Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

This article was retracted on 20 April 2017

Abstract

Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) is an important member of the matrix metalloproteinase family and is considered to be involved in the invasion and metastasis of cancer cells. Many studies were published to assess the prognostic role of MMP-9 overexpression in patients with colorectal cancer, but the findings from those studies were inconsistent. We searched eligible studies in Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Thirteen studies with a total of 2, 390 CRC patients were finally included into the meta-analysis. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with the corresponding 95 % confidence interval (95 % CIs) for overall and progression-free survival were calculated by using meta-analysis. There were nine studies with a total of 1,674 colorectal cancer patients relating the progression-free survival, and eight studies with a total of 1,379 colorectal cancer patients relating the overall survival. Overall, MMP-9 overexpression was associated with poorer progression-free survival in patients with colorectal cancer (fixed-effects HR 1.81, 95 % CI 1.48–2.20, P < 0.001; random-effects HR 1.92, 95 % CI 1.46–2.53, P < 0.001). In addition, MMP-9 overexpression was also associated with poorer overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer (fixed-effects HR 1.74, 95 % CI 1.39–2.19, P < 0.001; random-effects HR 1.78, 95 % CI 1.31–2.41, P < 0.001). MMP-9 expression is associated with the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer, and patients with higher MMP-9 expression have poorer survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kessenbrock K, Plaks V, Werb Z. Matrix metalloproteinases: regulators of the tumor microenvironment. Cell. 2010;141:52–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Walther A, Johnstone E, Swanton C, Midgley R, Tomlinson I, Kerr D. Genetic prognostic and predictive markers in colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:489–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou Y, Li G, Wu J, Zhang Z, Wu Z, Fan P, et al. Clinicopathological significance of E-cadherin, VEGF, and MMPs in gastric cancer. Tumour Biol. 2010;31:549–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Morrison CJ, Butler GS, Rodriguez D, Overall CM. Matrix metalloproteinase proteomics: substrates, targets, and therapy. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2009;21:645–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Page-McCaw A, Ewald AJ, Werb Z. Matrix metalloproteinases and the regulation of tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:221–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chu D, Zhao Z, Zhou Y, Li Y, Li J, Zheng J, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 is associated with relapse and prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:318–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Langers AM, Verspaget HW, Hawinkels LJ, Kubben FJ, van Duijn W, van der Reijden JJ, et al. Mmp-2 and mmp-9 in normal mucosa are independently associated with outcome of colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2012;106:1495–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Unsal D, Akyurek N, Uner A, Erpolat OP, Han U, Akmansu M, et al. Gelatinase b expression as a prognostic factor in patients with stage II/III rectal carcinoma treated by postoperative adjuvant therapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2008;31:55–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Langers AM, Sier CF, Hawinkels LJ, Kubben FJ, van Duijn W, van der Reijden JJ, et al. Mmp-2 geno-phenotype is prognostic for colorectal cancer survival, whereas mmp-9 is not. Br J Cancer. 2008;98:1820–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ogata Y, Matono K, Sasatomi T, Ishibashi N, Ohkita A, Mizobe T, et al. The mmp-9 expression determined the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy using oral fluoropyrimidines in stage II or III colorectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2006;57:577–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bendardaf R, Buhmeida A, Hilska M, Laato M, Syrjanen S, Syrjanen K, et al. Mmp-9 (gelatinase b) expression is associated with disease-free survival and disease-specific survival in colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Invest. 2010;28:38–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cho YR, Kwon HC, Suh SH, Lee JH, Kim SH, Choi HJ, et al. Expressions of matrix metalloproteinase-7 and −9 and their prognostic significances in rectal cancer. Cancer Res Treat. 2005;37:354–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Takeuchi T, Hisanaga M, Nagao M, Ikeda N, Fujii H, Koyama F, et al. The membrane-anchored matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) regulator RECK in combination with mmp-9 serves as an informative prognostic indicator for colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:5572–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jensen SA, Vainer B, Bartels A, Brunner N, Sorensen JB. Expression of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (mmp-9) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (timp-1) by colorectal cancer cells and adjacent stroma cells–associations with histopathology and patients outcome. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:3233–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cho YB, Lee WY, Song SY, Shin HJ, Yun SH, Chun HK. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity is associated with poor prognosis in t3-t4 node-negative colorectal cancer. Hum Pathol. 2007;38:1603–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang Y, Guan XY, Dong B, Zhao M, Wu JH, Tian XY, Hao CY. Expression of MMP-9 and WAVE3 in colorectal cancer and its relationship to clinicopathological features. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2012

  17. Zeng ZS, Huang Y, Cohen AM, Guillem JG. Prediction of colorectal cancer relapse and survival via tissue RNA levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:3133–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Buhmeida A, Bendardaf R, Hilska M, Collan Y, Laato M, Syrjanen S, et al. Prognostic significance of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in stage ii colorectal carcinoma. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2009;40:91–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Parmar MK, Torri V, Stewart L. Extracting summary statistics to perform meta-analyses of the published literature for survival endpoints. Stat Med. 1998;17:2815–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007;8:16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cunningham D, Atkin W, Lenz HJ, Lynch HT, Minsky B, Nordlinger B, et al. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2010;375:1030–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fearon ER. Molecular genetics of colorectal cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2011;6:479–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Des Guetz G, Uzzan B, Nicolas P, Cucherat M, Morere JF, Benamouzig R, et al. Microvessel density and VEGF expression are prognostic factors in colorectal cancer. Meta-analysis of the literature. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:1823–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Popat S, Matakidou A, Houlston RS. Thymidylate synthase expression and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:529–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Koskensalo S, Louhimo J, Nordling S, Hagstrom J, Haglund C. Mmp-7 as a prognostic marker in colorectal cancer. Tumour Biol. 2011;32:259–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fang YJ, Lu ZH, Wang F, Wu XJ, Li LR, Zhang LY, et al. Prognostic impact of ERbeta and MMP7 expression on overall survival in colon cancer. Tumour Biol. 2010;31:651–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lampropoulos P, Zizi-Sermpetzoglou A, Rizos S, Kostakis A, Nikiteas N, Papavassiliou AG. Prognostic significance of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) signaling axis molecules and E-cadherin in colorectal cancer. Tumour Biol. 2012;33:1005–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mott JD, Werb Z. Regulation of matrix biology by matrix metalloproteinases. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2004;16:558–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Parks WC, Wilson CL, Lopez-Boado YS. Matrix metalloproteinases as modulators of inflammation and innate immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4:617–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chun-Yu Li or Ying Gao.

Additional information

The Publisher and Editor retract this article in accordance with the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). After a thorough investigation we have strong reason to believe that the peer review process was compromised.

An erratum to this article can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-017-5487-6.

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13277-017-5487-6.

About this article

Cite this article

Li, CY., Yuan, P., Lin, SS. et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumor Biol. 34, 735–741 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-012-0601-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-012-0601-2

Keywords

Navigation