Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experiences of Cervical Cancer Survivors in Rural Eastern North Carolina: a Qualitative Assessment

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little qualitative research has been conducted with cervical cancer survivors. We sought to understand the experiences of survivors in rural Eastern North Carolina and identify any barriers which may have kept women from receiving preventive Papanicolaou screenings or follow-up care. We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with 15 low-income and underserved cervical cancer survivors living in Eastern North Carolina. Participants included English-speaking women who attended a large cancer center for care between March 2012 and March 2013. Participants ranged from being recently diagnosed with cervical cancer to being 15 years post-diagnosis. Interviews lasted approximately 1 h and were audio-tape-recorded. On average, women were 55 years old (range 35–85) and were diagnosed with cervical cancer 3 years prior to the interview (range 0.2 to 180 months). A good proportion was uninsured or Medicaid-insured (60 %). Half reported an annual household income of less than $20,000, and 13 % reported having a college degree. The majority of survivors had limited understanding of cervical cancer, experienced persistent symptoms related to their cancer before seeking care, and were nonadherent to Papanicolaou screening recommendations. The main barriers to care reported by participants was lack of money and health insurance, followed by the perception of overall health (which equated to the belief that medical care was not needed), transportation issues, and discomfort with provider. Health professionals should focus educational efforts on the benefits of Papanicolaou screenings, the symptoms sometimes associated with cervical cancer, and the free or low-cost services available to low-income women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. WHO guidance note: comprehensive cervical cancer prevention and control: A healthier future for girls and women. Switzerland, 2013. Available at http://www.who.int/immunization/hpv/learn/comprehensive_cervical_cancer_who_2013.pdf

  2. 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.). Cervical cancer. Atlanta, Ga: U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/cervical/

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.) & United States. Indian Health Service. Genital human papillomavirus (HPV). Atlanta, GA: Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Indian Health Service, 2011. Available at http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/common/ai/ai.pdf

  4. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z et al (2014) Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64(1):9–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Freeman HP, Wingrove BK (2005) Excess cervical cancer mortality: a marker for low access to health care in poor communities. Rockville, MD: National Cancer Institute, Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities, pp 1–96. Available at http://www.cancer.gov/aboutnci/organization/crchd/abouthealth-disparities/resources/excess-cervical-cancer-mortality.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2015

  6. Denslow SA, Knop G, Klaus C et al (2012) Burden of invasive cervical cancer in North Carolina. Prev Med 54(3–4):270–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lea S, May C, Miller E (2012) Cancer prevention in eastern North Carolina. Cancer profile of eastern North Carolina for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. Greenville, NC: Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University. Available at http://www.ecu.edu/cs-dhs/chsrd/Pubs/upload/ENC-Cancer-Profile-041612.pdf

  8. Hildesheim A, Hadjimichael O, Schwartz PE et al (1999) Risk factors for rapid-onset cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180(3 Pt 1):571–577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Janerich DT, Hadjimichael O, Schwartz PE et al (1995) The screening histories of women with invasive cervical cancer. Connecticut. Am J Public Health 85(6):791–794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Peters RK, Bear MB, Thomas D (1989) Barriers to screening for cancer of the cervix. Prev Med 18(1):133–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sambamoorthi U, McAlpine DD (2003) Racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and access disparities in the use of preventive services among women. Prev Med 37(5):475–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Behbakht K, Lynch A, Teal S et al (2004) Social and cultural barriers to Papanicolaou test screening in an urban population. Obstet Gynecol 104(6):1355–1361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Eggleston KS, Coker AL, Das IP et al (2007) Understanding barriers for adherence to follow-up care for abnormal pap tests. J Women’s Health 16(3):311–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Salz T, Gottlieb SL, Smith JS et al (2010) The association between cervical abnormalities and attitudes toward cervical cancer prevention. J Women’s Health 19(11):2011–2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cyrus-David MS, Michielutte R, Paskett ED et al (2002) Cervical cancer risk as a predictor of Pap smear use in rural North Carolina. J Rural Health 18(1):67–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ashing-Giwa KT, Kagawa-Singer M, Padilla GV et al (2004) The impact of cervical cancer and dysplasia: a qualitative, multiethnic study. Psycho-Oncology 13(10):709–728

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Guilfoyle S, Franco R, Gorin SS (2007) Exploring older women’s approaches to cervical cancer screening. Health Care Women Int 28(10):930–950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Waller J, Jackowska M, Marlow L et al (2012) Exploring age differences in reasons for nonattendance for cervical screening: a qualitative study. BJOG-Int J Obstet Gy 119(1):26–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. NVivo qualitative data analysis software; QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 10, 2012. Available at https://www.qsrinternational.com/support_faqs_detail.aspx?view=11. Accessed 15 Jan 2015

  20. The UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and NC Central Cancer Registry Cancer in North Carolina. 2008 Report: cCancer and income with a special report on cancer, income, and racial differences. North Carolina: North Carolina Center for Health Statistics, 2008. Available at http://ucrf.unc.edu/publications/cancer_report_2008.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the women who participated in this study for openly sharing their experiences with us and Samantha Billings, Ashley Allsbrook, Camden Heath, and Katlyn Eloshway for assistance with interviewing and transcription. We would also like to thank the staff from the cancer center for graciously allowing us to recruit study participants from their center and for their continued fight against cervical cancer.

Conflict of Interest

This study was unfunded and authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alice R. Richman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Richman, A.R., Troutman, J.L. & Torres, E. Experiences of Cervical Cancer Survivors in Rural Eastern North Carolina: a Qualitative Assessment. J Canc Educ 31, 314–321 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0809-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0809-0

Keywords

Navigation