Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the dependency of the uncertainties in the Elekta Agility MLC calibration procedure on the focal spot position

  • Scientific Paper
  • Published:
Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effectiveness of radiotherapy treatments depends on the accuracy of the dose delivery process. The majority of radiotherapy courses are delivered on linear accelerators with a Multi Leaf Collimator (MLC) in 3D conformal Radiation Therapy, Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) or Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) modes that require accurate MLC positioning. This study investigates the MLC calibration accuracy, following manufacturer procedures for an Elekta Synergy linac with the Agility head, against the radiation focal spot offset (alignment with the collimator axis of rotation). If the radiation focal spot is not aligned ideally with the collimator axis of rotation then a systematic error can be introduced into the calibration procedure affecting absolute MLC leaf positions. Calibration of diaphrams is equally affected; however they are not investigated here. The results indicate that an estimated 0.15 mm MLC uncertainty in all MLC leaves positions can be introduced due to uncertainty of the radiation focal spot position of 0.21 mm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klein E, Hanley J, Bayouth J et al (2009) Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys 36:4197–4212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huq M, Fraass B, Dunscombe P et al (2016) Task Group 100 report: application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management. Med Phys 43:4209–4261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Smith K, Balter P, Duhon J, et al. AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 8.a.: Linear accelerator performance tests. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2017; 18(4): 23–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Eckhause T, Al-Hallaq H, Ritter T et al (2015) Automating linear accelerator quality assurance. Med Phys 42:6074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Agility and Integrity R 3.0 (2012) Instruction for use—service mode. Elekta Limited, Crawley, UK.

  6. Chojnowski J, Taylor L, Sykes J et al (2018) Beam focal spot position determination for an Elekta linac with the Agility head; practical guide with a ready-to-go procedure. J Appl Clin Med Phys 19(4):44–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rangel A, Dunscombe P (2009) Tolerances on MLC leaf position accuracy for IMRT delivery with a dynamic MLC. Med Phys 36(7):3304–3309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nithiyanantham K, Mani GK, Subramani V et al (2015) Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system. J Appl Clin Med Phys 16(5):296–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Authors received no funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacek M. Chojnowski.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Research involving human and animal participants

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chojnowski, J.M., Taylor, L.M., Sykes, J.R. et al. Assessing the dependency of the uncertainties in the Elekta Agility MLC calibration procedure on the focal spot position. Phys Eng Sci Med 43, 93–96 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00821-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00821-x

Keywords

Navigation