Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative potential of phenotypic, ISSR and SSR markers for characterization of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) varieties from India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The assessment of genetic diversity is a primary concern of plant breeders and germplasm curators for which morphological traits are internationally accepted descriptors but are often associated with limitations due to G × E interactions. Phenotypic, ISSR, and SSR markers were employed to determine the genetic diversity and relationships among 20 commercially cultivated sesame genotypes representing different geographical regions of India. A narrow range of genetic dissimilarity (0.01–0.12) with mixed clustering was observed using morphological descriptors. A total 279 band positions with 57% polymorphism was amplified by ISSR primers, whereas 36 allelic positions with 73% polymorphism were produced by SSR primers with 100% reproducibility. The ISSR primers with high discrimination power were identified producing genotype-specific bands and distinguishing all the sesame genotypes used in this study. A poor correlation and lack of perfect congruence between phenotypes and marker-based analysis was indicated by the UPGMA dendrogram and PCA analysis. Our results suggest that SSR and ISSR markers provide a powerful tool for genotype identification and establishment of genetic relationships among sesame genotypes. We recommend the use of molecular markers for testing, required for obtaining intellectual property rights, and also for the analysis of genotypic diversity among sesame varieties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajibade SR, Weeden NF, Chite SM. 2000. Inter simple sequen ce repeat analysis of genetic relationships in the genus Vigna. Euphytica 111: 47–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashri A. 1995. Sesame research overview: current status, per spectives and priorities. In: Bennet MR, Wood IM. eds. Proceedings of the First Australian Sesame Workshop. Darwin and Katherine, Northern Territory

    Google Scholar 

  • Bart S, Melchinger AE, Lubberstedt T. 2002. Genetic diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana L. Heynh. investigated by cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Mol. Ecol. 11: 495–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedigian D, Harlan JR. 1986. Evidence for the cultivation of sesame in the ancient world. Eco. Bot. 4: 137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagyawant SS, Srivastava N. 2008. Genetic fingerprinting of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasm using ISSR mark ers and their relationships. Afr. J. Biotech. 7: 4428–4431

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat KV, Babrekar PP, Lakhanpaul S. 1999. Study of genetic diversity in Indian and exotic sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) germplasm using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Euphytica 110: 21–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bing Y, Xiaoli HU, Zhenmin B, Wei LU, Jingjie HU. 2007. Genetic variation in two sea cucumber (Apostichopus japoni cus) stocks revealed by ISSR markers. Chinese J. Oceanol. Limnol. 25: 91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisht IS, Mahajan RK, Loknathan TR, Agrawal RC. 1998. Diversity in Indian sesame collection and stratification of germplasm varieties in different diversity groups. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 45: 325–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brar G, Ahuja R. 1979. Sesame: its culture, genetics, breeding and biochemistry. In CP Malik CP, ed, Annu. Rev. Plant Sci., Kalyani publishers, New Dehli, pp 285–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstin J, Charcosset A. 1997. Relationship between phenotypic and marker distances: theoretical and experimental investiga tions. Heredity 79: 477–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit A, Jin M, Chung J, Yu J, Chung H, Ma K, Park Y, Cho E. 2005. Development of polymorphic microsatellite markers in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Mol. Eco. Notes 5: 736–738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1990. Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tis sue. Focus 12: 13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes S, Martins-Lopes P, Lopes J, Guedes-Pinto H. 2009. Assessing genetic diversity in Olea europaea L. using ISSR and SSR markers. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 27: 365–373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Isshiki S, Umezaki T. 1997. Genetic variations of isozyme in cultivated sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Euphytica 93: 375–377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones ES, Dupal MP, Kolliker R, Drayton MC, Forster JW. 2001. Development and characterisation of simple sequence repeat (SSRs) markers for perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 102: 405–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim D, Zur G, Danin-Poleg Y, Lee S, Shim K, Kang C, Kashi Y. 2002. Genetic relationships of sesame germplasm collec tion as revealed by inter-simple sequence repeats. Plant Breed. 121: 259–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laurentin HE, Karlovsky P. 2006. Genetic relationship and diversity in a sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) germplasm col lection using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). BMC Genet. 7: 10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Wendel JF. 2001. Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphisms as a genetic marker system in cotton. Mol. Eco. Notes 1: 205–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leal AA, Mangolin CA, do Amaral Júnior AT, Gonçalves LSA, Scapim CA, Mott AS, Eloi IBO, Cordovés V, da Silva MFP. 2010. Efficiency of RAPD versus SSR markers for determin ing genetic diversity among popcorn lines. Genet. Mol. Res. 9: 9–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morgante M, Olivieri AM. 1993. PCR amplified microsatellites as markers in plant genetics. Plant J. 3: 175–182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2006. GenAlEx: Genetic Analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Australian National University, Canberra, http://www.anu.edu.au/BoZo/GenAlEx/

  • Pei Z, Gao J, Chen Q, Wei J, Li Z, Luo F, Shi L, Ding B, Sun S. 2010. Genetic diversity of elite sweet sorghum genotypes assessed by SSR markers. Biol. Plant. 54: 653–658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pissard A, Arbizu C, Ghislain M, Faux AM, Paulet S, Bertin P. 2008 Congruence between morphological and molecular markers inferred from the analysis of the intra-morphotype genetic diversity and the spatial structure of Oxalis tuberose Mol. Genetica 132: 71–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prevost A, Wilkinson M. 1999. A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato culti vars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 107–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rafalski JA, Tingey SV. 1993. Genetic diagnostics in plant breeding: RAPDs, microsatellites and machines. Trends Genet. 9: 275–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roldan-Ruiz I, van Eeuwijk FA, Gilliland TJ, Dubreuil P, Dillmann C, Lallemand J, De Lose M, Baril CP. 2001. A comparative study of molecular and morphological methods of describing relationships between perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) varieties. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 1138–1150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ. 1998. NTSYSpc: numerical taxonomy and multivari ate system, version 2.02e. Exeter Software, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarla N, Sunil Bobba, Siddiq EA. 2003. ISSR and SSR markers based on AG and GA repeats delineate geographically diverse Oryza nivara varieties and reveal rare alleles. Curr. Sci. 84: 683–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S N, Kumar V, Mathur S. 2009. Comparative analysis of RAPD and ISSR markers for characterization of sesame (Sesamum indicum L) genotypes. J. Plant Biochem. Biotech. 18: 37–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava S, Gupta PS. 2008. Inter simple sequence repeat pro file as a genetic marker system in sugarcane. Sugar. Tech. 10: 48–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tessier C, David J, This P, Boursiqot JM, Charrier A. 1999. Optimization of the choice of molecular markers for varietal identification in Vitis vinifera L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 171–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsumura Y, Ohba K, Strauss SH. 1996. Diversity and inheri tance of inter-simple sequence repeat polymorphisms in Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and sugi (Cryptomeria japonica). Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 40–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yao H, Zhao Y, Chen DF, Chen JK, Zhou TS. 2008. ISSR primer screening and preliminary evaluation of genetic diver sity in wild populations of Glycyrrhiza uralensis. Biol. Plant. 52: 117–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satyendra Nath Sharma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, V., Sharma, S.N. Comparative potential of phenotypic, ISSR and SSR markers for characterization of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) varieties from India. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol. 14, 163–171 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-010-0102-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12892-010-0102-z

Key words

Navigation