Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effectiveness of Using Personal Health Records to Improve Recommended Breast Cancer Screening and Reduce Racial and Geographic Disparities Among Women

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the effectiveness of using personal health records (PHRs), which contains detailed health information to improve the use of recommended screening mammography among women at potential risk for breast cancer. It also explores the potential of PHR in reducing disparities in recommended mammography use experienced by minority and underserved women. The primary data used for this study were obtained from the 2015 Health Information National Trends Survey, and they were supplemented by the 2016 Area Health Resource Files. The study sample included women aged 40–75 years with no prior diagnosis of cancer. Because the use of PHRs as a key predictor of breast cancer screening may be endogenously determined, we used the instrumental variable (IV) approach to correct for estimation bias. We found a significant and positive association between the use of PHRs and recommended mammography use among women, with the likelihood of mammography screening increasing with more frequent use of PHRs. Furthermore, the effects of PHR use on mammography screening were found to be greater among Hispanic and Black women and those living in non-metropolitan areas compared with White women and those living in metropolitan areas, respectively. The use of PHRs for health information seeking can empower women at potential risk for breast cancer to participate in recommended screening mammography, particularly among those underserved and racial/ethnic minorities. Policymakers should consider developing policies and programs that can promote PHR use by women, especially medically underserved and minority women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data and/or Code Availability

Datasets used for this study are publicly available; SAS codes may be possible to receive upon request to HK (hkellykim19@gmail.com).

References

  1. WHO (2020) Screening. https://who.int/cancer/prevention/diagnosis-screening/screening/en/. Accessed 28 March 2020

  2. DeSantis CE, Ma J, Goding Sauer A, Newman LA, Jemal A (2017) Breast cancer statistics, 2017, racial disparity in mortality by state. CA Cancer J Clin 67:439–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. National Center for Health Statistics (2017) Health, United States, 2016: with chartbook on long-term trends in health. https://cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus16.pdf#070. Accessed 12 December 2017

  4. Sabatino SA, White MC, Thompson TD, Klabunde CN (2015) Cancer screening test use-United States, 2013. MMWR 64:464–468

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Peek ME, Han JH (2004) Disparities in screening mammography: current status, interventions, and implications. J Gen Intern Med 19:184–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sassi F, Luft HS, Guadagnoli E (2006) Reducing racial/ethnic disparities in female breast cancer: screening rates and stage at diagnosis. Am J Public Health 96:2165–2172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (2019) Healthy people 2020: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives. https://healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/cancer/objectives. Accessed 17 September 2017

  8. Meischke H, Eisenberg M, Rowe S, Cagle A (2005) Do older adults use the internet for information on heart attacks? Results from a survey of seniors in King County, Washington. Heart Lung 34:3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shi HJ, Nakamura K, Takano T (2004) Health values and health-information-seeking in relation to positive change of health practice among middle-aged urban men. Prev Med 39:1164–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim H, Mahmood A, Carlton E, Goldsmith J, Chang C, Bhuyan S (2019) Access to personal health records and screening for breast and cervical cancer among women with a family history of cancer. J Cancer Educ:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01568-5

  11. Ball MJ, Carla Smith NC, Bakalar RS (2007) Personal health records: empowering consumers. J Healthc Inf Manag 21:76–86

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarkar U, Karter AJ, Liu JY, Adler NE, Nguyen R, López A, Schillinger D (2010) The literacy divide: health literacy and the use of an internet-based patient portal in an integrated health system—results from the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE). J Health Commun 15:183–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim H (2018) Personal health records and their impact on breast cancer screening among women. The University of Memphis, Tennessee

  14. Newell SA, Sanson-Fisher RW, Girgis A, Davey HM (2002) Can personal health record booklets improve cancer screening behaviors? Am J Prev Med 22:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krist AH, Woolf SH, Rothemich SF, Johnson RE, Peele JE, Cunningham TD, Longo DR, Bello GA, Matzke GR (2012) Interactive preventive health record to enhance delivery of recommended care: a randomized trial. Ann Fam Med 10:312–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krist AH, Woolf SH, Hochheimer C, Sabo RT, Kashiri P, Jones RM, Lafata JE, Etz RS, Tu SP (2017) Harnessing information technology to inform patients facing routine decisions: cancer screening as a test case. Ann Fam Med 15:217–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wright A, Poon EG, Wald J, Feblowitz J, Pang JE, Schnipper JL, Grant RW, Gandhi TK, Volk LA, Bloom A, Williams DH, Gardner K, Epstein M, Nelson L, Businger A, Li Q, Bates DW, Middleton B (2012) Randomized controlled trial of health maintenance reminders provided directly to patients through an electronic PHR. J Gen Intern Med 27:85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Andersen R, Newman JF (1973) Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc:95–124

  19. Johnson JD, Meischke H (1993) A comprehensive model of cancer-related information seeking applied to magazines. Hum Commun Res 19:343–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Greene WH (2000) Econometric analysis. Prentice Hall International. Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  21. National Cancer Institute (2017) Health Information National Trends Survey: About HINTS. https://hints.cancer.gov/about.aspx. Accessed 9 May 2017

  22. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Health Resources & Services Administration Data Warehouse (2017) Area health resources files. https://datawarehouse.hrsa.gov/topics/ahrf.aspx. Accessed 24 July 2017

  23. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2019) Final recommendation statement: breast cancer: screening. https://uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementFinal/breast-cancer-screening1. Accessed 22 December 2017

  24. American Cancer Society (2019) Breast cancer facts & figures 2019-2020. American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  25. Daschle T, Frist B (2017) For patients with multiple chronic conditions, improving care will be a bipartisan effort. https://healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20170601.060354/full/. Accessed 28 June 2018

  26. Eysenbach G, Jadad AR (2001) Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the Internet age. J Med Internet Res 3:E19. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3.2.e19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to Dr. M. Paige Powell and Dr. Xinhua Yu for their comments and helpful suggestions concerning this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyunmin Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, H., Chang, C.F. Effectiveness of Using Personal Health Records to Improve Recommended Breast Cancer Screening and Reduce Racial and Geographic Disparities Among Women. J Canc Educ 37, 343–351 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01821-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01821-2

Keywords

Navigation