Abstract
In the context of fetal monitoring, non-invasive fetal electrocardiography is an alternative approach to the traditional Doppler ultrasound technique. However, separating the fetal electrocardiography (FECG) component from the abdominal electrocardiography (AECG) remains a challenging task. This is mainly due to the interference from maternal electrocardiography, which has larger amplitude and overlaps with the FECG in both temporal and frequency domains. The main objective is to present a novel approach to FECG extraction by using a deep learning strategy from single-channel AECG recording. A residual convolutional encoder–decoder network (RCED-Net) is developed for this task of FECG extraction. The single-channel AECG recording is the input to the RCED-Net. And the RCED-Net extracts the feature of AECG and directly outputs the estimate of FECG component in the AECG recording. The AECG recordings from two different databases are collected to illustrate the efficiency of the proposed method. And the achieved results show that the proposed technique exhibits the best performance when compared to the existing methods in the literature. This work is a proof of concept that the proposed method could effectively extract the FECG component from AECG recordings. The focus on single-channel FECG extraction technique contributes to the commercial applications for long-term fetal monitoring.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adkins RM, Krushkal J, Somes G, Fain J, Morrison J, Klauser C, Magann EF (2009) Extensive parent-of-origin genetic effects on fetal growth. BMC Bioinform 10(7):A13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-S7-A13
Andreotti F, Behar J, Zaunseder S, Oster J, Clifford GD (2016) An open-source framework for stress-testing non-invasive foetal ecg extraction algorithms. Physiol Meas 37(5):627
Assaleh K (2007) Extraction of fetal electrocardiogram using adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54(1):59–68
Begg R, Kamruzzaman J (2006) Neural networks for detection and classification of walking pattern changes due to ageing. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 29(2):188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178892
Behar J, Andreotti F, Zaunseder S, Oster J, D Clifford G (2016) A practical guide to non-invasive foetal electrocardiogram extraction and analysis. Physiol Meas 37(5):R1–R35. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/37/5/r1
Behar J, Johnson A, Clifford GD, Oster J (2014) A comparison of single channel fetal ecg extraction methods. Ann Biomed Eng 42(6):1340–1353
Behar J, Oster J, Clifford GD (2013) Non-invasive fecg extraction from a set of abdominal sensors. Comput Cardiol 2013:297–300
Bhutta Z, Yakoob M, E Lawn J, Rizvi A, Friberg I, Weissman E, Buchmann E, L Goldenberg R (2011) Stillbirths: what difference can we make and at what cost? Lancet 377:1523–1538
Castillo E, Morales DP, García A, Parrilla L, Ruiz VU, Álvarez Bermejo JA (2018) A clustering-based method for single-channel fetal heart rate monitoring. PLoS ONE 13(6):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199308
Cerutti S, Baselli G, Civardi S, Ferrazzi E, Marconi A, Pagani M, Pardi G (2009) Variability analysis of fetal heart rate signals as obtained from abdominal electrocardiographic recordings. J Perinat Med 14(6):445–452. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpme.1986.14.6.445
Chetham SM, Barker TM, Stafford W (2002) Neural networks in cardiac electrophysiological signal classification. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 25(3):124. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178773
Clifford GD, Silva I, Behar J, Moody GB (2014) Non-invasive fetal ecg analysis. Physiol Meas 35(8):1521
Dessì A, Pani D, Raffo L (2014) An advanced algorithm for fetal heart rate estimation from non-invasive low electrode density recordings. Physiol Meas 35(8):1621
Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa R, Ko J, M Swetter S, M Blau H, Thrun S (2017) Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature 542:115–118. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21056
Goldberger A, Amaral L, Glass L, Hausdorff JM, Ivanov P, Mark R, Mietus J, Moody G, Peng CK, Stanley H (2000) Physiobank, physiotoolkit, and physionet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation 101(23):215–220. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.101.23.e215
Hasan M, Reaz M, Ibrahimy M, Hussain M, Uddin J (2009) Detection and processing techniques of fecg signal for fetal monitoring. Biol Proced Online 11(1):263
Kanjilal PP, Palit S, Saha G (1997) Fetal ecg extraction from single-channel maternal ecg using singular value decomposition. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44(1):51–59
Kligfield P, Gettes LS, Bailey JJ, Childers R, Deal BJ, Hancock EW, van Herpen G, Kors JA, Macfarlane P, Mirvis DM, Pahlm O, Rautaharju P, Wagner GS (2007) Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram. Circulation 115(10):1306–1324. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.180200
Lewis MJ (2003) Review of electromagnetic source investigations of the fetal heart. Med Eng Phys 25(10):801–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00121-8
Liu C, Li P, Di Maria C, Zhao L, Zhang H, Chen Z (2014) A multi-step method with signal quality assessment and fine-tuning procedure to locate maternal and fetal qrs complexes from abdominal ecg recordings. Physiol Meas 35:1665–1683
Najafabadi FS, Zahedi E, Mohd Ali MA (2006) Fetal heart rate monitoring based on independent component analysis. Comput Biol Med 36(3):241–252
Pan J, Tompkins WJ (1985) A real-time qrs detection algorithm. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME–32(3):230–236
Sameni R, D Clifford G (2010) A review of fetal ecg signal processing issues and promising directions. Open Pacing Electrophysiol Ther J 3:4–20. https://doi.org/10.2174/1876536x01003010004
Savalia S, Emamian V (2018) Cardiac arrhythmia classification by multi-layer perceptron and convolution neural networks. Bioengineering 5(2):35
Silva I, Behar J, Sameni R, Zhu T, Oster J, Clifford GD, Moody GB (2013) Noninvasive fetal ecg: the physionet/computing in cardiology challenge 2013. Comput Cardiol 2013:149–152
Sriraam N, Tamanna K, Narayan L, Khanum M, Raghu S, Hegde AS, Kumar AB (2018) Multichannel eeg based interictal seizures detection using teager energy with backpropagation neural network classifier. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 41(4):1047–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-018-0694-z
Suzanna M, Rabotti C, Mischi M, Sluijter RJ (2007) A robust fetal ecg detection method for abdominal recordings. Physiol Meas 28(4):373
Vahidi A, Stefanopoulou A, Peng H (2005) Recursive least squares with forgetting for online estimation of vehicle mass and road grade: theory and experiments. Veh Syst Dyn 43(1):31–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110412331290446
Vullings R, Peters CHL, Sluijter RJ, Mischi M, Oei SG (2009) Dynamic segmentation and linear prediction for maternal ecg removal in antenatal abdominal recordings. Physiol Meas 30(3):291
Zarzoso V, Nandi AK (2001) Noninvasive fetal electrocardiogram extraction: blind separation versus adaptive noise cancellation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 48(1):12–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.900244
Zhong W, Liao L, Guo X, Wang G (2018) A deep learning approach for fetal QRS complex detection. Physiol Meas 39(4):045004
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the Key Program of the National Social Science Fund of China with Grant No. 18ZDA308 and in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61772574, 61375080, and U1811462.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants and animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhong, W., Liao, L., Guo, X. et al. Fetal electrocardiography extraction with residual convolutional encoder–decoder networks. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 42, 1081–1089 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00805-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-019-00805-x