Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Correlation Between 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Advanced Lung Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Purpose

Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene have been identified as potential targets for the treatment and prognostic factors for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We assessed the correlation between fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake and EGFR mutations, as well as their prognostic implications.

Methods

A total of 163 patients with pathologically confirmed NSCLC were enrolled (99 males and 64 females; median age, 60 years). All patients underwent FDG positron emission tomography before treatment, and genetic studies of EGFR mutations were performed. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary lung cancer was measured and normalized with regard to liver uptake. The SUVmax between the wild-type and EGFR mutant groups was compared. Survival was evaluated according to SUVmax and EGFR mutation status.

Results

EGFR mutations were found in 57 patients (60.8 %). The SUVmax tended to be higher in wild-type than mutant tumors, but was not significantly different (11.1 ± 5.7 vs. 9.8 ± 4.4, P = 0.103). The SUVmax was significantly lower in patients with an exon 19 mutation than in those with either an exon 21 mutation or wild type (P = 0.003 and 0.009, respectively). The EGFR mutation showed prolonged overall survival (OS) compared to wild-type tumors (P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in survival according to SUVmax. Both OS and progression-free survival of patients with a mutation in exon 19 were significant longer than in patients with wild-type tumors.

Conclusion

In patients with NSCLC, a mutation in exon 19 was associated with a lower SUVmax and is a reliable predictor for good survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, Ghafoor A, Samuels A, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54:8–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shin HR, Ahn YO, Bae JM, Shin MH, Lee DH, Lee CW, et al. Cancer incidence in Korea. Cancer Res Treat. 2002;34:405–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Won YJ, Sung J, Jung KW, Kong HJ, Park S, Shin HR, et al. Nationwide cancer incidence in Korea, 2003–2005. Cancer Res Treat. 2009;41:122–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Minna JD, Roth JA, Gazdar AF. Focus on lung cancer. Cancer Cell. 2002;1:49–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee C, Kang KH, Koh Y, Chang J, Chung HS, Park SK, et al. Characteristics of lung cancer in Korea, 1997. Lung Cancer. 2000;30:15–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pao W, Miller VA. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, small-molecule kinase inhibitors, and non-small-cell lung cancer: current knowledge and future directions. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2556–68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gettinger S. Targeted therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;29:291–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lynch TJ, Bell DW, Sordella R, Gurubhagavatula S, Okimoto RA, Brannigan BW, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2129–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Glynn C, Zakowski MF, Ginsberg MS. Are there imaging characteristics associated with epidermal growth factor receptor and KRAS mutations in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung with bronchioloalveolar features? J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:344–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Downey RJ, Akhurst T, Gonen M, Vincent A, Bains MS, Larson S, et al. Preoperative F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography maximal standardized uptake value predicts survival after lung cancer resection. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3255–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho A, Lim I, Na I, Choe D, Park J, Kim B, et al. Evaluation of adrenal masses in lung cancer patients using F-18 FDG PET/CT. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;45:52–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vesselle H, Schmidt RA, Pugsley JM, Li M, Kohlmyer SG, Vallieres E, et al. Lung cancer proliferation correlates with [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by positron emission tomography. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6:3837–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Downey RJ, Akhurst T, Gonen M, Park B, Rusch V. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographic maximal standardized uptake value predicts survival independent of clinical but not pathologic TNM staging of resected non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:1419–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Ohja B, Bartolucci AA. The maximum standardized uptake values on positron emission tomography of a non-small cell lung cancer predict stage, recurrence, and survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130:151–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu A, Shim H. Current molecular imaging positron emitting radiotracers in oncology. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;45:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Na II, Byun BH, Kim KM, Cheon GJ, du Choe H, Koh JS, et al. 18F-FDG uptake and EGFR mutations in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis. Lung Cancer. 2010;67:76–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang CT, Yen RF, Cheng MF, Hsu YC, Wei PF, Tsai YJ, et al. Correlation of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography maximal standardized uptake value and EGFR mutations in advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Med Oncol. 2010;27:9–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Detterbeck FC, Boffa DJ, Tanoue LT. The new lung cancer staging system. Chest. 2009;136:260–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Han SW, Kim TY, Hwang PG, Jeong S, Kim J, Choi IS, et al. Predictive and prognostic impact of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2493–501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cho BC, Im CK, Park MS, Kim SK, Chang J, Park JP, et al. Phase II study of erlotinib in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after failure of gefitinib. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2528–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mak RH, Digumarthy SR, Muzikansky A, Engelman JA, Shepard JA, Choi NC, et al. Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in predicting epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist. 2011;16:319–26.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Normanno N, De Luca A, Bianco C, Strizzi L, Mancino M, Maiello MR, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in cancer. Gene. 2006;366:2–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gazdar AF. Activating and resistance mutations of EGFR in non-small-cell lung cancer: role in clinical response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Oncogene. 2009;28:S24–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Greulich H, Chen TH, Feng W, Janne PA, Alvarez JV, Zappaterra M, et al. Oncogenic transformation by inhibitor-sensitive and -resistant EGFR mutants. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jackman DM, Yeap BY, Sequist LV, Lindeman N, Holmes AJ, Joshi VA, et al. Exon 19 deletion mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor are associated with prolonged survival in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:3908–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Carey KD, Garton AJ, Romero MS, Kahler J, Thomson S, Ross S, et al. Kinetic analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor somatic mutant proteins shows increased sensitivity to the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib. Cancer Res. 2006;66:8163–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mulloy R, Ferrand A, Kim Y, Sordella R, Bell DW, Haber DA, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutants from human lung cancers exhibit enhanced catalytic activity and increased sensitivity to gefitinib. Cancer Res. 2007;67:2325–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Won YW, Han JY, Lee GK, Park SY, Lim KY, Yoon KA, et al. Comparison of clinical outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 or exon 21 mutations. J Clin Pathol. 2011;64:947–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Zasadny KR, Wahl RL. Standardized uptake values of normal tissues at PET with 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose: variations with body weight and a method for correction. Radiology. 1993;189:847–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang SC. Anatomy of SUV. Standardized uptake value. Nucl Med Biol. 2000;27:643–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Won Jun Kang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choi, YJ., Cho, B.C., Jeong, Y.H. et al. Correlation Between 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Advanced Lung Cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46, 169–175 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-012-0142-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-012-0142-z

Keywords

Navigation