Skip to main content
Log in

Preparation, storage stability and palatability of spent hen meal based pet food

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Food Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extruded pet foods were prepared by extrusion process incorporating dry rendered spent hen meal (SHM) at 10 and 20% levels, and packed in LDPE bags before storage at room temperature (35 ± 2°C) up to 45 days. The colour of the pet foods was uniformly brown with pleasant meaty odour. The thiobarbituric acid, tyrosine values, free fatty acid content and acid value and total bacterial counts increased gradually during storage but E.coli, Salmonella spp, Clostridium spp, Staphylococci spp and fungi were not detected during storage. The pet owners rated the pet foods as good. The body weight of the adult pet dogs did not decrease during the feeding trial of one month and the health condition of pets was good. The cost of production per kg of pet food containing 10 and 20% SHM was Rs 18.00 and Rs 22.75, respectively. It was concluded that a pet food (whole meal) with good nutritive quality and palatability to dogs can be prepared by incorporating 10–20% of spent hen meal which can be safely stored up to 45 days at room temperature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AAFCO (1994) Official publication of the Association of American Feed Control Officials. Inc., Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • AAFCO (1995) Official publication of the Association of American Feed Control Officials. Inc., Atlanta, GA

    Google Scholar 

  • AAFCO (2004) Official publication of the Association of American Feed Control Officials. Inc., Atlanta, GA

  • Aldrich G (2006) Rendered products in pet food. Essential rendering all about the animal by-products industry. National Renderers Association, Kirby Lithographic Co., Inc. Arlington, Virginia, www.rendereres.org, accessed on 20.1.2007, p 158–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Anon (1978) Food Safety and Inspection Service, USDA, www.usda.org accessed on 15.4.2007

  • Anon (2005) Wenger pet food process team process description In: Pet food production. Wenger Mfg. Inc. Sabetha, KS, USA, p 1–18

  • AOAC (1995) Official methods of analysis, 16th edn, Association of Official Analytical Chemists Arlington, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo JA, Milgram NN (2004) A novel congnitive palatability assessment protocol for dogs. J Anim Sci 82: 2200–2208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin J (2001) Pet foods and feeding. Feed Stuffs 73:70–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Dainty RH, Shaw BG, Boer KA, Scheps ESJ (1975) Protein changes caused by bacterial growth on beef. J Appl Bacteriol 39:73–81

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dust JM, Grieshop CM, Parsons CM, Karr-Lilienthal LK, Schasteen CS, Quigley JD, Merchen NR, Fahey Jr GC (2005) Chemical composition, protein quality, palatability, and digestibility of alternative protein sources for dogs. J Anim Sci 83: 2414–2422

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haque AK, Lyons JJ, Vandepopuliere JM (1991) Expression processing of broiler diets containing ground whole hens, poultry by-product meal, feather meal, or ground feathers. Poult Sci 70:234–240

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (1974) The nutrient requirements of dog. National Academic Press, Washington, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (2006) The Nutrient requirements of dogs and cats. National Research Council. National Academic Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockerman HW, Hansen CL (1988) Animal by-products processing, Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, England, p 256–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn PJ, Carter ME, Markey B, Carter GR (1994) Clinical Veterinary Microbiology. Mosby year book Europe Ltd, Wolfe, p 256

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1989) Statistical methods of analysis, Oxford and IBH publ Co, Kolkata

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS (1999) SPSS User’s Guide: Statistics, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange ED, Benedict RC, Smith JL, Swift CE (1977) Evaluation of rapid tests for monitoring alterations in meat quality during storage. J Food Protect 40:843–847

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strombeck DR (1999) Home prepared dog and cat diets. Iowa State University Press, Ames, p 55

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts BM (1962) Symp on Foods: Lipids and their oxidation. Schultz HW, Day EAR, Sinnhuber RP (eds), AVI Publ Co, Westport, Connecticut, p 202

    Google Scholar 

  • Witte VC, Krause GF, Bailey ME (1970) A new extraction method for determining 2-thiobarbituric acid values of pork and beef during storage. J Food Sci 35:582–585

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. V. Kulkarni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karthik, P., Kulkarni, V.V. & Sivakumar, K. Preparation, storage stability and palatability of spent hen meal based pet food. J Food Sci Technol 47, 330–334 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0053-x

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-010-0053-x

Keywords

Navigation