Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Knowledge Management Performance on the Efficiency of R&D Active Firms: Evidence from Turkey

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study addresses to investigate the impact of the knowledge management (KM) performance on the efficiencies of 20 R&D active firms in manufacture of parts and accessories for motor vehicles industry in Turkey. The corresponding analysis is carried out using the traditional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and DEA with weight restrictions. Shannon’s Entropy Weighting is used to determine the weights of the input and output variables. Using the Mann-Whitney U test, the efficiency levels of firm which have low and high performance are compared. According to the results, there is significant difference between the efficiencies of the high-performance and low-performance R&D active firms in terms of the KM dimensions: knowledge creation, information system infrastructure, knowledge culture, and knowledge worker productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abuaddous, H. Y., Al Sokkar, A. A. M., & Abualodous, B. I. (2018). The impact of knowledge management on organizational performance. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9(4), 204–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S., Fiaz, M., & Shoaib, M. (2015). Impact of knowledge management practices on organizational performance: an empirical study of banking sector in Pakistan. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2), 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Husseini, S., & Elbeltagi, I. (2015). Knowledge sharing practices as a basis of product innovation: a case of higher education in Iraq. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 5(2), 182–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allee, V. (1997). Twelve principles of knowledge management. Training and Development, 51(11), 71–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almashari, M., Zairi, M., & Alathari, A. (2002). An empirical study of the impact of knowledge management on organizational performance. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42(5), 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Qubaisi, S. S., Ajmal, M. M., & Khan, M. (2018). Impact of knowledge management and ICT on operational efficiency: an empirical study. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 9(2), 174–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awad, E. M., & Ghaziri, H. M. (2008). Knowledge management (2nd ed.). Delhi: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azyabi, N. G. (2018). The impact of knowledge management capabilities and processes on SME performance. Biznes Informatika-Business Informatics, 45(3), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bae, Y., & Chang, H. (2012). Efficiency and effectiveness between open and closed innovation: empirical evidence in South Korean manufacturers. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(10), 967–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahar, N., Wahab, S. T., & Rahman, M. (2020). Impact of knowledge management capability on supply chain management and organizational practices in logistics industry. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-02-2020-0022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatt, G. D. (2001). Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques and people. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bian, Y., & Yang, F. (2010). Resource and environment efficiency analysis of provinces in China: a DEA approach based on Shannon’s entropy. Energy Policy, 38, 1909–1917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bin Dost, M. K., Rehman, C. A., Gilaninia, S., & Ismail, K. B. (2017). The impact of knowledge management’s practices on supply chain performance of the dairy sector in Central Punjab: a mediating role of decentralization. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja, 31(1), 290–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoni, A., Zanin, F., Corazza, G., Paradisi, A. (2020). Knowledge management and performance measurement systems for SMEs’ economic sustainability, Sustainability, 2020, 12(7), 2594.

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K., Kou, M., & Fu, X. (2018). Evaluation of multi-period regional R&D efficiency: an application of dynamic DEA to China’s regional R&D systems. Omega, 74, 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. H., Tao, C. Q., & He, W. (2012). Empirical research on relationship of knowledge integration and innovation ability of IT enterprise. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations, 11(3), 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, D., Chung, Y., & Bang, S. (2015). Impact of firm size and industry type on R&D efficiency throughout innovation and commercialisation stages: evidence from Korean manufacturing firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(8), 895–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., Li, S., Seiford, L. M., Tone, K., Thrall, R. M., & Zhu, J. (2001). Sensitivity and stability analysis in DEA: some recent developments. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 15(3), 217–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzenopoljac, V., Alasadi, R., Zaim, H., & Bontis, N. (2018). Impact of knowledge management processes on business performance: evidence from Kuwait. Knowledge and Process Management, 25(2), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, I. (2006). Knowledge management in SMEs: the case of Icelandic firms. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(4), 275–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmorshidy, A. (2018). The impact of knowledge management systems on innovation: an empirical investigation in Kuwait. Vine Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 48(3), 388–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanou, E. H., & Wang, X. (2018). Assessment of transit transport corridor efficiency of landlocked African countries using data envelopment analysis. South African Journal of Science, 114, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120, 253–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fey, C. F., & Birkinshaw, J. (2005). External sources of knowledge, governance mode, and R&D performance. Journal of Management, 31, 597–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Fernández, M. (2015). How to measure knowledge management: dimensions and model. VINE, 45(1), 107–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Valderrama, T., Mulero-Mendigorri, E., & Revuelta-Bordoy, D. (2009). Relating the perspectives of the balanced scorecard for R&D by means of DEA. European Journal of Operations Research, 196(3), 1177–1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrido-Moreno, A., & Padilla-Melendez, A. (2011). Analyzing the impact of knowledge management on CRM success: the mediating effects of organizational factors. International Journal of Information Management, 31(5), 437–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S., Yadav, V. K., Mukherjee, V., & Yadav, P. (2017). Evaluation of relative impact of aerosols on photovoltaic cells through combined Shannon’s entropy and data envelopment analysis (DEA). Renewable Energy, 105, 344–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, P. (2005). Strategic knowledge management technology (pp. 33–34). London: Idea Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P.D., Bhattacharya, S. (2016). Impact of knowledge management processes for sustainability of small family businesses: evidences from the brassware sector of Moradabad (India), Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649216500404.

  • Gupta, V., & Chopra, M. (2018). Gauging the impact of knowledge management practices on organizational performance - a balanced scorecard perspective. Vine Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 48(1), 21–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto, A., & Haneda, S. (2008). Measuring the change in R&D efficiency of the Japanese pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 37, 1829–1836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, B., Chern, C. C., & Chiu, C. R. (2011). Performance evaluation with the entropy-based weighted Russell measure in data envelopment analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 9965–9972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, S. W., & Wang, A. P. (2012). Entrepreneurs with glamour? DEA performance characterization of high-tech and older-established industries. Economic Model, 29(4), 1146–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, S.-W., & Wang, A. P. (2012). Entrepreneurs with glamour? DEA performance characterization of high-tech and older-established industries, Economic Modelling, 29, 1146–1153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, H., & Chawla, D. (2019). How knowledge management influences performance?: Evidences from Indian manufacturing and services firms. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(4), 56–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kharabsheh, R., Aqrabawi, A. (2013). Impact of knowledge management practices (KMPs) on competitive advantage in pharmaceutical firms, Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Knowledge Management (ECKM 2013), Vols 1 and 2, Edited by:Janiunaite, B; Petraite, M; Pundziene, A, 349–355.

  • Khoshnevis, P., & Teirlinck, P. (2017). Performance evaluation of R&D active firms. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kianto, A., Ritala, P., Vanhala, M., Inkinen, H. (2013). The impact of knowledge management practices on organizational performance, Proceedings of The 14th European Conference on Knowledge Management (ECKM 2013), Vols 1 and 2, Edited by:Janiunaite, B; Petraite, M; Pundziene, A, 356–361.

  • King, W. R., & Marks, P. V. (2008). Motivating knowledge sharing through a knowledge management system. Omega - The International Journal of Management Science, 36(1), 131–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuah, C. T., Wong, K. Y., & Wong, W. P. (2012). Monte Carlo data envelopment analysis with genetic algorithm for knowledge management performance measurement. Expert Systems with Applications, 39, 9348–9358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. L., Ho, C. T., & Chiu, Y. L. (2008). The impact of knowledge management enablers on non-financial performance in small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Technology Management, 43(1–3), 266–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Yang, G., Liu, X., & Song, Y. (2020). R&D performance assessment of industrial enterprises in China: a two-stage DEA approach. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 71, 100753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, S.P., Peon, J. M. M., and Ordas C. J. V. (2009). Information technology as an enabler of knowledge management: an empirical analysis. W.R. King (ed.), Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, Annals of Information Systems 4, 111–129.

  • Lotfi, H.L., Fallahnejad, R. (2010). Imprecise Shannon’s entropy and multi attribute decision Making, Entropy, 12, 53-62.

  • Marakas, G. M. (1999). Decision support systems in the twenty-first century. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obeidat, B. Y., Al-Suradi, M. M., Masa’deh, R., & Tarhini, A. (2016). The impact of knowledge management on innovation an empirical study on Jordanian consultancy firms. Management Research Review, 39(10), 1214–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obeso, M., Hernandez-Linares, R., Lopez-Fernandez, M. C., & Serrano-Bedia, A. M. (2020). Knowledge management processes and organizational performance: the mediating role of organizational learning. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(8), 1859–1880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Frascati Manual.

  • Omerzel, D. G. (2010). The impact of knowledge management on SME growth and profitability: a structural equation modelling study. African Journal of Business Management, 4(16), 3417–3432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacios, D., Gil, I., & Garrigos, F. (2009). The impact of knowledge management on innovation and entrepreneurship in the biotechnology and telecommunications industries. Small Business Economics, 32(3), 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qi, X.,Guo, B. (2015). A weight restricted DEA model for the supplier evaluation and selection. International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management Science, 613–616.

  • Payal, R., Ahmed, S., & Debnath, R. M. (2019). Impact of knowledge management on organizational performance. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 49(4), 510–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raza, S. S., Ghani, U., & Rafique, M. K. (2016). Impact of knowledge management practices and organizational culture on organization performance: a study of public sector organizations of Pakistan. Journal of Organisational Studies and Innovation, 3(3), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez, Y. W., & Nembhard, D. A. (2004). Measuring knowledge worker productivity. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 5(4), 602–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangari, M. S., Hosnavi, R., & Zahedi, M. R. (2015). The impact of knowledge management processes on supply chain performance: an empirical study. International Journal of Logistics Management, 26(3), 603–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Zafar, A. U., Rehman, S. U., & Islam, T. (2020). Exploring the influence of knowledge management process on corporate sustainable performance through green innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2019-0624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soleimani-Damaneh, M., & Zarepisheh, M. (2009). Shannon’s entropy for combining the efficiency results of different DEA models: method and application. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 5146–5150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soniewicki, M., & Paliszkiewicz, J. (2019). The importance of knowledge management processes for the creation of competitive advantage by companies of varying size. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 7(3), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storto, C. L. (2016). Ecological efficiency based ranking of cities: a combined DEA cross-efficiency and Shannon’s entropy method. Sustainability, 8, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stylianou, V., & Savva, A. (2016). Investigating the knowledge management culture. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 1515–1521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sueyoshi, T., & Goto, M. (2013). A use of DEAeDA to measure importance of R&D expenditure in Japanese information technology industry. Decision Support Systems, 54(2), 941–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. G., Langemeier, L. N., Lee, C., Lee, E., & Thrall, R. M. (1990). The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, A. I., Ferraz, S. S., & Santos-Rodrigues, H. (2018). The impact of knowledge management factors in organizational sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 19(2), 453–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, S. M. (2014). The impact of knowledge management capabilities and supplier relationship management on corporate performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 154, 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, S. M., & Wu, C. I. (2013). A study on knowledge management capability, partner relationship management and corporate performance, International Conference on Business and Information, Bali, Indonesia.

  • Tubigi, M., & Alshawi, S. (2015). The impact of knowledge management processes on organisational performance: the case of the airline industry. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(2), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valmohammadi, C., & Ahmadi, M. (2015). The impact of knowledge management practices on organizational performance a balanced scorecard approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(1), 131–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voronchhuck, I. & Lando, I. (2013). Application of innovative approaches and techniques to increase the effectiveness of knowledge management process in organisations. University of Latvia New Challenges of Economic and Business Development, May 2013, 645–653.

  • Yeh, L. T., & Chang, D. S. (2020). Using categorical DEA to assess the effect of subsidy policies and technological learning on R&D efficiency of IT industry. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 26(2), 311–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousaf, M. J., & Ali, Q. (2018). Impact of knowledge management on innovation: evidence from a South Asian Country, Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649218500351.

  • Zhang, A., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, R. (2003). A study of the R&D efficiency and productivity of Chinese firms. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(3), 444–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, S., Zhang, W., & Du, J. (2011). Knowledge-based dynamic capabilities and innovation in networked environments. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 1035–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Onder Belgin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mete, M.H., Belgin, O. Impact of Knowledge Management Performance on the Efficiency of R&D Active Firms: Evidence from Turkey. J Knowl Econ 13, 830–848 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00758-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00758-1

Keywords

Navigation