Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Watershed prioritization in order to implement soil and water conservation practices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to identify erosion-prone in the sub-watersheds of Haraz based on water and soil conservation projects using multi-criteria evaluation method and RS and GIS techniques. In this research, 16 sub-criteria data layers included rainfall erosivity, soil erodibility, land cover, land use, leaf area index, rainfall interception, soil infiltration, slope length, slope gradient, elevation, aspect, bifurcation ratio, basin circularity, length of overland flow, drainage density, drainage texture and form factor were prepared as raster layers. The Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) was provisioned to predict soil loss (ton ha−1 year−1) using six factors. Then, sub-criteria were rated based on the soil loss amount of RUSLE map by cutting of sub-criteria maps on RUSLE map, and also original criteria (topography, morphometric, soil, vegetation cover and climate) was weighted by AHP method. The final map was prepared from the multiplication of the weight by rate and in combination with layers in ArcGIS software by the overlay index method. The results showed soil erosion risk index varies from 2.37 to 3.89 in the basin area, and average and standard deviation are 3.06 and 0.28, respectively. Finally, prioritization of sub-watersheds was done based on average weighted of 13 sub-watershed to water and soil conservation practices and was classified into three priority high, medium and low classes. Five sub-watersheds SW1, SW5, SW8, SW11 and SW3 with total area of 30.52 % had low priority, six sub-watersheds SW4, SW6, SW12, SW13, SW9 and SW7 with total area of 62 % had medium priority, and two sub-watersheds WS2 and WS10 with total area of 7.48 % had high priority. The sub-watersheds under high erosion risk require immediate plans for soil and water conservation practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul Rahamana S, Abdul Ajeezb S, Aruchamy S, Jegankumar R (2015) Prioritization of sub watershed based on morphometric characteristics using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and geographical information system—a study of kallar watershed, Tamil Nadu. (Aquatic Procedia) International conference on water resources, coastal and ocean engineering (ICWRCOE 2015) vol 4, pp 1322–1330

  • Ahmad Dar I, Prabu P, Ahmad Dar M (2013) Erosion modeling in hard rock terrain using morphometry: a case study from Tamilnadu, India. Environ Qual Manag 23(2):47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexakis D, Hadjimitsis D, Agapiou A (2013) Integrated use of remote sensing, GIS and precipitation data for the assessment of soil erosion rate in the catchment area of “Yialias” in Cyprus. Atmos Res 131:108–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altaf S, Meraj G, Romshoo S (2014) Morphometry and land cover based multi-criteria analysis for assessing the soil erosion susceptibility of the western Himalayan watershed. Environ Monit Assess 186(12):8391–8412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angulo-Martinez M, Begueria S (2009) Estimating rainfall erosivity from daily precipitation records: a comparison among methods using data from the Ebro Basin (NE Spain). J Hydrol 379:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arar A, Chenchouni H (2012) How could geomatics promote our knowledge for environmental management in Eastern Algeria? J Environ Sci Technol 5(5):291–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arar A, Chenchouni H (2014) A “simple” geomatics-based approach for assessing water erosion hazard at montane areas. Arab J Geosci 7(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold J, Kiniry J, Srinivasan R, Williams J, Haney E, Neitsch S (2012) Soil & water Assessment tool, Input/Output Documentation Version2012. taxas water resources institute

  • Avinash K, Jayappa K, Deepika B (2011) Prioritization of sub-basins based on geomorphology and morphometric analysis using remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) techniques. Geocarto Int 26(7):569–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachaoui B, Bachaoui E, El Harti A, Bannari A, El Ghmari A (2007) Cartographie des zones à risque d’érosion hydrique: exemple duhaut Atlas marocain. Teledetection. 7:393–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkobi L, Trlica M, Smith J (1994) Evaluation of a refined surface cover subfactor for use in RUSLE. J Range Manage 47:74–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesemans J, Meirvenne M, Gabriels D (2000) Extending the RUSLE with the Monte Carlo error propagation technique to predict long-term average off-site sediment accumulation. J Soil Water Consery 55:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouaziz M, Leidig M, Gloaguen R (2011) Optimal parameter selection for qualitative regional erosion risk monitoring: a remote sensing study of SE Ethiopia. Geosci Frontiers. 2(2):237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow V, Maidment D, Mays W (1988) Applied hydrologhy. Mc GRAW-HILL, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jeng S (1999) Regional assessment of soil erosion using the distributed model SEMMED and remotely sensed data. Catena 37:291–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong S (1994) Application of reflective remote sensing for land degradation studies. University of Utrecht

  • De Steiguer J, Duberstein J, Lopes V (2003) The analytic hierarchy process as a means for integrated watershed management. In: Renard KG (ed) First interagency conference on research on the watersheds. Benson Arizona. 27–30 Oct 2003, 736–740

  • Eswaran H, Lal R, Reich P (2001) Land degradation: an overview. In: Bridges EM, Hannam ID, Oldeman LR, Penning de Vries FWT, Scherr SJ, Sombatpanit S (eds) Response to land degradation. Sci Enfield, pp 20–35

  • FAO (1989) Soil and water conservation in semi-arid areas. FAO Soils Bulletin., 57. URL: http://www.fao.org/docrep/T0321E/T0321E00.htm

  • Farhan Y, Nawaiseh S (2015) Spatial assessment of soil erosion risk using RUSLE and GIS techniques. Environ Earth Sci 74(6):4649–4669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferro V, Giordano G, Lovino M (1991) Isoerosivity and erosion risk map for Sicily. Hydrol Sci J 36(6):549–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajbhiye S, Mishra S, Pandey A (2014) Prioritizing erosion-prone area through morphometric analysis:an RS and GIS perspective. Appl Water Sci. 4(1):51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcıa-Mozo HG, Galan C, Vazquez L (2006) The reliability of geostatic interpolation in olive field floral phenology. Aerobiologia 22(2):97–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitas I, Douros K, Minakou C, Silleos G, Karydas C (2009) Multi-temporal soil erosion risk assessment in N. Chalkidiki using a modified USLE raster model. EARSeLeProceedings 8(1):40–51

  • Haan C, Barfield B, Hayes J (1994) Design hydrology and sedimentology for small catchments. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Hichey R (2000) Slope angle and slope length solutions for GIS. Cartogeraphy 29:582–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton R (1932) Drainage basin characteristics. Trans Am Geophys Union 13(1):350–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton R (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Am bull Geol Soc. 56:275–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal R, Thomas T, Galkate R, Ghosh N, Singh S (2014) Watershed prioritization using saaty’s AHP based decision support for soil conservation measures. Water Resour Manage 28(2):475–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javed A, Khanday M, Ahmed R (2009) Prioritization of subwatersheds based on morphometric and land-use analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 37:261–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kachouri S, Achour H, Abida H, Bouaziz S (2014) Soil erosion hazard mapping using Analytic Hierarchy Process and logistic regression: a case study of Haffouz watershed, central Tunisia. Arab J Geosci. 8(6):4257–4268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamaludin K, Lihan T, Ali Rahman Z, Mustapha M, Idris W, Rahim S (2013) Integration of remote sensing, RUSLE and GIS to model potential soil loss and sediment yield (SY). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10:4567–4596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kavian A, Fathollah Nejad Y, Habibnejad M, Soleimani K (2011) Modeling seasonal rainfall erosivity on a regional scale: a case study from Northeastern Iran. Int J Environ Res 5(4):939–950

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelarestaghi A, Jafarian Jeloudar Z (2011) Land use/cover change and driving force analyses in parts of northern Iran using RS and GIS techniques. Arab J Geosci 4:401–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan M, Gupta V, Moharana P (2001) Watershed prioritization using remote sensing and geographical information system: a case study from Guhiya. India J Arid Environ 49:465–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kheir R, Cerdan O, Abdallah C (2006) Regional soil erosion risk mapping in Lebanon. Geomorphology 82(3–4):347–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim S-M, Choi Y, Suh J, Oh S, Park H-D, Yoon S-H (2012) Estimation of soil erosion and sediment yield from mine tailing dumps using GIS: a case study at the Samgwang mine, Korea. Geosyst Eng 15(1):2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouli M, Soupios P, Valianatos F (2009) Soil erosion predication using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Eq. (RUSLE) in a GIS framework, Chania, Northwestrn Crete, Greece. Environ Geol 57(3): 483–497

  • Kumar R, Kumar S, Lohani A, Nema R, Singh R (2000) Evaluation of geomorphological characteristics of a catchment using GIS. GIS India. 9(3):13–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (1998) Soil erosion impact on agronomic productivity and environment quality. Crit Rev Plant Sci 17(4):319–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2001) Soil degradation by erosion. Land Degrad Dev 12(6):519–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bissonnais Y, Montier C, Jamangne M, Daroussin J, King D (2001) Mapping erosion risk for cultivated soil in France. Catena 46(2–3):207–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2004) Soil erosion assessment and its verification using the Universal Soil Loss Eq. and geographic information system:a case study at Boun, Korea. Environ Geol 45:457–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim JK, Sagong M, Engel B, Tang Z, Chio J, Kim K (2005) GIS-based sediment assessment tool. Catena 64(1):61–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin C, Lin W, Chou W (2002) Soil erosion prediction and sediment yield estimation: the Taiwan experience. Soil Tillage Res. 68:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller V (1953) A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginiaand Tennessee. Tech. Rep. 3 NR 389-402, Columbia University, Department of Geology, ONR, New York, NY, USA

  • Morgan P (2005) Soil erosion and conservation. Eur J Soil Sci. 56(5):377–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Staff (1996) National soil survey handbook, title 430-VI. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni J, Li Y (2003) Approach to soil erosion assessment in terms of land-use structure changes. J Soil Water Conserv 58(3):158–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Nooka Ratnam K, Srivastava Y, Venkateshwara R, Amminedu E, Murthy K (2005) Check dam positioning by prioritization of micro-watersheds using SYI model and morphometric analysis—remote sensing and GIS perspective. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 33(1):25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parysow P, Wang G, Gertner G, Anderson A (2003) Spatial uncertainty analysis for mapping soil erodibility based on joint sequential simulation. Catena 53:65–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Harvey C, Resosudarmo P, Sinclair K, Kurz D, McNair M, Blair R (1995) Environmental and economic costs of soil erosion and conservation benefits. Science 267:1117–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poesen J, Boardman J, Wilox B, Valentin C (1996) Water erosion monitoring and experimentation for global changes studies. J Soil Water Conserv 5:386–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan B, Chaudhari A, Adinarayana J, Buchroithner M (2011) Soil erosion assessment and its correlation with landslid events using remote sensing data and GIS. Environ Monit Assess 171:153–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman M, Shi Z, Chongfa C (2009) Soil erosion hazard evaluation—an integrated use of remote sensing, GIS and statistical approaches with biophysical parameters towards management strategies. Ecol Model 220(13–14):1724–1734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard K, Freimund J (1994) Using monthly precipitation data to estimate the R factor in the revised USLE. J Hydrol 157:287–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard, K., Foster, G., Weesies, G., McCool, D., & Yoder, D. (1997). Predicting soil erosion by water: A guide to conservation planning with the revised universal soil loss equation. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 703, 384

  • Saaty T (1986) Axiomatic foundation of analytical hierarchy process. J Manage Sci 31(7):841–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin S, Kurum E (2002) Erosion risk analysis by GIS in environmental impact assessment: a case study: seyhan Kopru Dam conservation. J Environ Manage 66:239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumms S (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Bull Geol Soc Am 67:597–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma J, Prasad J, Saha S, Pande L (2001) Watershed prioritization based on sediment yield index in eastern part of Don Valley using RS and GIS. Indian J Soil Conserv 29(1):7–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrimali S, Aggarwal S, Samra J (2001) Prioritizing erosion-prone areas in hills using remote sensing and GIS—a case study of the Sukhna lake catchment, northern India. Int J App Earth Obs Geoinf 3(1):54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler A (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. In VT Chow (ed) Handbook of applied hydrology, pp 4–11

  • Sun W, Shao Q, Liu J, Zhai J (2014) Assessing the effects of land use and topography on soil erosion on the Loess Plateau in China. Catena 121:151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terranova O, Antronico L, Coscarelli R, Iaquinta P (2009) Soil erosion risk scenarios in the Mediterranean environment using RUSLE and GIS: an application model for Calabria (southern Italy). Geomorphology 112:228–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Remortel R, Maichle R, Hickey R (2004) Computing the LS Factor for the Revised Universal Soil Loss Eq. through array-based slope processing of digital elevation data using C++ executable. Comput Geosci 30:1043–1053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Westen C (1997) Statistical landslide hazard analysis. ILWIS 2.1 for Windows application guide. ITC Publication Enschede, pp 73–84

  • Vrieling A (2006) Satellite remote sensing for water erosion assessment: a review. Catena 65:2–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Wente S, Gertner G, Anderson A (2002) Improvement in mapping vegetation cover factor for the universal soil loss Eq. by geostatistical methods with Landsat Thematic Mapper images. Int J Remote Sens 23:3649–3667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier W, Smith D (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion. Losses: a guide to conservation planning. Agriculture Handbook, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 537: 58

  • Wischmeier W, Johnson C, Cross B (1971) A soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites. J Soil Water Conserv 26:189–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshino K, Ishioka Y (2005) Guidelines for soil conservation towards integrated basin management for sustainable development: a new approach based on the assessment of soil loss risk using remote sensing and GIS. J. Water Environ. 3(4):235–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Degroote J, Wolter C, Sugumaran R (2009) Integration of Modified Universal Soil Loss Eq. (MUSLE) into a GIS frame work to assess soil erosion risk. Land Degrad Dev 20(1):84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Wu B, Ling F, Zeng Y, Yan N, Youan C (2010) Identification of priority areas for controlling soil erosion. Catena. 83:76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Natural Resources, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran

    Moghadaseh Fallah

  2. College of Natural Resources, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, PO. Box 737, Sari, Iran

    Ataollah Kavian

  3. Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran

    Ebrahim Omidvar

Authors
  1. Moghadaseh Fallah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ataollah Kavian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ebrahim Omidvar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ataollah Kavian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fallah, M., Kavian, A. & Omidvar, E. Watershed prioritization in order to implement soil and water conservation practices. Environ Earth Sci 75, 1248 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6035-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6035-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation