Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Lymphoid Follicles and Histiocytes on the False-Positive FDG Uptake of Lymph Nodes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT has improved the accuracy of evaluating lymph node (LN) staging in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), false-positive results remain a problem. The reason why benign LNs show high FDG uptake is still unclear. The aim of this study was to identify molecular and pathological characteristics of benign LNs showing high FDG uptake.

Materials and Methods

We studied 108 mediastinal LNs of pathologically benign nature obtained from 43 patients with NSCLC who underwent FDG PET/CT and surgery. We measured the following parameters in each LN: maximum standardized uptake value (maxSUV), short diameter, maximum Hounsfield unit (maxHU) value, occupied proportions of lymphoid follicles, histiocytes in extrafollicular space and the degree of glucose transporter 1 (Glut1) expression. We compared the parameters between two LN groups according to maxSUV.

Results

There were 74 LNs showing maxSUV≥3.0 (group 1) and 34 LNs with maxSUV<3.0 (group 2). The size of LN (p < 0.001) and maxHU (p = 0.003) in group 1 was higher than that in group 2. Histologically, the occupied proportions of lymphoid follicles (p = 0.031) or histiocytes (p = 0.004) were higher in group 1. The Glut1 expression of lymphoid follicles (p = 0.035) or histiocytes (p = 0.005) was also higher in group 1.

Conclusion

Lymphoid follicular hyperplasia and histiocyte infiltration associated with Glut1 overexpression are important molecular and pathological mechanisms for false-positive FDG uptake in benign mediastinal LNs in patients with NSCLC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ratto GB, Mereu C, Motta G. The prognostic significance of preoperative assessment of mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with lung cancer. Chest. 1988;93:807–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Steinert HC, Hauser M, Allemann F, Engel H, Berthold T, von Schulthess GK, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: nodal staging with FDG PET versus CT with correlative lymph node mapping and sampling. Radiology. 1997;202:441–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Verhagen AF, Bootsma GP, Tjan-Heijnen VC, van der Wilt GJ, Cox AL, Brouwer MH, et al. FDG-PET in staging lung cancer: how does it change the algorithm? Lung Cancer. 2004;44:175–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gupta NC, Tamim WJ, Graeber GG, Bishop HA, Hobbs GR. Mediastinal lymph node sampling following positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose imaging in lung cancer staging. Chest. 2001;120:521–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoon YC, Lee KS, Shim YM, Kim BT, Kim K, Kim TS. Metastasis to regional lymph nodes in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: CT versus FDG PET for presurgical detection prospective study. Radiology. 2003;227:764–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown RS, Leung JY, Fisher SJ, Frey KA, Ethier SP, Wahl RL. Intratumoral distribution of tritiated fluorodeoxyglucose in breast carcinoma: I. Are inflammatory cells important? J Nucl Med. 1995;36:1854–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kubota R, Yamada S, Kubota K, Ishiwata K, Tamahashi N, Ido T. Intratumoral distribution of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in vivo: high accumulation in macrophages and granulation tissues studied by microautoradiography. J Nucl Med. 1992;33:1972–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wahl RL. Targeting glucose transporters for tumor imaging: "sweet" idea, "sour" result. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1038–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Higashi K, Ueda Y, Sakurai A, Wang XM, Xu L, Murakami M, et al. Correlation of Glut-1 glucose transporter expression with 18F-FDG uptake in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:1778–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Younes M, Brown RW, Stephenson M, Gondo M, Cagle PT. Overexpression of Glut1 and Glut3 in stage I nonsmall cell lung carcinoma is associated with poor survival. Cancer. 1997;80:1046–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang BY, Kalir T, Sabo E, Sherman DE, Cohen C, Burstein DE. Immunohistochemical staining of GLUT1 in benign, hyperplastic, and malignant endometrial epithelia. Cancer. 2000;88:2774–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Malide D, Davies-Hill TM, Levine M, Simpson IA. Distinct localization of GLUT-1, -3, and −5 in human monocyte-derived macrophages: effects of cell activation. Am J Physiol. 1998;274:516–26.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chung JH, Cho KJ, Lee SS, Baek HJ, Park JH, Cheon GJ, et al. Overexpression of Glut1 in lymphoid follicles correlates with false-positive 18F-FDG PET results in lung cancer staging. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:999–1003.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mountain CF, Dresler CM. Regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging. Chest. 1997;111:1718–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shim SS, Lee KS, Kim BT, Chung MJ, Lee EJ, Han J, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: prospective comparison of integrated FDG PET/CT and CT alone for preoperative staging. Radiology. 2005;236:1011–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakagawa T, Yamada M, Suzuki Y. 18F-FDG uptake in reactive neck lymph nodes of oral cancer: relationship to lymphoid follicles. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:1053–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fukuzumi M, Shinomiya H, Shimizu Y, Ohishi K, Utsumi S. Endotoxin-induced enhancement of glucose influx into murine peritoneal macrophages via GLUT1. Infect Immun. 1996;64:108–12.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chung JH, Lee WW, Park SY, Choe G, Sung SW, Chung JK, et al. FDG uptake and glucose transporter type 1 expression in lymph nodes of non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:989–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tawakol A, Migrino RQ, Hoffmann U, Abbara S, Houser S, Gewirtz H, et al. Noninvasive in vivo measurement of vascular inflammation with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12:294–301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dunphy MP, Freiman A, Larson SM, Strauss HW. Association of Vascular 18F-FDG Uptake with Vascular Calcification. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1278–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Avril N, Menzel M, Dose J, Schelling M, Weber W, Jänicke F, et al. Glucose metabolism of breast cancer assessed by 18F-FDG PET: histologic and immunohistochemical tissue analysis. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:9–16.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sureshbabu W, Mawlawi O. PET/CT Imaging Artifacts. J Nucl Med Technol. 2005;33:156–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Takamochi K, Nagai K, Yoshida J, Suzuki K, Ohde Y, Nishimura M, et al. The role of computed tomographic scanning in diagnosing mediastinal node involvement in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:1135–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Institute of Medical System Engineering (iMSE) of Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST), Korea.

Conflict of Interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hee-Seung Bom.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kwon, S.Y., Min, JJ., Song, HC. et al. Impact of Lymphoid Follicles and Histiocytes on the False-Positive FDG Uptake of Lymph Nodes in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45, 185–191 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-011-0085-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-011-0085-9

Keywords

Navigation