophil to lymphocyte counts for breast cancer patients with ER/PR-positivity and HER2-negativity in neoadjuvant setting

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the predictive or prognostic impact of absolute neutrophil count/absolute lymphocyte count ratio (NLR) in breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative subtype who have received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We performed retrospective analysis of 157 patients with primary breast cancer with ER/PR-positive and HER2-negative subtype who were treated with NAC, followed by definitive surgical resection. The median follow-up after surgery was 21 months (range, 1–108 months). On univariate analysis, high NLR (>2.25) correlated with poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis of non-pathologic complete response (pCR) subgroup showed that high NLR was significant for RFS and OS (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001). Particularly, high NLR patients had inferior clinical outcomes in the high clinical stage. Uni- and multivariate Cox analysis showed NLR to be an only predictor of RFS and OS. The NLR is an independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS in breast cancer patients with ER/PR-positive and HER2-negative subtype receiving NAC. The NLR provides additional prognostic information to choose suitable patients who might profit from further therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kuerer HM, Newman LA, Smith TL, Ames FC, Hunt KK, Dhingra K, et al. Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:460–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Untch M, Fasching PA, Konecny GE, Hasmuller S, Lebeau A, Kreienberg R, et al. Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab predicts favorable survival in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer: results from the TECHNO trial of the AGO and GBG study groups. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3351–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kong X, Moran MS, Zhang N, Haffty B, Yang Q. Meta-analysis confirms achieving pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts favourable prognosis for breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47:2084–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gonzalez-Angulo AM, McGuire SE, Buchholz TA, Tucker SL, Kuerer HM, Rouzier R, et al. Factors predictive of distant metastases in patients with breast cancer who have a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:7098–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gralow JR, Burstein HJ, Wood W, Hortobagyi GN, Gianni L, von Minckwitz G, et al. Preoperative therapy in invasive breast cancer: pathologic assessment and systemic therapy issues in operable disease. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:814–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, Costa SD, Eidtmann H, Fasching PA, et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1796–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aaltomaa S, Lipponen P, Eskelinen M, Kosma VM, Marin S, Alhava E, et al. Lymphocyte infiltrates as a prognostic variable in female breast cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1992;28A:859–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahmoud SM, Paish EC, Powe DG, Macmillan RD, Grainge MJ, Lee AH, et al. Tumor-infiltrating cd8+ lymphocytes predict clinical outcome in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1949–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chua W, Charles KA, Baracos VE, Clarke SJ. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio predicts chemotherapy outcomes in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:1288–95.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohno Y, Nakashima J, Ohori M, Hatano T, Tachibana M. Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as an independent predictor of recurrence in patients with nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2010;184:873–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sarraf KM, Belcher E, Raevsky E, Nicholson AG, Goldstraw P, Lim E. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and its association with survival after complete resection in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;137:425–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmidt H, Suciu S, Punt CJ, Gore M, Kruit W, Patel P, et al. Pretreatment levels of peripheral neutrophils and leukocytes as independent predictors of overall survival in patients with American Joint Committee on cancer stage IV melanoma: results of the EORTC 18951 Biochemotherapy Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1562–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Koh YW, Kang HJ, Park C, Yoon DH, Kim S, Suh C, et al. Prognostic significance of the ratio of absolute neutrophil count to absolute lymphocyte count in classic Hodgkin lymphoma. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;138:846–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Azab B, Bhatt VR, Phookan J, Murukutla S, Kohn N, Terjanian T, et al. Usefulness of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in predicting short- and long-term mortality in breast cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:217–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Forget P, Machiels JP, Coulie PG, Berliere M, Poncelet AJ, Tombal B, et al. Neutrophil: lymphocyte ratio and intraoperative use of ketorolac or diclofenac are prognostic factors in different cohorts of patients undergoing breast, lung, and kidney cancer surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:013–3136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Noh H, Eomm M, Han A. Usefulness of pretreatment neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in predicting disease-specific survival in breast cancer patients. J Breast Cancer. 2013;16:55–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dirican A, Kucukzeybek BB, Alacacioglu A, Kucukzeybek Y, Erten C, Varol U, et al. Do the derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predict prognosis in breast cancer? Int J Clin Oncol. 2014;18:18.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kuang DM, Zhao Q, Wu Y, Peng C, Wang J, Xu Z, et al. Peritumoral neutrophils link inflammatory response to disease progression by fostering angiogenesis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2011;54:948–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Scapini P, Morini M, Tecchio C, Minghelli S, Di Carlo E, Tanghetti E, et al. Cxcl1/macrophage inflammatory protein-2-induced angiogenesis in vivo is mediated by neutrophil-derived vascular endothelial growth factor-a. J Immunol. 2004;172:5034–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rotondo R, Bertolotto M, Barisione G, Astigiano S, Mandruzzato S, Ottonello L, et al. Exocytosis of azurophil and arginase 1-containing granules by activated polymorphonuclear neutrophils is required to inhibit T lymphocyte proliferation. J Leukoc Biol. 2011;89:721–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Munder M, Schneider H, Luckner C, Giese T, Langhans CD, Fuentes JM, et al. Suppression of t-cell functions by human granulocyte arginase. Blood. 2006;108:1627–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schmielau J, Finn OJ. Activated granulocytes and granulocyte-derived hydrogen peroxide are the underlying mechanism of suppression of T-cell function in advanced cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2001;61:4756–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23 el-Hag A, Clark RA: Immunosuppression by activated human neutrophils. Dependence on the myeloperoxidase system. J Immunol 1987;139:2406–2413.

  24. Petrie HT, Klassen LW, Kay HD. Inhibition of human cytotoxic t lymphocyte activity in vitro by autologous peripheral blood granulocytes. J Immunol. 1985;134:230–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jacobs TW, Gown AM, Yaziji H, Barnes MJ, Schnitt SJ. Specificity of herceptest in determining her-2/neu status of breast cancers using the United States food and drug administration-approved scoring system. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1983–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Straver ME, Rutgers EJ, Rodenhuis S, Linn SC, Loo CE, Wesseling J, et al. The relevance of breast cancer subtypes in the outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2411–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shimizu C, Ando M, Kouno T, Katsumata N, Fujiwara Y. Current trends and controversies over pre-operative chemotherapy for women with operable breast cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007;37:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Estevez LG, Gradishar WJ. Evidence-based use of neoadjuvant taxane in operable and inoperable breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:3249–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Miglietta L, Vanella P, Canobbio L, Naso C, Cerisola N, Meszaros P, et al. Prognostic value of estrogen receptor and ki-67 index after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer expressing high levels of proliferation at diagnosis. Oncology. 2010;79:255–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee J, Im YH, Lee SH, Cho EY, Choi YL, Ko YH, et al. Evaluation of ER and Ki-67 proliferation index as prognostic factors for survival following neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin/docetaxel for locally advanced breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008;61:569–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Schneeweiss A, Katretchko J, Sinn HP, Unnebrink K, Rudlowski C, Geberth M, et al. Only grading has independent impact on breast cancer survival after adjustment for pathological response to preoperative chemotherapy. Anticancer Drugs. 2004;15:127–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Jones RL, Salter J, A’Hern R, Nerurkar A, Parton M, Reis-Filho JS, et al. The prognostic significance of Ki67 before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;116:53–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Margeli M, Cirauqui B, Castella E, Tapia G, Costa C, Gimenez-Capitan A, et al. The prognostic value of BRCA1 mRNA expression levels following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e9499.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bain B, Seed M, Godsland I. Normal values for peripheral blood white cell counts in women of four different ethnic origins. J Clin Pathol. 1984;37:188–93.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mantovani A, Allavena P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008;454:436–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002;420:860–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Moore MM, Chua W, Charles KA, Clarke SJ. Inflammation and cancer: causes and consequences. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010;87:504–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu Y, Zhao Q, Peng C, Sun L, Li XF, Kuang DM. Neutrophils promote motility of cancer cells via a hyaluronan-mediated TLR4/PI3K activation loop. J Pathol. 2011;225:438–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Coussens LM, Tinkle CL, Hanahan D, Werb Z. Mmp-9 supplied by bone marrow-derived cells contributes to skin carcinogenesis. Cell. 2000;103:481–90.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kusumanto YH, Dam WA, Hospers GA, Meijer C, Mulder NH. Platelets and granulocytes, in particular the neutrophils, form important compartments for circulating vascular endothelial growth factor. Angiogenesis. 2003;6:283–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ulich TR, del Castillo J, Keys M, Granger GA, Ni RX. Kinetics and mechanisms of recombinant human interleukin 1 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced changes in circulating numbers of neutrophils and lymphocytes. J Immunol. 1987;139:3406–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ulich TR, del Castillo J, Guo KZ. In vivo hematologic effects of recombinant interleukin-6 on hematopoiesis and circulating numbers of RBCs and WBCs. Blood. 1989;73:108–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Teramukai S, Kitano T, Kishida Y, Kawahara M, Kubota K, Komuta K, et al. Pretreatment neutrophil count as an independent prognostic factor in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an analysis of Japan Multinational Trial Organisation lc00-03. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:1950–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gyungyub Gong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koh, Y.W., Lee, H.J., Ahn, JH. et al. Prognostic significance of the ratio of absolute neutrophil to lymphocyte counts for breast cancer patients with ER/PR-positivity and HER2-negativity in neoadjuvant setting. Tumor Biol. 35, 9823–9830 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2282-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2282-5

Keywords

Navigation