Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to describe an outline of a proton therapy system in Nagoya Proton Therapy Center (NPTC). The NPTC has a synchrotron with a linac injector and three treatment rooms: two rooms are equipped with a gantry and the other one is equipped with a fixed horizontal beamline. One gantry treatment room has a pencil beam scanning treatment delivery nozzle. The other two treatment rooms have a passive scattering treatment delivery nozzle. In the scanning treatment delivery nozzle, an energy absorber and an aperture system to treat head and neck cancer have been equipped. In the passive treatment delivery nozzle, a multi-leaf collimator is equipped. We employ respiratory gating to treat lung and liver cancers for passive irradiation. The proton therapy system passed all acceptance tests. The first patient was treated on February 25, 2013, using passive scattering fixed beams. Respiratory gating is commonly used to treat lung and liver cancers in the passive scattering system. The MLCs are our first choice to limit the irradiation field. The use of the aperture for scanning irradiation reduced the lateral fall off by half or less. The energy absorber and aperture system in scanning delivery is beneficial to treat head and neck cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Smith A, Gillin M, Bues M et al (2009) The M. D. Anderson proton therapy system. Med Phys 36:4068–4083
Yasui K, Toshito T, Omachi C et al (2015) A patient-specific aperture system with an energy absorber for spot scanning proton beams: verification for clinical application. Med Phys 42:6999–7010
Minohara S, Kanai T, Endo M et al (2000) Respiratory gated irradiation system for heavy-ion radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 47:1097–1103
Tsunashima Y, Vedam S, Dong L et al (2008) Efficiency of respiratory-gated delivery of synchrotron-based pulsed proton irradiation. Phys Med Biol 53:1947–1959
Gillin MT, Sahoo N, Bues M et al (2010) Commissioning of the discrete spot scanning proton beam delivery system at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Proton Therapy Center. Houston. Med Phys 37:154–163
Zhu XR, Poenisch F, Lii M et al (2013) Commissioning dose computation models for spot scanning proton beams in water for a commercially available treatment planning system. Med Phys 40:041723
Japan Society of Medical Physics (JSMP) (2012) Standard dosimetry of absorbed dose in external beam radiotherapy. Tsuushou Sangyou Kenkyuusya, Tokyo)
Boon SN, Van Luijk P, Schippers M et al (1998) Fast 2D phantom dosimetry for scanning proton beams. Med Phys 25:464–475
Olsher RH, Hsu H, Beverding A et al (2000) WENDI: an improved neutron rem meter. Health Phys 79:170–181
Yonai S, Matsufuji N, Kanai T et al (2008) Measurement of neutron ambient dose equivalent in passive carbon-ion and proton radiotherapies. Med Phys 35:4782–4792
Pedroni E, Scheib S, Bohringer T et al (2005) Experimental characterization and physical modeling of the dose distribution of scanned proton pencil beams. Phys Med Biol 50:541–561
Inaniwa T, Furukawa T, Nagano A et al (2009) Field-size effect of physical doses in carbon-ion scanning using range shifter plates. Med Phys 36:2889–2897
Schaffner B, Pedroni E, Lomax A (1999) Dose calculation models for proton treatment planning using a dynamic beam delivery system: an attempt to include density heterogeneity effects in the analytical dose calculation. Phys Med Biol 44:27–41
Park PC, Zhu XR, Lee AK et al (2012) A beam-specific planning target volume (PTV) design for proton therapy to account for setup and range uncertainties. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:e329–e336
Cao W, Lim G, Li X et al (2013) Incorporating deliverable monitor unit constraints into spot intensity optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 58:5113–5125
Li Y, Zhang X, Lii M et al (2008) Incorporating partial shining effects in proton pencil-beam dose calculation. Phys Med Biol 53:605–616
Kanematsu N, Akagi T, Takatani Y et al (2006) Extended collimator model for pencil-beam dose calculation in proton radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 51:4807–4817
Sahoo N, Zhu XR, Arjomandy B et al (2008) A procedure for calculation of monitor units for passively scattered proton radiotherapy. Med Phys 35:5088–5097
Bert C, Durante M (2011) Motion in radiotherapy: particle therapy. Phys Med Biol 56:R113–R144
Pedroni E, Bacher R, Blattmann H et al (1995) The 200-MeV proton therapy project at the Paul Scherrer Institute: conceptual design and practical realization. Med Phys 22:37–53
Sawakuchi GO, Zhu XR, Poenisch F et al (2010) Experimental characterization of the low-dose envelope of spot scanning proton beams. Phys Med Biol 55:3467–3478
Kanai T, Kawachi K, Matsuzawa H et al (1983) Broad beam three-dimensional irradiation for proton radiotherapy. Med Phys 10:344–346
Lomax A (1999) Intensity modulation methods for proton radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 44:185–205
Furukawa T, Inaniwa T, Sato S et al (2010) Moving target irradiation with fast rescanning and gating in particle therapy. Med Phys 37:4874–4879
Shimizu S, Miyamoto N, Matsuura T et al (2014) A proton beam therapy system dedicated to spot-scanning increases accuracy with moving tumors by real-time imaging and gating and reduces equipment size. PLoS One 9:e94971
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 24601013. We are grateful to Prof. Masataka Komori and Ms. Eri Sekihara for the measurement of neutron ambient dose equivalent. We also wish to thank Hitachi Ltd. for their outstanding design, effort for installation, and sustained work towards the stable operation of the system.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toshito, T., Omachi, C., Kibe, Y. et al. A proton therapy system in Nagoya Proton Therapy Center. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 39, 645–654 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-016-0456-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-016-0456-8