Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Engaging Patients and Caregivers in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research on Advanced Stage Lung Cancer: Insights from Patients, Caregivers, and Providers

  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Participatory and patient-centered approaches to cancer research have been highlighted as the most appropriate means of engaging patients in the conduct of clinical research. However, there is a paucity of patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) on lung cancer. Previous studies seeking to define lung cancer treatment success have generally not included patients’ and caregivers’ perceptions and views in treatment decision-making. Additionally, little is known about effective strategies for the engagement of lung cancer patients in PCOR. We sought to gain insights into the perceptions of patients, caregivers, and providers on lung cancer treatment success, as well as on strategies for patient engagement in lung cancer PCOR. Four focus groups were conducted with provider, patient, and caregiver participants from four cancer centers in Nebraska and South Dakota. A total of 36 providers, patients, and caregivers participated in this study. Patients and caregivers confirmed that survival alone should not be the measure of lung cancer treatment success and that definitions of treatment success should emphasize factors such as effective clinical guidance throughout treatment, symptom management, functionality, and quality of life. Clinician participants noted that the definition of treatment success evolved over time and appeared to be linked to patients’ experiences with chemotherapy. Participants identified barriers to and facilitators of research participation and suggested strategies for the recruitment and retention of research participants. Our study indicates that patients can successfully play active and engaged roles in clinical research, ranging from participant to partner. Judging from the enthusiasm of our focus group attendees, patients and caregivers want to participate and be engaged in clinical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chiu CG, Mitchell TL, Fitch MI (2013) From patient to participant: enhancing the validity and ethics of cancer research through participatory research. J Cancer Educ 28(2):237–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wright D, Corner J, Hopkinson J, Foster C (2006) Listening to the views of people affected by cancer about cancer research: an example of participatory research in setting the cancer research agenda. Health Expect 9(1):3–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Godskesen T, Nygren P, Nordin K, Hansson M, Kihlbom U (2013) Phase 1 clinical trials in end-stage cancer: patient understanding of trial premises and motives for participation. Support Care Cancer 21(11):3137–3142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson J, Bissell P, Cooper CL, Armitage CJ, Barber R (2014) Exploring the impact of patient and public involvement in a cancer research setting. Qual Health Res 24(1):46–54

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones JM, Nyhof-Young J, Moric J, Friedman A, Wells W, Catton P (2007) Identifying motivations and barriers to patient participation in clinical trials. J Cancer Educ 21(4):237–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Catt S, Langridge C, Fallowfield L, Talbot D, Jenkins V (2011) Reasons given by patients for participating, or not, in phase 1 cancer trials. Eur J Cancer 47(10):1490–1497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schutta KM, Burnett CB (2000) Factors that influence a patient's decision to participate in a phase I cancer clinical trial. Oncol Nurs Forum 27(9):1435–1438

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. PCORI (2014) Patient-centered outcomes research definition revision: Response to public input [online] Available at: from http://www.pcori.org/assets/PCOR-Definition-Revised-Draft-and-Responses-to-Input.pdf. Accessed 3 April 2014

  9. Selby JV, Lipstein SH (2014) PCORI at 3 years—progress, lessons, and plans. N Engl J Med 370(7):592–595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maher AR, Miake-Lye IM, Beroes JM, Shekelle PG (2012) Treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review of comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Department of Veterans Affairs (US), Washington (DC)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kutikova L, Bowman L, Chang S, Long SR, Obasaju C, Crown WH (2005) The economic burden of lung cancer and the associated costs of treatment failure in the United States. Lung Cancer 50(2):143–154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Payne JK, Hendrix CC (2010) Clinical trial recruitment challenges with older adults with cancer. Appl Nurs Res 23(4):233–237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Baggstrom MQ, Waqar SN, Sezhiyan AK, Gilstrap E, Gao F, Morgensztern D, Govindan R (2011) Barriers to enrollment in non-small cell lung cancer therapeutic clinical trials. J Thorac Oncol 6(1):98–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. NVivo qualitative data analysis software; QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 10, 2012

  15. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Knodel J (1995) Focus groups as a qualitative method for cross-cultural research in social gerontology. Ann Arbor, MI: Population Studies Center, University of Michigan

  17. Heisler M, Vijan S, Anderson RM, Ubel PA, Bernstein SJ, Hofer TP (2003) When do patients and their physicians agree on diabetes treatment goals and strategies, and what difference does it make? J Gen Intern Med 18(11):893–902

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Meropol NJ, Weinfurt KP, Burnett CB, Balshem A, Benson AB, Castel L, Corbett S, Diefenbach M, Gaskin D, Li Y et al (2003) Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: implications for physician-patient communication. J Clin Oncol 21(13):2589–2596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cheung WY, Neville BA, Cameron DB, Cook EF, Earle CC (2009) Comparisons of patient and physician expectations for cancer survivorship care. J Clin Oncol 27(15):2489–2495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fouad MN, Lee JY, Catalano PJ, Vogt TM, Zafar SY, West DW, Simon C, Klabunde CN, Kahn KL, Weeks JC et al (2013) Enrollment of patients with lung and colorectal cancers onto clinical trials. J Oncol Pract 9(2):40–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gysels M, Shipman C, Higginson IJ (2008) “I will do it if it will help others:” motivations among patients taking part in qualitative studies in palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manag 35(4):347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kendall M, Harris F, Boyd K, Sheikh A, Murray SA, Brown D, Mallinson I, Kearney N, Worth A (2007) Key challenges and ways forward in researching the “good death”: qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study. BMJ Br Med J 334(7592):521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Biedrzycki BA (2011) Factors and outcomes of decision making for cancer clinical trial participation. Oncol Nurs Forum 38(5):542–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Denicoff AM, Mccaskill-Stevens W, Grubbs SS, Bruinooge SS, Comis RL, Devine P, Dilts DM, Duff ME, Ford JG, Joffe S et al (2013) The National Cancer Institute—American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: summary and recommendations. J Oncol Pract 9(6):267–276

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Comis RL, Miller JD, Aldigé CR, Krebs L, Stoval E (2003) Public attitudes toward participation in cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 21(5):830–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest and Sources of Funding

This project was supported in part by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) Contract #CE-12-11-4351. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of PCORI.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. M. Islam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Islam, K.M., Opoku, S.T., Apenteng, B.A. et al. Engaging Patients and Caregivers in Patient-Centered Outcomes Research on Advanced Stage Lung Cancer: Insights from Patients, Caregivers, and Providers. J Canc Educ 29, 796–801 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0657-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-014-0657-3

Keywords

Navigation