Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of Cast and Forged (C&F) Gr. 91 Steel in Different Heat Treatment Condition

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present research work deals with the results of influence of different heat treatment conditions on the microstructure stability and mechanical properties of high-chromium X10CrMoVNNB9-1(P91) cast and forged (C&F) P91 steel. The C&F P91 steel was subjected to various tempering condition in the temperature range of 350–760 °C and tempering time of 2 h, after the normalizing at 1040 °C for 40 min. The steel was also subjected to furnace cooled and water quenched heat treatment. Tempering at 650 and 760 °C produced the fully tempered lath martensitic structure with M23C6, M7C3, M3C and MX precipitates along the prior austenite grain boundaries, lath boundaries and matrix region. Tempering at 350 and 1000 °C produced the partially tempered columnar laths and untempered columnar laths martensite, respectively. The tempering time was also varied from 2 to 8 h for fixed tempering temperature of 760 °C. The optimum microstructure evolution was obtained for 6 h of tempering at 760 °C that led to improved mechanical properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Toda Y, Lijima M, Kushima H, Kimura K, and Abe F, ISIJ Int 45 (2005) 1747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Klueh R L Elevated temperature ferritic and martensitic steels and their application to future nuclear reactors (2004) ORNL/TM-2004/176.3.

  3. Murty K L, and Charit I, J Nucl Mater 383 (2008) 189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pandey C, and Mahapatra M M, Trans Indian Inst Met 69 (2016) 1657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kunz L, and Lukas P, Mater Sci Eng A 319–321 (2001) 555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koo G H, and Lee J H, Int J Press Vessels Pip 84 (2007) 284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pandey C, Saini N, Mahapatra M M, Kumar P, Int. J Hydrogen Energ 41 (2016) 17695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Booker M K, Sikka V K, and Booker B L P, in Processing Int. Conference on Ferritic Steels for High Temperature Applications, (ed) Khare A K, ASM, Metals Park, OH (1983), p 257.

  9. Pandey C, Giri A, and Mahapatra M M, Mater Sci Eng A 657 (2016) 173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pandey C, and Mahapatra M M, Proc Inst Mech Eng Part E J Process Mech Eng (2016) 0954408916656678.

  11. Barbadikar D R, Deshmukh G F, Maddi L, Laha K, Parameswaram P, Ballal A R, Peshwe D R, Nandagopal M, and Mathew M D, Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 132-133 (2015) 97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sireesha M, Shaju K A, and Sundaresan S, J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 10 (2001) 320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pandey C, Giri A, and Mahapatra M M, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 664 (2016) 58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan W, Wang W, Shan Y, and Yang K, Mater. Sci. 7 (2013) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marzocca A L, Inés Luppo M, Zalazar M, Procedia Mater. Sci. 8 (2015) 894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arivazhagan B, Sundaresan S, Kamaraj M, Mater. Lett. 62 (2008) 2817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Swindeman R W, Santella M L, Maziasz P J, Roberts B W, Coleman K, Int. J. Press. Vessel. Pip. 81 (2004) 507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. ECCC Data Sheet, 2005.

  19. Tchizhik A I, The High-Resistant Steel for Steam Turbine Rotors, Report of LMZ, N9-The Properties of Materials Used in Turbine Building and Methods for their Testing, MASHGIZ, Moscow- Leningrad (1962) p 7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shrestha T, Basirat M, Charit I, Potirniche G P, Rink K K, and Sahaym U, J. Nucl. Mater. 423 (2012) 110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pandey C, Mahapatra M M, Kumar P, Saini N, J Eng Mater Technol 139 (2017) 1. doi:10.1115/1.4035764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas Paul V, Saroja S, Vijayalakshmi M, J Nucl Mater 378 (2008) 273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Abe F, Mater Sci Eng A 64–69 (2009) 510.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shen Y Z, Kim S H, Han C H, Cho H D, Ryu W S, J Nucl Mater 384 (2009) 48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Klueh R L, Harries D R, High-Chromium Ferritic and Martensitic Steels for Nuclear Applications, ASTM International, ISBN 0-8031-2090-7.

  26. Silwal B, Li L, Deceuster A, and Griffiths B, Weld J 92 (2013) 80.

  27. Santella M L, Swindeman R W, Reed R W, and Tanzosh J M, Martensite Formation in 9Cr-1Mo Steel Weld Metal and Its Effect on Creep Behavior, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, Babcock & Wilcox Company, Barberton, Ohio 44203.

  28. Kumar H, Mohapatra J N, Roy R J, and Mitra A, J Mater Process Technol 210 (2010) 669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Vodopivec F, Kmeti D, Vojvodi-Tuma J, and Skobir D A, Mater Tehnol 38 (2004) 233.

  30. Pandey C, and Mahapatara M M, J Mater Eng Perform 25 (2016) 2195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fujita N, and Bhadeshia H K D H, ISIJ Int 42 (2002) 760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Baltušnikas A, Levinskas R, and Lukoštūtė I, J Mater Sci 13 (2007) 286.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Peelamedu R D, Roy R, and Agrawal D K, Mater Lett 55 (2002) 234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pandey C, Giri A, Mahapatra M M, and Kumar P, Met Mater Int 23 (2017) 148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pandey C, and Mahapatra M M, J Mater Eng Perform 25 (2016) 2761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pandey C, Mahapatra M M, Kumar P, and Saini N, Mater Sci Eng A 685 (2017) 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pandey C, and Mahapatra M M, Effect of soaking temperature and time on microstructure and mechanical properties of P91steel, Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Processing and Fabrication of Advanced Materials, IIT Roorkee, (2014).

  38. Blach J, Falat L, and Sevc P, Eng Fail Anal 16 (2009) 1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pandey C, Saini N, Mahapatra M M, and Kumar P, Eng Fail Anal 71 (2017) 131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The steel used in the present work were supplied by Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited Haridwar-India. The experimental work was also supported by Department of Science and Technology (DST) Govt. of India and Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee. Authors are thankful to BHEL Haridwar, DST and Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee for the support. Authors are also thankful to Mr. Pradeep Kumar (Lab Assistant-MIED Laboratory IIT Roorkee).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Pandey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pandey, C., Mahapatra, M.M., Kumar, P. et al. Characterization of Cast and Forged (C&F) Gr. 91 Steel in Different Heat Treatment Condition. Trans Indian Inst Met (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-017-1144-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-017-1144-4

Keywords

Navigation