Abstract
The aim of this study was to demonstrate the construct validity of a newly developed cancer screening perception scale as a measure of the perception of cancer screening in general among high-risk but healthy asymptomatic groups.
The cancer screening perception scale (CSPS) was developed based on extensive literature reviews guided by The Health Belief Model. Fifty-five written items were initially pooled, reviewed by experts for face validity, pretested by 25 healthcare workers and translated into Malay using simple back translation. The scale was then distributed to 300 respondents from two health clinics for construct validation purposes. The obtained data were analyzed using the varimax rotation method for exploratory factor analysis (EFA). The data was submitted for further confirmatory factor analysis using AMOS software.
Based on EFA, the results produced five constructs as predicted: perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and cues for action. Two items with low factor loading and unrelated to the recovered domains were removed. Perceived barriers and cues for action had three and two sub-domains respectively which were further confirmed to fit the measurement and structural models. CFA demonstrated the scale fitted GFI = 0.936, CFI = 0.935, RMSEA = 0.076, NORMEDCHISQ = 2.162. The scale discriminated between the domains. Cronbach’s alpha for perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived barrier, and cues for action were 0.907, 0.877, 0.940, 0.864 and 0.938, respectively.
The cancer screening perception scale with its promising psychometric properties is now available to measure risks to high-risk but healthy, asymptomatic groups aged 18 and above and can also be used for larger scale study purposes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
World Health Organization (2009) Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland
Curry SJ, Byers T, Hewitt M (eds) (2003) Fulfilling the potential for cancer prevention and early detection. National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Wardle J, Robb K, Vernon S, Waller J (2015) Screening for prevention and early diagnosis of cancer. Am Psychol 70(2):119
Glasgow RE, Marcus AC, Bull SS, Wilson KM (2004) Disseminating effective cancer screening interventions. Cancer 101(S5):1239–1250
Goroll AH, Mulley AG (2012) Primary care medicine: office evaluation and management of the adult patient. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
Farooqui M, Hassali MA, Knight A, Shafie AA, Farooqui MA, Saleem F, Aljadhey H (2013) A qualitative exploration of Malaysian cancer patients’ perceptions of cancer screening. BMC Public Health 13(1):1
Parsa P, Kandiah M, Abdul Rahman H, Zulkefli NM (2006) Barriers for breast cancer screening among Asian women: a mini literature review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 7(4):509
Lasser KE, Ayanian JZ, Fletcher RH, Good DMJ (2008) Barriers to colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 9(1):1
Markovic M, Kesic V, Topic L, Matejic B (2005) Barriers to cervical cancer screening: a qualitative study with women in Serbia. Soc Sci Med 61(12):2528–2535
De Vellis RF (2003) Scale Development, 2nd edn. Sage, London
Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH (1988) Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Behav 15(2):175–183
Antshel KM (2002) Integrating culture as a means of improving treatment adherence in the Latino population. Psychol Health Med 7(4):435–449
Lynn MR (1986) Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 35(6):382–386
Rosnah I, Hassim IN, Shafizah AS (2013) A systematic translation and cultural adaptation process for Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R21). Med J Malaysia 68(5):425
Brislin RW (1976) Comparative research methodology: cross-cultural studies. Int J Psychol 11(3):215–29
Naing L (2010) Reliability analysis. First UKMMC Intermediate to Advance Biostatistics in Medical Sciences Workshop. Anjuran Jabatan Kesihatan Masyarakat, Faculty Perubatan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur
Bond T, Fox CM (2015) Applying the rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Routledge, New York
Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 107(2):238
Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1986) LISREL VI: analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood, instrumental variables, and least squares methods. Scientific Software, Arizona
Bollen KA (1989) A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociol Methods Res 17(3):303–316
Browne MW, Cudeck R (1992) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol Methods Res 21(2):230–258
Marsh HW, Hocevar D (1985) Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: first-and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychol Bull 97(3):562
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective. Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey
Tabachnik BG, Fidell LS (2001) Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon, London
Arbuckle J, Wothke W (1999) AMOS 4 user’s reference guide. Smallwaters Corp, Chicago
Ogden J (2012) Health psychology. McGraw-Hill Education, UK
Hafizah P, Zaleha MI, Shamsul AS (2002) The validation of questionnaire on risk perception of developing five most common non-communicable diseases in Malaysia. J Nurs Health Sci 1(2):29–35
Williams B, Brown T, Onsman A (2012) Exploratory factor analysis: a five-step guide for novices. Australas J Paramed 8(3):1
Costello AB (2009) Getting the most from your analysis. Pan 12(2):131–146
Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H (2003) Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods Psychol Res Online 8(2):23–74
de Winter JCF, Dodou D, Wieringa PA (2009) Exploratory factor analysis with small sample sizes. Multivar Behav Res 44(2):147–181
Acknowledgment
The research project was part of doctorate research which funded by the Peruntukan Dana Fundamental PPUKM with the Project Code FF-2015-348 and received ethical approval from the National Medical Research Centre of Malaysia with code approval NMRR-15-1399-26609 (IIR). A special thanks to those direct and indirectly involved in the research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahmood, M.I., Shah, S.A., Ahmad, N. et al. Cancer Screening Perception Scale: Development and Construct Validation. J Canc Educ 33, 269–277 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1081-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1081-7