Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Development of a Multi-modality Compatible Flow Loop System for the Functional Assessment of Mitral Valve Prostheses

  • Published:
Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We sought to build a robust pulsatile flow model permitting comparison of 3D Color Doppler and phase contrast magnetic resonance (PCMR) flow and orifice area measurements of prosthetic valve function that would provide an in vitro gold standard for evaluation of the accuracy of new imaging techniques. A multi-modality compatible, pulsatile linear actuation system, control software, and mock circulation loop was designed and created using non-ferromagnetic components, NI Labview, and rapid prototyping. The developed system’s ability to create pulsatile, controlled flow was assessed by examining peak diastolic flow, diastolic period, and diastolic flow volume (DFV) of 12 consecutive cardiac cycles at 3 different DFVs. Reproducibility of flow was tested by examining the systems ability to generate the same target DFV after draining and re-configuring the flow loop components. Furthermore, the system was evaluated by CMR and echocardiography to examine image quality, DFV quantification, and an initial functional assessment of prosthetic mitral valve (MV) orifice area by four different imaging methods. The system was able to reproducibly create prescribed flow volumes across 31 mm bioprosthetic and mechanical MV’s under a range of flow conditions. In vitro image quality for the identification of MV sewing ring, struts and leaflets was similar to clinical imaging quality for both echocardiographic and MRI methods. For the quantification of DFV, the PCMR method demonstrated an error range of 1.4–9.2% and a mean difference of 4 ± 2 mL/beat compared to the flowmeter reference standard. Across the three flow conditions the bioprosthetic MV diastolic flow area was statistically similar by MRI planimetry, phase contrast MRI planimetry, and 3D color Doppler planimetry methods (mean area 3.2 ± 0.5 cm2, ANOVA, p = NS), but the effective orifice area by 2D spectral Doppler (continuity) method was smaller (mean area 2.0 ± 0.3 cm2, ANOVA, p < 0.001). We describe the development and initial functional testing of a novel MRI-compatible flow loop system for comparison of multimodality imaging techniques to assess prosthetic valve function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blauwet, L. A., J. F. Malouf, H. M. Connolly, D. O. Hodge, K. N. Evans, R. M. Herges, T. M. Sundt, III, and F. A. Miller, Jr. Comprehensive echocardiographic assessment of normal mitral Medtronic Hancock II, Medtronic Mosaic, and Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprostheses early after implantation. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 23:656–666, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonow, R. O., B. A. Carabello, K. Chatterjee, A. De Leon, Jr, D. P. Faxon, M. D. Freed, W. H. Gaasch, B. W. Lytle, R. A. Nishimura, P. T. O’Gara, R. A. O’Rourke, C. M. Otto, P. M. Shah, J. S. Shanewise, S. C. Smith, Jr, A. K. Jacobs, C. D. Adams, J. L. Anderson, E. M. Antman, V. Fuster, J. L. Halperin, L. F. Hiratzka, S. A. Hunt, B. W. Lytle, R. Nishimura, R. L. Page, and B. Riegel. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 48:e1-148, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Garver, D., R. G. Kaczmarek, B. G. Silverman, T. P. Gross, and P. M. Hamilton. The epidemiology of prosthetic heart valves in the United States. Tex. Heart Inst. J. 22:86–91, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hasenkam, J. M., S. Ringgaard, K. Houlind, R. M. Botnar, H. Stodkilde-Jorgensen, P. Boesiger, and E. M. Pedersen. Prosthetic heart valve evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 16:300–305, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hendel, R. C., M. R. Patel, C. M. Kramer, M. Poon, R. C. Hendel, J. C. Carr, N. A. Gerstad, L. D. Gillam, J. M. Hodgson, R. J. Kim, C. M. Kramer, J. R. Lesser, E. T. Martin, J. V. Messer, R. F. Redberg, G. D. Rubin, J. S. Rumsfeld, A. J. Taylor, W. G. Weigold, P. K. Woodard, R. G. Brindis, R. C. Hendel, P. S. Douglas, E. D. Peterson, M. J. Wolk, J. M. Allen, and M. R. Patel. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 48:1475–1497, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Krim, S. R., R. P. Vivo, A. Patel, J. Xu, S. R. Igo, W. A. Zoghbi, and S. H. Little. Direct assessment of normal mechanical mitral valve orifice area by real-time 3D echocardiography. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 5:478–483, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kvitting, J. P., P. Dyverfeldt, A. Sigfridsson, S. Franzen, L. Wigstrom, A. F. Bolger, and T. Ebbers. In vitro assessment of flow patterns and turbulence intensity in prosthetic heart valves using generalized phase-contrast MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 31:1075–1080, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, C. P., S. F. Chen, C. W. Lo, and P. C. Lu. Turbulence characteristics downstream of a new trileaflet mechanical heart valve. ASAIO J. 57:188–196, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Little, S. H., S. R. Igo, B. Pirat, M. McCulloch, C. J. Hartley, Y. Nose, and W. A. Zoghbi. In vitro validation of real-time three-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography for direct measurement of proximal isovelocity surface area in mitral regurgitation. Am. J. Cardiol. 99:1440–1447, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Little, S. H., B. Pirat, R. Kumar, S. R. Igo, M. McCulloch, C. J. Hartley, J. Xu, and W. A. Zoghbi. Three-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography for direct measurement of vena contracta area in mitral regurgitation: in vitro validation and clinical experience. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 1:695–704, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pham, N., H. Zaitoun, T. L. Mohammed, E. LaPena-Almaguer, F. Martinez, G. M. Novaro, and J. Kirsch. Complications of aortic valve surgery: manifestations at CT and MR imaging. Radiographics 32:1873–1892, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pibarot, P., and J. G. Dumesnil. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention. Heart 92:1022–1029, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Quail, M. A., J. Nordmeyer, S. Schievano, M. Reinthaler, M. J. Mullen, and A. M. Taylor. Use of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for TAVR assessment in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves: comparison with computed tomography. Eur. J. Radiol. 81:3912–3917, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rabbah, J. P., N. Saikrishnan, and A. P. Yoganathan. A novel left heart simulator for the multi-modality characterization of native mitral valve geometry and fluid mechanics. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 41:305–315, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sugeng, L., S. K. Shernan, L. Weinert, D. Shook, J. Raman, V. Jeevanandam, F. DuPont, J. Fox, V. Mor-Avi, and R. M. Lang. Real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in valve disease: comparison with surgical findings and evaluation of prosthetic valves. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 21:1347–1354, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Valdes-Cruz, L. M., A. P. Yoganathan, T. Tamura, F. Tomizuka, Y. R. Woo, and D. J. Sahn. Studies in vitro of the relationship between ultrasound and laser Doppler velocemitry and applicability to the simplified Bernoulli relationship. Circulation 73(2):300–308, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vasko, S. D., S. J. Goldberg, J. A. Requarth, and H. D. Allen. Factors affecting accuracy of in vitro valvar pressure gradient estimates by Doppler ultrasound. Am. J. Cardiol. 54(7):893–896, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, F., R. Rottgen, and J. Schulz-Menger. Complementary assessment of aortic bioprosthetic dysfunction using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. J. Heart Valve Dis. 21:20–22, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  19. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, F., A. Rudolph, R. Wassmuth, S. Bohl, E. E. Buschmann, H. Abdel-Aty, R. Dietz, and J. Schulz-Menger. Feasibility of cardiovascular magnetic resonance to assess the orifice area of aortic bioprostheses. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2:397–404, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, F., A. Rudolph, R. Wassmuth, and J. Schulz-Menger. Assessment of mitral bioprostheses using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 12:36, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yap, C. H., H. S. Kim, K. Balachandran, M. Weiler, R. Haj-Ali, and A. P. Yoganathan. Dynamic deformation characteristics of porcine aortic valve leaflet under normal and hypertensive conditions. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 298:H395–H405, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yap, C. H., N. Saikrishnan, G. Tamilselvan, and A. P. Yoganathan. Experimental technique of measuring dynamic fluid shear stress on the aortic surface of the aortic valve leaflet. J. Biomech. Eng. 133:061007, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is funded in part by Grant support from the American Heart Association Beginning Grant-in-Aid (MJ, SL), and product support from Medtronic Inc. The collaboration between Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center and ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company was developed through the Pumps & Pipes annual symposium (pumpsandpipes.com), which aims to foster research opportunities between the Medical, Energy, and Aerospace industries of Houston.

Conflict of Interest

Matthew S. Jackson, Stephen R. Igo, Thomas E. Lindsey, Dimitrios Maragiannis, Karen E. Chin, Kyle Autry, Robert Schutt III, Dipan J., Pietro Valsecchi, and William B. Kline declare that they have no conflict of interest. Stephen H. Little has received a research Grant Number #11BGIA5840008 from the American Heart Association

Human Subjects

No human studies were carried out by the authors for this article

Animal Studies

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX, USA

    Matthew S. Jackson, Stephen R. Igo, Dimitrios Maragiannis, Karen E. Chin, Kyle Autry, Robert Schutt III, Dipan J. Shah & Stephen H. Little

  2. ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company, Houston, TX, USA

    Thomas E. Lindsey, Pietro Valsecchi & William B. Kline

Authors
  1. Matthew S. Jackson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen R. Igo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Thomas E. Lindsey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dimitrios Maragiannis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Karen E. Chin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kyle Autry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Robert Schutt III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Dipan J. Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Pietro Valsecchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. William B. Kline
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Stephen H. Little
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen H. Little.

Additional information

Associate Editor Ajit P. Yoganathan oversaw the review of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, M.S., Igo, S.R., Lindsey, T.E. et al. Development of a Multi-modality Compatible Flow Loop System for the Functional Assessment of Mitral Valve Prostheses. Cardiovasc Eng Tech 5, 13–24 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-014-0177-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13239-014-0177-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation